Prestige had women?
All I can think of is Scarlet.
SARAH YOU FOOLS. She was played beautifully.
I hate everyone here now.
Prestige had women?
All I can think of is Scarlet.
I honestly feel bad for anyone who would watch this or any other movie and care about these kind of things.
SARAH YOU FOOLS. She was played beautifully.
I hate everyone here now.
Rebecca Hall!
He coulda simply asked some of the inmates at some point during those 3 months? Or, when Alfred mentioned to him early on that Bane was from a prison in the carribean?
Was anyone else really put off by the lack of blood? This movie was fucking GRIMM. I was feeling real about humanity for the majority of it, but right around when they straight up murdered like 100 cops in slow motion and there's barely even a bullet wound it kinda ruined my suspension of disbelief.
Batman: Year Two made a pretty huge deal about Bruce's no-gun vow, so seeing him shoot someone in the leg in BB was kind of a shock to me. His less strict no-killing policy in the movies has never quite sat right with me, but I keep having to remind myself that Nolan's Bruce Wayne is a pretty distinct reinterpretation of the character.I don't think Batman is against firepower.. in a more defensive capacities.. he just won't use it to kill someone.
He showed them the bomb but didn't say anything about the countdown. He lead them to believe Gotham could save itself somehow by taking back the city.First question: Happened to me too.
Second question: I'm not 100% sure, but use when Bane addressed Gotham at the stadium (which I'm assuming was televised), he brought out the bomb too.
Yea, I totally pity people who care about sloppy writing in their triple-A movies.
He showed them the bomb but didn't say anything about the countdown. He lead them to believe Gotham could save itself somehow by taking back the city.
So Bane wears a bullet proof vest, was the bullets catwoman shot, armor piercing rounds?
So Bane wears a bullet proof vest, was the bullets catwoman shot, armor piercing rounds?
But wouldn't Bruce know that removed it would cause it to decay?
I forgot.
They weren't bullets, they were friggin rockets.
Yea, I totally pity people who care about sloppy writing in their triple-A movies.
Good article and I agree with all points. Exerpts (unquoted so you can quote):
15 Things That Bothered Us About The Dark Knight Rises
1. When and how did Bane find out about Batmans identity and Applied Sciences?
5. Why Wouldnt the SEC Just Overturn Banes Fraudulent Trades
11. Why Does a Prison Exist Where People Can Possibly Climb To Freedom, And By Doing So, Free All The Other Prisoners?
Alfred already knew he was alive. They just crossed paths/met up there.
Which makes the scene of Alfred crying at the funeral right before that really stupid and meaningless.
He didn't know the core had been removed. Only Fox and Talia knew that because they saw it. It wasn't public because JGL has to have Fox tell the Special Forces guys that it's on a timer.
Yeah, I mean, I don't feel as strongly about this movie the way you do, but I do understand where you're coming from in nearly all the criticisms.
The plotting and editing of this film is a little sloppy. It feels like Nolan's running up against a time limit (IMAX's), and trying to get everything in there he can.
I think slashfilm makes a lot of good points. It's just that the good outweighs the bad for me.
6. Christian Bale and Marion Cotillard Have Sex
On the one hand, yes these are two very attractive individuals. Why shouldnt they give in to their carnal desires? On the other, more reasonable hand, there is virtually no development in the relationship between these two. Theyre running in the rain, then they start making out, then in the next scene theyre naked. If only real-life romance worked like this
I'm saying:
1) Bruce funded the device, so he probably knows what removing it does (it would decay for five months).
2) Bane removed the device and turned it into a bomb.
3) Bane wheeled the bomb out during the stadium scene, telling Gotham it was the instrument of their liberation.
4) Bruce was watching the televised destruction of the city, so he probably could see the fact that the bomb was removed and that the countdown had commenced.
Or am I missing something?
This doesn't seem that crazy at all.
Oh, just for my own curiosity, a few weeks ago in the hype thread some junior suicided by posting a spoiler and causing a shitstorm. Anyone remember what the spoiler was?
It doesn't seem crazy at all, but Nolan does have problems showing an existence of true chemistry between the characters (that's his problem in general IMO) which is why I could see someone thinking this scene looked off. I think Marion's acting made it believable despite Nolan's best efforts though.This doesn't seem that crazy at all.
I'm saying:
1) Bruce funded the device, so he probably knows what removing it does (it would decay).
2) Bane removed the device and turned it into a bomb.
3) Bane wheeled the bomb out during the stadium scene, telling Gotham it was the instrument of their liberation.
4) Bruce was watching the televised destruction of the city, so he probably could see the fact that the bomb was removed and that the countdown had commenced.
Or am I missing something?
The Dark Knight Rises, however, was just a movie about a villain trying to blow up a city and a hero that had to stop him, and that's it. No moral dilema, no philosophies in conflict, Bane was an evil psycopath, Batman is a righteous hero, and that's the end of that, no shades of grey, greater theme or whatsoever. The talk about the movie being a metaphore for the OWS movement is ridiculous.
This doesn't seem that crazy at all.
This doesn't seem that crazy at all.
He said Bane killed Alfred.
1. When and how did Bane find out about Batmans identity and Applied Sciences?
...And even if thats how it went down, it doesnt explain how she or Bane knew about the existence of the Applied Sciences wing of Wayne Enterprises, that it was Batmans armory and its specific location in the building. Yet they do because Bane was building his hideout right below it. Even if the aforementioned identity leak was possible, Lucius Fox himself said Applied Sciences was completely off the books.
2. Blake Intuits That Bruce Wayne is Batman
3. Bruce Wayne Is Down, Then Back Up, Then Down, Then Back Up
4. Alfred Says Goodbye to Bruce
5. Why Wouldnt the SEC Just Overturn Banes Fraudulent Trades
6. Christian Bale and Marion Cotillard Have Sex
On the one hand, yes these are two very attractive individuals. Why shouldnt they give in to their carnal desires? On the other, more reasonable hand, there is virtually no development in the relationship between these two. Theyre running in the rain, then they start making out, then in the next scene theyre naked. If only real-life romance worked like this
7. So Batman is a street artist now?
... Yet somehow, with this impossibly frightening ticking clock, he finds the time to use gasoline to make a huge Bat symbol on the top of a bridge with the knowledge Gordon will be there, pick up the flare, and light it up. Theatrically is part of Batmans persona, yes, but it seems like there might have been a better use of his time.
9. Why Does Bane Take a Break from His Master Plan to Ship Bruce Wayne Off to the Desert?
10. How Does Bruce Wayne Get Back to Gotham?
11. Why Does a Prison Exist Where People Can Possibly Climb To Freedom, And By Doing So, Free All The Other Prisoners?
12. The Post-Bane Gotham Feels Totally Fake
13. Are the Gotham City Police Department and CIA Really THAT Dumb?
14. Most of the Hand-To-Hand Combat Is Terrible
15. Multiple Ending Syndrome
I'm saying:
1) Bruce funded the device, so he probably knows what removing it does (it would decay for five months).
2) Bane removed the device and turned it into a bomb.
3) Bane wheeled the bomb out during the stadium scene, telling Gotham it was the instrument of their liberation.
4) Bruce was watching the televised destruction of the city, so he probably could see the fact that the bomb was removed and that the countdown had commenced.
Or am I missing something?
There were certainly some of the contrivances in the movie, some of which were outlined in that slashgear article. What particularly bothered me was how the somewhat unpredictably unstable reactor core ended up with up-to-second correct countdown timer - as well as the very existence of said timer.
I've come to accept that it's just how Nolan does things. His bigger films pretty much all have sloppy plotting and editing. This is most telling when he does scenes which are supposed to keep the audience "in the zone" for an extended set piece. For example: The final monorail chase in BB, the chase with Dent in the middle of TDK, and the car chase in Inception while they're dreaming inside the van.
These scenes all consist of a lot of cuts which feel really exciting, along with dramatic moments where there is suspense as to whether someone is going to make it or not, and sometimes lines of dialogue which throw out numbers or details which are meant to elevate the suspense and danger.
Yet when they are analyzed as a whole and all the details and information provided are broken down and compared, stuff generally don't add up, the plans don't make much sense, or there are inconsistencies with what the dialogue says and what is being shown. But the way the scenes are directed, they are so fast moving that it is clearly not intended for the audience to be thinking analytically at that moment, so it just feels exciting. It's the experience and thrill that Nolan is going for, and he either doesn't care about making all the details add up, or he just doesn't pay enough attention to clean stuff up because it's not important to his intent.
Once I accepted that, it becomes easier to enjoy those scenes on repeat viewings.
Not just that Bane killed Alfred
BANE KILLS ALFRED
BANE KILLS ALFRED
BANE KILLS ALFRED
BANE KILLS ALFRED
BANE KILLS ALFRED
6. Christian Bale and Marion Cotillard Have Sex
On the one hand, yes these are two very attractive individuals. Why shouldnt they give in to their carnal desires? On the other, more reasonable hand, there is virtually no development in the relationship between these two. Theyre running in the rain, then they start making out, then in the next scene theyre naked. If only real-life romance worked like this
I guess 1) is what we're supposed to assume and there's no proof against it, but I don't know why he would assume the core had been removed. 4) seems like a stretch to me because after the stadium the bomb is kept in the truck patrolling the streets.
Watched it again and now I'm even more convinced that Bruce is dead and Alfred imagines him being there.
