The Last of Us - Review Thread [Emargo up, scores in OP.]

Status
Not open for further replies.
9 more reviews brought it down to 95

GfTRw7z.png
hype plummeting
 
It took our reviewer more than 21 hours to complete the game on hard difficulty. He took his time, but it's still very impressive.

Sooo good. Shame they don't make most games this sort of length any more. If they did I get the feeling less people would feel antsy about dropping $60 on them.
 
Worst games I've played . Not worst in general.

I really have nothing good to say about Bioshock. It was just walking around a world, waiting for enemies to spawn and then killing them while some kawaii girl with big eyes threw ammo at you and looked weak and defenseless when you spoke to her. Nothing about it was fun, but it's the ultimate example of what video game reviews want games to be; something they can praise for it's "art" and graphics rather than focusing on what actually makes a game fun to play.

While there was nothing special about the gameplay in Infinite (I was expecting soo much more), I still had a genuinely fun time playing it.
 
7? Point 5?! Are you serious? Did you not see the Naughty Dog logo on the box? Do I need to remind you what these guys have made? Uncharted? Crash Bandicoot? JAK & FREAKIN' DAXTER? *takes deep breath* And you have the audacity to give what many are calling the Citizen Kane of video games a mere 7.5?! For no other reason than going against the grain and to increase your indie cred by giving a game with a budget of over $300 a below average score. For shame, Polygon. These guys were also funded by Micro$oft if you didn't know so if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck...

To my fellow IT managers: Add Polygon to your company's blacklist. They do not deserve the clicks. To those not in IT: block it on your home network or speak with whoever is in charge of your IT department and tell them that Polygon is Malware. >:)

I love this post (assuming it is sarcastic and not serious).
 
People really are obsessed with numbers for some reason. Whether it be experience points in games, performance stats in sports, percentages achieved in exams or some 'aggregate review score' for games and movies people just love to talk about them. Which is fine I think as long as people remember what that number means and represents but I think we're past that point with metacritic scores. Or may be people are aware and are just too invested into certain companies' and developers' reputations.
 
There's going to be a fair bit of pressure on Naughty Dog and Uncharted 4 now, for all sorts of reasons.

Why do some people just assume Naughty Dog will make Uncharted 4?

Naughty Dog has never made a sequel after moving to another platform. I hope they make something else amazing and new. Sony can give Uncharted4 to one of their younger studios.
 
The perfect scores so far:
Hahahaha
IGN 10/10
Eurogamer 10/10
Eurogamer IT/Sp 10/10
Edge 10/10
CVG 10/10
Destructoid 10/10
Gamereactor 10/10
VideoGamer 10/10
thesixaxis 10/10
ibtimes 10/10
PS-Lifestyle 10/10
Digital Spy 10/10
Machinima 10/10
Digital Fix 10/10
Post Arcade 10/10
speciogames 10/10
Gamingbolt 10/10
Godisageek 10/10
OPM 10/10
Pushsquare 10/10
PS-Nation 10/10
Giantbomb 5/5
Techdigest 5/5
Gamesradar 5/5
TheMirror 5/5
Guardian 5/5
Telegraph 5/5
Gameblog 5/5
CheatCodeCentral 5/5
Adam Sessler 5/5
Thats damn impressive.

I read through some of the reviews of the lower scored ones and if what they actually SAY in the review is true to any degree, their reviews seem perfectly justified to me. This doesn't mean that everybody will feel the same way about these things, but their opinion is their opinion.

As with anything, it means there's a small chance you wont think this quite as 'omg amazing' as most people do, but it also does mean that there's a very good chance you will be one of those 'omg amazing' people. And thats a good thing.

I can definitely say that its one of the very few titles that I'm genuinely upset I cant play. This and Demon Souls may convince my to buy a cheap, used PS3 at some point way down the line.
 
Phil Kollar is hardly a MS shill, dismissing his review because of some MS funded documentary in 2012 is hilarious.

I will grant you that, and can see what you are saying. But the real underlying issue with Polygon is that they have rated a game considered to be a masterpiece by most sites a point higher than a game like Fuse (6.5). Their credibility has gone out the window.
 
I am still not sure if I am going to get the game (not sure if its my cup of tea really) But it crazy how great the reviews have been.

I find the one polygon review extremely suspect considering their previous history with MS. Im not saying that he review isn't justified but I am saying that every time I see something from them that deviates that far from the norm it gives me another reason to ignore them.
 
More importantly, why are "emotional responses" the metric by which we judge great games, a medium that is almost entirely defined in its greatness by cerebral depth and/or pitch perfect twitch action? Can you imagine if the same benchmarks were applied to say, music? "Oh this album sounded absolutely sublime, but the lyrics didn't get me emotionally invested in the subject." Gaming is fundamentally about something more than narrative and we should quit looking to narrative for some sort of desperate validation of our hobby.

2s2ShKD.gif
 
I really hope they do a new IP for next gen. I know Uncharted sells well but man, I want something new.

You've just gotten something new!

I want one more Uncharted game from ND, next gen, and then they can do whatever the hell they want. But I just want one more.
 
Has any review gone in depth about the AI and how it compares to the E3 demos?

The A.I. is above standard, but it is not groundbreaking in any way. Enemies don't have set patrols but they do have a pattern. They react to noise, will communicate, give orders and will be aware if one of the team mates aren't responding.

But I was never able to replicate the holding up a person with a gun and making him back away. I guess they opted to make the enemies aggressive instead.
 
Laws being broken? What the fuck?



The Review Score Standardization Act of 1932

Stockley's Vaudeville v. Ye Olde Re-views

Judge Learned Hand ruled in favor of plaintiffs after they sued defendants for reviewing their vaudeville show 7 and a half-stone, while all the other reviews gave it the full 10 stones.

It's right on point.
 
I think that bashing to that extent is a bit much, but I did feel pretty similarly about Bioshock. Despite everything, it just wasn't very fun to play and I found it a chore to play more than anything. In the end, we need to realize that tastes are personal, and not every game can appeal to everyone's tastes. Reviews are entirely subjective, and that's okay.

Reviews are subjective, but what doesn't seem to be subjective is the fact that certain games are incapable of not getting near universal praise. That's the issue for me. If The Last Of Us got a lot more 9s than 5s, but actually had some 5s, I'd be more likely to take the higher reviews seriously. When everything is so homogenized, both in the tone of reviews and the aspects being praised, it's very, very difficult to take reviews seriously.

I don't know if The Last Of Us is a good game, but I know that it's exactly the kind of game you'd expect to get universally high scores. That's kind of disheartening to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom