Nintendo of America not allowing SSBM to be streamed at EVO [Up: Decision Reversed]

Lumination

'enry 'ollins
They charge a fee to be able to use the chat feature on Twitch. Other than that it's free, but there's also the poverty chat which is just using another channel to talk about stuff.
I believe the chat profits all go towards an annual college scholarship.
 

Wallach

Member
This is EXACTLY why I think they're doing this. I've been watching Evo directly for the past three years, and every year, I hear or see at least 10 embarassing things that make me shake my head.

While this isn't a popular decision, I can understand why it's being done. The FGC isn't family friendly, and Nintendo doesn't want one of their babies associated with it. Why so much venom?

Because it amounts to Nintendo saying they wish they had a different fanbase for Smash than the one they actually have. Of course those people are going to react to being treated that way.
 

MrDaravon

Member
I'm pretty sure they get permission from the other companies whose games are there, just Nintendo's the first to actually deny them.

Also every single other game there is being published by someone who is directly sponsoring the event (except Namco Bandai, but I'm pretty sure Namco does sponsor a lot of FGC events in general).
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
This is EXACTLY why I think they're doing this. I've been watching Evo directly for the past three years, and every year, I hear or see at least 10 embarassing things that make me shake my head.

While this isn't a popular decision, I can understand why it's being done. The FGC isn't family friendly, and Nintendo doesn't want one of their babies associated with it. Why so much venom?

All commentators really try their hardest to keep it as clean as possible. Even with this in mind, the risk-reward scale is heavily skewed towards the reward side if they were to go the Karticles route of doing things. The image they're maintaining now is that of the backwards old-timey geezer who think he always knows best, besides the world around him having adopted objectively better practices.
 

Haunted

Member
I think I've already seen more "Fuck You Nintendo" #freemelee twitter posts than there are Miiverse posts in general. :lol


It's extremely dangerous for a tech company to be so much behind the times like this, coming across like a boring dinosaur compared to the sleek, smart and attractive competition. Their image among western media is at an all-time low already. Things like this will only reinforce every negative notion people have about Nintendo.

Incredible that they allowed something like this to happen. Just incredible.
 
This is EXACTLY why I think they're doing this. I've been watching Evo directly for the past three years, and every year, I hear or see at least 10 embarassing things that make me shake my head.

If there are really that many, then you can name at least one off the top of your head from last year's broadcast right?
 

MrDaravon

Member
From 2008? I'm pretty sure this is deliberate, dude.

Nah, they've been replaying past evo stuff for a few days now, and they do this every year right before evo where they re-run streams and footage from previous years. They were showing some 2005 (?) stuff or older a couple of days ago.
 
Well you are supporting for desicions like this to continue on.

What can i tell you, is just how things are and what's stopping progress in the company for decades.

If there was a way to reject decisions like this without shitting on developers who have nothing to do with this I would. But the fact is that developers are rarely responsible for any issue you have with a company; the executives are. That's why I don't support game boycotts in cases like this: why punish the people doing their jobs because someone else is fucking up?
 

Zemm

Member
The players raise 90k for charity to get their game at EVo and have their players in the spotlight for 1 weekend and Nintendo shits on it.


C'mon Nintendo.

Wow, did not know this. Makes this even more incredible really. Why shit on your biggest fans? Unbelievable.
 
I expect Sod's Law to happen to Nintendo soon enough. They'll end up finally fixing a lot of their medieval ways only for people to just hand wave it away and completely dismiss their achievement.

For me, personally, this is the deep rooted problem...

Yoshihiro Mori, 68
Masaharu Matsumoto, 71
Eiichi Suzuki, 63
Shigeru Miyamoto, 61
Genyo Takeda, 64
Nobuo Nagai, 68
Kaoru Takemura, 67
Tatsumi Kimishima, 63
Shinji Hatano, 71

...a talented band of merry old men with their medieval "We must reinvent the wheel" ways.


I wonder how many TVs these people own.
 
Because it amounts to Nintendo saying they wish they had a different fanbase for Smash than the one they actually have. Of course those people are going to react to being treated that way.

I disagree. The entire Smash fanbase isn't that way. This isn't even addressing my question.

I'm speculating that Nintendo doesn't want the Smash brand to be associated with the possible (likely) shenanigans of Evolution, which isn't an unreasonable position to take. The vast majority of people who play this game aren't playing it in a setting like this.

Further, if they were doing what you're suggesting, they'd cancel the entire tournament all together, wouldn't they? They just don't want it streamed.
 

GuardianE

Santa May Claus
Nah, they've been replaying past evo stuff for a few days now, and they do this every year right before evo where they re-run streams and footage from previous years. They were showing some 2005 (?) stuff or older a couple of days ago.

Oh, alright. I can't believe that this is a coincidence, though.
 

Jintor

Member
I have never heard of UltraDavid doing pro bono work, though that's not to say he doesn't. As I'm not well-informed in law myself, I can't answer your first point.

Edit: And I wish people would stop bashing Nintendo fans. I am a Nintendo fan. I am very unhappy about this decision. Proof of me being a Nintendo fan? I own a Wii U!

Ultradavid went off on a bit of rant about copyright stifling innovation on the tweeters and is now presumably getting drunk in a bar somewhere, not unreasonably.
 

GetemMa

Member
Because it amounts to Nintendo saying they wish they had a different fanbase for Smash than the one they actually have. Of course those people are going to react to being treated that way.

This, so much this. Thank you.

This is Nintendo's treatment of its base over the past 5 years. They are so desperate to court the casuals that they will piss off the people who support them on day 1 at launch. What is sad is that they have failed to realize that those casuals have by and large moved on and what they have left is a base that feels more and more alienated. Operation Rainfall? Yeah great guys. Kudos for getting the games you wanted, but you shouldn't have had to do that. Big N has no faith in us and I am starting to lose faith in them.
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
If I had to guess, the reason Evo got shut down is because they actually asked, and APEX and all the others don't.

Really big chance of this being the case. I'm Belgian, and we have basically one big convention a year where friends of mine host tournaments. They're nowhere the scale of the larger FGC scene, but Smash Bros always gets the biggest turnout. People with highly varying ages compete and everyone generally has a good time. If my friends were to ask Nintendo they'd probably get the same treatment, which is bullshit. They're helping to nurture the love people have for this brand and instead of just letting them go about their ways they are now destroying those heartfelt efforts.

Edit: Wait, to be exact. Apart from this there have been large Smash Bros tournaments over here, which also draw a lot of Dutch players. Like I said, it's very rare for this sort of thing to exist here, but for Smash there definitely was a scene although I could never make it out to one of those events. I think they had 100+ people turnouts.
 

notworksafe

Member
This is EXACTLY why I think they're doing this. I've been watching Evo directly for the past three years, and every year, I hear or see at least 10 embarassing things that make me shake my head.

While this isn't a popular decision, I can understand why it's being done. The FGC isn't family friendly, and Nintendo doesn't want one of their babies associated with it. Why so much venom?

They didn't let MLG stream it either, and they are the epitome of professionalism when it comes to this kind of thing.
 

Sixfortyfive

He who pursues two rabbits gets two rabbits.
I'm speculating that Nintendo doesn't want the Smash brand to be associated with the possible (likely) shenanigans of Evolution, which isn't an unreasonable position to take.
That is entirely an unreasonable position to take. EVO is about as sanitized as you can get.
 

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
I disagree. The entire Smash fanbase isn't that way. This isn't even addressing my question.

I'm speculating that Nintendo doesn't want the Smash brand to be associated with the possible (likely) shenanigans of Evolution, which isn't an unreasonable position to take. The vast majority of people who play this game aren't playing it in a setting like this.

Further, if they were doing what you're suggesting, they'd cancel the entire tournament all together, wouldn't they? They just don't want it streamed.

MLG? Maybe, just maybe, Nintendo is actually the bad guy here.
 

jello44

Chie is the worst waifu
I disagree. The entire Smash fanbase isn't that way. This isn't even addressing my question.

I'm speculating that Nintendo doesn't want the Smash brand to be associated with the possible (likely) shenanigans of Evolution, which isn't an unreasonable position to take. The vast majority of people who play this game aren't playing it in a setting like this.

Further, if they were doing what you're suggesting, they'd cancel the entire tournament all together, wouldn't they? They just don't want it streamed.

The vast majority of people that could be offended by the shenanigans don't know nor care what EVO is.
 

kick51

Banned
This is EXACTLY why I think they're doing this. I've been watching Evo directly for the past three years, and every year, I hear or see at least 10 embarassing things that make me shake my head.

While this isn't a popular decision, I can understand why it's being done. The FGC isn't family friendly, and Nintendo doesn't want one of their babies associated with it. Why so much venom?


babies, indeed.
 

~Devil Trigger~

In favor of setting Muslim women on fire
Seriously?????

Not that like watching this game, hell im glad there'll be more KOF13 but...not like this

this fuckin company is so backwards.
 
They didn't let MLG stream it either, and they are the epitome of professionalism when it comes to this kind of thing.

This is a fair point, and one I was unware of until you brought it up. That does make the whole situation much more questionable.

Hopefully they put out a statement. I'm really curious as to why they'd do this, if not for the reason I speculated.
 
Ya, this company keeps making the same type of mistakes over and over and over....
If there was a way to reject decisions like this without shitting on developers who have nothing to do with this I would. But the fact is that developers are rarely responsible for any issue you have with a company; the executives are. That's why I don't support game boycotts in cases like this: why punish the people doing their jobs because someone else is fucking up?
Some sacrifices are needed for progress to be made. Is not like talented individual like Sakurai won't:

-Find place in any other company.
-Have the chance to make another proyect within the same company even, if sales for the next Smash game don't meet the goals. Is not a cash cow that one renounces so easily.

The only tru4 saying you have is with your money, yet that consumer responsability is really hard to fullfil for most company followers. But let's leave this subject aside because believe me, most of the time some individuals don't really like to hear this.
 

PKrockin

Member
So, it's confirmed that NoA put a stop to this? All I get from the OP is that it's missing from the schedule (link won't load for me)
 

Tathanen

Get Inside Her!
So what happens when I say that in Mario Kart 8 in an online race? Everyone has a microphone because of the gamepad.

I bet you there won't be voice chat. But if there is, it'll be limited to friend matches. Nintendo gonna Nintendo.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Nintendo doesn't give a crap about EVO and the hardcoerez.

As far as they are concerned, the Wii's expanded audience is still their target and what they are chasing.

The sooner you people understand Nintendo is the Wii Fit company, the better. They believe tournaments, unified account systems, extensive social network integration, etc... they are just the follies of the "gamers" - a market they are not interested on anymore as a primary target.

Whenever you think Nintendo, think your mom, your grandpa, your 4 year old niece - because that is what they think about.

This would explain a lot about Nintendo of America, specifically. NoE and NCL don't seem to have the same problem.
 
god dammit fuck you nintendo

Nintendo doesn't give a crap about EVO and the hardcoerez.

As far as they are concerned, the Wii's expanded audience is still their target and what they are chasing.

The sooner you people understand Nintendo is the Wii Fit company, the better. They believe tournaments, unified account systems, extensive social network integration, etc... they are just the follies of the "gamers" - a market they are not interested on anymore as a primary target.

Whenever you think Nintendo, think your mom, your grandpa, your 4 year old niece - because that is what they think about.
Gamers are "geeks and otaku" who need to get bigger fridges.
 

Wallach

Member
I disagree. The entire Smash fanbase isn't that way. This isn't even addressing my question.

I'm speculating that Nintendo doesn't want the Smash brand to be associated with the possible (likely) shenanigans of Evolution, which isn't an unreasonable position to take. The vast majority of people who play this game aren't playing it in a setting like this.

Further, if they were doing what you're suggesting, they'd cancel the entire tournament all together, wouldn't they? They just don't want it streamed.

Isn't what way? Those are the most dedicated, passionate fans they have. They're saying that they don't want to be associated with them to the extent that they're using legal force to prevent them from streaming what they came together to raise $100,000 to pull off.
 
Nintendo doesn't give a crap about EVO and the hardcoerez.

As far as they are concerned, the Wii's expanded audience is still their target and what they are chasing.

The sooner you people understand Nintendo is the Wii Fit company, the better. They believe tournaments, unified account systems, extensive social network integration, etc... they are just the follies of the "gamers" - a market they are not interested on anymore as a primary target.

Whenever you think Nintendo, think your mom, your grandpa, your 4 year old niece - because that is what they think about.
How do you explain Bayonetta, then?

Nintendo might be out of touch, and might make a lot of dumb decisions, but I do not think your characterization is accurate.
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
That is entirely an unreasonable position to take. EVO is about as sanitized as you can get.

It really is. I've been watching the main stream in almost its entirety for the past three years and I can't think of any out of line behavior. As soon as one of the commentators starts veering in dangerous territory the other one either calls him out on it or steers the conversation back instantly.
 
Top Bottom