basically, yeah. That he could be available to Skype.
She was a good witness for the prosecution, I wonder if the use of a translator made it more difficult for the defense to go after her more.
the only witness & statements the jury will remember are the ones given by Rachel lol she did more for Zimmerman than anyone they'll put on the stand
Uh huh, I'm sure the jury will just disregard everything other people witnessed because Jeantel came across as a moron...
they won't remember every single thing said today lol which is why they need the notepads but one thing is for SURE they will remember her dumb ass
Eh, I'm talking about a sleazy lawyer acting sleazy. Hate to say this but people don't really like lawyers. Having sat on a jury a few times, the way a lawyer acts in court really does affect the jury, for better or worse.
Regarding the witnesses, I believe Zimmerman made the statement to police that after shooting Martin he ended up pushing him off of him and getting on top to restrain him. Did the witnesses see the change of positions or did the person on top remain there during the altercation?
https://twitter.com/jenna_lauer has been deleted
https://twitter.com/jenna_lauer has been deleted
If you really think he did that to be a creeper, or that it seriously came off that way anywhere other than a videogame forum filled with horny 20-something dudes, most of whom were joking around, I think you're a bit delusional
So what happens if the prosecution has witnesses that say that Zimmerman was on top?
Do they get to retell their story without Zimmerman declaring? Still get to claim Zimmerman acted in self defense?
they won't remember every single thing said today lol which is why they need the notepads but one thing is for SURE they will remember her dumb ass
I've heard someone say GZ's jacket has grass stains on the back. Is this accurate?
So what happens if the prosecution has witnesses that say that Zimmerman was on top?
Do they get to retell their story without Zimmerman declaring? Still get to claim Zimmerman acted in self defense?
You seem to be a huge fan of hisGZ defense attorneys are top notch though.. i can't imagine the cost but a good trial attorney here in NYC begins at $50,000
GZ defense attorneys are top notch though.. i can't imagine the cost but a good trial attorney here in NYC begins at $50,000
GZ defense attorneys are top notch though.. i can't imagine the cost but a good trial attorney here in NYC begins at $50,000
I don't know how you can say that when every witness contradicts his version with only one of them looking bad depending on how you that person came off to you.Curious to see what the other members of law-gaf/lawyer-gaf think, but based on what I've seen and read so far, it's looking good for Zimmerman. Also, he should not be put on the stand at all, come hell or highwater.
Curious to see what the other members of law-gaf/lawyer-gaf think, but based on what I've seen and read so far, it's looking good for Zimmerman. Also, he should not be put on the stand at all, come hell or highwater.
I don't know how you can say that when every witness contradicts his version with only one of them looking bad depending on how you that person came off to you.
Good trial attorneys bill by the hour, not a flat rate. Please stop talking about things you know nothing about.
So far it's after.are these witnesses claiming to see who is on top, before or after the shot?
Yeah but i thought he was saying he wouldnt have to testify and my comment was based on that. i kinda feel like that if all these people are saying it went down one way, he kinda has to put himself out there no?There are 911 calls that support Zimmerman's case, with statements like "The guy on top was wearing white", which would be Martin (who was wearing white). Don't be surprised if those are the ones the defense show.
https://twitter.com/jenna_lauer has been deleted
There are 911 calls that support Zimmerman's case, with statements like "The guy on top was wearing white", which would be Martin (who was wearing white). Don't be surprised if those are the ones the defense show.
How is it looking good?
Yeah but i thought he was saying he wouldnt have to testify and my comment was based on that. i kinda feel like that if all these people are saying it went down one way, he kinda has to put himself out there no?
The prosecution has to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Not only is eyewitness testimony in general unreliable, they don't all match up to each other, plus the star witness has been impeached to shreds. Basically, all we can glean from the combination of the witness testimonies is: there was a fight. We are unclear on who started it, why it started, who assaulted/battered who first, etc.
If he gets put on the stand, the prosecution could cross-examine him to death. The defense shouldn't let him take the stand.
The prosecution has to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Not only is eyewitness testimony in general unreliable, they don't all match up to each other, plus the star witness has been impeached to shreds. Basically, all we can glean from the combination of the witness testimonies is: there was a fight. We are unclear on who started it, why it started, who assaulted/battered who first, etc.
If he gets put on the stand, the prosecution could cross-examine him to death. The defense shouldn't let him take the stand.
Impeached to shreds? Doesn't impeached mean, accused of unlawful activity? Or is there another meaning I am not aware of? English isn't my first language so I don't know all the intricacies.
Impeached to shreds? Doesn't impeached mean, accused of unlawful activity? Or is there another meaning I am not aware of? English isn't my first language so I don't know all the intricacies.
The prosecution has to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Not only is eyewitness testimony in general unreliable, they don't all match up to each other, plus the star witness has been impeached to shreds. Basically, all we can glean from the combination of the witness testimonies is: there was a fight. We are unclear on who started it, why it started, who assaulted/battered who first, etc.
If he gets put on the stand, the prosecution could cross-examine him to death. The defense shouldn't let him take the stand.
In this context it just means her credibility was undermined, which it was, but people who don't know much about how these things go are making far too big a deal out of it. The prosecution knew she would be asked about it, which is why they asked about it on direct.
Quite a few. I don't think they've brought in any of the medical examiners or the defense witnesses yet. My guess is at least a week or so more.How many witnesses are left to take the stand outside of the hiking guy?
Why not? Is it because he will prove himself guilty? Doesn't seem the defense is going so well then.
but it was
Haven't been following the trial since it started and read about/saw the knock knock "joke". Where is the trial leaning?
That seems crazy to me. Anyone can kill and just say 'self defense' prove it was not! If there are no witnesses, you are scott free. :/