Riots In Downtown Miami After George Zimmerman Not Guilty Verdict
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
He was killed in self defense and you all want to crucify the man that was defending himself. So yes, more sickening than him being killed.
What is up with these juniors out the fucking WOODWORK?
I wish I had something intelligent to say about this.
There are times where I question my lack of awareness, meaningful understanding or empathy for the real struggles that people go in their lives. I wonder whether I may have some weird prejudice towards people that I unconsciously act out in my everyday life. The idea that I could be racist even a little bit horrifies me.
Then I realize that people actively embrace ignorance and never actually question the origins of their beliefs. Some often thrive off the idea that people of a certain race, sexuality or different religion are inferior and undeserving of compassion.
Pretending to have no remorse because you fear what would happen if you actually let yourself feel it is one thing. Actually having no true remorse about the fact that the path God took you on led to the death of an innocent is psychotic.
Fuck everyone that doesn't feel like shit because Travon Martin is dead and the man who killed him is content and has now has the legal justification to back up his smugness.
So you are advocating killing the only other witness to the altercation. Your defense is basically " A dead guy can't tell his story. Guess he should have stayed alive."Defend himself from what? A man following him without provoking any kind of physical altercation? I'll tell you right now that if they were able to show proof that GZ initiated a PHYSICAL altercation, he should have been found guilty of murder 2. They couldn't so he didn't.
Right, so ignoring the legal side of things, we're going back to this "coward" argument. Essentially, if i'm attacked, i'm not allowed to kill unless my own life is in danger. But it is up to me to determine as such. I'm not sure how that can be broached.
sorry i have not followed case but how does some one can be not guilty of killing some one when he did it. Young kid was killed by this person.
Riots In Downtown Miami After George Zimmerman Not Guilty Verdict
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
And they...what? Decide to post here on E3, then only come up to act as secret conservative boogeymen?E3 was a month ago. Then they found the OT.
I never said he wasn't guilty of being an idiot. But there was no evidence that he initiated any sort of physical altercation.
No, you are the one who said that anyone who agrees with the verdict must also necessarily believe the killing of Trayvon was justified. I didn't say that.
In other words, it means you think it's reasonable to suggest that George Zimmerman shouldn't be held responsible for shooting and killing Trayvon Martin.
That's what reasonable doubt means!
I was shocked, but was more convinced it was self defense. The more I pieced the entire trial together the more I thought to myself that a gun has no other means than to fire and potentially kill. I support someone defending themselves, so if that gun went off because he was trying to defend himself. His intentions were for himself and his own superior.
Where that comes off as murder I can't comment. We defend ourselves, just like in the wild. If you throw this in the legal system and try and make them understand how certain environments change a persons behavior. I honestly don't think you can do it. It seems like our legal system won't allow a particular mindset into a trial. Being guilty or not.
If. If. IF. As in we don't know. But many seem to just assume Trayvon is the aggressor. Why?
I asked this in the other thread and I've never received an answer: Why does Zimmerman get the benefit of the doubt but Trayvon Martin doesn't? What about Trayvon makes people assume he is the aggressor. Who noticed who as not belonging? Who followed who? Who profiled who?
Defend himself from what? A man following him without provoking any kind of physical altercation? I'll tell you right now that if they were able to show proof that GZ initiated a PHYSICAL altercation, he should have been found guilty of murder 2. They couldn't so he didn't.
IT'S HAPPENING
I don't know the answers to these questions, but I highly doubt the frequency of junior posters coming out for a thread like this is a coincidence.Alts of who? For what reasons? One-off accounts to just go "na na na boo boo"?
My favorite headline of all time
![]()
Looks like a massive demonstration, not a riot. Major difference. Wake me if people start breaking shit and pummeling people due to their ethnicity.Riots In Downtown Miami After George Zimmerman Not Guilty Verdict
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
Marches. Not riots.
I don't get this logic. If you're engaged into a fistfight with someone it's okay to shoot them if they start beating your ass?
Riots In Downtown Miami After George Zimmerman Not Guilty Verdict
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
I feel bad that Trayvon Martin is dead. That is the worst thing to come out of this. I don't care how Zimmerman feels. He's the one who has to live with himself over this. I hope it haunts him.
But then you felt no remorse that someone lost their life that night."IF IF IF" is why he got off. Reasonable doubt.
I don't assume Trayvon was the aggressor, I just know they were completely incapable of making me and the jury think Zimmerman was.
If. If. IF. As in we don't know. But many seem to just assume Trayvon is the aggressor. Why?
If he attacked Zimmerman as he was walking away then his actions were offensive, not defensive.
I never said he wasn't guilty of being an idiot. But there was no evidence that he initiated any sort of physical altercation.
Do people usually set cars or stuff on fire in "marches"? Just asking because I can see something big on fire in the distance.
Was Trayvon not supposed to feel threatened by a strange heavy set man stalking/following him?
y'all hate juniors
Defend himself from what? A man following him without provoking any kind of physical altercation? I'll tell you right now that if they were able to show proof that GZ initiated a PHYSICAL altercation, he should have been found guilty of murder 2. They couldn't so he didn't.
I don't know why I read the comments.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7...ch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Apparently this is downtown Miami, even though it doesn't look like anywhere I've been in miami. Take with salt.
Riots In Downtown Miami After George Zimmerman Not Guilty Verdict
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
Defend himself from what? A man following him without provoking any kind of physical altercation? I'll tell you right now that if they were able to show proof that GZ initiated a PHYSICAL altercation, he should have been found guilty of murder 2. They couldn't so he didn't.
Marches. Not riots.
"IF IF IF" is why he got off. Reasonable doubt.
I don't assume Trayvon was the aggressor, I just know they were completely incapable of making me and the jury think Zimmerman was.
I never said physical. Zimmerman stalked and engaged (approached and had his firearm ready) Martin while he was in the gated community.
I'd certainly feel threatened, and worried for my life, if someone did that to me.
Who pays attention to such idiocy in the first place?I hate posts that say the outrage at Zimmerman's acquittal is somehow worse than the slaying of Trayvon Martin.
He was under attack when he shot, which the jury found to be a reasonable course of action.
"IF IF IF" is why he got off. Reasonable doubt.
I don't assume Trayvon was the aggressor, I just know they were completely incapable of making me and the jury think Zimmerman was.
Murder 2, sure.
Manslaughter? No. There was enough for that.
Riots In Downtown Miami After George Zimmerman Not Guilty Verdict
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBtSN7-zoj0
IT'S HAPPENING
They did have proof. Rachel's testimony.
But you know, she couldn't read cursive...