• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PoliGAF 2012 Community Thread |OT2| This thread title is now under military control

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd agree with that for most issues, but abortion is the one where I think the base would completely draw the line. It's not like they would stop voting for Mitt en mass, but it would be enough lost votes to ensure he has no shot of winning. There's just absolutely no reason for them to consider a pro-choice VP when they have viable pro-life candidates.

It's either going to be Portman or Ayotte. Most likely Portman with how vital Ohio is to Mitt.
Yeah, it seems like a lot of pro-lifers are one-issue voters. If you had two pro-choice candidates on each tickets (recall Romney's own history on abortion), that would probably keep a lot of them from turning out.
 
I'd agree with that for most issues, but abortion is the one where I think the base would completely draw the line. It's not like they would stop voting for Mitt en mass, but it would be enough lost votes to ensure he has no shot of winning. There's just absolutely no reason for them to consider a pro-choice VP when they have viable pro-life candidates.
But the fact is they still have the biggest draw of all for those voters: Obama. I also think the Congressional races will keep them at the polls too. While there are viable prolife candidates, Rice does have cross over appeal. Just look at her ratings among African Americans, it's on her wiki page, it was higher than most Republians can ever hope to get. lol
 
Please no Christie, it's bad enough being in PA and working in NY I see him on the news fairly often, I don't know if I can take a vp run coverage

Can someone explain Rubos appeal, it's a name I hear often, but really nothing in memory.

He's a minority from a swing state, outside of that he brings nothing. His main issue Obama snatched out from under him.
 
iklhaeyLz7ycR.png

Comedy option: Bachmann.
 
I'd agree with that for most issues, but abortion is the one where I think the base would completely draw the line. It's not like they would stop voting for Mitt en mass, but it would be enough lost votes to ensure he has no shot of winning. There's just absolutely no reason for them to consider a pro-choice VP when they have viable pro-life candidates.

It's either going to be Portman or Ayotte. Most likely Portman with how vital Ohio is to Mitt.
Yeah. Transitioning to the center is usually prudent. But on an issue as fundamental as abortion, that would entail substantial risk. I would not antagonize the base for a decision typically of scant consequence.
Comedy option's any of those four, really
Yeah. With Obama (finally) supporting marriage equality, I'd love to hear man-on-dog's response. Plus, the vitriolic nonsense he'd vomit would only harm his cause.
I'd probably vote for Romney/Rice ticket
As would I. We only afforded Republicans eight years to fix the country. I think they deserve another term.
 
Party is over, Eric Erickson says Romney folks are telling him Rice isn't going to be VP

back to the Bain stuff...as acting CEO he was still responsible for the company. If they had fucked something up royally, his ass would be brought up regardless of whether he was involved in decision making. This whole thing flies in the face of the general justification of CEO salaries/jobs. They are the company, if things go bad they get blamed, if things go well they get credit.

I'd love to get Kosmo's position on that basic CEO premise
 
Lysol wipes

also, here's another ad of Romney's son reading Spanish competently off a teleprompter. I truly don't understand why they make these though. It has about as much resonance with Latinos as if Obama had one of his daughters speak English in an ad. Also, Romney tries to speak Spanish at the end of the vid. It sounds like an American trying to speak Spanish with a ridiculous French accent.
At least he tries, the effort can still be appreciated. If one of the candidates somehow did an add in Hebrew, though Yiddish would be cooler, I'd be impressed.
 
You haven't seen it? Someone link this man.



Correct, but this case should be a little different since Romney's got more visibility and is taking part in something bigger.

I guess not. I did watch his whole NAACP speech though. Said this morning, it was surprisingly not awful and I was most surprised that he got so much applause. I guess that speech buried his racist comments?
 
I guess not. I did watch his whole NAACP speech though. Said this morning, it was surprisingly not awful and I was most surprised that he got so much applause. I guess that speech buried his racist comments?

It was later that day at a fundraiser. It wasn't necessarily racist. He just implied that if "they" (while talking about the NAACP booing incident) want more free things from the government, then they should vote for Obama.
 
I guess not. I did watch his whole NAACP speech though. Said this morning, it was surprisingly not awful and I was most surprised that he got so much applause. I guess that speech buried his racist comments?

I'm guessing he is referring to Romney's comments at an event later in the day when he referred to the booing incident. From memory it wasn't explicitly racist, though the implication is there and it could certainly be interpreted as such if you wanted to.
 
It was later that day at a fundraiser. It wasn't necessarily racist. He just implied that if "they" (while talking about the NAACP booing incident) want more free things from the government, then they should vote for Obama.

I must have the world's worst racism detector.
 
Because I wouldn't expect a candidate to try and get the Jewish vote that way, and unlike say Spanish, it's not something most people could pick up in High School or College. I'd be impressed that they put the effort in.

Well unless it turned out like Wesly Clark's appeal to the youth ad talking about Outkast...yes it exist, I highly suggest finding it.
 
Wait, was that NCAA thing really a dog whistle? Usually when I think of such things, it's more vague like "states rights". If this was a dog whistle, it was definitely at a higher frequency, since Romney specifically referred to black people wanting free stuff from the government.
 
Wait, was that NCAA thing really a dog whistle? Usually when I think of such things, it's more vague like "states rights". If this was a dog whistle, it was definitely at a higher frequency, since Romney specifically referred to black people wanting free stuff from the government.

He didn't say black people, otherwise you'd be right. He said "they" and also something like "the people who like Obamacare."
 
“By the way, I had the privilege of speaking today at the NAACP convention in Houston and I gave them the same speech I am giving you. I don’t give different speeches to different audiences alright. I gave them the same speech. When I mentioned I am going to get rid of Obamacare they weren’t happy, I didn’t get the same response. That’s ok, I want people to know what I stand for and if I don’t stand for what they want, go vote for someone else, that’s just fine. But I hope people understand this, your friends who like Obamacare, you remind them of this, if they want more stuff from government tell them to go vote for the other guy-more free stuff. But don’t forget nothing is really free. It has to paid for by people in the private sector creating goods and services, and if people want jobs more than they want free stuff from government, then they are going to have to get government to be smaller. And if they don’t want to repeal Obamacare they are going to have to give me some other stuff they are thinking about cutting, but my list takes Obamacare off first and I have a lot of other things I am thinking of cutting.”

A lot more innocuous in context.
 
Because I wouldn't expect a candidate to try and get the Jewish vote that way, and unlike say Spanish, it's not something most people could pick up in High School or College. I'd be impressed that they put the effort in.

Well unless it turned out like Wesly Clark's appeal to the youth ad talking about Outkast...yes it exist, I highly suggest finding it.

????

The only extra obstacle is a different alphabet. Learning Hebrew is otherwise just like learning other language.

It's still subject-verb-object like any western language, and it isn't based around logograph/ideographs that make learning something like Chinese or Japanese a nightmare for naive speakers of latin-derived languages.
 
????

The only extra obstacle is a different alphabet. Learning Hebrew is otherwise just like learning other language.

It's still subject-verb-object like any western language, and it isn't based around logograph/ideographs that make learning something like Chinese or Japanese a nightmare for naive speakers of latin-derived languages.
Well with Yiddish is hard now since it's no really spoken anymore, my point was it was a language you wouldn't already have a head start on commonly from regular schooling.

Regardless did you look up the Wesley Cark ad?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom