EA Sports Engineer: Wii U is crap, < powerful than 360. No $ 3party. [Tweets Deleted]

If ms released a console like the wii u as their follow up to 360, ballmer effigies would be burning. did you see how people started turning on that company when those rumours were floating around? No, some nintendo fans are really hardcore fans come hell or high water. please notice the word 'some' in the above sentence.

I don't know, I'm pretty diehard towards Nintendo, and I don't have a single positive thing to say about the Wii U, nor do I intend on buying one anytime soon.
You are talking about diehards? EVERY group has diehards. Using diehards to brand an entire group makes no sense, though.
 
I might as well ruin it because people are actually falling for it in droves, but going by his post history, I'm pretty sure that miksar is just trolling. That, or he's a rather self-loathing Nintendo fan, like that movie where Ryan Gosling is a Jewish Neo-Nazi.
 
Yes, I am sure a Sony fan or a Microsoft fan would have responded any differently to such a comment, amirite?
If my position was that I only cared about 1st party support, I wouldn't give a damn what 3rd parties said. Not too mention that 3rd party support has been awful since the n64 so there should be some level of desensitization present with Nintendo fans.
 
You're telling me not to be dense, then you throw something far-fetched out there like it's a conspiracy. You truly are a hypocrite.

Don't worry, your truth is just as good as my truth, and just as good as his truth.

The fuck?

What is far-fetched about what I'm saying?

EA is routinely criticized for its anti-consumer practices, from always online to Project $10 DLC plans.

I'm not talking about a conspiracy, I'm talking about their corporate subculture and how it's arguably worse than the supposedly "tyrannical" Nintendo.

You're reaching if you're trying to call me a hypocrite. Do you even know what you're arguing about anymore?
 
I know exactly what tyranny means. Nintendo has a long history of bullying third parties by implying that game design is more important than graphics. And the way they present themselves to their audience doesn't help the industry. Instead of growing some balls, trying to man up and speak the truth like the EA employee they resort to constant apologies and polite answers that somehow are considered to be "professional". What are they, a bunch of babies? Judging by their recent gaming output, seems so.

tumblr_mm3xmbnE821r5xzspo1_500.gif
 
Can Fifa save the entire company. It sells well not that well. Ea's in a tough patch ahead there's no doubt about that. Same with activision due to likely low next gen intial growth but they're profitable enough to weather it.

Fifa 13 sold more than 12 million copies. It's a huge blow for the Wii U for not having at least a Fifa game. EA made their decision, it's unfortunate, but what can you do?
 
I'd absolutely agree with this if they still weren't making games for Vita. Plus, their support back at launch was tepid at best and there were rumors before launch that something had happened and games were being cancelled.

The head of Crytek alluded to issues when talking about the (functional) Wii U port that EA suddenly decided to nix.
 
But that certainly didn't save them. What makes you think it will save them now. If for example battlefield fails and loses market share they're even more screwed. They're no Activision.

It's a high risk strategy, as it is literally putting all your eggs in one basket.

Even if EA did put "all their eggs in one basket", and they chose that basket to be FIFA, they'd be absolutely fine.

FIFA isn't going to stop selling anytime soon and it absolutely isn't going to experience the same sort of collapse as Guitar Hero or what some still believe is going to happen to COD (and we're still waiting for this mythical event to happen). FIFA has always sold huge, huge numbers. Even during the PS2 era when it was fucking crap and a grossly inferior game to Pro Evolution Soccer, it outsold PES every year.

I don't think there's a safer bet or a more guaranteed seller in the industry right now than FIFA.
 
If my position was that I only cared about 1st party support, I wouldn't give a damn what 3rd parties said. Not too mention that 3rd party support has been awful since the n64 so there should be some level of desensitization for Nintendo fans.

Maybe people only care for first party games because there is no third party software to write home about on a Nintendo system? Food for thought. Did the egg come first or the chicken?
 
That guy was right.



That Criterion shipped Most Wanted doesn't prove anything false. Their game just didn't stress the aspects of the design that are deficient in WiiU when compared to 360/PS3. Except in multiplayer where the WiiU version supports fewer players at once.
And what R these deficiencies you speak about?
 
If ms released a console like the wii u as their follow up to 360, ballmer effigies would be burning. did you see how people started turning on that company when those rumours were floating around? No, some nintendo fans are really hardcore fans come hell or high water. please notice the word 'some' in the above sentence.

Many aren't handling the near certainty that the Durango is less powerful than the PS4 very well, but nothing there approaches the level of delusion we saw in the WUST where specs revealed by Iwata himself were called into question as improbable.
 
His whole point dosn't make sense.

Madden has been selling since the 16bit era
Same as FIFA.

Why will they stop selling now?

And we seen Activision milking dry Guitar Hero and creating another very successful IP with Skylanders. He's merely making an assumption that EA won't make another succesful IP ever.

No, his point dosn't offers any real argument.
Nintendo should do a Sega and bring their sports sims in-house. It didn't take long for Sega's 2K sports series to outdo EA Sports with better review scores across the board.

They could bring back the NBA Courtside series. Let NST do that. Then get Retro studios working on an NFL game. If I remember correctly EA's NFL exclusivity agreement doesn't cover 1st party games.
 
I'd absolutely agree with this if they still weren't making games for Vita. Plus, their support back at launch was tepid at best and there were rumors before launch that something had happened and games were being cancelled.

Well as I mentioned Sony actually reached out to 3rd parties. Who knows what back alley dicks they are sucking to get games on Vita, whereas Nintendo seems too proud to suck a little dick.
 
Nintendo should do a Sega and bring their sports sims in-house. It didn't take long for Sega's 2K sports series to outdo EA Sports with better review scores across the board.

They could bring back the NBA Courtside series. Let NST do that. Then get Retro studios working on an NFL game. If I remember correctly EA's NFL exclusivity agreement doesn't cover 1st party games.

Nintendo first party sports games?

Mario Soccer, Mario Football, Mario Tennis, Mario Golf, Mario Basketball, Mario Baseball, Mario Cricket all incoming :/
 
Fifa 13 sold more than 12 million copies. It's a huge blow for the Wii U for not having at least a Fifa game. EA made their decision, it's unfortunate, but what can you do?

That has nothing to do with this argument I'm talking about if fifa can save ea not about the wii u's loss of course it's a potential loss. But Ea has been unprofitable for a long ass time and is putting it's eggs in one basket. This could easily blow up in their face.
 
I think they'd still be trying another console, probably with a twist like the Wii (since they were already thinking in that direction during the GC era, and even if the Wii had done Cube numbers it'd still have probably turned a profit). The DS was still a massive hit, after all.

It's hard to say how things would be different it history had gone in the complete opposite direction.

You don't think that Nintendo, coming off of two consoles that were relative flops, compared to the competition of the time anyway, would be in a very bad place financially if the Wii had met the same fate? People in 2005 were talking about how Nintendo would transition to 3rd party just like Sega.
 
Dude, there's a lot of overreactions on both "sides" of this thing.

Both sides are at fault, I will admit. That being said, I feel it is a moot point. These overreactions should not be occurring. Period. The emotional investment by all involved parties is neither healthy nor productive. Consoles simply aren't as financially solvent as they once were, and zealots should probably brace themselves for the inevitable impact.
 
Nintendo should do a Sega and bring their sports sims in-house. It didn't take long for Sega's 2K sports series to outdo EA Sports with better review scores across the board.

They could bring back the NBA Courtside series. Let NST do that. Then get Retro studios working on an NFL game. If I remember correctly EA's NFL exclusivity agreement doesn't cover 1st party games.
NHL 2K3 is still better hockey game than any of EA's offerings.
 
Yes, this tweet definitely proves that the rift between Nintendo and EA is solely the result of the sober analysis of the sales of a late Mass Effect port. Nothing else to see here. Move along.
 
Completely unprofessional but videogames industry is devoid of any type of decorum so I don't expect anything less. What he said might be true but it's unnecessary. He seems to come off really bitter towards Nintendo. He's like an adult that never got out of that high school petty hate teenager mentality.
 
Activision has like four IPs in constant rotation, that and licensed games. Activision also has diversity in what audiences it caters to, unlike EA. Activison can actually support the Wii U with an appropriate title, because they have something in their portfolio that will appeal to the Wii U audience. EA guns for literally the same audience with every game it makes.

Nintendo is unsustainable? High profit margins on hardware, high profit margins on accessories, software royalties, and insane sales for internal software? How is that unsustainable? The only problem right now is the Wii U making a loss, which 3DS is more than absorbing, and for which they have cash reserves of $15 billion.

