Pachter -PS4 will feature "hyperrealistic games" and "render games at 240fps"

The Boat

Member
Gemüsepizza;47252132 said:
Do some people here not get the difference between "can render games at 240fps" and "will render games at 240fps"? Imo this is just an example to show someone that a console is much more powerful than it's predecessor. Maybe not the best example, but how would you explain with only a few words to someone who isn't into tech how powerful the PS4 will be?

To someone who isn't into tech I wouldn't use things like framerate. I also would say complete and utter bullshit just because they don't understand what I'm saying.
 

AGITΩ

Member
>Have Developer ACTUALLY try to meet those specs
>Game ends up being 5 hours in Length
>Sold at $70
>Needs to Sell 25 Mil to Break Even
>Fails to meet expectations
>Studio Shuts down

OH MAN, NEXT GEN IS GONNA SUCK.
 

Corto

Member
I didn't read the context of that statement and at face value it is indeed absurd. But I can see that it would be difficult to use a simple metric to the question: "how much powerful the PS4 should be compared to the PS3?". The most sensible way to answer would be that there's no simple answer to that simple question, and that the quality of effects/lightning, and the increase in image quality/texture resolution will certainly be rather noticeable but difficult to quantify depending on the game and developer choices. But if pressed to give an answer teraflops wouldn't be the metrics that would be immediately recognizable by the public.
 

BlazinAm

Junior Member
AGITΩ;47252339 said:
>Have Developer ACTUALLY try to meet those specs
>Game ends up being 5 hours in Length
>Sold at $70
>Needs to Sell 25 Mil to Break Even
>Fails to meet expectations
>Studio Shuts down

OH MAN, NEXT GEN IS GONNA SUCK.

I think the dumbest thing a developer would want to max out a system unless that is the major selling point of their game. Pushing graphics doesn't always equal high budget. Besides graphics can encompass a lot of visual fields.
 
gaf is pretty damn negative. there's critical, and then there's vitriol

Vitriol is a stretch. If we're broadly characterising GAF in one way or another I would call the tone one of unwavering scepticism, which, given the tone of petulant adulation from most of the gaming community, actually seems quite healthy.
 

Dr Dogg

Member
gaf is pretty damn negative. there's critical, and then there's vitriol

But Gaf is my Ying to the nicey-nice gaming press Yang, there has to be a balance. To be fair I have found Derrick01 to be able to give a far better constructive opinion than the vast majority of gaming journalists.
 
D

Deleted member 22576

Unconfirmed Member
MOBA games don't count because they're not on consoles or do you know that little about gaming?
Maybe we are a bunch of assholes.

It's clear he's talking about consoles, and on steam counter strike and tf2 are right up there with dota.AND he did say "games with clear balance" which I'm pretty sure dota falls in to. I dunno.
 
No. Last gen games.

Depending on how engine intensive they were. Fillrate busting games? LOL no.

But I guess that was his point. That they would be so powerful that they could display current gen games with 240fps. They obviously won't, but they are that powerful.
 

Reiko

Banned
By the way... Using DMC as a benchmark for running 200fps and PC power is a joke.

UE3 is dated and scales well.

The same monster PC running DMC in 1080p & above in 200fps would have trouble running Zone of Enders 2 in 200fps in 1080p.

Depends on the game.


Gemüsepizza;47252442 said:
But I guess that was his point. That they would be so powerful that they could display current gen games with 240fps.

It's a blanket statement that also depends on the game. A fillrate intensive game like Bayonetta might make a majority of PCs cry if you try to hit 1080p & 200fps.
 

AOC83

Banned
I don´t get why people become so angry in this thread.
Everybody knows Pachter has no clue what he´s talking about, but the predictions are fun nontheless.
Nobody should take that whole thing serious.
 

farnham

Banned
Last gen kutaragi hyped ps3 with 4D and 120 fps. This gen its pachter.. And he isnt even a sony employee and has probably no internal knowledge
 

michaelpachter

He speaks, and we freak
Gemüsepizza;47252132 said:
Do some people here not get the difference between "can render games at 240fps" and "will render games at 240fps"? Imo this is just an example to show someone that a console is much more powerful than it's predecessor. Maybe not the best example, but how would you explain with only a few words to someone who isn't into tech how powerful the PS4 will be?

It's nice to see that ONE GAFfer understood precisely what I was trying to say. Thank you for the post, I wish I were as articulate.
 

Blablurn

Member
qSUgoC3.png
 

EvB

Member
I don´t get why people become so angry in this thread.
Everybody knows Pachter has no clue what he´s talking about, but the predictions are fun nontheless.
Nobody should take that whole thing serious.

I suspect if we activate the next gen bullshit translator the sentance would go something like this.

PS4 is going to Support HDMI 2.0 which has the bandwidth to output 1080p at 240FPS!

At some point we will hear it the other way.. 4k@60hz
 
Patcher works for MS, right?

Ps4 is suppose to be more powerful then the nextbox, right?

So isn't obvious he's over-hyping it so it'll be a let down to any fool that takes this at face value?


Is MS scared of Nintendo and Sony?
 
Well, so that means 720p @ 30FPS is confirmed as the target for the majority of games for next generation consoles. Good to know.
 

volturnus

Banned
It's nice to see that ONE GAFfer understood precisely what I was trying to say. Thank you for the post, I wish I were as articulate.
Now that you're here, enlighten us and explain what you tried to say with the FUSE, Destiny and Respawn sales prediction. I found it to be amusing, to say the least.
 
It's nice to see that ONE GAFfer understood precisely what I was trying to say. Thank you for the post, I wish I were as articulate.

I must say I love the way you filter through all the critical voices and pick out the one lone supporter to defend your case.

It's been said over and over again why your laughable 240 frames theory is a hilariously wrong way of showing the power increase of the PS4. Why don't you answer some of it?
 

BlazinAm

Junior Member
I must say I love the way you filter through all the critical voices and pick out the one lone supporter to defend your case.

It's been said over and over again why your laughable 240 frames theory is a hilariously wrong way of showing the power increase of the PS4. Why don't you answer some of it?

I think he gets that you know.
 

legacyzero

Banned
But Gaf is my Ying to the nicey-nice gaming press Yang, there has to be a balance. To be fair I have found Derrick01 to be able to give a far better constructive opinion than the vast majority of gaming journalists.

That's what's scary LMFAO
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
Gemüsepizza;47252132 said:
Do some people here not get the difference between "can render games at 240fps" and "will render games at 240fps"? Imo this is just an example to show someone that a console is much more powerful than it's predecessor. Maybe not the best example, but how would you explain with only a few words to someone who isn't into tech how powerful the PS4 will be?
I still think that's wrong unless the game in question is Quake 3.
 

Reiko

Banned
Crytek should just give up right now.

Everybody in the Beta Crysis 3 thread could only hit 60fps at best. This is at max settings.
 
D

Deleted member 80556

Unconfirmed Member
SHIFT?

Oh, no. I sense name jokes are inbound.
SHIT
 
Pachter, the reason GAF hates you is because you talk out of your ass like so many people on here do but you get paid to do it as if your opinion is somehow worth more than that of a random internet forum member. Like so many economists your analyst predictions are worth jack squat yet somehow you still have a job when people with more skill in their pinky fingers are out of work.
 
I still think that's wrong unless the game in question is Quake 3.

There was a thread recently about DMC being over 200fps on PC. And yes, some games won't do that, that's why I said "maybe not the best example". But it was just that, an example to illustrate that they will be more powerful. Not a scientific statement about graphics technology.
 
Top Bottom