Joe Shlabotnik
Banned
I loved the movie, but I am a bit bewildered at the rating it has. In the UK it is a 12A, which I thought was a stretch for The Dark Knight, but I actually thought this movie was a lot more graphic with people getting stabbed, shot, neck snapped. Does anybody else think it is quite a low rating.
The movie is certainly quite violent but I thought it was considerably tamer in content and mood than The Dark Knight. Bane was fond of snapping necks but the Joker's "pencil trick" is on another level. And TDKR doesn't have a character walking around with half his skull exposed (as silly as that was).
The entire mood of The Dark Knight was bitter and nihilistic, much more so than The Dark Knight Rises. Neither of these are exactly for little kids but there's no way I'd consider this more graphic or disturbing than the last film.
Try not to think too hard (or at all) about that entire plot point. The idea that a massively fraudulent block of trades could leave a billionaire almost literally penniless--to the point where he can't afford electricity!--might be the silliest thing in three movies about a man dressed as a bat.Are stocks really traded using fingerprints?