• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gay and Bisexual thread |OT2|Bears and Twinks and Otters. Oh My!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The notion of defined roles in gay relationships is interesting to me, mostly because I've never really thought about it. Personally I know that I would want to be absolutely equal with my partner, and anything outside of that (paying for dinner, or what have you) I would just chalk up to courtesy and return the favour.

The whole thing is archaic nonsense, fot straight people too (This isn't the 50s.) I hate when people ask me who is the "man" in our relationship. We're both guys. How difficult is that to understand?

Are lesbians either butch or bitch? Come on now. We don't have to imitate straight people.

Roles are ingrained in a broader cultural perception by being acknowledged and perpetuated. Regardless of whether 'gendered' roles in gay relationships are informed by archaic standards set by the straight community, they're certainly imitating them in their own way (bears, twinks, otters, etc. and the personalities attached to those classifications).

I don't personally agree with it and it's one of my bigger problems with 'mainstream' gay culture in general. But I digress.

edit; I should say I'm not condemning anyone who does enjoy those roles - to each their own - just interesting to think about why they're so prevalent.
 
I think it was pretty clear. What I think he meant was that when you are gay, there are two people of the same gender and thus, no societal expectations of roles each has to have in a relationship as opposed to heterosexual relationships where traditional roles might be expected.

This just isn't true. Gay men often bring those roles in based on sexual position alone.
 
This thread is so confusing. What, exactly, are we assigning traditional gender roles to? Is it cooking and cleaning? Or are we just talking about what goes on in the sack?

Because, either way, they're incredibly outdated and I would have thought that we'd be beyond this type of discussion anyway. For traditional gender roles, I know more guys who are better cooks/cleaner than girls.

I despise scarves. They're hideous.

I hate scarves too but I will admit they look nice on some people. Just not my cup of tea.

Hi Gay GAF I have a question for you kind folk.

What is it called when your not attracted to men in any sort of way, but still like to jack off (occasionally) to shemale porn, and gay porn?

It's called human sexuality being more complex than how most people think of it. I wouldn't really put a lot of stock into porn preferences since they're essentially fantasy fulfillment anyway.

(Also, bisexuality is criminally ignored in the current academic and mainstream discourse on sexuality but that's a whole other discussion.)
 
I'll side with the no roles crowd, personally. And as mentioned, I find downright confusing labels like "gray muscle tall bear with exactly 25% of body fat who wears clothes made of polyester" equally silly.

And I like scarves :P Winter wear is the best.
 
I'll side with the no roles crowd, personally. And as mentioned, I find downright confusing labels like "gray muscle tall bear with exactly 25% of body fat who wears clothes made of polyester" equally silly.

This I can kind of understand (well, barring the polyester). Since these labels are usually thrown up on dating/hook-up sites they serve as basically a quick filter for those who want that. I do want to say in my (albeit brief) sojourn at those places I didn't come across many if any people promoting themselves as "feminine" or "top" or any of these roles that we seem to be describing.

You'll find the odd asshole saying "masculine only" but that's pretty much the only label I've encountered. And, given that this label can mean just about anything it's impossible to know what those people are asking for anyway.
 
Hi Gay GAF I have a question for you kind folk.

What is it called when your not attracted to men in any sort of way, but still like to jack off (occasionally) to shemale porn, and gay porn?

Kinsey 1?
Not sure, you gotta be slightly attracted to man though to get off to males fucking each other. I think.
 
I think there's a little confusion here with what everyone's talking about when we discuss roles. It's not just about who's "being the man" and who's "being the woman" or even who is penetrating who, although that's certainly a part of it for some people. Relationships can fall into a dominant/passive structure for any number of reasons - financial, emotional, intellectual, physical, whatever. There are a lot of couples out there where one partner is dominant in one or more of these areas, and thus "take charge" in certain aspects of the relationship, and it doesn't always have anything to do with traditional gender roles. In fact, you find this to be the case in a lot of heterosexual relationships with women being the dominant partner, and men actually preferring it. I certainly have a lot of straight male friends who do.

I know for me personally, I tend to be attracted to guys with a mix of high-level intelligence and almost aggressive confidence. I love take-charge kind of people, and not because I want to be taken care of or treated "like the woman."
 
i'm definitely for equality in the relationship. it has always pissed me off how people ask who the man of the relationship is. and, the whole issue of tops being masculine and bottoms needing to be submissive is also laughable to me. my current bf is 100% bottom and he is a much more aggressive person than i.

i totally understand roleplaying and fantasies though, so being submissive and dominant definitely has its place imo for those who want it. i just mean to say there is no standard for who is which role and there shouldn't be.
 
Read Jeffrey's post again, you might've missed that little nugget.

Oh, yeah...just saw that...whatever fulfills the fantasy, I suppose.

Also, I've missed your posts. :)

iBpVqrfXmT1lA.gif
 
Equality... it is a nice concept but the truth is people are different and someone is going to be more submissive one way or the other. It's no different in straight relationships sometimes the woman is the dominant one.
 
Equality... it is a nice concept but the truth is people are different and someone is going to be more submissive one way or the other. It's no different in straight relationships sometimes the woman is the dominant one.

It's also natural that you take those roles in different components in a relationship. Someone may be older, but make less money, more muscular but the bottom, aggressive personality and loud spoken but prefer to not take charge.
 
Equality... it is a nice concept but the truth is people are different and someone is going to be more submissive one way or the other. It's no different in straight relationships sometimes the woman is the dominant one.

I suppose. I do usually end up liking older guys, but I think that's because Japanese guys maturity level can be 10ish years behind. Or maybe I make up that fact to justify myself. I've dated younger people too though.

Nothing is set in stone though. If someone checks enough boxes for me in game
 
I love to cook for or with people, my gf has a very restricted diet and it is one of the things I miss.

What kind of a restricted diet?

He pays for his food, I pay for mine ( the fact that he has multiple severe food allergies and I'm vegan has is a big influence on that as well),

Multiple severe food allergies, eh? So say he's allergic to peanuts and wheat and you eat a peanut butter sandwich - can you kiss him afterwards or do you have to rinse your mouth out or something?
 
Scarves are awesome btw. I've been kickin an infinity scarf for the past few weeks. A great accessory that can be a statement piece in any ensemble.
 
I can sympathize on a human-to-human level (no one wants to see someone going through what you're going through happen to anyone, it's awful), but honestly, "open relationship leads to an emotional crisis and intimacy-related betrayal" really is a news at 11 type headline. If it happened once it'll probably happen again. Either redefine your 'rules' or get out.
 
You feel like you've been " cheated" on then you've been cheated.

But maybe the fact that they are close friends and have a trusting relationship should soften the offense. They may have a connection that transcends the dynamic of your relationship?

Edit: I dunno, I don't mess with open relationships. I can't give advise on this one. I guess trust your own feelings on this one.
 
I can sympathize on a human-to-human level (no one wants to see someone going through what you're going through happen to anyone, it's awful), but honestly, "open relationship leads to an emotional crisis and intimacy-related betrayal" really is a news at 11 type headline. If it happened once it'll probably happen again. Either redefine your 'rules' or get out.

I think I was wrong to post here. I was hoping to get some advice that didn't involve "open relationshisp are always evil". Thank you anyway, though.
 
But maybe the fact that they are close friends and have a trusting relationship should soften the offense. They may have a connection that transcends the dynamic of your relationship?

I don't follow. This makes it worst for the cheated on on every level.

I think I was wrong to post here. I was hoping to get some advice that didn't involve "open relationshisp are always evil". Thank you anyway, though.

what do you want to hear? Keep doing what you're doing? He still loves you? It probably isn't that black and white and we don't have enough information. I didn't say open relationships were evil, I said redefine your rules or end the relationship. Be happy or don't, I guess.
 
I don't follow. This makes it worst for the cheated on on every level.

Like I said, it's difficult to give insight on this as I'm similar to your opinion.

I guess what I was trying to say was that perhaps they didn't feel like it was cheating because the intensity and history of their friendship overode their commitments.
 
I don't follow. This makes it worst for the cheated on on every level.



what do you want to hear? Keep doing what you're doing? He still loves you? It probably isn't that black and white and we don't have enough information. I didn't say open relationships were evil, I said redefine your rules or end the relationship. Be happy or don't, I guess.

No, I appreciate the feedback, I really do. I think I might have just picked a poor topic of choice for this forum.
 
I used to be on some dating sites that guys were looking for masculine men (or straight acting) and in some cases would only ask for curious guys or bi sexual guys. Also most people who were bi and married were priority for some odd reason. I was confused at first but there is even confusion on the gay/bi side of things that I at first didnt get it but its certainly impressive and amusing to watch.

I can honestly get why you might want a masculine man since some might fine the flamboyant or a effeminate guys not attractive and its fine but when it comes to bi only or curious it actually got to me and figured out they were thinking gay men are feminine or so while bisexual are masculine and seriously some messed up thinking but then again the society doesnt help either to the understanding of things even in the community can be seen at times.

Yadda yadda sexuality and the way of thinking its amusing.
 

:( sorry to hear this dude. while i'm not in an open relationship at the moment, i believe it may be the future of my current one. it's hard for me to give advice as i'm not in the same position and haven't been before. all i can say is i feel for you! that does seem like a huge breach of trust. it is definitely a big deal. it seems like it may be salvagable since it was a close friend and you know them both well, but if you really can't trust him again, then things might be extremely difficult.

i wish you the best of luck!
 
No, I appreciate the feedback, I really do. I think I might have just picked a poor topic of choice for this forum.

I am sorry you didn't get the answers you were looking for but yeah, some topics are best left out of this forum. GAF in particular is pretty awful in regards to sympathy and compassion.

whenever possible, they'll think you deserve what you got and you are an asshole, otherwise you wouldn't have that problem.

I hope you find a solution for your problem (I can't find it, maybe you edited?)
 
I am sorry you didn't get the answers you were looking for but yeah, some topics are best left out of this forum. GAF in particular is pretty awful in regards to sympathy and compassion.

whenever possible, they'll think you deserve what you got and you are an asshole, otherwise you wouldn't have that problem.

What?

It does depend on the topic, but overall I've found that GAF can be really sympathetic.
 
I am sorry you didn't get the answers you were looking for but yeah, some topics are best left out of this forum. GAF in particular is pretty awful in regards to sympathy and compassion.

whenever possible, they'll think you deserve what you got and you are an asshole, otherwise you wouldn't have that problem.

I hope you find a solution for your problem (I can't find it, maybe you edited?)
Er, no. GAF is generally very sympathetic and helpful, even though you may not think so if you never leave this catty thread. There are tons of topics day in and day out devoted to helping people, but there a few problem areas that makes a lot of people here twitchy. Religion, etc. Apparently, open relationships are also one of those areas, at least in this thread.
 
What?

It does depend on the topic, but overall I've found that GAF can be really sympathetic.

They really can be, but my topic was a bit of a hot issue here on GayGAF that can lead to some polarization. I just decided to drop it because I didn't want to start anything (I've seen numerous incidents of this the past years).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom