Rumour is that it costs $150...
For that price, its as bad IMO.
Cheaper to get an actual 360.
It's gonna be $99 because Apple TV.
Rumour is that it costs $150...
For that price, its as bad IMO.
Cheaper to get an actual 360.
What's the point of this thing if there is no optical drive as the article claims? As someone who already owns a 360 with dozens of games, why would I want a bc add-on that won't actually let me play my own games
What's the point of this thing if there is no optical drive as the article claims? As someone who already owns a 360 with dozens of games, why would I want a bc add-on that won't actually let me play my own games
.
Yeah, but it makes no sense to make it a requirement. What exactly would they need to verify by an always-online requirement? People have been able to play pirated 360 games for years.I wouldn't rule it out because we know pretty much nothing about what the XBOX Mini hardware actually is.
Who's to say that this '3 minute disconnection' rumour for single player games wasn't a reference to Durango software, but was actually talking about 360 discs running on the Durango, and the 3 minute thing was referring to how long it would run without an active connection to the XBOX Mini? We don't know anything.
Convenience? Only one HDMI used? Only Durango controllers in your living room?Because it's stupid. Why would you trade in your 360 that you can use offline? Too lazy to push the power button the 360 and use that instead?
MS probably won't be marketing it as a 360, it'll be marketed as a TV box, and it'll be relatively cheap - that's the reason people will be buying it.
Please be true about the offline and used games!
Buy a Durango, trade your 360 for a mini. Done.
The out-of-pocket on the trade will probably cost about what re-buying one to three PS3 games for Gakai will cost.
To be fair, anything is possible after Windows 8.While this is also a rumour - and we'll wait for confirmation when Durango is finally unveiled. I still cannot believe anyone bought into the Xbox = always online, no offline gaming - bullshit.
It reveals either a clear bias from the individual or a distinct lack of critical thinking.
It's better than nothing for sure. I can see this appealing to people who never picked a 360 and want to access a few games. But I can't imagine why would any 360 owner have their whole library rendered to drm just because they don't want to use an extra plug.
I get that. I'm talking about BC for old games and XBLA stuff. It seems like a bad idea for anyone looking for BC in the Durango. It's just plain smarter to use the 360 instead of buying a $150 accessory.
Buy a Durango, trade your 360 for a mini. Done.
How can it "always be online" but able to play content offline?
That's not "always online".
No mandatory online is great, but stackable unit to play 360 games? The fuck?
If it works like I think it'll work, then it'll probably save you an HDMI out on the back of your TV as well as a power outlet.
Xbox mini hardly seems like a bullet point in MS's favor. You still need an extra system for BC. The real news here is that Durango doesn't require always online which seemed like an insane move from the start.
How can it "always be online" but able to play content offline?
That's not "always online".
Perhaps the source is SuperDAE? He's been saying Durango won't need always online forever and has supplied both Kotaku and VGLeaks with info.
Clearly the term has been confused with 'always connected'.
I wouldn't be surprised if both are designed to look like one device if connected and there is a dedicated port to connect them, and when the combined devices will run 360 games it could be using less power than 360S.If it works like I think it'll work, then it'll probably save you an HDMI out on the back of your TV as well as a power outlet.
I get that. I'm talking about BC for old games and XBLA stuff. It seems like a bad idea for anyone looking for BC in the Durango. It's just plain smarter to use the 360 instead of buying a $150 accessory.
I guess it depends on just what this TV functionality will entail, maybe it'll be a really excellent value $150 accessory that renders you old 360 pretty pointless.
Aren't you just paying extra for something you already have? A 360?
No mandatory online is great, but stackable unit to play 360 games? The fuck?
I'm probably late to the game but after looking through the responses, there seem to be a lot of people who don't understand what this means for current XBOX 360 users and the new Durango console.
Here's how I see it.
There are 2 units. The XBOX Mini and the Durango Console.
The XBOX Mini unit:
- No physical Disc Drive
- XBOX 360 Functionality
- Provides competitive AppleTV service
- required Always Online connection to download games and stream media
- 100-150 price range
- Interface with Durango to provide BC WITH the Durango Unit
The DURANGO unit:
- Next Gen gaming console
- Always Online, but not required for local play(like the current 360)
- Also provides competitive AppleTV service
- NO built-in Backwards Compatibility, must interface with Xbox Mini for BC
- Competitive price point compared to PS4
If you don't have a 360, then you don't really care about Backwards Compatibility. You can save money by not NEEDING the Mini unit and can just buy the Durango Unit. You will still get the TV service, next-gen games, etc. If you were really interested in playing the backlog of XBOX 360 games, then you could always upgrade by purchasing the Mini unit.
If you already have a 360, then you've already got a machine that plays your collection of current Xbox games. You don't need the mini unit immediately. If you want next gen games, then all you need is the Durango Unit. Durango will provide TV services that the Mini does, so unless you want everything in a neat package, you don't need the mini. Unfortunately, the difference in hardware won't allow Durango to interface with the current 360 models, so switching between Durango and 360 is the only real downside I can see. Upgrading the Durango Unit with the Xbox Mini at a later time of your choosing seems like it would be easier on your wallet.
If you only want the TV services, then the Xbox Mini unit is what you want. The VGleaks article said that MS is trying to keep the price of the Xbox Mini unit at $150 or less. AppleTV is 100 bucks and requires Always Online. So at it's maximum price of 150, you get TV services that also plays 360 games. As the article stated, you would have to download the games/movies/music, or if you already have them previously purchased, just redownload them. If you decide that you want to play next-gen games, then you can save your money and purchase a Durango unit to go with your Xbox Mini when you have the money. At this point you'll have the full package.
If you have no interest in either Durango or the Xbox Mini, then purchase a PS4 and be happy with what you got.
In any scenario, the choice of whatever features you want seems to be saving your wallet a little bit
This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.
Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.
Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?
This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.
Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.
Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?
Will lol when they require XBL Gold to stream netflix on the stream/360 box.
I thought the Gakai PS3 games were free if you had the PS3 disc in the drive. No?
Well presumably they won't call Durango the Xbox 360 U.
Reiko said:I think the problem with Wii U was that Nintendo did not know how to market the device correctly.
Smart marketing is key here. Look at the success of Kinect, for example.
This post is EXACTLY why I see this being a disaster for Microsoft.
Remember the incredible market confusion for Wii U? GAFers who work in retail constantly reported about many, many people who had no idea that the Wii U was a new system.
Does anybody else foresee the same thing for the new, smaller, disc drive-less 360? Won't people not in the know confuse it with Durango?
That's why you get a PS4 or WiiU.. well mostly PS4 (as it is with PS3). But hey, when you're in MS's camp, you can't have everything. At least, the lack of continual internet connectivity is a major win for consumer camp. It makes me wonder whether it was the mounting pressure of negativity that caused them to back track or was it always the plan...
I highly, highly doubt they lose the "Xbox" name for this one, though.
While I agree that marketing is key, I'm not following your comparison here. Kinect didn't have "Xbox 360" in its name, nor did it look anything like an Xbox 360. It was quite clear it was something different.
It would be nice if there were some IQ enhancements for old games.
How would they confuse something with likely 2 distinct names?
The pricing gap will be huge, too.
People do that all the time. PS3 slim and Xbox slim were bought be a ton of people that already had the systems.
Because I don't see them losing the "Xbox" name for the add-on. Also, the pricing gap on Wii U/Wii was huge.
I don't think anybody can screw it up as bad as Nintendo did with Wii U marketing. That is/was legendary market confusion. I still think MS is going to have issues, though, if what is being reported is true.
This is the dumbest idea ever. Buying a console that piggybacks off another console to give me BC from my last console doesn't sound like the best way to go about this.