• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Magic: The Gathering |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
EDIT: Not sure how I ended up with three Soul Ransoms. Fixed.

ke6zenv9u5_en.jpg
v1n9eq8w2g_en.jpg


p6ky6h8leu_en.jpg
0xfkhp15jr_en.jpg
gagqof3lss_en.jpg


h6ewtukll4_en.jpg
qn5e3tjtlk_en.jpg
 
Soul's Ransom is some pretty big card advantage. Either you're up 4, or they lose their best creature. It's biggest issue is that the opponent gets to decide.
 
And the spoiled Gruul Charm was confirmed. I really can't believe that second ability is on there.

Traditionally giving your opponent a choice isn't good, so Soul Ransom probably isn't going to get there. Maybe if you pair it with some sac outlets or something, so they at least can't get their guy back by using the ability. But then bounce and whatnot still gets you.

In Magic Christmasland, they activate the ability and discard, you Cloudshift or Restoration Angel the creature in response.
 
Soul's Ransom is some pretty big card advantage. Either you're up 4, or they lose their best creature. It's biggest issue is that the opponent gets to decide.
You're up 3. Soul Ransom gets blown up.

Killin the creature in response to the Ransom being paid is actually hilarious.
 
I love that the art is just a big hammer.

If you're playing it, you're playing it almost entirely for the third ability, which is likely not terribly relevant in this standard.
 
It doesn't even kill Restoration Angels!

Aren't the first and third ability entirely green? Usually it is one color for each and a hybrid ability.
 
Those are both red cards :-P


For some reason I remembered falter being green, don't know why. Those effects are so terrible in anything other than limited anyway.

I guess it makes sense that Gruul gets the weakest charm since it should have the best creatures.

Wish we would see some of those though...
 
I may have to buy half a box or so as this is a pretty sweet deal. By the sound of it they won't ship any out for another week though right?
 
Is that deck strong? I rarely see it in the dailies I play on mtgo. Maybe that has to do with timing since the deck probably takes a lot of clicks to win.

Playing that deck on MTGO is quite possibly the least fun thing ever. To combo off can take ten minutes, which kind of makes winning impossible if your opponent is enough of a dick to make you play it out. (which I must admit, I sometimes am.)

I would be absolutely fine with a banning for time reasons.... But no, it's not strong when you consider the obscene amount of graveyard hate available.
 
https://www.massdrop.com/buy/return-to-ravnica-3pack

$6.49 for three packs of RTR, so a $78 box with free shipping. Thought you might be interested. Never used the site before, but I haven't seen packs that cheap in a loooong time.

Thats a damn good price. I dont need anything more of RTR really.. but extra packs are always nice. Also from the site some GC stuff

https://www.massdrop.com/buy/gatecrash-3pack

Though its not anywhere as close to a deal as the RTR stuff
 
Is that deck strong? I rarely see it in the dailies I play on mtgo. Maybe that has to do with timing since the deck probably takes a lot of clicks to win.

It's incredibly easy to hate that deck out with a few sideboard cards, but like mentioned it's a nightmare on mtgo.
 
It seems like I'll be buying a box and a playset of Aurelia's Fury from GTC. All the cool stuff is at rare and uncommon so far.

I'm beginning to see why people hate Mythic rarity. Aurelia's Fury is clearly an example of R&D just not even trying to balance a card and just slapping mythic on it to make it 'fair.'

Having not played for the entire middle of MTG, was this how it was for a long time?
 
It seems like I'll be buying a box and a playset of Aurelia's Fury from GTC. All the cool stuff is at rare and uncommon so far.

I'm beginning to see why people hate Mythic rarity. Aurelia's Fury is clearly an example of R&D just not even trying to balance a card and just slapping mythic on it to make it 'fair.'

Having not played for the entire middle of MTG, was this how it was for a long time?


Rosewater and the design and dev teams came up with a so called "New World Order"(their words) philosophy that keeps complex(cool) stuff out of common. Their stated reasoning was to lower the barrier to entry for new players. You can read about it from Rosewater himself here: http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/mm/172
 
Rosewater and the design and dev teams came up with a so called "New World Order" philosophy (their words) that keeps complex(cool) stuff out of common. Their stated reasoning was to lower the barrier to entry for new players. You can read about it from Rosewater himself here: http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/mm/172

Yeah, I'm caught up on NWO. I'm not sure I agree with a lot of it, to be honest. I'm especially not a fan of the "TURN IT ALL UP TO 11" design philosophy. Aurelia's Fury is just....stupid. They're not even trying, you know?

But the flavor has gotten better with the years. The art has improved by an order of magnitudes. DotP was insanely smart on their part. They're doing a lot of things right.
 
h0ndjlxf87_en.jpg


Not good enough of a fix. I hope that the existence of this card shows they realize how big the problem is, and that Magic 2014 might fix the issue.
 
What would be a better fix?

Seems a great sideboard card.

The better fix would be just getting rid of Hexproof. But unless they want to ban Invisible Stalker/Geist/et all, there is no better way to fix the problem until rotation. Assuming they keep it out of M14, when M13 and INN block rotate everything should get better.

It's just an incredibly lazy fix.
 
h0ndjlxf87_en.jpg


Not good enough of a fix. I hope that the existence of this card shows they realize how big the problem is, and that Magic 2014 might fix the issue.

I like the flavour/art.
It's good enough to kill off the invisible stalker decks while being narrow enough Geist of Saint Traft is still a strong card.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom