REMEMBER the dArk knight rises UnmaRked spOileR threAd | You only legend once

Status
Not open for further replies.
People like Robin?

It was nothing more than Nolan trolling the audience and anyone familiar with the Robin character. In actuality, JGL's character is the next Batman. Not the Robin character.

There are four different Robins with four distinct personalities.

People have a different opinion for each.

Two of them have/or will become Batman.
 
Bane's line when he sees the bat signal on the bridge "That's impossible" came off as comical, it wasn't serious nor angry or frustrated. The way he said it made some folks, including myself laugh.

He should have said:

NHfA3.jpg
 
I REALLY can't wait for the trilogy set...

Some parts I definitely needed subtitles and I say the same for TDK.

theres a lot of the movie online. it really helped me with some stuff.




also on a different note the prologue leaked like 6 months ago, and i still have no idea what was said during the opening scenes in the recut.
 
I wish it were. While the fight was already awesome, breaking him in his own home would have been PERFECT. If you're going to base a movie around Knightfall, you might as well borrow the best part.
It almost was when you think about it. The whole fight took place beneath the R&D part of Wayne enterprises so essentially they WERE fighting on Bruce's turf.
 
Maybe someone that's more emotionally in touch can explain it to me:

How would it have been disrespectful or in poor taste to at least reference the Joker? It almost seems more cruel to have his existence completely wiped from the film's universe, especially considering that this film brought back every other villain and major character (even ones that had already died!). I'm not talking about recasting him or dong some corny scene where he's shot in silhouette, but just finding some cool way of letting us know he's still out there.
 
Watching Batman Begins again, that final kick of Bane's is identical to the way Liam Neeson kicks him in the temple before he says "Death does not wait for you to be ready!". I think Bane also kicks him while he's down in the same way.

SIMILAR KICKS!?!?!?

poetry.jpg
 
Maybe someone that's more emotionally in touch can explain it to me:

How would it have been disrespectful or in poor taste to at least reference the Joker? It almost seems more cruel to have his existence completely wiped from the film's universe, especially considering that this film brought back every other villain and major character (even ones that had already died!). I'm not talking about recasting him or dong some corny scene where he's shot in silhouette, but just finding some cool way of letting us know he's still out there.

Basically anything you have to say about the Joker would be read as a commentary on Heath. Nolan just chose to avoid it altogether.
 
Gordan: I never said thank you
Batman: You won't have too.

Blake: I never said thank you
Batman: You won't have too

I almost came when that happened.

seriously though, how did blake's and batmans exchange go?
 
If Avengers can get such an awesome blu ray set (with Criterion-esque new covers for each movie), I expect no less for a Dark Knight trilogy blu ray set.
 
Gordan: I never said thank you
Batman: You won't have too.

Blake: I never said thank you
Batman: You won't have too

I almost came when that happened.

seriously though, how did blake's and batmans exchange go?

Batman says "Don't thank me yet."
 
I just remembered about Bane hanging the bodies off the bridge. pretty fucked up.

One detail that felt a little glossed over was Gordon's family abandoning him. Must have really cut him having to sit on a lie
 
Basically anything you have to say about the Joker would be read as a commentary on Heath. Nolan just chose to avoid it altogether.

Except that doesn't avoid it at all. Emitting his character from a film that re-unites literally every character from the previous films is also a commentary on Ledger.....and not a very positive one, IMO. It could pretty easily be interpreted as "Yeah, let's distance ourselves from this dead junkie."
 
Except that doesn't avoid it at all. Emitting his character from a film that re-unites literally every character from the previous films is also a commentary on Ledger.....and not a very positive one, IMO. It could pretty easily be interpreted as "Yeah, let's distance ourselves from this dead junkie."

There's no way it can't be interpreted. But this way, it is only your interpretation, not Nolan's.
 
Except that doesn't avoid it at all. Emitting his character from a film that re-unites literally every character from the previous films is also a commentary on Ledger.....and not a very positive one, IMO. It could pretty easily be interpreted as "Yeah, let's distance ourselves from this dead junkie."

No one I know interpreted it as that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom