I'm not threatened in any way shape or form by it, simply offering my opinion on what I saw in the video. Lots of people have stated theirs about what they thought, this is mine - That's it, I ain't holding you at gunpoint to agree with it.
As for the last part, you can't rebuff/reply to what I stated so you cop out. You're a great role model chief, can't win/don't try.
How can I rebuff an argument that's been pulled directly out of your ass?
No... no, you have to explain your 'analysis' better before any kind of actual discussion can take place.
1)
The men's mind have been spun back to an childlike state which is inherently asexual.
What is your basis for this assessment? That they're enjoying a kids show? It's already been stated by multiple people that the show is intentionally made to be enjoyable for adults much like most kids shows. Is it because they're buying toys? Toys aren't inherently for children. There is nothing in the action of buying a toy pony that regresses ones mind. The very IDEA of some group of men having 'spun back to a childlike state' is completely illogical. Are they more susceptible to this 'spinning' then other men who watch the show? Is the collective nature of their obsession related at all to the collective nature of other obsessions? Do you have any idea of what you're actually talking about?
2)
Only difference is they are still grown men with sexual urges and testosterone running around their systems which causes them to act in the bizarre fashion illustrated in the video by swinging the psychological sexual pendulum from its natural male home into an over compensatory feminine state to fit in with
So lets go ahead and assume that your brand new psychological thesis is correct. That a man's mind can be 'spun back to a childlike state' by liking a kids show. So these man-children still have sexual urges not normally associated with children. How does this conclusion lead you to assigning them a 'sexual pendulum'? WHAT IS A SEXUAL PENDULUM? Is this an identified psychological mechanism? That because there is sexual confusion caused by their now childlike state they suddenly swing all the way over into femininity? You really need to explain this better, because it kind of sounds like complete bullshit. Why don't they just remain male identified in their childlike state?
3)
a) the medium that has attracted them in the first place
b) to suppress their natural state to allow the illusion to feel complete without any contradictory urges and
c) seek the gratification/satisfaction in this state that they can't achieve in their ordinary one
Oh I see you've tried to give evidence to the brand fucking new idea of a 'sexual pendulum' that is as fickle as you claim. Lets talk about this.
First you claim that the medium itself is swinging their 'sexual pendulum'. The show is not identified sexually. It remains in between a male identification (Example: Ben 10) and a female identification (Example: Angelina Ballerina). The reason that some people want to identify it as simple a female show is because they're too used to seeing little kids shows aimed at Boys so when a show isn't aimed at boys they automatically assume that it's aimed at girls. It's a form of overcompensation that is a part of gender identity in every medium. The show is not inherently female because the ponies are girls or even because they're ponies. The show is not female because it focuses on friendship morality or has female themes as well as male themes.
Your second point is that they're suppressing their natural state in order to battle back the contradictory urges you've hypothetically given them with zero evidence. This seems out of place given the rest of your argument above since you've given them an already childlike state. Are they suppressing their nature prior to the video and that's why they're in a childlike state? Are they suppressing their male nature? If you're already married to the idea that these men have somehow regressed to a childlike mental state because of a TV show and that childlike state is asexual from a standpoint of identity, then why would they have to suppress a state that has been regressed? Are you talking from a sexual standpoint? Sexually most adults don't identify with ponies and I think we can assume that the men in the video have no sexual desire for the ponies.
Thirdly you talk of gratification or satisfaction. Are we talking about the obsession of the show or sexual gratification? If it's sexual gratification, then why are you assuming that they need sexual gratification from ponies? If they've been regressed and swung by an inherently female show, why then would they identify sexually with female ponies? Are you talking about the satisfaction of an obsessive nature that leads them to collect the toys in the first place? This kind of obsessive collection is not gender identified. When someone has a need to collect, they don't do it on a gender basis normally. They'll collect the female Magic: the Gathering cards just as quickly as they'll collect the male ones.
I'm not mad that you're attacking MLP fans. It's a TV show and fans of any show have a wide spectrum of obsession. Why I'm mad about is your fake analysis. Don't assign a gender identity to a group of people based simply on your theories that are created out of whole cloth with no basis for their existence.