What is the point of this? Do you want me to find the video?
What is the point of this? Do you want me to find the video?
yeah it was launched late last year.
if i remember correctly, we will be able to watch its landing live (well, takes 14min for the signal to travel) in HD, at 5fps. i don't know if i will be able to contain myself when watching it...
I think that one day man might have to send a hyperkinetic missile after voyager and destroy it. It's a naked invitation to come and invade a weak semi-technological resource rich society. There is not only SERO reason to suspect aliens would be peaceful, but a giant preponderance of evidence and logic to suggest predatory species advance quickly and that hegemonies succeed by eliminating competition.
That said, voyager is a needle in a haystack, while our radio emissions are a big old hayloft.
Nasa has released a new "White Marble" image of the amazing planet we call home.
![]()
![]()
Not sure if this has been posted before but I believe this is the first photo that fully contains both the moon in the earth in it. It has an...eerie quality to it
http://i.minus.com/iYb7hqeW1M2v8.jpg
Not sure if this has been posted before but I believe this is the first photo that fully contains both the moon in the earth in it. It has an...eerie quality to it[/QUOTE]
Where's that image taken from?
Where's that image taken from?
Kentucky.
this video is awesome
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzqdoXwLBT8
shows the landing sequence for the Curiosity rover and challenges with the landing. super cool!
Because we landed the other rovers a different way. This new one is also a lot bigger so the old solutions weren't going to work.
Possibly an utterly stupid question but .. I'm aware there are random gasses floating in space but is it possible that there are clouds of breathable oxygen out there? And if so, would it feasibly be possible for a space ship to somehow suck it up with a hose more or less?
Possibly an utterly stupid question but .. I'm aware there are random gasses floating in space but is it possible that there are clouds of breathable oxygen out there? And if so, would it feasibly be possible for a space ship to somehow suck it up with a hose more or less?
I'd like to do some stargazing this summer. Willing to travel abroad. Anyone here live where there is little light pollution willing to host me for a few nights?
Outer space is a near-vacuum, so only bodies with sufficient gravity can have anything that your lungs are capable of breathing in. There is nowhere in space where you could step outside and take a breath, if that's what you meant.
Hit up Arizona, if you can. They've got houses you can rent and such. Never been myself, but I know quite a few people who have gone.I'd like to do some stargazing this summer. Willing to travel abroad. Anyone here live where there is little light pollution willing to host me for a few nights?
Outer space is a near-vacuum, so only bodies with sufficient gravity can have anything that your lungs are capable of breathing in. There is nowhere in space where you could step outside and take a breath, if that's what you meant. As to whether there is O2 floating around that could be harvested, there is, but not in any large concentrations (see above). In order for it to be on Earth, it had be collected from what was once interstellar gasses. Oxygen itself is formed by Stellar nucleosynthesis, when stars are nearing the latter part of their life. When the star eventually breaks up, this material will spread out (along with all of the other materials produced by the star).
There are 2 event's that I'm really looking forward to:
1 - Curiosity - I'm really optimistic about it and I think it will show us some impressive stuff;
2 - JWST - I bet this will be a mind blowing marvel, that will show us things we never imagined and help us explain many of the 'unexplainable' things we have no clue about today. Too bad we'll have to wait for AT LEAST 6 more years until it get green light to fly =(
Well, even if Makler meant the other way (if a random high concentration of oxygen floated by, could you breathe it in?) the answer is probably no as your lungs work on pressure change (air rushing to fill or vacate a space). With no pressure in the vacuum the best you could hope for is the oxygen somehow randomly hitting your lungs, which is more or less as likely as just floating around and hoping you get hit by a space hotdog.![]()
I was asking because I was wondering would it be possible if a generation ship could be out in deep space and instead of just using completely recycled air (or water as Slightly Live points out) if they could locate random floating clouds of resources in space and bring it into the ship - therefore never having to dock anywhere to resupply themselves.
this video is awesome
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzqdoXwLBT8
shows the landing sequence for the Curiosity rover and challenges with the landing. super cool!
this video is awesome
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzqdoXwLBT8
shows the landing sequence for the Curiosity rover and challenges with the landing. super cool!
I'd like to do some stargazing this summer. Willing to travel abroad. Anyone here live where there is little light pollution willing to host me for a few nights?
I been watching Lawrence Krauss' 'a universe from nothing' conferences with Dawkins. Pretty deep stuff. I know its no news to anyone but hot damn is the human brain not equipped to consider almost any scale of any sort significant to the universe.
I been watching Lawrence Krauss' 'a universe from nothing' conferences with Dawkins. Pretty deep stuff. I know its no news to anyone but hot damn is the human brain not equipped to consider almost any scale of any sort significant to the universe.
Damn, that thing is still alive?![]()
This image of Mars released Thursday combines 817 component images taken between Dec. 21, 2011, and May 8, 2012, by the rover Opportunity.
Damn, that thing is still alive?
There are 2 event's that I'm really looking forward to:
1 - Curiosity - I'm really optimistic about it and I think it will show us some impressive stuff;
2 - JWST - I bet this will be a mind blowing marvel, that will show us things we never imagined and help us explain many of the 'unexplainable' things we have no clue about today. Too bad we'll have to wait for AT LEAST 6 more years until it get green light to fly =(
![]()
This image of Mars released Thursday combines 817 component images taken between Dec. 21, 2011, and May 8, 2012, by the rover Opportunity.
I been watching Lawrence Krauss' 'a universe from nothing' conferences with Dawkins. Pretty deep stuff. I know its no news to anyone but hot damn is the human brain not equipped to consider almost any scale of any sort significant to the universe.
![]()
Not sure if this has been posted before but I believe this is the first photo that fully contains both the moon in the earth in it. It has an...eerie quality to it
![]()
Not sure if this has been posted before but I believe this is the first photo that fully contains both the moon in the earth in it. It has an...eerie quality to it
this is one of the things I find very intimidating about Science it is so far beyond my own level of thinking that it almost feels magical, I am sad I was not born smarter to explore it all or even understand half of it
when these guys talk about the Universe, none of it makes sense until you love 'Thinking'
Until recently, black holes were thought to come in only two sizes: Small stellar varieties that are several times heavier than our sun, and supermassive black holes that pack the gravitational punch of many million sunslarge enough to swallow our entire solar system.
Notorious for ripping apart and swallowing stars, extra-large black holes live exclusively in the hearts of most galaxies, including our own Milky Way.
The new middleweight black hole is between these two typesequal to the matter of about 90,000 suns.
Pfft, only 90,000 suns?
I thought they formed from a collapsing star. I don't know. There is so much to remember I forget in the process lolI take it these "new" black holes are not the type Hawking predicted?
What were those called, primordial black holes? Anyway, weren't those formed (according to theory) by extremely thick regions of early universe, just like stars do form from gas clouds?
Pfft, only 90,000 suns?