Jake Tower
Banned
WatchmenI simply wondered what a "true comic book movie" might be.
WatchmenI simply wondered what a "true comic book movie" might be.
Fixed.Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Daredevil
Marvel got a comic guy to do Avengers, and it paid off big.
I wonder if WB/DC is about to drop a giant pile of money in front of Kevin Smith...
Marvel got a comic guy to do Avengers, and it paid off big.
I wonder if WB/DC is about to drop a giant pile of money in front of Kevin Smith...
If there was one man even more box office poison than Whedon was...
Marvel got a comic guy to do Avengers, and it paid off big.
I wonder if WB/DC is about to drop a giant pile of money in front of Kevin Smith...
I hope so. Batman pissing himself needs to happen on the silver screen.
That just means that Smith would create an even bigger hit, then? Right?
Marvel got a comic guy to do Avengers, and it paid off big.
I wonder if WB/DC is about to drop a giant pile of money in front of Kevin Smith...
Marvel got a comic guy to do Avengers, and it paid off big.
I wonder if WB/DC is about to drop a giant pile of money in front of Kevin Smith...
I was very bored all throughout Avengers because it lacked soul. .
No, you accurately described your experience with pretty much everything.
It was an action packed comic book movie that does exactly what it needs to. It has colorful animated characters, and over the top and at times nonsensical plot, and lots of action. The difference between Avengers and most comic book flicks is that this was done considerably better than others, striking a great balance.
But hey, I guess if it doesn't have crazy "deep" plot and character development, it's "vapid". You're such a joke character sometimes.
That just means that Smith would create an even bigger hit out of left field, then? Right?
God dammit Joss Whedon, what the fuck. Stop making me like you!
I wonder if WB/DC is about to drop a giant pile of money in front of Kevin Smith...
*nods* Good man.
Makes sense, BB was an actual Batman movie.
hmm. so he throws it directly at hawkeye? where he can see it coming? that only works on grunts.
I think you're vastly underestimating how fast Cap's shield is. And how much you have to work to actually dodge it.
Who has the rights to Daredevil now?
Who has the rights to Daredevil now?
As all sensible people do.
God dammit Joss Whedon, what the fuck. Stop making me like you!
A good man indeed.
I do too.
Can't fault him for being right. SM2 is still a great movie and I prefer BB over TDK any day of the week.
*nods* Good man.
My man Joss. Right on the money.
![]()
Joss, my man!
Makes sense, BB was an actual Batman movie.
Where is your god now, those of you who were shitting on Spidey 2 and fluffing up Whedon/Avengers earlier?
Who has the rights to Daredevil now?
Still FOX. They would have lost them this year, but they started work on a reboot to keep the rights.
Where is your god now, those of you who were shitting on Spidey 2 and fluffing up Whedon/Avengers earlier?
GAF surprises me sometimes. It's like you guys want another Ang Lee's Hulk/Superman returns.
Spider-Man says hello.I think people here are confusing 'simple' with ''shallow and vapid''.
Avengers isn't stupid just because it doesn't try to address some inner human conflicts. It's wise to not engage in something like that, lest the film become a contrived, self-indulgent borefest. You can't have something like that in a film with so many important characters.
GAF surprises me sometimes. It's like you guys want another Ang Lee's Hulk/Superman returns.
Just sad. DD would benefit from long form storytelling on TV. So would the Punisher. With DD , you can tell so many awesome stories provided you get the key thing right- the depiction of his powers. Sadly Fox have no fucking clue.
![]()
I'd love another of the former.
Just sad. DD would benefit from long form storytelling on TV. So would the Punisher. With DD , you can tell so many awesome stories provided you get the key thing right- the depiction of his powers. Sadly Fox have no fucking clue.
Joss Whedon said:What, in your view, have been the great superhero movies?
I still think the first two “Spideys” were unmatched. I think they captured the comic and found some cinematic extensions of that that were purely cinematic. Again, I think “Watchmen” was slavishly adherent to the comic, and that sometimes is almost as bad as completely ignoring the comic and just using the title. I think “Batman Begins” is certainly my favorite Batman movie I’ve seen.
Huh, not “The Dark Knight”? Most people would say “The Dark Knight.”
“The Dark Knight,” for me, has the same problem that every other “Batman” movie has. It’s not about Batman. I think Heath Ledger is just phenomenal and the character of the Joker is beautifully written. He has a particular philosophy that he carries throughout the movie. He has one of the best bad guy schemes. Bad guy schemes are actually very hard to come up with. I love his movie, but I always feel like Batman gets short shrift. In “Batman Begins,” the pathological, unbalanced, needy, scary person in the movie is Batman. That’s what every “Batman” movie should be.
Joss Whedon said:For a writer-director, you have an unusually strong “brand.” You come with a built-in audience with a certain idea of what a Joss Whedon movie is.
Yes, but that built-in audience isn’t actually big enough to register on the scale of what “Avengers” needs to accomplish in the marketplace. The fact is some people really love my work, some people not so much, but at the end of the day I don’t want anybody coming out of the movie thinking about me. I want them thinking about the Avengers. I want to subsume myself in the piece. Tony Stark is enormously fun for me to write because he makes quips and he’s silly and he’s fun and he’s smart. I love writing him. But I don’t want people go, “Ha, that’s a Joss line.” I want them to think, “That’s a Tony line.”