John Rabbit
Banned
so does morrowind look like daggerfall on low settings then?
PC Low Settings Screenshot Thread
- Thread starter DodgyGeezerFella
- Start date
AzureSkies
Member
Honestly, the only way to actually play Oblivion on a low-end PC is by using Oldblivion, which runs better and looks far nicer:
Spazznid
Member
lol, I remember playing at those settings and only getting 5 frames per second... When the game would load, that is... Now, my skyrim looks like crysis and Oblivion uses all 4k textures and I get 60 frames per second. This thread is so humbling. (I'm using that term correctly, aren't I?)
I just checked and there are not a lot of graphics settings to play with in the game menu, only support for Pixel Shaders and Draw Distance.
okay
so you guys need to believe me here
this was all done with the in game settings i swear
High Settings Comparison
High Settings Comparison
Serious Sam Minecraft?
John Rabbit
Banned
lol it was mostly a joke but thanks for looking. would like to see it anyway.
Croteam is love. Serious Sam doesn't get enough credit on GAF.okay
so you guys need to believe me here
this was all done with the in game settings i swear
High Settings Comparison
High Settings Comparison
RibbedHero
Member
Humbling would be you stumbling on some of the pics in the High-Res thread thinking what you were playing looked good. This is almost the opposite of humbling, though not quite.
ThaneKrios
Banned
RoadHazard
Gold Member
Runs fine here (Steam version), although it took a loooong time to start up the first time, and the very first load was also very loooooong (but maybe that's just how the game is).
Disgusting.
I had that problem with my disc-based version of FC1, so I ended up buying it on Steam for like $3 and it runs fine there. I'm not sure what majicks they wring, but the Steam version works.
IMACOMPUTA
Member
This thread really goes to show how much advancements in lighting tech have changed game graphics, holy shit.
IMACOMPUTA
Member
Crysis
I changed it to the lowest res on 4:3 but it didn't stay for some odd reason, just notice the screens are bigger...sorry...
Funny thing is that everyone remembers the game looking like this, because thats the only way anyone could run it when it came out.
I beat the game like that^
ThaneKrios
Banned
benjipwns
Banned
It is kinda impressive how that game scales. I know Q3A blah blah, but it has some pretty good lighting and texture work maxed all out. And you also have the Wii version which has most of the game/MP, etc.
I wouldn't be surprised if lots of people intentionally play it on the lowest settings. I knew somebody who got like 300 fps on the CS:S benchmark and still played the game with everything set to lowest possible to get that advantage.
I wouldn't be surprised if lots of people intentionally play it on the lowest settings. I knew somebody who got like 300 fps on the CS:S benchmark and still played the game with everything set to lowest possible to get that advantage.
Was messing around with GTA IV and because I have a 4GB GPU(s) I got the usual bug where you can't change settings until you add a command line. Well, got a screenshot at least ( Which I know doesn't adhere to the resolution rule but I couldn't go higher so this is lowest of the lowest low. )
Sexy.
Sexy.
Princess Viola
Member
Dem shadowsWas messing around with GTA IV and because I have a 4GB GPU(s) I got the usual bug where you can't change settings until you add a command line. Well, got a screenshot at least ( Which I know doesn't adhere to the resolution rule but I couldn't go higher so this is lowest of the lowest low. )
Sexy.
benjipwns
Banned
I did the start of the demo a while back: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=38834700&postcount=429
Yes, yes you did! I completely overlooked that. Thanks.
Got to say, in terms if visual fidelity both in low and high setting the game's IQ is poor (down the AA).
Was messing around with GTA IV and because I have a 4GB GPU(s) I got the usual bug where you can't change settings until you add a command line. Well, got a screenshot at least ( Which I know doesn't adhere to the resolution rule but I couldn't go higher so this is lowest of the lowest low. )
Sexy.
Oh man those shadows !
Harlan Ellison quote? You my friend, just made an ally.
ThaneKrios
Banned
DodgyGeezerFella
Member
I missed this thread, so many funny screenshots 
Here's some BLOPS II MP. Anybody care to share what Far Cry 3 looks like at its lowest ?
Here's some BLOPS II MP. Anybody care to share what Far Cry 3 looks like at its lowest ?
DodgyGeezerFella
Member
DodgyGeezerFella
Member
RibbedHero
Member
Those Black Ops II jaggies!!!!
Druz
Member
I don't think people are looking at these examples properly. Looking "amazing" on low isn't necessarily the goal. It's all about how much frames you're getting with a bad computer. Games like HL2 look pretty bad, but it scales just about everything down to be playable. Bad developers can still make a game look great on low by having a difficult to scale engine.
So I'm more curious about FPS gain vs Visual detail left over.
So I'm more curious about FPS gain vs Visual detail left over.
The Janitor
Member
This thread...
PoweredBySoy
Banned
This thread is awesome.
Similar threads
- Poll