5 Dead in Illinois shooting (inc. 2 children)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Case in point that guns are a large portion of the problem, at least when it comes to fatalities:

http://wgntv.com/2013/04/09/texas-college-stabbing-14-injured-2-in-critical-condition/

dude only has a knife. Goes on a stabbing spree. Stabs 14 people. Nobody dies.

If he had guns most of them would have died. Taking guns away reduces the lethality potential. If we arent going to control for mental problems (which we really don't in this country), we should at least reduce the amount of damage they can do.

Got a knife? I can run from you if I'm faster. Got a gun? Shoot me in the back, dead.
Two idiot kids make pressure cooker bombs and hold a city in terror for almost a week.

Didnt need a gun to kill and mame people.

Also if a person stabbed in the right places he could kill alot of people with a knife and its silent so the person could get away and resume his act in anotherarea
 
Two idiot kids make pressure cooker bombs and hold a city in terror for almost a week.

Didnt need a gun to kill and mame people.

Also if a person stabbed in the right places he could kill alot of people with a knife and its silent so the person could get away and resume his act in anotherarea

We're lucky the Boston guys only used homemade bombs rather than guns or the death toll would likely have been much higher than three.
 
Our country enjoys posting news stories about shootings all day everyday, you guys act like people don't get shot around the world.

Guns + humans = Chaos
 
Two idiot kids make pressure cooker bombs and hold a city in terror for almost a week.

Didnt need a gun to kill and mame people.

Also if a person stabbed in the right places he could kill alot of people with a knife and its silent so the person could get away and resume his act in anotherarea

Ahahaha that is so bloody good, that is seriously a classic GAF sentence.
 
Guise the US military has been brainwashed by fluoride in the water supply and is taking over the country. It's alright though, I have my AR-15.

I got dis.
 
We're lucky the Boston guys only used homemade bombs rather than guns or the death toll would likely have been much higher than three.
We are lucky they didnt know how to build bombs. If they built real ones they could have killed alit more people

With the police at the event as soon as shots were fired the cops would have shkt back putting an end to the problem there and then
 
Wait, people are using the Boston bombers as examples of how guns aren't the only way to cause mass death? The Boston bombers who were armed with guns as well as bombs?

That's really the last card in the pack, isn't it?
 
I don't listen to Alex Jones. How would history have changed if the Jews fought back against Nazi Germany? Look at what happened when we fought back against the British.

What makes you think they didn't? Private gun ownership was not banned under Hitler, and in fact the Third Reich reinstated legal private rifle and shotgun ownership, which had been illegal for years in Germany following World War I.

So you might want to stop including Hitler/Nazis when you parrot talking points from your chosen "news" source.
 
We are lucky they didnt know how to build bombs. If they built real ones they could have killed alit more people

Indeed. It's almost as if it's easier for Joe Nutjob to kill people with a gun than it is for him to build an effective homemade bomb. Will wonders never cease!
 
Why don't you ban pistols? I could see a person in Montana with a shotgun for hunting or for protect himself, but in a big city who needs a firearm?
 
Easy answer to all this...BAN GUNS

They are in chicago
http://danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/houston-chicago-guns-weather.jpg

This has been happening for hundreds of years..just because we have the internet and people go searching these kind of stories is why you see it so much, doesnt mean its happening more often

Why don't you ban pistols? I could see a person in Montana with a shotgun for hunting or for protect himself, but in a big city who needs a firearm?

you cant have them in a lot of the major cities
 
Why don't you ban pistols? I could see a person in Montana with a shotgun for hunting or for protect himself, but in a big city who needs a firearm?
Well banning pistols isn't gonna stop a criminal from obtaining one. Basically the only people this would effect is law abiding citizens.
 
Why don't you ban pistols? I could see a person in Montana with a shotgun for hunting or for protect himself, but in a big city who needs a firearm?

It would be unconstitutional for one. You don't see a need for a person in a big city to protect himself, but you do for someone in Montana?
 
This has been happening for hundreds of years..just because we have the internet and people go searching these kind of stories is why you see it so much, doesnt mean its happening more often.

The 5 people that died today were probably jerks anyway. WOOP-DI-DOO!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom