Wkd BO 07•6-8•12 - Piderman a firework, Tity Perry pop rocks, Taylor Kitsch am bomba

Status
Not open for further replies.
Prome.will be lucky to hit 125m. Really thought it hit 130m domestic.
Prome should crack $140 domestic when all's said and done.
tumblr_m6q495ikmm1r3xeuqtq.gif
 
No Taylor Kitsch pictures to make fun of Savages yet? I guess at this point it's like making fun of a.clown.

I kinda feel bad for him, he's not a bad actor but then he's not a very good one either. He's a good Riggins, but then the role doesn't really demand that much acting ability.

Will be interesting to see where he goes from here, will be go the indie route? Attempt another shot at the big time or head back to TV? Maybe he'll just fade into obscurity as the rest of the FNL cast have.

Anyway, Killer Joe should be out soon (week after Rises), everyone needs to watch it. Heard amazing things. Can't wait personally.
 
Overseas Amazing Spider-man breakdown (these are all opening weekends):

- $18.1M in the UK (just below Spider-man 3, edit: in US dollars the difference is larger. SM3 was $23M)
- $10.8M in Russia (Avengers was $15M, but Spider-man 3 only made $14M total)
- $9.6M Mexico (sixth largest opening, but down from SM3)
- $8M France (way down from SM3)
- $7.5 Australia (around the same as SM3)
- $6.9 Brazil (Slightly down from SM3)
- $5.7M Italy (way down)
- $4.5M Indonesia (largest opening ever)
- $4.1M Spain (35% of SM3's opening)
- $2.1 for United Arab Emirates (3rd highest ever and twice SM3's final gross)

Japan is at $20.7M and Germany $9.6M after two weeks. The movie will probably fall short of Spider-man 3's total by a fair amount in both territories.



In other news, Prometheus is at $294M, up $9M since last weekend. It should hit $300M in the next week or two, but that's about it.

Australia loves Ted. The movie made $8.6M over the weekend and $13.1 including early screenings.
 
Tobor is crying right now at the thought of Marvel never getting Spiderman back. Which is a good thing because ASM is better than Marvels recent output.

This is crazy talk. ASM is on Norton's Hulk level (the worst Marvel film).
 
I don't even remember a single thing about Norton's Hulk, and I JUST SAW THAT SHIT on FX like a month or two ago when they were replaying it for the Avengers.

There was a bunch of CGI near the end about two people I didn't give a single fuck about it, and it just went on and on forever
 
Prometheus has yet to open in Japan and a few European territories. Would another $20m overseas gross be a fair estimate? Can it end up in the same ballpark WW as Snow White?
 
I don't even remember a single thing about Norton's Hulk, and I JUST SAW THAT SHIT on FX like a month or two ago when they were replaying it for the Avengers

All I really remember is the first 15 minutes where Norton is hiding out in some poor country, and that's better then anything shown in ASM. Too bad the rest of the film is bland and boring.
 
Iron Man (first half)
The Avengers

poop

Iron Man (second half)
Thor
The Incredible Hulk
Captain America
Iron Man 2
The Amazing Spiderman
 
All I really remember is the first 15 minutes where Norton is hiding out in some poor country, and that's better then anything shown in ASM. Too bad the rest of the film is bland and boring.

As weak as the rest of that movie is, I thought the first act of fugitive Banner in Brazil was pretty cool.
 
Meh I have zero interest in TAS.

I actually liked the original trilogy....not interested in every single god damn Marvel franchise getting rebooted every few years.
 
I don't even remember a single thing about Norton's Hulk, and I JUST SAW THAT SHIT on FX like a month or two ago when they were replaying it for the Avengers.

There was a bunch of CGI near the end about two people I didn't give a single fuck about it, and it just went on and on forever

There's apparently a three hour cut or at least there was rumored to be one, would pay some serious cash money to see it.

The movie wasn't too hot, but how much of that was down to Marvel forcing them to cut away a lot of character development, plot advancement scenes, etc.
 
I don't even remember a single thing about Norton's Hulk, and I JUST SAW THAT SHIT on FX like a month or two ago when they were replaying it for the Avengers.

There was a bunch of CGI near the end about two people I didn't give a single fuck about it, and it just went on and on forever

Yeah, Hulk was pretty god damn boring. If I had to compare Amazing to the Marvel films, I'd probably rank it about on par with Thor and Cap, above Hulk, and below Avengers, IM1 and IM2.

TAS cost that much to make? lol lol...

The whole scene where
Spidey is fighting Lizard in the school
is CG. Everything. Seemed really expensive.
 
I don't even remember a single thing about Norton's Hulk, and I JUST SAW THAT SHIT on FX like a month or two ago when they were replaying it for the Avengers.

There was a bunch of CGI near the end about two people I didn't give a single fuck about it, and it just went on and on forever

the best thing to come out of that movie is the .gif of Norton closing his laptop in disgust.
 
Two Punishers and two Fantastic Fours?

i don't know if you questioning my grammer or if those are actual questions but here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Punisher_(1989_film)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Punisher_(2004_film)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fantastic_Four_(film)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantastic_Four_(film)

He's talking about the 80s punisher and the Cormen Fantastic Four that was never actually released and only made to hold onto the movie rights.

yeah i stretched it a bit lol.
 
He's talking about the 80s punisher and the Cormen Fantastic Four that was never actually released and only made to hold onto the movie rights.


Oh. Well, you learn something new everyday.

idcmd.jpg


Jesus Christ, nightmare fuel. O_O
 
After 6 days:

S-M1 - $144M before inflation
S-M2 - $180M before inflation
S-M3 - $176M before inflation
ASM - $140M
 
700 mil for spider man to break even does not sound right. I thought they get 50% at least from the box office. So that means they only need to do 460 to break even right? Also they have a lot of product placement in that movie.
 
box office should be tracked with number of tickets sold and nothing else

Most of the interest in sales figures is to do with wanting to see good films make some money. I don't give a fuck how many people saw the Avengers, for example, I just like knowing it made a fuck ton of money and thus will keep the Marvel cinematic universe ticking along for the foreseeable future.

The only people who want to know round about how many people saw a film is the people who were involved in making it, really.
 
It's 100 years too late for that.

I think traditional theatre used to report dollar amounts, and they just continued doing so when the switched to showing films.

I sort of see the point. You are not selling a physical product, and even now different people pay different prices to see the same showing (children vs gen audience vs seniors). Family films would always have an edge on regular films if we went by attendence.
 
box office should be tracked with number of tickets sold and nothing else

A friend of mine in the business who has a whole presentation that argues this very thing.

The way box office numbers are reported like NFL scores is doing more harm than good.

But the simple fact of the matter is that cinema attendance is going down while prices are going up. Studios aren't keen to shout about that kind of thing.

700 mil for spider man to break even does not sound right. I thought they get 50% at least from the box office. So that means they only need to do 460 to break even right? Also they have a lot of product placement in that movie.

People always forget the marketing costs of these films. For a film like ASM Sony could easily have spent $100/200m on marketing alone worldwide.

Film production + P&A (print and advertising) costs = total studio investment.
 
poor kitsch. i wonder how hard his life must be aside from being a multi-millionaire and, i'm sure, having sex with lots of attractive women.
 
poor kitsch. i wonder how hard his life must be aside from being a multi-millionaire and, i'm sure, having sex with lots of attractive women.

Meh. He'll probably be on a drama on FOX in a few years. This sort of thing happens all the time.

Remember Josh Lucas?
 
Amazing Spider-Man will hit $700M worldwide so it doesn't matter anyhow. The real question is whether it can hit $800M. Definitely going to be more of a struggle to $500M overseas than I thought. I think the difference between $750ish or $800M will be the movie's reception in China.
 
I thought movies needed to make double the budget to break even more or less...

At the box office?? Absolutely not. If that were the case 95% of films would be losing massive amounts of money.

Usually these days if a film's domestic gross is equal to the budget, it's profitable. Overseas grosses can help with this, though as other posters have mentioned studios get a lesser percentage than they do from stateside release.

After the box office release, there's a ton of revenue from home video, cable, and broadcast rights for the studios as well. A film like ASM will have no problem whatsoever commanding top dollar in this area.

Whoever keeps spouting the $700 million WW to break even number is out of their mind, or using extremely creative accounting.
 
After 6 days:

S-M1 - $144M before inflation
S-M2 - $180M before inflation
S-M3 - $176M before inflation
ASM - $140M

And all bar TAS were standard 2d releases. Which makes TAS take all the more disappointing. Guess Spidey is no longer the draw he once was.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom