Captain America sucks anyway, and I thought his movie was lame too, but man they went above and beyond the call of duty in making him a pussy.
Man, I thought we were friends. But it's over. It's OVER.

Captain America sucks anyway, and I thought his movie was lame too, but man they went above and beyond the call of duty in making him a pussy.
Yeah it's not like the comics didn't have goofy plotlines or awful bits...
Man, I thought we were friends. But it's over. It's OVER.(
Flaws dont make a movie awful if the whole point is to be fun.
People watch B movies knowing that flaws are part of the experience.
Sometimes its OK to turn your brain off for a bit and just enjoy the spectacle before you.
It's actually symptomatic of how ridiculous it would be to have "the most important intelligent base in the world" be a "Helicarrier" to begin with. It has huge fucking weakspots that make it absurdly easy to take down, if it existed in real life the way it did in the film. I mean, those giant helicopter blade things were like shining red weakpoints, like the giant crabs of yore. I mean sure they could scurry some jets to protect the thing I suppose, but any good sneak attack with an even remotely sufficient force of any size would likely be able to cripple the beast.
I'll file it next to giant limitless energy cubes and alien flying seadoos on silly crap that can't exist for the simple fact they're so silly.
if you have so much money to spend on movie tickets, and there are so many movies that don't require you shut off your brain, why would you waste your time?
I'm not saying Avengers isn't worth a movie ticket, I thought it was decent enough to deserve that, I'm just saying how much I hate this saying.
No, it's not OK to have to shut off your brain for a movie. That disengages your critical faculties and makes you prone to ridiculous assertions about the quality of said film. If the movie is actually any good, you won't have to disengage your brain.
Captain America sucks anyway, and I thought his movie was lame too, but man they went above and beyond the call of duty in making him a pussy.
So I had my second viewing yesterday and it was so weird. I couldn't enjoy the movie at all. And despite the theatre being packed (which is quite impressive for the UK given it's early release here), it was the quietest crowd in the world. On the opening night, everyone understood the jokes, laughed at the right parts, and cheered during some of the fight scenes - I imagine that was the nerd crowd, who like me, had waited for this movie forever. So gushing emotion just poured out without restraint.
But yesterday's showing was eerily quiet. There were a few chuckles here and there, but people seemed to be getting restless. And that's the problem with the movie - it's essentially two long action sequences tied by a knot of shoddy character interactions.
Anyone else have a similar experience on their second viewing?
Unlike, say, Spider Man 2.
It really depends on what you look for in a movie. In this kind of movie, the characters are already superheroes. They have entirely unrealistic powers of all kinds. I wouldn't expect to come into a movie like this expecting it to be even remotely realistic.
That's not what is being argued at all.
Realism has nothing to do with good writing.
I really don't see what about the writing you thought was bad. It wasn't *just* a series of wisecracks and action scenes, there were some genuinely great lines in there, particularly from Nick Fury and Captain America.
That's not what is being argued at all.
Realism has nothing to do with good writing.
You want to talk about things being different on a second viewing, try actually watching S2 objectively. It's a very average film, with a good villain.
Spiderman 2 has aged really poorly, haven't seen it since it came out on DVD but it was hard for me to watch again. Cgi is awful and the train sequence made me cringe.
I'm afraid I'm on the same boat as you. People wet their pants talking about Spiderman 2. I found it to be a fun movie but it wasn't as spectacular or mind-blowing as it seemed after the first viewing.
You like Cap America as a hero or in the movie?
I hate what Captain America stands for as a hero. It's such a lazy concept. But that's just me.
I actually havent seen Spiderman 2 or 3. I enjoyed the first one, but that seemed enough.
Hes not one of my favorite superheroes so thats probably why.
On the other hand I thoroughly enjoyed Batman Begins and TDK so Im looking forward to the next one very much.
So I had my second viewing yesterday and it was so weird. I couldn't enjoy the movie at all. And despite the theatre being packed (which is quite impressive for the UK given it's early release here), it was the quietest crowd in the world. On the opening night, everyone understood the jokes, laughed at the right parts, and cheered during some of the fight scenes - I imagine that was the nerd crowd, who like me, had waited for this movie forever. So gushing emotion just poured out without restraint.
But yesterday's showing was eerily quiet. There were a few chuckles here and there, but people seemed to be getting restless. And that's the problem with the movie - it's essentially two long action sequences tied by a knot of shoddy character interactions.
Anyone else have a similar experience on their second viewing?
Oh and on a sidenote, did anyone else think it hilarious just how easily the Helicarier was compromised? I mean jesus christ, it's one of the most important intelligence bases in the world, and the whole thing almost goes crashing down because some dude shoots an explosive arrow at it.
Yep, don't think I'll ever understand the logic behind that. There's a part where he blindly sprays bullets at one of Loki's gunmen for like 10 minutes while Stark is trying to repair the damage done to the Hellicarier. This is fucking Captain America, unable to actually shoot some random soldier, and he's ducking and running and sweating throughout the encounter. The movie really goes out of its way to drive home the point that Cap's only advantage is his shield.
It wasnt just great character interaction either, this is the best Bruce Banner we're going to see. The action makes a good case for what motivation the characters have into the final battle which was written and shot in a spectacular fashion. In no way was this comparable to the action in Transformers which was always an unwatchable mess. I never felt lost during a scene and everything felt natural as an extension of what each character would do.I really don't see what about the writing you thought was bad. It wasn't *just* a series of wisecracks and action scenes, there were some genuinely great lines in there, particularly from Nick Fury and Captain America.
It wasnt just great character interaction either, this is the best Bruce Banner we're going to see. The action makes a good case for what motivation the characters have into the final battle which was written and shot in a spectacular fashion. In no way was this comparable to the action in Transformers which was always an unwatchable mess. I never felt lost during a scene and everything felt natural as an extension of what each character would do.
But I'm sure I'm just wrong and in two months I will hate the movie because someone on GAF sad its bad.
Captain America represents a man from a different time and place who is proud of his country and everything it stands for and isn't ashamed of it. He is larger than life and iconic. I think that's a great concept. I'm not even American, and I don't care for the American government of today or what the country stands for, but I can respect a man like Steve Rogers.
The fact people are even comparing it to Transformers is laughable.
Captain America represents a man from a different time and place who is proud of his country and everything it stands for and isn't ashamed of it. He is larger than life and iconic. I think that's a great concept. I'm not even American, and I don't care for the American government of today or what the country stands for, but I can respect a man like Steve Rogers.
When was it decided that the Transformers series has badly directed action scenes? Apart from the terrible character designs, the action itself is very fluid, easy-to-follow and often quite impressive.
I must be the only one that loved how they portrayed him in the Avengers. Part of the point of Captain America is this quote
![]()
This is a character that isn't the biggest dog in the yard, and that's a part of the point. The fact that he does not compromise his beliefs or his integrity in spite of this makes is convictions all the more powerful. Captain America isn't about being the strongest, or the fastest, he's about doing the right thing and giving it your all no matter what.
He is far from useless, it was his tactical orders that in part allowed everything to play out like it did in this film. He's the leader/tactician, not the biggest gun.
I bet watching Avengers alone was like walking in a dudebro theater in downtown Austin.
When was it decided that the Transformers series has badly directed action scenes? Apart from the terrible character designs, the action itself is very fluid, easy-to-follow and often quite impressive.
It's a popular plot convenience. Nolan used the same one in The Dark Knight.
Is it true that the Bluray edition will come with more than 30 minutes of deleted scenes?
They probably haven't even thought about the home video release yet. Youre getting ahead of yourself.
The fact people are even comparing it to Transformers is laughable.
Also, I loved Mark Ruffalo. Had no real interest in Hulk before this film, will definitely see the new Hulk film if he's in it.
I'm trained, but the economy is in the tank and some brahs need to have fun![]()
They probably haven't even thought about the home video release yet. Youre getting ahead of yourself.
So we can all agree that spider man 2 is better, right?
I hope Captain America gets a new uniform or goes back to his old one. I was so glad when it got ripped off
It's gonna be really interesting to see how Whedon will split up the screentime of each character in Avengers 2 which will most likely have a bigger cast of heroes. I thought he hit a good balance but purely mathematically speaking total screentime will suffer with more members.