• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Verdict reached in George Zimmerman case - Not Guilty

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well it was dark, and GZ, from the stuff I've read up, claimed Trayvon was looking around, and in the circumstances were that there were break ins reported recently, so it kind of just of became a recipe for disaster from their.

I don't know, I feel like it was just alot of bad circumstances, and some bad decisions, but I understand with the outcome of him being not guilty.

Also to check just because the dispatcher said "we dont need you to follow", doesnt make it illegal for him to follow, right?

It's not illegal if you don't kill someone in the process due to incompetence but one should be liable for their actions in some way after the fact.
 
Well it was dark, and GZ, from the stuff I've read up, claimed Trayvon was looking around, and in the circumstances were that there were break ins reported recently, so it kind of just of became a recipe for disaster from their.

I don't know, I feel like it was just alot of bad circumstances, and some bad decisions, but I understand with the outcome of him being not guilty.

Also to check just because the dispatcher said "we dont need you to follow", doesnt make it illegal for him to follow, right?

Just come out and say Zimmerman fucked up by following and ignoring dispatch. It wasn't illegal but he damn sure escalated the situation. Its been repeated so many times, yet we keep going in circles.
 
"oh you know a fucking idiot thought something shady was going and like it was dark and there were breakins so it's totally understandable to follow a kid around just oh you know and then kill him yeah it was just a recipe for disaster and it was just bad decisions so yeah it's ok"

Okay, How was he supposed to know it was a kid?
 
Saw this coming a mile away but my family didn't believe me. There wasn't enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was not acting in self defense. Justice system worked in that regard. He's still a piece of shit though. I won't say that if the races were reversed, the trial would be different because there's no solid evidence to back that up.

In unrelated news, as a black 22 year old, I'm never going to go live in Florida, fuck that.
 
Oh fuck off. Because that's what this verdict means??

Does nobody understand the concept of innocent before proven guilty? And does nobody understand why that's such an important concept of law and order? Oh, but don't mind us, there's a witchhunt to be had. Armchair lawyers all up in here. Like anybody here knows exactly what happened.

I'm sure all things being equal if Trayvon was light skinned and George Zimmerman were a black man events would have unfolded in an identical manner.
 
I understand why people are upset, but this was the right verdict, based on the evidence. It's absolutely a terrible situation and it's difficult for anyone to know what truly happened, but the witness testimony indicating that Martin was on top of Zimmerman and that Zimmerman was the one screaming for help on the 911 call, was enough to create reasonable doubt.

Again, I understand why people are upset and angry at Zimmerman, but this isn't an example of the justice system failing. The evidence was enough to create doubt and the appropriate response to doubt is a not guilty verdict.
 
Fantastic post.

sure, if you ignore all the rebuttals, and its author walking it back, it sure is something

Exactly, revenge and justice are two different things

oh man it's really hard not to put another can of worms in this can of worms and start a capital punishment debate here but i'm cool

It's a shame they didn't know you were out here with the truth, they could have just skipped the whole "jury" thing.

honestly, do you think this garbage is helpful? you literally just got done staying this was a smart place, and you post needlessly hostile nonsense like this, adding nothing.

Oh dear me, my language hurt your feelings? Don't even start. If you think telling someone to fuck off is "worse" than a blindingly racially-charged generalization devoid of any sort of proof, then you are a child.

doubling down with ad hominem, man you're on a roll here
 
"oh you know a fucking idiot thought something shady was going and like it was dark and there were breakins so it's totally understandable to follow a kid around just oh you know and then kill him yeah it was just a recipe for disaster and it was just bad decisions so yeah it's ok"

I dont think anyone is saying its okay with a smile. I at least UNDERSTAND why Zim followed him whether I agree with him or not. I think hes a total asshole wannabe cop who was a tough guy for having a gun strapped to his hip but I am not going to pretend he followed him for no reason. He thought TM was someone he wasn't, he made a HUGE mistake and in the end didn't pay for it because of lack of evidence. He's a scumbag and is going to have to suffer by looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life.
 
I haven't read through the thread...

But it's open season on young, Black youth when they can be blatantly profiled, followed, then shot, and the shooter is acquitted.

I thought Zimmerman would atleast get manslaughter but to be acquitted of absolutely everything is just terrible.
 
Its funny because you believe that these groups formed for reasons other than getting kicked around by society's norms in the first place

Look dude, I never fsaid that. We've already been over the fact that your assuming too much. I can't argue with you if you are going to keep putting words into my mouth. I understand why pride movements form. I don't agree with their tactics and I think that they can become a replacement for actual self-esteem. Can I prove either thing? No. Can we have a civil discussion in which we discuss our different philosophies without assuming the others position? Hopefully. I'm about to go to bed so I may or may not get back to you or anyone else but feel free to respond.
 
Oh dear me, my language hurt your feelings? Don't even start. If you think telling someone to fuck off is "worse" than a blindingly racially-charged generalization devoid of any sort of proof, then you are a child.

Oh wait we got another "call them a kid" in this thread because I don't want to hear what they are saying. Nope your not going to undermine/disregard my opinion by calling me a child. If anything I am a little disappointed you couldn't think of something more original.

Also for those who weren't here the irony of that post was when ninjakixx told satch she was a child for cursing and now a poster who is cursing says I am a child for noting their foul language.
 
I dont think anyone is saying its okay with a smile. I at least UNDERSTAND why Zim followed him whether I agree with him or not. I think hes a total asshole wannabe cop who was a tough guy for having a gun strapped to his hip but I am not going to pretend he followed him for no reason. He thought TM was someone he wasn't, he made a HUGE mistake and in the end didn't pay for it because of lack of evidence.

This is kind of what I've been trying to say.
 
Look dude, I never fsaid that.
yeah you did. You're trying to change what you've said a little with each post but you kinda did lol.
We've already been over the fact that your assuming too much. I can't argue with you if you are going to keep putting words into my mouth. I understand why pride movements form.
You do?
I don't agree with their tactics and I think that they can become a replacement for actual self-esteem. Can I prove either thing? No.
This is the shit I'm talking about.
Can we have a civil discussion in which we discuss our different philosophies without assuming the others position? Hopefully. I'm about to go to bed so I may or may not get back to you or anyone else but feel free to respond.
I'm not assuming your position. You're simply not aware of what your position actually means.
 
You're assuming that I'm ignoring "such things". I believe that the spread of individualism is the only way to get rid of race issues. You may not agree with my perspective, but don't tell me that I ignore the issues because I don't. Don't say that I ignore history because I don't. Frankly it's because of history that I think that pride is the wrong way to gain equal acceptance. I think that forcing people into groups is disgusting and having pride in one's race or something like diversity cannot fix the issues it can only make them more tolerable. You assume so much about me based on short forum posts that it's unreal. Respond to what I have written, not the false representation of me that you have in your mind.

Ok, so this seems like its been going on for a really long time, and I dont know if I'll anything that hasn't already been said,but Ill try.
So I understand what you're saying. Taking pride in having a some extra melanin, or two X chromosomes is kind of a strange concept on a superficial level. The achievements of other African Americans has nothing to do with me, so why should I be proud? I should be proud of my own actions and want to progress because I want it, not because of some artificial ties to people I know nothing about.
BUT, I think the biggest problem with the logic (not you) is that it ignores the social climate. African Americans have been put down as a group. Told they were ugly as a group. Told they were stupid, cant achieve, were inferior. Black was ugly and useless. People wanted to be something else, anything else to escape that. But to counter that, pride in ones race arose. Black became beautiful and strong and something to be proud of. It was necessarily to take pride in your race, because everyone was telling you it was the worst thing to be. Of course it functioned on an individual level. Individuals were tired of feeling that way, so they took pride in their own hair and skin and features, but that's hard to do alone, when everyone is hating on you. Plus, when you and all your family and friends are being persecuted for the same thing, something that ties you all together and makes you the same, it becomes a group pride. A pride in ones race and culture.
. People have pride in their ethnicity because its not really as superficial as just skin tone. Its not like left hand pride or right hand pride, it comes with serious social implications. Being black was and still carries a slew of challenges. To be proud of a black doctor or physicist or poet is an extension of yourself. You see people struggling like you, making progress and overcoming. They become role models for you and for the future of your race.
 
Let's make it as simple as possible: 'individualism' isn't something afforded by blacks in modern society. To say it is, is to discount today and the history that built it; to lack perspective. It's that simple.

I wish it wasn't.

Why?
I really think that you have no more perspective, but saying that I lack perspective makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
 
Thanks for the argument. It was intellectually stimulating. I really wish that everyone could come up with challenging arguments such as this.

Its all you should get honestly.

Explain to anyone how in the fuck Blacks, Gays, Irish, Native Americans, or any large group that was done a disservice by greater society got ANYTHING based on movement through individuality?

