Next Xbox Reveal Set For May 21, 10:00 A.M. PST, Livestreamed

Status
Not open for further replies.
what

It never looked like a good deal. You ended up paying more in the long run.

Well, of course you do. Do you think subsidized models exist just to be kind to the customer ? It's a loan, it helps you buy things earlier, but in the end you have to pay interests. That's standard business.

Everyone was skeptical about Kinect too.

True. But I was a strong kinect believer from the beginning. ;)
I think both are very different. Kinect brings something new to the consumer, a different experience from regular games (and you cannot play those genres without a kinect).
Illumiroom brings something better to the consumer, you're playing the same games, but with an added "wow" factor (and you could still play those games without illumiroom, for a more conventional experience).

That's why the reception among hardcore gamers is in favor of illumiroom : they usually don't want new experiences, but improvement on existing ones. On the other hand, regular consumers will more easily spend money for something new, while they'll start counting their beans when asked to pay for something better (if they have something that is functional, they'd rather keep it that way instead of spending more, since it's "good enough").
 
That's a fair reason to be doubtful, but all I want to say is that Mr. Thurrott is pretty spot-on when it comes to his info. Product plans and strategies change, so there's a possibility that he was technically right both times he said it.

Very true.

Tomorrow just needs to get here already.
 
what

It never looked like a good deal. You ended up paying more in the long run.

You ended up paying $40 more after 2 years for buying a $500 console for $300.

For some people it's more convenient to pay it off in $15 monthly increments, even it it ultimately costs a bit more. Even if they have it, many can't justify spending half a grand on a console at once. But they can easily justify a lump $300 payment and 15 dollars per month.

Either way, I'm hoping this means that have some sort of $400 SKU.
 
what

It never looked like a good deal. You ended up paying more in the long run.

It wasn't that bad. With what people were saying you ended up paying an extra $40. 40 bucks interest over 2 years on what's essentially a 'loan' is nothing. Plus it could leave you with extra money to get more games right away.
 
New avatar, I need a new tag please.

HFC5nWm.jpg


Very true.

Tomorrow just needs to get here already.

Hell yeah!
 
Hmmm, opens them up a bit to criticism assuming a standard illumiroom you might buy for your home wouldn't be what they would use as it couldn't handle such a big venue. They could simulate the idea nicely, but it would leave questions.

Yeah literally thought of that. MS are always keen to replicate the house feel of demos and a giant black tent doesn't represent most homes.
Although it would look bloody awesome!

Didn't they say the projector was lower resolution as the effects are only for ambient play alongside your setup, I did like the halo snow effect on the original tech demo.
 
Hope this happens to one of the presenters if they dont up the specs.

-so i had to do presentation for class
-awkward as ****
-start working out
-not so awkward
-zyzz is my inspiration
-presentation again
-trembling
-just keep telling myself "i'm fawkin zeez bruh"
-get confident
-my turn
-i get up there
-start shaking uncontrollably
-start telling myself "i'm fawkin zeez bruh"
-teacher says I can start anytime
-I start off with "i'm fawkin zeez bruh"
-at this point I'm so nervous I blackout
-"i'm fawkin zeez bruh"
-repeat at least 4 more times
-look around the room, people are saying "why does he keep saying that?"
-girls start laughing
-I pass out
-hit head on the corner of teacher's desk
-minor concussion
-teacher thinks I was on drugs
-classmates call me zeezbrah
-nickname eventually turns into zebra
-i haven't heard my real name in months
-haven't been this depressed in high school
 
True. But I was a strong kinect believer from the beginning. ;)
I think both are very different. Kinect brings something new to the consumer, a different experience from regular games (and you cannot play those genres without a kinect).
Illumiroom brings something better to the consumer, you're playing the same games, but with an added "wow" factor (and you could still play those games without illumiroom, for a more conventional experience).

That's why the reception among hardcore gamers is in favor of illumiroom : they usually don't want new experiences, but improvement on existing ones. On the other hand, regular consumers will more easily spend money for something new, while they'll start counting their beans when asked to pay for something better (if they have something that is functional, they'd rather keep it that way instead of spending more, since it's "good enough").
Core gamers favor Illumiroom? It seems like an awful gimmick -- at least one with no longevity.
 
Didn't they say the projector was lower resolution as the effects are only for ambient play alongside your setup, I did like the halo snow effect on the original tech demo.

I think the strength lies in ambient effects. Anything trying to extend out your field of view with actual information won't work as well at that resolution. It could also attempt to pull ambient effects out of any game, not just those with it defined.
 
Core gamers favor Illumiroom? It seems like an awful gimmick -- at least one with no longevity.

Well, the general reactions on NeoGaf seem to be on the positive side (see messages above), while those for kinect are... well just look at all MS topics of the past three years. :P
 
Works for cell phones.


With operators making the slimmest of margins.

My phone costs £600 to buy - I pay £720 over 2 years for a handset , unlimited texts , Internet and 15hrs of calls.....

So it's not really a similar model.


Core gamers favor Illumiroom? It seems like an awful gimmick -- at least one with no longevity.


Typical reaction , people have seen something , are ignoring the logic that says it can't possibly work as described and then built it up in their minds as being something it's not.

Queue tears when/if it ever comes out and it's crap for 95% of the population just like kinect.
 
Others (me included) seem to disagree with you completely.
You're telling me five years from now you are going to be disappointed if Halo 7 doesn't have Illumiroom support? Or that you won't play unless your Illumiroom is turned on? Or that gameplay experiences are made significantly worse without it there? It just screams gimmick. It'll go from "Hey, dude. That's pretty cool" to "Turn that fucking thing off" a few hours later.
 
Illumiroom is a cool idea to add effects to play. Imagine racing on PGR5, it's raining and you can see the rain dropping. Suddenly there's a large strobe as a loud flash of lightning lights up your room.
Hell I'm convincing myself about it even more now.
 
its still in development do you really think its going to look and work like that when its finished ?
but clearly you know something we dont so please enlighten us

Wait a minute, I just told you how it looked in a TV demonstration today, and now you're the one telling me it won't look like that when it's released.

It seems more like you know something I don't.
 
Core gamers favor Illumiroom? It seems like an awful gimmick -- at least one with no longevity.

I'm not a core gamer but Illumiroom just doesn't appeal much to me at all. For one, my setup isn't in any way conducive to that. Two, I just want games on the screen.

Maybe it might be big, IDK. It looked kind of cool.
 
You're telling me five years from now you are going to be disappointed if Halo 7 doesn't have Illumiroom support? Or that you won't play unless your Illumiroom is turned on? Or that gameplay experiences are made significantly worse without it there? It just screams gimmick. It'll go from "Hey, dude. That's pretty cool" to "Turn that fucking thing off" a few hours later.

Pretty much the same can be said about the Rift. Either a game supports it or not.
Either way, they are very different concepts and I always wonder why the Rift comes up as comparison to this.
 
You're telling me five years from now you are going to be disappointed if Halo 7 doesn't have Illumiroom support? Or that you won't play unless your Illumiroom is turned on? Or that gameplay experiences are made significantly worse without it there? It just screams gimmick. It'll go from "Hey, dude. That's pretty cool" to "Turn that fucking thing off" a few hours later.

I can't see the future, but I think you're completely off base.

The demo video with the prototype had me completely interested from the beginning, so if it's better than that I could see myself wanting it in every game going on forward. It's going to add a ton to atmosphere alone.
 
For some reason the thing I'm most excited about is how they'd incorporate Illumniroom into Fallout 4. Even more immersion for a Fallout or Elder Scrolls game is going to be awesome.
 
Well, the general reactions on NeoGaf seem to be on the positive side (see messages above), while those for kinect are... well just look at all MS topics of the past three years. :P

In comparison with Kinect, yes definitely, reactions to Illumiroom are more positive. But in terms of serious consideration into buying such a thing, I'd reckon it's on the same level due to the impracticality/additional cost of the system.

No doubt in my mind though, if core gamers had the choice, between including illumiroom functionality as a standard or kinect functionality as a standard with the 720, they'd no doubt choose illumiroom functionality in an overwhelming majority.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom