Analyst on Wii U: "Competitive position has deteriorated", "No Activision support".

1. Why is graphic power the main issue here? PS2/GC era prove this wrong. Wii/PS3/360 era prove this wrong, again. So... why is this "underpower" still an issue? The point is that WiiU has more power (a lot more) than Wii. So, if we take what the Wii has done, and think bigger, we might get an idea of where this is going.

2. Why are we starting to compare home consoles to iPads? I'm not against considering the iPad a gaming device, in fact, I think it's a nice game device. But is not on the same level as a home console or PC. Gameplay wise, game quality wise, functionality wise, is not the same. Gaming is an option of the iPad. Gaming is the main purpose of a home console.

3. What is this whole: "If Activision is not in, then it's doomed" thingy? Activision didn't support the Wii either. Nintendo is a rare case. Is like a one man band. They do their hardware, have excellent in house games, and has 5 to 10 third party exclusives that are great. This is all what Nintendo needs to still succed with the WiiU.

So, taking this 3 points, why the fuck is this Gibson claiming to avoid Nintendo stocks? I know it's just an advice, but this is part of the problem right here. Living up to rumors is not doing anything good to Nintendo. So they better step up, and cut that "We don't comment on rumor or speculation" and start bringing facts.

E3 is going to be wonderful btw.
 
I don't see how anything Apple has at the minute is a threat to Nintendo's home console market.

Nintendo's bread and butter is local multiplayer in front of a television. I'd argue that their focus on that aspect of video games whilst their competitors barely acknowledged it was a huge reason for their success with the Wii. Nothing that Apple currently has competes in that space.
 
3. What is this whole: "If Activision is not in, then it's doomed" thingy? Activision didn't support the Wii either. Nintendo is a rare case. Is like a one man band. They do their hardware, have excellent in house games, and has 5 to 10 third party exclusives that are great. This is all what Nintendo needs to still succed with the WiiU.
Kind agree with the rest, except #3. :p
Maybe not "exclusives" but Call of Duty (all but MW2), Guitar Hero, DJ Hero, Skylanders, Spider-man..and many more..all sold great too (except DJ Hero :p)

They were also the firsts to release Wii retail-games with DLC (Guitar Hero) and even allow patches (Black Ops).
 
But will lightening strike twice? Will the majority that bought a Wii pick up the successor. The compelling reason of why people bought the Wii was a different or more friendly gaming experience to the HD twins and it became its expanded market. Have they all moved on is the question.
It has already struck twice, with the DS, and it looks like the 3DS is on track for a third lightning strike since it's selling faster than the DS.

Why did the DS succeed?
Stylus precision, dual screens, new gameplay style.

The Wii?
New gameplay style, first party quality software.

And what's the selling point for WiiU?
Stylus precision, new gameplay style, dual screens, and most likely first party quality software.

Why are we doubting WiiU again?
Nintendo might not go after the people that only likes powerful hardware, those people will turn to PC in a year anyway since PC will always be the best choice if that's what you like, but Nintendo is definitely going after their own customers and people that likes new experiences, and judging by the DS and Wii sucess there are quite a few of those out there. Nintendo will do just fine.
 
1. Why is graphic power the main issue here? PS2/GC era prove this wrong. Wii/PS3/360 era prove this wrong, again. So... why is this "underpower" still an issue? The point is that WiiU has more power (a lot more) than Wii. So, if we take what the Wii has done, and think bigger, we might get an idea of where this is going.

2. Why are we starting to compare home consoles to iPads? I'm not against considering the iPad a gaming device, in fact, I think it's a nice game device. But is not on the same level as a home console or PC. Gameplay wise, game quality wise, functionality wise, is not the same. Gaming is an option of the iPad. Gaming is the main purpose of a home console.

3. What is this whole: "If Activision is not in, then it's doomed" thingy? Activision didn't support the Wii either. Nintendo is a rare case. Is like a one man band. They do their hardware, have excellent in house games, and has 5 to 10 third party exclusives that are great. This is all what Nintendo needs to still succed with the WiiU.

