They released some PC information yesterday (Servers/Matchmaking). It could make or break the game for some people:
http://community.callofduty.com/com...-online-security-matchmaking-and-server-intel
I don't get why they won't allow both.
•Recoil. There is significant recoil in Black Ops 2. Gun WILL take skill.
*all guns in all videos lacking any recoil*
#gamechanger
Holy shit.
*all guns in all videos lacking any recoil*
Gameplay montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRex280VBUw
Domination on Overflow
http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/...ops-ii-overflow-map-debut-domination-gameplay
Gameplay montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRex280VBUw
Domination on Overflow
http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/...ops-ii-overflow-map-debut-domination-gameplay
The boat map could easily fit into MW3. The class design allows you to requip whatever you want, but base on similar perks and weapons, not that big of a difference. I know I'll probably be running a similar setup with sub machine, anti UAV / air support / silence perks and stringer.
Treyarch completely fucked up the PS3 version of Black Ops in my opinion, the game ran like absolute shit.
So i'm wary about this one. Maybe i'll pick it up for the Wii-U someday.
They released some PC information yesterday (Servers/Matchmaking). It could make or break the game for some people:
http://community.callofduty.com/com...-online-security-matchmaking-and-server-intel
I don't get why they won't allow both.
lol, reading the comments seems like alot of pc gamers are mad about this.
I can't stand every server being 24/7 Nuketown, crouch only, or restricted weapon crap in BO 1.
I feel the same way. Luckily Party Chat on 360 has turned all MP games into pure silence over comms, for the most part.Interested.... But the community since 2009 haa become such a cesspool to the point I dont think I can take it anymore.
I think that comment right there just convinced me that out of the plausible alternatives, BO2's probably the best.I'm conflicted. This one comment at that article sums up what I felt about BLOPS 1...
lol, reading the comments seems like alot of pc gamers are mad about this.
Why not just go for the mute-all. The only game where I personally ever see a "gg" anymore is Team Fortress 2 and even that can get out of hand sometimes.
Treyarch completely fucked up the PS3 version of Black Ops in my opinion, the game ran like absolute shit.
So i'm wary about this one. Maybe i'll pick it up for the Wii-U someday.
I feel the same way. Luckily Party Chat on 360 has turned all MP games into pure silence over comms, for the most part.
Black Ops 1 was pretty bad on Xbox 360 as well, the framerate drops in multiplayer were extremely noticeable. Word at War hat horrible dips, too.
lol, reading the comments seems like alot of pc gamers are mad about this.
On second thought, there are some clear benefits and disadvantages to this system. The biggest negative about a game being solely-matchmaking is that it in a few years, this game will be unplayable. MW2 PC is in this state right now. The playerbase is so small that it takes waaaaay too long to find any game due to the factor they're divided by 16 playlists and several DLC packs. Even if you do find a game, the geographic disparity between players is so vast that lag will be a blatant factor. My fear is that by the time BO2's successor comes out, BO2 PC will go the route of MW2 PC.They released some PC information yesterday (Servers/Matchmaking). It could make or break the game for some people:
http://community.callofduty.com/com...-online-security-matchmaking-and-server-intel
I don't get why they won't allow both.
Why not? That "shit" is a fun distraction outside of the normal COD experience.The ones who are mad are the ones who want this shit:
Can I get a Amen?! Oh Yes!
Why not? That "shit" is a fun distraction outside of the normal COD experience.
Dropshotting, the auto aim for your opponent can't keep up.What's with all the proneshotting in all the vids I'm seeing lately? That shit is almost instant, where in the first Black Ops, there was kind of a delay.
The singleplayer campaign was done by Sledgehammer, IW was incharge of multiplayer.
Why not? That "shit" is a fun distraction outside of the normal COD experience.
I couldn't agree more. This game looks really fast, which makes me sad since one of the reasons Blops is my favorite CoD is the lower speed :/Is it just me or is the game speed look even faster somehow than MW3? It seems like when they are walking, the speed they are moving is at like a fast jog. do not like this
Gameplay montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRex280VBUw
Domination on Overflow
http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/...ops-ii-overflow-map-debut-domination-gameplay
Because it sucks that 95% of the servers are infected, crouch-only, snipers-only and/or high jump. If you want to play regular Call of Duty, you have no choice but to use matchmaking.
Gameplay montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRex280VBUw
Domination on Overflow
http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/...ops-ii-overflow-map-debut-domination-gameplay
Yup, tried MW3 during the last free weekend on Steam. Hackers in like 80% of the games I played during that one hour I had the game installed.
I assume all the footage is from 360, any PS3 or WiiU impressions? Would love to know how broken are those versions.
And forcing matchmaking and reducing choices makes it better? If you want a controlled standard experience, go play on consoles.
I played Black Ops on the 360 for 2 weeks when the PSN went down and I don't remember there being much noticeable difference between the two. The slow down during Napalm being the biggest thing but thats hardly a game breaker IMO.
I own BLOPS on PS3 and this is the first time I heard the game is unplayable, I actually have played both versions and I always had a blast with the game.
I guess this is neogaf being neogaf