Are we talking about the same company of games like The Sims and Sim City?. Are you forgetting Popcap games? and their whole mobile games?

What you are saying is not acording with the actual market. 3DS won't get the same numbers as DS and mobile gaming is becoming a real problem. Wii U is losing money like 3DS had to lose money too for months. You're talking about other times. Is not the same situation anymore as years ago. Yeah, they had a lot of money in the bank, dosn't mean that with the changes of the market is sustainable anymore.

I mean their whole model remains in the sole idea of:"Will this console sell enough?". Once it dosn't sell their whole model shakes.
 
You don't think that Nintendo, coming off of two consoles that were relative flops, compared to the competition of the time anyway, would be in a very bad place financially if the Wii had met the same fate? People in 2005 were talking about how Nintendo would transition to 3rd party just like Sega.

They wouldn't be in a great position, but they wouldn't be anywhere near Sega levels. What people on the Internet were saying in 2005 hardly matters anyway. Fighting games and 2D platformers were a dead genre, PC gaming was dying out, the PS3 was going to rock the Xbox 180 with real next-gen graphics, and Nintendo's toy wand would doom them.
 
Nintendo should do a Sega and bring their sports sims in-house. It didn't take long for Sega's 2K sports series to outdo EA Sports with better review scores across the board.

They could bring back the NBA Courtside series. Let NST do that. Then get Retro studios working on an NFL game. If I remember correctly EA's NFL exclusivity agreement doesn't cover 1st party games.
NBA Courtside, Nintendo Pennant Chase Baseball, Football, True Swing Golf, Soccer.

NST, Next Level would both be decent fits. Who else though?
 
I'd absolutely agree with this if they still weren't making games for Vita. Plus, their support back at launch was tepid at best and there were rumors before launch that something had happened and games were being cancelled.

Yup but all these expert says its only about WiiU current sales, lets ignore canceled games before launch
 
Maybe people only care for first party games because there is no third party software to write home about on a Nintendo system? Food for thought. Did the egg come first or the chicken?

It doesnt matter how the fans arrived at the stage - if they only care about first party games, comments like EAs shouldn't matter.
 
That's all the point I was trying to make, they COULD do it. Let me simply ask you this. Do you see the WiiU succeeding at the rate it's going? Do you think the money Nintendo has pocketed now will last if they don't get this system going?

But no one claimed that the Wii U will succeed going as is. No one. Not a single Nintendo fan, fanboy, or even casual gamer would claim that. Hell Nintendo wouldn't. Where are you even getting the faint idea that ANYONE at all thinks Nintendo can continue the way things are right now and be happy about the results?

But yes the money Nintendo has pocketed and is continuing to pocket from the handheld market ALLOWS them to fail with the WiiU and try again the next cycle. Sega did not have this luxury so they were at their end, desperate, and had to go 3rd party. That isn't Nintendo's only or last option. And while no one thinks (myself included), that Nintendo will magically regain the top spot this cycle, they can improve the current state of the WiiU starting this fall by simply releasing the games they haven't yet.

Also maybe I am alone but why is GAF being blamed for a witch hunt. No one forced him to write what he wrote. I don't care that he feels that way, he has every right to as many here do to but as a professional in the industry he also has to know there might be consequences for putting it out publicly. Maybe EA doesn't care and hell I don't want this guy fired. But at most people here are pointing out HE MIGHT get fired. Not that he should or that we should organize an actual witch hunt. If he gets fired it will be because he put his comments in a very poor form on twitter, which then got picked up by media outlets, and EA cared enough to let him go.
 
If ms released a console like the wii u as their follow up to 360, ballmer effigies would be burning. did you see how people started turning on that company when those rumours were floating around? No, some nintendo fans are really hardcore fans come hell or high water. please notice the word 'some' in the above sentence.


Well, that's not a fair comparison though. Microsoft is KNOWN as being company that continually pushes the technological barrier in their products, so it would be expected that if they release a hardware product that it's going to have some degree of power to it.


Nintendo is NOT a company that is known for pushing the tech envelope, so it should really have been no surprise that they decided to release a competent, but not incredibly powerful console so that they could focus on the Gamepad instead.
 
Top Bottom