To be fair the police are allowed to stop anyone with reasonable doubt that crime is "afoot"lol
If only it weren't Zimmerman and instead an actual police officer. Trayvon would probably still be alive.
To be fair the police are allowed to stop anyone with reasonable doubt that crime is "afoot"lol
Well it was dark, and GZ, from the stuff I've read up, claimed Trayvon was looking around, and in the circumstances were that there were break ins reported recently, so it kind of just of became a recipe for disaster from their.
I don't know, I feel like it was just alot of bad circumstances, and some bad decisions, but I understand with the outcome of him being not guilty.
Also to check just because the dispatcher said "we dont need you to follow", doesnt make it illegal for him to follow, right?
Well it was dark, and GZ, from the stuff I've read up, claimed Trayvon was looking around, and in the circumstances were that there were break ins reported recently, so it kind of just of became a recipe for disaster from their.
I don't know, I feel like it was just alot of bad circumstances, and some bad decisions, but I understand with the outcome of him being not guilty.
Also to check just because the dispatcher said "we dont need you to follow", doesnt make it illegal for him to follow, right?
"oh you know a fucking idiot thought something shady was going and like it was dark and there were breakins so it's totally understandable to follow a kid around just oh you know and then kill him yeah it was just a recipe for disaster and it was just bad decisions so yeah it's ok"
Oh fuck off. Because that's what this verdict means??
Does nobody understand the concept of innocent before proven guilty? And does nobody understand why that's such an important concept of law and order? Oh, but don't mind us, there's a witchhunt to be had. Armchair lawyers all up in here. Like anybody here knows exactly what happened.
Fantastic post.
Exactly, revenge and justice are two different things
It's a shame they didn't know you were out here with the truth, they could have just skipped the whole "jury" thing.
Oh dear me, my language hurt your feelings? Don't even start. If you think telling someone to fuck off is "worse" than a blindingly racially-charged generalization devoid of any sort of proof, then you are a child.
I'm not creating a strawman. That has literally been my argument the entire time. I'm an individualist. I think that the spread of individualism is the only cure for racism. Racial pride only creates further division. And yeah, there was no hyperbole in your post.
"oh you know a fucking idiot thought something shady was going and like it was dark and there were breakins so it's totally understandable to follow a kid around just oh you know and then kill him yeah it was just a recipe for disaster and it was just bad decisions so yeah it's ok"
Fantastic post.
Its funny because you believe that these groups formed for reasons other than getting kicked around by society's norms in the first place
Oh dear me, my language hurt your feelings? Don't even start. If you think telling someone to fuck off is "worse" than a blindingly racially-charged generalization devoid of any sort of proof, then you are a child.
I dont think anyone is saying its okay with a smile. I at least UNDERSTAND why Zim followed him whether I agree with him or not. I think hes a total asshole wannabe cop who was a tough guy for having a gun strapped to his hip but I am not going to pretend he followed him for no reason. He thought TM was someone he wasn't, he made a HUGE mistake and in the end didn't pay for it because of lack of evidence.
lmao.
yeah you did. You're trying to change what you've said a little with each post but you kinda did lol.Look dude, I never fsaid that.
You do?We've already been over the fact that your assuming too much. I can't argue with you if you are going to keep putting words into my mouth. I understand why pride movements form.
This is the shit I'm talking about.I don't agree with their tactics and I think that they can become a replacement for actual self-esteem. Can I prove either thing? No.
I'm not assuming your position. You're simply not aware of what your position actually means.Can we have a civil discussion in which we discuss our different philosophies without assuming the others position? Hopefully. I'm about to go to bed so I may or may not get back to you or anyone else but feel free to respond.
You're assuming that I'm ignoring "such things". I believe that the spread of individualism is the only way to get rid of race issues. You may not agree with my perspective, but don't tell me that I ignore the issues because I don't. Don't say that I ignore history because I don't. Frankly it's because of history that I think that pride is the wrong way to gain equal acceptance. I think that forcing people into groups is disgusting and having pride in one's race or something like diversity cannot fix the issues it can only make them more tolerable. You assume so much about me based on short forum posts that it's unreal. Respond to what I have written, not the false representation of me that you have in your mind.
If only it weren't Zimmerman and instead an actual police officer. Trayvon would probably still be alive.
Let's make it as simple as possible: 'individualism' isn't something afforded by blacks in modern society. To say it is, is to discount today and the history that built it; to lack perspective. It's that simple.
I wish it wasn't.
Thanks for the argument. It was intellectually stimulating. I really wish that everyone could come up with challenging arguments such as this.
Because TM wouldn't have attacked an actual police officer? I can buy that,
Why?
I really think that you have no more perspective, but saying that I lack perspective makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
honestly, do you think this garbage is helpful? you literally just got done staying this was a smart place, and you post needlessly hostile nonsense like this, adding nothing.
Because TM wouldn't have attacked an actual police officer? I can buy that,
A Florida woman who fired warning shots against her allegedly abusive husband has been sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Marissa Alexander of Jacksonville had said the state's "Stand Your Ground" law should apply to her because she was defending herself against her allegedly abusive husband when she fired warning shots inside her home in August 2010. She told police it was to escape a brutal beating by her husband, against whom she had already taken out a protective order.
[...]
Alexander's case has drawn support from domestic abuse advocates - and comparison to the case of neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman, who has claimed a "Stand Your Ground" defense in his fatal shooting of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin.
Thanks for the argument. It was intellectually stimulating. I really wish that everyone could come up with challenging arguments such as this.
Because TM wouldn't have attacked an actual police officer? I can buy that,
Look dude, I never fsaid that. We've already been over the fact that your assuming too much. I can't argue with you if you are going to keep putting words into my mouth. I understand why pride movements form. I don't agree with their tactics and I think that they can become a replacement for actual self-esteem. Can I prove either thing? No. Can we have a civil discussion in which we discuss our different philosophies without assuming the others position? Hopefully. I'm about to go to bed so I may or may not get back to you or anyone else but feel free to respond.
I don't know if this came up yet, but George Takei posted this article today.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57433184/fla-mom-gets-20-years-for-firing-warning-shots/
It's not needless. Too many people think their gut feelings are paramount to the findings of a jury after a thorough criminal investigation/trial. Sorry if I offended you, but vulgar language and sarcasm absolutely have their place in civilized discussion, especially in the context of an open forum such as this. I think that my point was pretty clear, and that's all that really matters.
As a black British citizen am I allowed to say fuck America yet? because seriously fuck America the most backwards regressed 1st world country on this planet we call home, seriously fuck America im disguised right now and I dont even live there.
It's not needless. Too many people think their gut feelings are paramount to the findings of a jury after a thorough criminal investigation/trial. Sorry if I offended you, but vulgar language and sarcasm absolutely have their place in civilized discussion, especially in the context of an open forum such as this. I think that my point was pretty clear, and that's all that really matters.
Saw this coming a mile away but my family didn't believe me. There wasn't enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was not acting in self defense. Justice system worked in that regard. He's still a piece of shit though. I won't say that if the races were reversed, the trial would be different because there's no solid evidence to back that up.
In unrelated news, as a black 22 year old, I'm never going to go live in Florida, fuck that.
lmao.
The guest on CNN was spot on. The Jury didnt find that Zimmerman was innocent. They found out he wasnt guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the fact that there were no credible witnesses or testimonies. People need to accept that
please noMods should restrict him to only post in the Community forums.
Is George Zimmerman a murderer? I don't know. I'm not sure what happened that night. But I do know that there wasn't enough evidence to determine that George Zimmerman did not act in self-defense, and therefore the jury reached the correct verdict. Before you lock a man up, you have to be able to clearly demonstrate that he committed a crime, and the prosecution had a weak case.
If Zimmerman did murder Trayvon Martin, that is now between him and God. The court got it right.
please no
Because TM wouldn't have attacked an actual police officer? I can buy that,
I wonder if Zimmerman would have been brave enough to confront TM without a gun strapped to his hip. I also wonder if when TM was on top of him beating the living daylights out of him, he thought to himself, hmm I better shoot this guy before he sees my gun and shoots me. I'm not really sure how I feel about normal citizens being able to carry a gun out freely like they are in the wild west. Sorry these are just thoughts going through my head right now.
in other words, it's over, nothing more to see here?
Why?
I really think that you have no more perspective, but saying that I lack perspective makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
Fashion is a very individualistic field, he'd be perfect in the Men's Fashion thread.