So, taking this 3 points, why the fuck is this Gibson claiming to avoid Nintendo stocks? I know it's just an advice, but this is part of the problem right here. Living up to rumors is not doing anything good to Nintendo. So they better step up, and cut that "We don't comment on rumor or speculation" and start bringing facts.

E3 is going to be wonderful btw.

Umm..that couldn't be further from the truth.

Edit: Beaten
 
Kind agree with the rest, except #3. :p
Maybe not "exclusives" but Call of Duty (all but MW2), Guitar Hero, DJ Hero, Skylanders, Spider-man..and many more..all sold great too (except DJ Hero :p)

They were also the firsts to release Wii games with DLC (Guitar Hero) and even allow patches (Black Ops).

You're right. But my point is that Nintendo is not doomed if they don't have any Activision games. Sure, they will be losing great amounts of money, but it's not their main source. Never was, never will.

I think a big part of Activision not involving has to do with the partnership that Nintendo has done with EA with their online service. And we all know that EA and Activision are not the best buds there.

Regarding this, online system, I'm terrified. This is what should people care about... not only raw power. If Nintendo misses this oportunity to make an open online console (that admits something like Steam), then... we can call it a day. If this console manages to be Origin only... then, it's all over
at least for me

Umm..that couldn't be further from the truth.

Do you honestly call what Activision has done in this generation, regarding the Wii, support? The good ones that come to my mind are:

Goldeneye
Guitar Hero (in all it's forms)
aaaand...?
 
There are many reason of why the Wii U might struggle.

None of which are :

- Wii U GPU being weaker than Ps3's (won't happen).
- Lack of Activision Support (won't happen)
- Lack of Konami (or Kojima Productions?) support.
- Nintendo not supporting iOS.

The worst analysis I have seen in a while.
 
image.php


Your avatar is perfect for this thread.
 
Activision? The same Activision that is selling fucktons of Skylanders with Wii as the leading SKU by far? That Activision?

Seriously. Goldeneye Wii, CoD (with their own homebrewed patching scheme), Skylanders lead platform.. the only reason they aren't talking much about their Wii U projects is that nobody can talk about their Wii U projects until Nintendo lifts the gag order.

Oh, and their Guitar Hero DLC was outselling Rock Band's on Wii as well. Even made a special DS multiplayer mode that linked up with the Wii Guitar Heroes that wasn't on the other consoles.
 
2. Why are we starting to compare home consoles to iPads? I'm not against considering the iPad a gaming device, in fact, I think it's a nice game device. But is not on the same level as a home console or PC. Gameplay wise, game quality wise, functionality wise, is not the same. Gaming is an option of the iPad. Gaming is the main purpose of a home console.

Same level? The very same thing could be said (and was!) for the wii compared to the 360 or PS3. Didn't quite turn out that way. Not the same level today? Maybe, but things change very fast and we are talking about a year or two down the track. You can't really ignore the direction the industry is going when trying to guess where it will all end up.

I don't see how anything Apple has at the minute is a threat to Nintendo's home console market.

Hardware wise? Fair call. But what they do have is a massive and growing customer base heavily invested in their app store, which certainly includes gaming and a lot of it (people can scoff at the quality or whatever but again this is the same as the wii). Fixing the lack of hardware wouldn't be difficult at all. Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony can't afford to sit back and wait for them to catch up, because I think there will be big trouble if they will.

There seems to be an attitude that the ipad isn't a console threat today so it can be disregarded. This is not correct. By building up such a customer base, Apple are in the position where they could move if they wanted to, putting especially Nintendo at a difficult position competitively. The current players in the industry can't just wait for it to happen and start reacting and they are not. Nintendo are clearly trying to head it off with the Wii U and Microsoft's strategy with windows 8 is pretty transparent. Sony don't seem to know what they are doing, but that is another issue.

The question in my mind (and the article) is if the wii U will be sufficient to compete in the worst case. When considering stock investments, this is a pretty good idea to think about. I don't know enough about it yet to make a call, but I have my doubts. Nintendo games will always sell, but if it doesn't reach the same success the price will fall...which means buying it now may not be the best idea as the author stated.

So I am ok with this analysis.
 
To be honest, I wouldn't invest in Nintendo right now either. I would risk it right before E3 in the off chance that they will rise after all the announcements.

Your bet is that the stock price goes down in the next two months? I don't see it, the price has gone up since I bought it two months ago.
 
You're right. But my point is that Nintendo is not doomed if they don't have any Activision games. Sure, they will be losing great amounts of money, but it's not their main source. Never was, never will.

I think a big part of Activision not involving has to do with the partnership that Nintendo has done with EA with their online service. And we all know that EA and Activision are not the best buds there.

Regarding this, online system, I'm terrified. This is what should people care about... not only raw power. If Nintendo misses this oportunity to make an open online console (that admits something like Steam), then... we can call it a day. If this console manages to be Origin only... then, it's all over
at least for me

Activision has already gone record pledging support for the system.
 
Where do these analysts come from? Their predictions are so off the wall wrong I have a hard time believing they're even legitimate industry figures.

Also: under powered or not, I will be getting a Wii-U. I love the tablet-console setup and first party Nintendo games are always a treat. Frankly, this generation is ending too soon anyhow...I could easily survive another 5 years on 360/PS3 graphics.
 
I just had that "Aha! Moment" where I suddenly realized how bizarre it is to be so emotionally attached to the performance of a corporate entity.

Carry on.
 
Nintendo's so bad at business they have $10 billion in the bank. That means they could hemorrhage $100 million a year and still not go bankrupt for 100 years.

$100 million a year isn't "hemorrhaging" in the video game business. You can run through billions a year...heck Microsoft took a $1 billion write off just for RROD...
 
Well if WiiU wants to sell to non Nintendo fans in 2012, they really need COD: Black Ops 2 to be on par with 360, PC and ps3.

They missed an entire marked this gen with not having "proper" COD on their consoles.
 
I just had that "Aha! Moment" where I suddenly realized how bizarre it is to be so emotionally attached to the performance of a corporate entity.

Carry on.

I had this feeling when the Wii U was first shown last year. I felt no excitement, and then I wondered why I felt no excitement, and I thought it was my fault... when it wasn't. I hope Nintendo does well, but, for the first time in my following the company, I am fearful.
 
Numbers need updating.

Nintendo's cash stood at $7B last quarter. They ate through $3B in the last 9 months of 2011. That sort of burn rate certainly isn't lasting 100 years.

That would have to do with the yen issues no? Either that or they have been on an incredible spending spree...which would be rather interesting.
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?
Has in any generation a vastly graphically inferior console outsold its competition by far, and made people feel insecure?

WiiU is the successor to that console!
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?


I don't think it's sophisticated enough to be called hate. Just utter idiocy.
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?

Its Big N every one got it in they head that them failing and going under a good idea they just want them to go 3rd party so they can play they games on the twins.

We all know that work out well for Sega..... they as good as they use to be
 
Except the press was high on the hog for PS2. For Wii, most have been singing of its demise since Day 1 and just seem to be continuing the tune with Wii U. This would've been like if they were decrying the PS2 its whole life for holding back the superior Xbox or something.


Lol, the PS2 was easy on the PS2 after it had been on market for some time. Before and during launch, the PS2 was attacked on many fronts, from people disappointed in graphics, to shipment issues and even the difficulty of programming complaints were there in the first year. Let us not forget the DRE's. It wasn't until most of that blew over did PS2 become shinning overall. They had detractors at first.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998343,00.html
snippets

Sony won't explain what went wrong. Sony Computer Entertainment president Kazuo Hirai will say only that PlayStation2 is a "very complex machine that requires a lot of components." But the guessing in Japan is that the company botched the production of graphics chips. Skeptics in the gaming community are flooding the Internet with charges that Sony has created an artificial shortage in a calculated attempt to make PS2 this year's Furby, the gotta-have-it toy of the holiday season

Part of the reason for the underwhelming array of games, gamemakers say, is that PS2 is hard to program for. "The PS2 is definitely more powerful than Dreamcast," says John Carmack, the multimillionaire, ponytailed master gamer behind legendary shooters like Doom and Quake. "But it's less convenient to extract performance from it

Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

The Playstation 3. Ever since the price announcement at E3.
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?

PS3? I remember allot of hate for it well before launch.
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?
Well there certainly wasn't much enthusiasm among the press in 2004 when Nintendo announced that their next handheld will have two screens.
 
PS3 got some heat before the release but I think it was more from Xbox (American) focused media.

Wii U is just trashed all around the globe. And we don't even know it specs. Or price. Or anything except it has a tablet-like controller.
 
Has any console received this kind of hate, loathing and backlash a whole fucking YEAR before it got released?

Is there any media outlet that has positive stance on the Wii U and is not nintendopower.com or some other fan site?

This is less about Nintendo hate and more about "analysts" wants to be seen as someone who can predict the future trend. Nintendo is the easiest target right now.
 
In the next life, I want to be an analyst.
I mean: I would be paid to say nonsense (no CoD for WiiU when Wii had 4 episodes of that franchise?...)
It could be the perfect work, honestly!
 
I had this feeling when the Wii U was first shown last year. I felt no excitement, and then I wondered why I felt no excitement, and I thought it was my fault... when it wasn't. I hope Nintendo does well, but, for the first time in my following the company, I am fearful.

If you had that feeling then you wouldn't be fearful. You just wouldn't give a fuck. Then you'd start baiting those who you see as "irrational fanboys" and try to teach them the way of enlightenment. Then you'd realise you were actually more of a dick now than you ever were when you were a console fanboy. Finally you'll start to calcify, eventually die or start talking to yourself and become a living dinosaur like...well, never mind.
 
Fantastic point, and I agree. Though the N64 campaign, from what I remember, was clearly targeting the boys that grew up with the NES and now (then) fully expected some super-ULTRA pre-rendered stuff. So while the NES was the family-computer, and the SNES was more of that, the N64 seemed like it was a console trying to grow up with its customers and a direct shot at the SEGA ads (at teenage boys) running the previous generation.

It's pretty clear that Nintendo never tried that again.
I don't know, man. N64 was also billed as "The Fun Machine".
 
I hope that one day Ninty will allow universal VC gaming. I have zero interest in buying anything from Wii and 3DS stores because I know, those are the only machines the games will work on. And they are expensive as fuck (virtual console).
 
Much as I love Nintendo, they don't seem to be much right with the Wii U.

So obviously it'll end up being the most popular and most successful console of all time.
 
I hope that one day Ninty will allow universal VC gaming. I have zero interest in buying anything from Wii and 3DS stores because I know, those are the only machines the games will work on. And they are expensive as fuck (virtual console).
Hmm? I think its fair to expect ww/vc to transfer to wii u as dsiw transferred to 3ds (dsi had no vc so nothing to transfer on that front). Probably no overlap like wii - 3ds or dsi - wii u though. But i agree that if they offer the same games they should transfer. However they seem to focus on having different catalogue on portables vs home.
 
Hmm? I think its fair to expect ww/vc to transfer to wii u as dsiw transferred to 3ds (dsi had no vc so nothing to transfer on that front). Probably no overlap like wii - 3ds or dsi - wii u though. But i agree that if they offer the same games they should transfer. However they seem to focus on having different catalogue on portables vs home.

Yeah just felt so dirty seeing Super Mario Bros. on the 3DS store for 5 euros. Haven't launched the store since.
 
Well if WiiU wants to sell to non Nintendo fans in 2012, they really need COD: Black Ops 2 to be on par with 360, PC and ps3.

anyone remotely interested in playing COD already owns a 360/PS3 or a PC

why would anyone pick up the Wii U version when it's near as damn obvious that the differences are likely to be fairly minor , might have some sort of pad use, and all the people you usually play this online heavy game with already have a console?

I think it'll be of importance to Nintendo fans who decided to sit out every other console but to everyone else? i doubt it's going to be a big draw.
 
Top Bottom