There are a few hints throughout the movie, Alfred tells Bruce about taking a girl out for Coffee, Selina happens to be wearing the pearls that Bruce took back before his ownage at the hands of Bane so how did she get them again and the most telling piece - how on earth did Bruce know Alfred would take a vacation or when he'd be there?
I've come to accept that it's just how Nolan does things. His bigger films pretty much all have sloppy plotting and editing. This is most telling when he does scenes which are supposed to keep the audience "in the zone" for an extended set piece. For example: The final monorail chase in BB, the chase with Dent in the middle of TDK, and the car chase in Inception while they're dreaming inside the van.
These scenes all consist of a lot of cuts which feel really exciting, along with dramatic moments where there is suspense as to whether someone is going to make it or not, and sometimes lines of dialogue which throw out numbers or details which are meant to elevate the suspense and danger.
Yet when they are analyzed as a whole and all the details and information provided are broken down and compared, stuff generally don't add up, the plans don't make much sense, or there are inconsistencies with what the dialogue says and what is being shown. But the way the scenes are directed, they are so fast moving that it is clearly not intended for the audience to be thinking analytically at that moment, so it just feels exciting. It's the experience and thrill that Nolan is going for, and he either doesn't care about making all the details add up, or he just doesn't pay enough attention to clean stuff up because it's not important to his intent.
Once I accepted that, it becomes easier to enjoy those scenes on repeat viewings.
You're getting the timeline mixed up...
At the funeral, how would Alfred know that Bruce is still alive? At the funeral EVERYONE still thought Bruce was dead. It wasn't until AFTER the funeral where all of Bruce's little clues to his group started popping up to let them know that he was alive.
After the funeral, sure I can see that Alfred knew Bruce was alive. But during the funeral, no way. Everyone thought he was dead while they were at the funeral.
I really think you should watch this movie again, if you're going to continue slinging complaints. Because many of your complaints have been incorrect.
Watched it again and now I'm even more convinced that Bruce is dead and Alfred imagines him being there.
There are a few hints throughout the movie, Alfred tells Bruce about taking a girl out for Coffee, Selina happens to be wearing the pearls that Bruce took back before his ownage at the hands of Bane so how did she get them again and the most telling piece - how on earth did Bruce know Alfred would take a vacation or when he'd be there?
I think the fixed auto pilot is a red herring, something he did but decided not to use in the end as he couldn't see a life beyond being the Bat. With regards to the fixed bat sign, I think we see the ending out of sync. Blake finds the batcave and everything else and decides Gotham needs to the legend of bats alive so he goes about fixing the sign. (this is a reach, but it's possible)
And one last thing, why/how on Earth is Gordon still commish at the end? Dude was outed as lying and being responsible for the immoral and possibly illegal incarceration of 1000 people and yet he gets to keep his job?
C'mon.
There is no train, only a van which fits 8 people
Actually - having worked at an electric company - a majority of people actually avoid disconnection for a number of reasons.1 and 11 could be explained by League of Shadows, 11 explicitly so.
5 was addressed by Lucius (the board forcing them to act before the fraud could be straightened out). If you want to nitpick something there, why does the electricity at the Manor get shut off after only a manner of days?
Kind of think this movie would have benefited from being a two-parter
And one last thing, why/how on Earth is Gordon still commish at the end? Dude was outed as lying and being responsible for the immoral and possibly illegal incarceration of 1000 people and yet he gets to keep his job?
C'mon.
No, I understand the timeline. At the funeral they weren't aware Bruce was alive.
What I'm saying is that the funeral scene is empty/meaningless because in the very next scene he meets up with Bruce. So his mourning and tearful apology for failing the Waynes loses its emotional impact, like right away.
It's of a criticism of the editing of the film (#15 on the Slashfilm piece "Multiple Ending Syndrome" and how too much stuff happens in the last five minutes)
Watched it again and now I'm even more convinced that Bruce is dead and Alfred imagines him being there.
There are a few hints throughout the movie, Alfred tells Bruce about taking a girl out for Coffee, Selina happens to be wearing the pearls that Bruce took back before his ownage at the hands of Bane so how did she get them again and the most telling piece - how on earth did Bruce know Alfred would take a vacation or when he'd be there?
I think the fixed auto pilot is a red herring, something he did but decided not to use in the end as he couldn't see a life beyond being the Bat. With regards to the fixed bat sign, I think we see the ending out of sync. Blake finds the batcave and everything else and decides Gotham needs to the legend of bats alive so he goes about fixing the sign. (this is a reach, but it's possible)
And one last thing, why/how on Earth is Gordon still commish at the end? Dude was outed as lying and being responsible for the immoral and possibly illegal incarceration of 1000 people and yet he gets to keep his job?
C'mon.
This is either an elaborate troll or....
...
.. yeah.