Dinner Out's 131.64 points scored this week was second only to the 132.32 points scored against Kememsi/FPL by Sinistar in Week 9 this season.
The 119.32 points put up the Long Island Broskis in this week's championship game was the highest point total ever to be put up by a losing opponent in No Quitters league history. 98 fantasy matchups were played in NQ1 and 116 fantasy matchups have been played each year in NQ2-NQ4. So yeah, like I said earlier, that spans 446 contests.
Dinner Out sports two 1st place finishes and a 3rd place finish out of his 4 seasons in the league. He boasts 42 matchup wins; no one else has even amassed 30. Despite finishing 12-4 on the season, he was outscored by most of the league every week and will wind up finishing with a sub .500 record in "had they faced every other opponent" scenarios which is a first for a No Quitters champion.
No team has ever saved their highest-scoring week of the season until the Championship game... although Crazymoogle came close back in NQ2. Not only did Dinner Out save his best for last but he DEMOLISHED his previous season high - which was a mere 105.44 points back in Week 9. He outpaced that margin by more than 25 points.
This was NOT the closest margin for a league championship matchup. That honor still belongs to NQ1's finale between Dinner Out and a still very bitter Azwethinkweiz (manager of Hookers And Blow). The winner of that contest was also Dinner Out.
The absence of playoff reseeding in NQ2 would not have changed that league's eventual winner. Bail Kings outscored everyone in both Weeks 15 & 16. Crazymoogle would have beat Ember Island Players in the semifinals instead of the title game. Ember Island and Alex Anderson would have swapped 2nd and 3rd place.
This was the first season where Week 15 reseeding impacted the actual league champion. Had the bracket remained locked as in NQ2, Hookers And Blow would have won last week's semifinal matchup and lost this week to the Broskis. Dinner Out would have finished 3rd.
The Long Island Broskis is only the 3rd team in No Quitters history to open the regular season winning 4 consecutive games and to not win the league. The first was NQ1's 2Legit2Bitch! and the second was NQ3's Good As Gould (aka rinker). Each of the previous three league champions had won their first 3 games of the season. Dinner Out split his first 6 games this year prior to putting together an amazing streak of 9 wins out of 10.
The Long Island Broskis scored a total of 1580.28 points across 16 weeks this season - the most in the league and a nice average of 98.77 points/week. This was the second time in No Quitters league history that the owner of the highest scoring team in the league failed to win the league championship game. The first was NQ2's Alex Anderson - although he would have at least made it to the championship game had NQ4's reseeding structure been in place.
Not really as broad as you think, going season by season from NQ1.
This IS an incentive. You absolutely cannot give money outside the Top 4 in a 16-teamer, why not reward people for playing the game then?
Relegation is proven to be extremely effective in soccer and I've heard no real complaints when I asked around a few forums. With people doing like 4-5 leagues at a time no one gets too broken up for missing one. And yes Cloudy, I too would've been against the 8-Ball. I was 14th last year and had to win 3 of my last 4.
A similar idea was brought up on the Fantasy Focus podcast earlier this week. However, instead of eliminating the two bottom feeder teams from league eligibility (to ensure owners remain competitive - note that Dinner Out benefited with a high seed due to playing the two last place teams during Weeks 12 & 13) the suggestion was to have them pay 1.5 times and DOUBLE the league buy-in, respectively. That would be difficult to enforce either for the current season (collecting $$ after the regular season was well underway) or if the penalty was applicable for the following year (as these owners may simply choose to not return to the league - although that would certainly open the doors for new blood of which there always seems to be interest).
At least in that scenario they'd have a choice to pay more instead of simply being told they're out of luck. And it could then easily be enforceable against a Commissioner (having a Commissioner unable to play in their own league would be silly - but a financial penalty rule would still allow them to).
Additionally, the penalty money could then be awarded to the winner of the Consolation bracket instead of taking $$ from the rest of the league and further diluting the importance of winning it all. I'm with Frankman that only the top 4 teams should get paid from the primary prize pool in a 16-team league but I would have no problem with buy-in penalty dollars going to a Consolation bracket winner.
We also need a league trophy that the league champion can then upload pictures of them kissing and mocking the rest of the losers in the league at the end of the season thus inciting more rage. Pictures like this one.
I can try and incite all of the rage in the world against Dinner Out but I know all of you are just going to forget about his incredible win record and will roll over for him next season like you have in years past.