VG Leaks: BC for NextBox to be an add on, can play offline

What's the point of this thing if there is no optical drive as the article claims? As someone who already owns a 360 with dozens of games, why would I want a bc add-on that won't actually let me play my own games

It would be pretty useless without a durango if you want to play your disc based 360 games. So as a standalone it's really just an apple tv kind of thing I guess, I wouldn't buy it as a standalone.
 
Then what was that twitter dbag going on about the other day? Guy tosses his job away over a repackaged 360. I cant wait till this thing is revealed to get the true story.
 
I like the idea if they stack and are aesthetically pleasing. A design such as the Mac Mini would be good. Having an a connected transition through Live would be a great word-of-mouth growth plan.
 
I wouldn't rule it out because we know pretty much nothing about what the XBOX Mini hardware actually is.
Who's to say that this '3 minute disconnection' rumour for single player games wasn't a reference to Durango software, but was actually talking about 360 discs running on the Durango, and the 3 minute thing was referring to how long it would run without an active connection to the XBOX Mini? We don't know anything.
Yeah, but it makes no sense to make it a requirement. What exactly would they need to verify by an always-online requirement? People have been able to play pirated 360 games for years.

I thnik Xbox Mini is going to require online connection to purchase and download games (and TV /streaming multimedia functionality) but that's far as far as it goes.
Because it's stupid. Why would you trade in your 360 that you can use offline? Too lazy to push the power button the 360 and use that instead?
Convenience? Only one HDMI used? Only Durango controllers in your living room?
 
MS probably won't be marketing it as a 360, it'll be marketed as a TV box, and it'll be relatively cheap - that's the reason people will be buying it.

I get that. I'm talking about BC for old games and XBLA stuff. It seems like a bad idea for anyone looking for BC in the Durango. It's just plain smarter to use the 360 instead of buying a $150 accessory.
 
While this is also a rumour - and we'll wait for confirmation when Durango is finally unveiled. I still cannot believe anyone bought into the Xbox = always online, no offline gaming - bullshit.
It reveals either a clear bias from the individual or a distinct lack of critical thinking.
 
Xbox tower of power!

Sega-Tower-of-Power.jpg
 
Maybe I didn't see discussion, but doesn't this rumored setup mean 360 BC is exactly like Sony's PS3 BC, i.e. a streaming solution? It seems to work like this:

- Durango collects controller input and, for disc-based games, anything read off the disc.
- Durango sends this data over the network to mini360
- Mini360 does the number-crunching
- Mini360 sends a video feed back to Durango

Won't this potentially have the same latency and video quality problems people feared for Sony's Gaikai idea? It's a local rather than wide-area network, so perhaps it wouldn't be as bad. But on the other hand you're paying $150 for it, as opposed to an unknown cost for the Gaikai system (probably a small number spread over time, as a service).

Also, I can't imagine Microsoft would allow you to fully install 360 discs across the network from Durango to mini360. So would you be allowed to install 360 games onto the Durango hard drive? If not, that option for increasing performance would be gone in this BC.
 
While this is also a rumour - and we'll wait for confirmation when Durango is finally unveiled. I still cannot believe anyone bought into the Xbox = always online, no offline gaming - bullshit.
It reveals either a clear bias from the individual or a distinct lack of critical thinking.
To be fair, anything is possible after Windows 8.
 
It's better than nothing for sure. I can see this appealing to people who never picked a 360 and want to access a few games. But I can't imagine why would any 360 owner have their whole library rendered to drm just because they don't want to use an extra plug.

If it works like I think it'll work, then it'll probably save you an HDMI out on the back of your TV as well as a power outlet. Also, it puts a $99 (I imagine subscription-less) Xbox 360 on the market. If that ends up being how it works, then you'd also have an Xbox 360 that doesn't play disc games. The add-on functionality seems like a way to incorporate that.
 
I get that. I'm talking about BC for old games and XBLA stuff. It seems like a bad idea for anyone looking for BC in the Durango. It's just plain smarter to use the 360 instead of buying a $150 accessory.

I guess it depends on just what this TV functionality will entail, maybe it'll be a really excellent value $150 accessory that renders you old 360 pretty pointless.
 
Buy a Durango, trade your 360 for a mini. Done.

I can easily see this happening @ GS.

How can it "always be online" but able to play content offline?

That's not "always online".

Games that are downloaded or played off the disc wont require a connection

No mandatory online is great, but stackable unit to play 360 games? The fuck?

I'm thinking this device will be plugged seamlessly into durago like a Xbox 360 Slim HDD.
 
Xbox mini hardly seems like a bullet point in MS's favor. You still need an extra system for BC. The real news here is that Durango doesn't require always online which seemed like an insane move from the start.

I think the Mini is a smart way of solving the BC problem, and it will also sell very well during the holidays. It appeals to both core gamers who value BC and convenience, and also casual/non-gamers who want an easy way to consume media/games.

Obviously the no always-online requirement is huge, but I think people are also overlooking the Kinect 2.0 mention. Specifically, they say Kinect 2.0 isn't a huge focus right now for Microsoft, and doesn't have to be plugged in at all times. Even if everyone still has to buy one with their Durangos (which they didn't actually state), it was still a big worry among lots of people that Kinect would be one of Microsoft's major focal points.
 
Perhaps the source is SuperDAE? He's been saying Durango won't need always online forever and has supplied both Kotaku and VGLeaks with info.

But both Kotaku and vgleaks details contradict one another. I don't see why superdae wouldn't supply this info to Kotaku if he had it.

He always came across as a fanboy on twitter and probably just denying it without any information. Just a hunch, but I think vgleaks got their source from somewhere else.
 
If it works like I think it'll work, then it'll probably save you an HDMI out on the back of your TV as well as a power outlet.
I wouldn't be surprised if both are designed to look like one device if connected and there is a dedicated port to connect them, and when the combined devices will run 360 games it could be using less power than 360S.
If Microsoft designs this stuff right it's going to be a win/win solution for those interested in revisiting their old 360 games.
 
I get that. I'm talking about BC for old games and XBLA stuff. It seems like a bad idea for anyone looking for BC in the Durango. It's just plain smarter to use the 360 instead of buying a $150 accessory.

Of course it's smarter to use the 360 for BC. Just like it's smarter to use the PS3 over PS4 gaikai BC. However giving consumers options isn't a bad thing. More importantly we have no idea about the functionality of the new mini. It could lose the disc tray but end up being a far more capable media box than 360 is/was.
 
I'm probably late to the game but after looking through the responses, there seem to be a lot of people who don't understand what this means for current XBOX 360 users and the new Durango console.

Here's how I see it.

There are 2 units. The XBOX Mini and the Durango Console.

The XBOX Mini unit:
  • No physical Disc Drive
  • XBOX 360 Functionality
  • Provides competitive AppleTV service
  • required Always Online connection to download games and stream media
  • 100-150 price range
  • Interface with Durango to provide BC WITH the Durango Unit

The DURANGO unit:
  • Next Gen gaming console
  • Always Online, but not required for local play(like the current 360)
  • Also provides competitive AppleTV service
  • NO built-in Backwards Compatibility, must interface with Xbox Mini for BC
  • Competitive price point compared to PS4

If you don't have a 360, then you don't really care about Backwards Compatibility. You can save money by not NEEDING the Mini unit and can just buy the Durango Unit. You will still get the TV service, next-gen games, etc. If you were really interested in playing the backlog of XBOX 360 games, then you could always upgrade by purchasing the Mini unit.


If you already have a 360, then you've already got a machine that plays your collection of current Xbox games. You don't need the mini unit immediately. If you want next gen games, then all you need is the Durango Unit. Durango will provide TV services that the Mini does, so unless you want everything in a neat package, you don't need the mini. Unfortunately, the difference in hardware won't allow Durango to interface with the current 360 models, so switching between Durango and 360 is the only real downside I can see. Upgrading the Durango Unit with the Xbox Mini at a later time of your choosing seems like it would be easier on your wallet.


If you only want the TV services, then the Xbox Mini unit is what you want. The VGleaks article said that MS is trying to keep the price of the Xbox Mini unit at $150 or less. AppleTV is 100 bucks and requires Always Online. So at it's maximum price of 150, you get TV services that also plays 360 games. As the article stated, you would have to download the games/movies/music, or if you already have them previously purchased, just redownload them. If you decide that you want to play next-gen games, then you can save your money and purchase a Durango unit to go with your Xbox Mini when you have the money. At this point you'll have the full package.


If you have no interest in either Durango or the Xbox Mini, then purchase a PS4 and be happy with what you got.

In any scenario, the choice of whatever features you want seems to be saving your wallet a little bit
 
I guess it depends on just what this TV functionality will entail, maybe it'll be a really excellent value $150 accessory that renders you old 360 pretty pointless.


My guess is similar functions to the Apple TV if it's going to compete directly with it. At this point, I see it dead in the water on both ends. Those who have a streaming solution will continue to use it (Apple TV, Roku, current console) and gamers will continue to use their old system till it dies.


They'd have to add something that isn't offered to consumers to drop money on the device.
 
Aren't you just paying extra for something you already have? A 360?

People do that all the time. PS3 slim and Xbox slim were bought be a ton of people that already had the systems.

No mandatory online is great, but stackable unit to play 360 games? The fuck?

Keep your current 360 then. It is not mandatory to buy the Xbox mini. It is for people that don't have a 360 or just want to play both the 720 and 360 games through the 720.
 
Do VGLeaks articles always contain so many typos/grammatical errors? These mistakes make the writer sound Chinese to me. Could this rumor be from someone in Shenzhen (Foxconn)?
 
I'm probably late to the game but after looking through the responses, there seem to be a lot of people who don't understand what this means for current XBOX 360 users and the new Durango console.

Here's how I see it.

There are 2 units. The XBOX Mini and the Durango Console.

The XBOX Mini unit:
  • No physical Disc Drive
  • XBOX 360 Functionality
  • Provides competitive AppleTV service
  • required Always Online connection to download games and stream media
  • 100-150 price range
  • Interface with Durango to provide BC WITH the Durango Unit

The DURANGO unit:
  • Next Gen gaming console
  • Always Online, but not required for local play(like the current 360)
  • Also provides competitive AppleTV service
  • NO built-in Backwards Compatibility, must interface with Xbox Mini for BC
  • Competitive price point compared to PS4

If you don't have a 360, then you don't really care about Backwards Compatibility. You can save money by not NEEDING the Mini unit and can just buy the Durango Unit. You will still get the TV service, next-gen games, etc. If you were really interested in playing the backlog of XBOX 360 games, then you could always upgrade by purchasing the Mini unit.


If you already have a 360, then you've already got a machine that plays your collection of current Xbox games. You don't need the mini unit immediately. If you want next gen games, then all you need is the Durango Unit. Durango will provide TV services that the Mini does, so unless you want everything in a neat package, you don't need the mini. Unfortunately, the difference in hardware won't allow Durango to interface with the current 360 models, so switching between Durango and 360 is the only real downside I can see. Upgrading the Durango Unit with the Xbox Mini at a later time of your choosing seems like it would be easier on your wallet.


If you only want the TV services, then the Xbox Mini unit is what you want. The VGleaks article said that MS is trying to keep the price of the Xbox Mini unit at $150 or less. AppleTV is 100 bucks and requires Always Online. So at it's maximum price of 150, you get TV services that also plays 360 games. As the article stated, you would have to download the games/movies/music, or if you already have them previously purchased, just redownload them. If you decide that you want to play next-gen games, then you can save your money and purchase a Durango unit to go with your Xbox Mini when you have the money. At this point you'll have the full package.


If you have no interest in either Durango or the Xbox Mini, then purchase a PS4 and be happy with what you got.

In any scenario, the choice of whatever features you want seems to be saving your wallet a little bit

This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.

Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.

Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?
 
This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.

Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.

Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?

Well presumably they won't call Durango the Xbox 360 U.
 
Seems like a good deal if you don't already have an Xbox. An inexpensive box to run 360 games and new apps and services. Should prolong the life of Xbox 360.

It would be nice if there were some IQ enhancements for old games.
 
This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.

Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.

Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?

I think the problem with Wii U was that Nintendo did not know how to market the device correctly.

Smart marketing is key here. Look at the success of Kinect, for example.
 
Will lol when they require XBL Gold to stream netflix on the stream/360 box.

That's why you get a PS4 or WiiU.. well mostly PS4 (as it is with PS3). But hey, when you're in MS's camp, you can't have everything. At least, the lack of continual internet connectivity is a major win for consumer camp. It makes me wonder whether it was the mounting pressure of negativity that caused them to back track or was it always the plan...
 
Well presumably they won't call Durango the Xbox 360 U.

I highly, highly doubt they lose the "Xbox" name for this one, though.

Reiko said:
I think the problem with Wii U was that Nintendo did not know how to market the device correctly.

Smart marketing is key here. Look at the success of Kinect, for example.

While I agree that marketing is key, I'm not following your comparison here. Kinect didn't have "Xbox 360" in its name, nor did it look anything like an Xbox 360. It was quite clear it was something different.
 
This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.

Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.

Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?

How would they confuse something with likely 2 distinct names?

The pricing gap will be huge, too.

Also... Food for thought: who said the mini will come with a controller?
 
That's why you get a PS4 or WiiU.. well mostly PS4 (as it is with PS3). But hey, when you're in MS's camp, you can't have everything. At least, the lack of continual internet connectivity is a major win for consumer camp. It makes me wonder whether it was the mounting pressure of negativity that caused them to back track or was it always the plan...

Probably always the plan.

If I remember correctly, a Chinese MS dev called us on GAF and Kotaku idiots for not understanding the rumor correctly and Adam Orth's comments.

I highly, highly doubt they lose the "Xbox" name for this one, though.



While I agree that marketing is key, I'm not following your comparison here. Kinect didn't have "Xbox 360" in its name, nor did it look anything like an Xbox 360. It was quite clear it was something different.

Well the plan was for MS to debut 2 new Xboxes, presumably at E3. So whatever it is, it's been planned for a long while.
 
How would they confuse something with likely 2 distinct names?

The pricing gap will be huge, too.

Because I don't see them losing the "Xbox" name for the add-on. Also, the pricing gap on Wii U/Wii was huge.

I don't think anybody can screw it up as bad as Nintendo did with Wii U marketing. That is/was legendary market confusion. I still think MS is going to have issues, though, if what is being reported is true.
 
People do that all the time. PS3 slim and Xbox slim were bought be a ton of people that already had the systems.


Those cases are different. You need a Durango to play any disc-based games. It seems like these games would be served up like movies or TV on the Apple TV. Those who will primarily buy the mini are those who currently do not have a media streaming solution.
 
Because I don't see them losing the "Xbox" name for the add-on. Also, the pricing gap on Wii U/Wii was huge.

I don't think anybody can screw it up as bad as Nintendo did with Wii U marketing. That is/was legendary market confusion. I still think MS is going to have issues, though, if what is being reported is true.

Since you didn't see my edit

Who said the mini will come with a controller :p
 
This is the dumbest idea ever. Buying a console that piggybacks off another console to give me BC from my last console doesn't sound like the best way to go about this.

As opposed to switching TV/Receiver inputs all the time? Granted, I'd prefer "free", but I'll take this over keeping my old 360 around.
 
Top Bottom