Correct.
PUArtistry is fundamentally about dishonesty in the service of getting laid. I have a friend who talks much like Nerds with Guns does,
whom I have posted about before.
I think it's all very well wanting to learn to interact with people, to go up to a stranger confidently and talk to her (or him), and to carry on a conversation. I think it is a great goal to feel confident in social situations like that. And these are things that I myself would never claim to be particularly good at and could certainly stand to improve. If it were merely about improving confidence in these ways, people would not have a problem with it.
But "The Game" is not merely about teaching these basic social skills (however much it might); it
also goes about teaching rather odious rape myths, encourages a fundamentally dishonest approach of faking who you are, what you think, and what your intentions are in the service of getting laid, and creates a mythological bogeyman form of feminism that is rabidly anti-sex. And as I said it constructs male-female relationships as this game of male ingenuity vs female social programming, where the woman doesn't possess the actual ability to know what she wants. It's this absurd and ultimately adversarial understanding of social interaction that is less about genuine social connection and more about winning the game - keeping her ASD from going off (or getting past her "resistance") and "scoring."
If someone says that "game" just means "learning to be a more socially confident person" to them and that's all they are trying to learn, I don't really have a problem with that - though I don't think that fundamentally is what it is about. But when someone says that they are trying to learn game, and they mean all that baggage? I'm disgusted.