Marvel's The Avengers |OT| (Dir. Joss Whedon) [Spoilers unmarked]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Btw hemworth got a bit fat (like worthington in warmth) and the whole time thor was on screen I could help notice his chin face. All the more so when they shot him from low. Quite amusing I thought.
 
Just Iron Man 2 of those.

I really can't recall much if iron man 2, although I do remember not enjoying it all that much.

But I liked Thor and captain America. Sure, they are not cinematic masterpieces and are kind of 'dumb', but I wouldn't say badly done. On the contrary, I just watched cap again, and I love it. we missed some cap action to montage, but it was better that it set him up as a 'legend' more. The movies are always fun and entertaining.

I don't ask my super hero movies to be ultra serious. In fact, I'm starting to resent movies such as dark knight for being needlessly complex and serious. I still enjoy it and probably like that we have both kinds. Yes they can exist in one movie but I do like having the range.
 
I watched Thor again last night and enjoyed it a lot more than I did the first time I saw it.
I think I disliked it so much the first time I saw it because it was in 3D and during a movie marathon.

I tried watching Captain America again the other day and got about 1hour20mins in before I couldn't be bothered finishing it and went to bed. If it was a better paced film I would have probably stuck with it.

I don't know what to think about Chris Evans. He's not captivating or anything but he does a decent job. Are there many other people who have portrayed 2 different superheroes? (3 even for Evans if you count his Scott Pilgrim guy I guess)

Hugo Weaving is a great actor but I couldn't help thinking of Schwarzenegger when he speaks in Capt. America. Probably just me.

I don't think he resisted the spell at all. It's just a secret fail save and in theory can only be operated by Loki with his spear.

I don't think the portal opens up into actual space, the enemies can breath (?) there etc. It's just like the "magical" world of Asgard etc. (I could be wrong because I have no knowledge of the comics).
Anyway, IIRC the reason for Iron Man's malfunction was that he was out of energy. He was even told that he won't have enough energy to come back etc.)

On Skarsgard:
iirc he's very strongly "I" about it. "lol I seem to have actually known what I was doing" like he thought of it (for good) not something Loki told him to put in.
But I like your thinking better heh.

On Iron Man:
Ah that's true, somehow that didn't even cross my mind. Thanks for that!

It increases my hate for 3D. And now I actually noticed a few things happening in the background.

Having seen it in 3D after 2D it's so distracting and gets in the way. It's very well post-converted but still.


"That man over there is playing Galaga. He didn't think anyone would notice but I did"
KuGsj.gif

I completely missed that line. :l
That explains a bit. I thought the
shot of him playing Galaga
came out of nowhere and was some random Whedonism.

Also, come to think of it. In the scene where Loki and Stark are talking why
doesn't Tony get "converted"? I first thought it was because the bracelets was giving him some kind of thin body armor but thats not the case. Was he tapping on his chest piece?

I thought that was what was going on too! I imagined he had created an invisible Iron Man suit. that would be awesome. but yeah I think it was just on the chestpiece or as some others have theorized ITT it won't work because the thingy is blocking his heart from Loki.




Searched youtube for the mid credit scene...

Left... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpIsDiiaEH0 ... not sure.

haha how do people come up with this shit.

Warning there is kind of spoilers in this I guess.
 
He could have had Thor charge him up with the lightning like he did by accident when they were fighting in the forest.

That's true! Seams like a plot hole. Anyone care to explain it away? (besides 'he was busy' heh)

Like surely at least one of the two (or it could be said that
Thor still wasnt' aware it powered Iron Man
) would have thought of it. And I don't think 'they didn't have time' is an acceptable excuse either.

I'd say
it would have crossed the writer's mind but they decided to create a plothole by going with the current series of events as it is more exciting.
 
That's true! Seams like a plot hole. Anyone care to explain it away? (besides 'he was busy' heh)

Like surely at least one of the two (or it could be said that
Thor still wasnt' aware it powered Iron Man
) would have thought of it. And I don't think 'they didn't have time' is an acceptable excuse either.

I thought they made it obvious by having Thor saying
He's not stopping (from his fall), implying he wasn't aware that Ironman is losing power. The whole thing also happened so quickly and since Ironman didn't bother asking for backup, Thor had no idea.
 
Saw it a second time yesterday. Still a fun flick. No need to rewatch it anytime soon.
I fell asleep a few times during the first viewing but not due to the movie, had been awake for ages.
 
That's true! Seams like a plot hole. Anyone care to explain it away? (besides 'he was busy' heh)

Like surely at least one of the two (or it could be said that
Thor still wasnt' aware it powered Iron Man
) would have thought of it. And I don't think 'they didn't have time' is an acceptable excuse either.

I'd say
it would have crossed the writer's mind but they decided to create a plothole by going with the current series of events as it is more exciting.

I don't see how it's a plot hole at all.
 
I thought they made it obvious by having Thor saying
He's not stopping (from his fall), implying he wasn't aware that Ironman is losing power. The whole thing also happened so quickly and since Ironman didn't bother asking for backup, Thor had no idea.

That's true.
For some reason I didn't think of Thor's statement as not being aware beforehand of the suit being dead as a result of Starks' actions as just plainly confused (like the statement you make before you come to the realization of why) but they're one and the same really hey.

I don't see how it's a plot hole at all.

Yeah I'll gladly admit that I'm just talking shit from the idea smiggy put forward.

I mean
Stark had a lot on his mind but shouldn't a super intelligent guy have thought back to (probably the only time?) his suit has gotten a power boost from another source and in the chummy spirit they were all in got Thor to help him out? Obviously it was extremely time sensitive (but still not impossible to have Thor strike him on the way) and his mind would have been extremely weary too but I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility and it's a much more straightforward series of events where Iron Man isn't at the brink of being stuck on the other side of the portal. With so much shit going on it's probably hard to say it could have happened hey? It's such an insignificant thing it's not something worth going on about probably either.

Just something I was spitballing on. I don't have any ill feeling towards the way it went and am probably on my own in my way of thinking about it all.
 
The main thing I've got from this movie is that I'm now exited for Renner's Bourne.

Liked the movie a lot, loved Hawkeye for some reason.
 
What the hell is going on? I'm hearing people comparing this to TDK in terms of quality. Is such a thing even possible?

I've soured a little on Dark Knight.

Mood, Joker, complex, deep storyline, but some chaotic plot devices, and sometimes just plain too serious.

I mean, sure, amazing film, but is it 'fun'?

Avengers and Dark Knight are too very, very different approaches to the genre.

In my current state of mind, I prefer 'fun' over 'complex'.
 
What the hell is going on? I'm hearing people comparing this to TDK in terms of quality. Is such a thing even possible?

Yes. Just like how TDK was a great adaptation of the dark Batman comic book, The Avengers is a great adaptation of the fun, ridiculous, action packed style of comic.
 
I've soured a little on Dark Knight.

Mood, Joker, complex, deep storyline, but some chaotic plot devices, and sometimes just plain too serious.

I mean, sure, amazing film, but is it 'fun'?

Avengers and Dark Knight are too very, very different approaches to the genre.

In my current state of mind, I prefer 'fun' over 'complex'.

Dark Knight was more a crime movie than a superhero movie, that would ONLY work in the batman universe.
 
Yes. Just like how TDK was a great adaptation of the dark Batman comic book, The Avengers is a great adaptation of the fun, ridiculous, action packed style of comic.

Best way to put it really.

Dark Knight was more a crime movie than a superhero movie, that would ONLY work in the batman universe.

Well, it would work in the Daredevil universe as well if they had a better director attached.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom