This is basically what I think of it.
Hooo boy.
So, Ridley Lucased Aliens.
A lot of my criticisms come from the general way the story and characters are handled, but in terms of the highlights and lowlights I can remember right now:
Amazing bits:
The look of the movie. Just stunning. Like a 70's Sci Fi novel cover come to life.
Fassbender. God tier performance.
Set piecesMedical pod was just fantastic. Ship crash. Sandstorm.
Terrible bits:
"FATHER" God that dialogue was terrible.
Running from the gigantic ship, running from the gigantic ship, trip, oh god the gigantic ship is going to crush me, roll three foot to the right, all nice and safe
Is this spoilery? Love his reviews, but don't want anything ruined.
I feel like a watched a different film to you, I don't like to be down on someone's enjoyment, but you must have seen a version that had more scenes in it or something because half the characters didn't get the screen time or lines in the film to ask questions in the first place, and the characters that did sure didn't get any answers.
Hooo boy.
So, Ridley Lucased Aliens.
Yep. Can't stop thinking about it. Best movie I've seen in forever. GAF is GAF and complains about everything that is good, picks it apart and overanalyzes everything every little scene. Truth is this is one smart movie, but most of all it is terrifying, exciting, gripping, and an incredibly fun ride. Is it perfect? Maybe not. I could see a Director's Cut with 10-15 minutes addes being better, but if this wasn't burdened with being compared to Alien so much, we'd see much more glowing impressions and reviews.There are now officially three alien movies. Amazing movie, best sci-fi since anything, made avatar look like a kids show. Mature, brutal, masterfully directed, great cast and mindblowing effects completely lacking that homogenized cgi motion capture look of modern cgi.
Inspirational.
Haven't stopped thinking about this movie for hours now.
Thoughts on the mythology and plot:
- Clearly the opening sequence is an alternate origin story of life on earth. Read Chariots of the Gods which is a hokey but influential book tracing evidence in Mayan civilisation that our ancestors mistakenly worshipped aliens who originally 'fertilised' earth's ecosystem with the DNA for human life. Scott has cited the book as a major influence for Prometheus.
- The black goo is a biological WMD that is massively adaptive to environment and / or its host. The way I read it, the reaction differed on proto-earth and LV-233, local atmospheric conditions, and characteristics of the host. There is clearly more to be explained here than can be narratively though in this two hour film.
- Loved the symbolism of humankind landing on Christmas day, ie the birth of a new mythological lord. And how the film took place over seven days (creation).
- Interesting upturning of the Adam/eve allegory at the end too with Noomi/David exploring the bring of an unknown world. David/Adam being the original proto-species, created by mankind in place of 'God'.
You're either into Lindelof's narrative style (provide answers that stimulate bigger discussion) or you're not. Personally I much prefer a film that explores big ideas with space to think to one that serves up a prescribed solution to the philosphical mysteries of the universe. How could it anyway?
I think it's fine. He alludes to one sequence being a standout sequence but doesn't say what it is. I'd say it's fine to listen to.
Thanks - watching now. Get ready for angry PMs if there are spoilers.![]()
Haven't stopped thinking about this movie for hours now.
Thoughts on the mythology and plot:
- Clearly the opening sequence is an alternate origin story of life on earth. Read Chariots of the Gods which is a hokey but influential book tracing evidence in Mayan civilisation that our ancestors mistakenly worshipped aliens who originally 'fertilised' earth's ecosystem with the DNA for human life. Scott has cited the book as a major influence for Prometheus.
- The black goo is a biological WMD that is massively adaptive to environment and / or its host. The way I read it, the reaction differed on proto-earth and LV-233, local atmospheric conditions, and characteristics of the host. There is clearly more to be explained here than can be narratively though in this two hour film.
- Loved the symbolism of humankind landing on Christmas day, ie the birth of a new mythological lord. And how the film took place over seven days (creation).
- Interesting upturning of the Adam/eve allegory at the end too with Noomi/David exploring the bring of an unknown world. David/Adam being the original proto-species, created by mankind in place of 'God'.
You're either into Lindelof's narrative style (provide answers that stimulate bigger discussion) or you're not. Personally I much prefer a film that explores big ideas with space to think to one that serves up a prescribed solution to the philosphical mysteries of the universe. How could it anyway?
Just do it here so everyone can join in!
You're clear - was spoiler free. Interesting review from Mark, still very much looking forward to my IMAX viewing next week. If he gave it a 7.5, I am happy.
Ask me anything, I'll try and answer, there was not a single thing in the movie I didn't understand.
Good, fun film. Expect more Aliens than Alien. Music was excellent.
It's not Alien scary, it is rather, I would say a kind of mixture between a slighter suspense of Alien, the wonder of space so elegantly displayed in alien, and the explosiveness of Aliens.
The dialogue was not the same as in Alien. It also sacrifices spending time with characters, for scale. It does scale, immensely well though. There are no real moments where you feel anything for most of the characters that die as a result. Part of me believes that this is due to the fact that we've seen it all before. A crew encounters an alien, the crew die a horrible shocking deaths. I think it is also because you as well as the crew, know that they might encounter aliens when they land on the planet, whereas the Nostromo crew had no idea and knew just as much as you did. So really, in context, it all makes more sense.
Although, the developed characters have been done well enough for you to care for them.
They do explain some important things, and bring in new questions. I found this was done rather well actually. Although, I was not expecting any answers at all, and actually didn't want any answers as I was scared this would ruin, for me at least, the mysterious nature of thexenomorph, however as far as origins go, the explanation here was not disappointing.
Lawrence of Arabia bit made me giddy as hell
To get the aesthetic, the clever jokes and easter eggs, watch:
Lawrence of Arabia
Space Odyssey
Alien
Aliens (2x)
Blade RunnerVicker's grey suit is essentially another version of Rachel's.
Only thing I did not like, was the opening scene. Absolutely pointless and took away from the actual mystery for the rest of the film.
All in all, I would say that this is a worthwhile standalone/prequel to Alien and Aliens. I am not disappointed in the slightest bit. It was enjoyable, in its own way.
So essentially, expect to watch Aliens, with more scale and less classic action hero stuff. More realistic action I would say. Slightly more human characters, and with the exception of a few, not nearly as good as the Alien crew.
Bring on the Blade Runner sequel!
Also Prometheus sequel!
I read your review.Oh no. My review is at the bottom of the previous page![]()
So, the Engineers came to Earth, created humans (which may or may not be depicted in the opening scene), and then fucked off to LV-223 to create/farm/store a shitload of lethal alien goo that they plan on using to kill us (for reasons that aren't made apparent in this movie). And they did this by burying their ships under ground, where they were all killed by their own alien goo? Am I missing something?
I've got one question, and please answer this without spoiling anything; does this movie tie in well with the original Alien movie? Going in with the assumption that it takes place on the same planet that was in Alien, I'm having a hard time believing that all the stuff in this movie happened before the Nostromo showed up in the first movie. Of course, I haven't seen it yet.
So, does it tie in well?
I've got one question, and please answer this without spoiling anything; does this movie tie in well with the original Alien movie? Going in with the assumption that it takes place on the same planet that was in Alien, I'm having a hard time believing that all the stuff in this movie happened before the Nostromo showed up in the first movie. Of course, I haven't seen it yet.
So, does it tie in well?
For some fucking reason.Except it doesn't take place on the same planet.
For some fucking reason.
I haven't seen it yet, but is it possible thatShaw crashes the ship on LV-426, and that's where the two stories meet? Like I said, I haven't seen it, I'm just trying to make sense of this supposed mess of a script. Where is the engineer when the proto-xeno bursts from it?
Yeah I really don't get it. It's like some random decision to try and distance itself from Alien whereas it should have just taken the plunge after having so much linked to it and done it anyway.
That's one of the main things that need to be elaborated on for me. Did the aliens kill every single Engineer on every single ship on every host planet (if there was more than one?) Is the LV426 one a single engineer that escaped and got a little further before being chestbursted?
Specific complaints
The reasons nor significance behind Charlie Holloway's bizarre death are never explained. David's character and motives are never explained. .
Well, wasn't it just a way to see if what they had created had become smart enough to be a threat to its creator? And if that was so - they had to die?
Well, nevermind then.And to answer your question, it's in a sort of escape pod on the planet
There's not a direct connection as far as I see it, in terms of actual events in Prometheus leading up to Alien. It's just a picture into a much larger world, and like the captain said, this was probably just one of many installations. What we saw here just hints at what might have gone down to get the other ship to crash and set of the events in the Alien series.
He was under orders to do it. Objective was to get it back to Earth. Weyland is there for immortality - and at that moment it was the only life any of them knew existed out there. Seems logical to me. It is the same thing they did in Alien, and the same thing Burke tried to do in Aliens.
He was under orders to do it. Objective was to get it back to Earth. Weyland is there for immortality - and at that moment it was the only life any of them knew existed out there. Seems logical to me.
Edit: Also, I hope there is a director's cut as it felt like large parts were removed in points.
There MUST be about 30 mins of character development type stuff missing. Assuming that footage exists and there is a DC - I'm calling future classic.
Well, nevermind then.
Now I have no idea how they could possibly link the two.
I mean, black goo+human+space squid+Space Jockey are supposed to have made the Proto-Xeno, which is on LV-226, so how does another Xeno end up on LV-426 to lay Facehugger eggs? I read that Space Jockeys and humans have the same type of DNA, so I guess listing them separately MIGHT be redundant.
Oh, I was entertained alright. I'm just trying to piece everything together. If you'll excuse me, I'll repost my questions from the bottom of the last page:
If his goal was to get it back to Earth, then why remove it from the vase he had retrieved? What's wrong with not taking the vase back to Earth? And how does effectively murdering Charlie achieve that goal? What am I missing here
Why infect somebody during the mission (without any way of knowing the effects beforehand) instead of simply bringing that black goo sample back to Earth though?
One might infer that David was jealous and actually meaning to get rid of a rival, but it still seems an extremely haphazard method, especially coming from a supposedly ultra-smart android...
Okay Erigu. You're off the ignore list cos you're posting alot and apparently talking some sense. At least, until we start arguing about Lost again. But yeah. This fucked me off. If only because I watched Aliens yesterday,Why infect somebody during the mission (without any way of knowing the effects beforehand) instead of simply bringing that black goo sample back to Earth though?
One might infer that David was jealous and actually meaning to get rid of a rival, but it still seems an extremely haphazard method, especially coming from a supposedly ultra-smart android...
Okay Erigu. You're off the ignore list cos you're posting alot and apparently talking some sense. At least, until we start arguing about Lost again. But yeah. This fucked me off. If only because I watched Aliens yesterday,and Bishop specifically mentions the Laws of Robotics (well, two of them). Apparently these laws were not in place during earlier synthetic manufacturing day? Short-sighted.
Fake edit: Wait. Ash broke the rules too, I suppose.
Maybe it was to see the effects it would have before taking it back to Earth? If they took it back to Earth without testing it on the ship beforehand all hell might've broken loose. As to killing Charlie, I guess he was the easiest to get into because he was drinking, and obviously they didn't know whether he'd die or not. I'm not saying it's right but that's what I've got.