I think everyone would love to hear it.
 
honestly, do you think this garbage is helpful? you literally just got done staying this was a smart place, and you post needlessly hostile nonsense like this, adding nothing.

It's not needless. Too many people think their gut feelings are paramount to the findings of a jury after a thorough criminal investigation/trial. Sorry if I offended you, but vulgar language and sarcasm absolutely have their place in civilized discussion, especially in the context of an open forum such as this. I think that my point was pretty clear, and that's all that really matters.
 
I don't know if this came up yet, but George Takei posted this article today.
A Florida woman who fired warning shots against her allegedly abusive husband has been sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Marissa Alexander of Jacksonville had said the state's "Stand Your Ground" law should apply to her because she was defending herself against her allegedly abusive husband when she fired warning shots inside her home in August 2010. She told police it was to escape a brutal beating by her husband, against whom she had already taken out a protective order.

[...]

Alexander's case has drawn support from domestic abuse advocates - and comparison to the case of neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman, who has claimed a "Stand Your Ground" defense in his fatal shooting of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57433184/fla-mom-gets-20-years-for-firing-warning-shots/
 
Thanks for the argument. It was intellectually stimulating. I really wish that everyone could come up with challenging arguments such as this.

I don't argue with stupidity, it's beneath me. I mean you think black people being "individualistic" will stop others from judging and persecuting them based on their skin color....yea okaaaay.
 
Because TM wouldn't have attacked an actual police officer? I can buy that,

ironically, if an officer likewise would've stepped outside the law/his position and endangered TM, he would've likely fought back & been killed, yes - it's certainly not without precedent

only there'd likely be less of a defense force i'd imagine...i could be wrong about that as well though
 
Look dude, I never fsaid that. We've already been over the fact that your assuming too much. I can't argue with you if you are going to keep putting words into my mouth. I understand why pride movements form. I don't agree with their tactics and I think that they can become a replacement for actual self-esteem. Can I prove either thing? No. Can we have a civil discussion in which we discuss our different philosophies without assuming the others position? Hopefully. I'm about to go to bed so I may or may not get back to you or anyone else but feel free to respond.

I think its a perfectly mature thing to take a rest because as of right now there's not much room for understanding your point when you posture that someone taking pride in the minority they identify is a self-esteem issue.

(sigh)
 
The guest on CNN was spot on. The Jury didnt find that Zimmerman was innocent. They found out he wasnt guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the fact that there were no credible witnesses or testimonies. People need to accept that
 
It's not needless. Too many people think their gut feelings are paramount to the findings of a jury after a thorough criminal investigation/trial. Sorry if I offended you, but vulgar language and sarcasm absolutely have their place in civilized discussion, especially in the context of an open forum such as this. I think that my point was pretty clear, and that's all that really matters.

People keep talking about a jury.

But I now know that someone can follow me from a store in the middle of the night through a neighborhood that I do have business being in - and when I tell them to kiss my ass and we get into it (God help me if its in a hard to see area) - I can get shot and killed.

Legally.

Who gives a fuck if I ever felt threatened? It won't matter because I'll be dead.
 
It's not needless. Too many people think their gut feelings are paramount to the findings of a jury after a thorough criminal investigation/trial. Sorry if I offended you, but vulgar language and sarcasm absolutely have their place in civilized discussion, especially in the context of an open forum such as this. I think that my point was pretty clear, and that's all that really matters.

Its funny you argue how peoples POV doesn't matter in discussing this case on this forum and then immediately (in the same post in fact) say your point does matter and that is all that counts....

But I don't want to continue with this talking point its derailing the thread...., and that's all that counts
 
Saw this coming a mile away but my family didn't believe me. There wasn't enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was not acting in self defense. Justice system worked in that regard. He's still a piece of shit though. I won't say that if the races were reversed, the trial would be different because there's no solid evidence to back that up.

In unrelated news, as a black 22 year old, I'm never going to go live in Florida, fuck that.

The Justice system DID NOT work...at all! Partially due to Florida's fucked up laws.
 
Not surprised to be honest. There is always very weird things that happen in these high profile cases.

It also doesn't help that America's courts seem convoluted.
 
I wonder if Zimmerman would have been brave enough to confront TM without a gun strapped to his hip. I also wonder if when TM was on top of him beating the living daylights out of him, he thought to himself, hmm I better shoot this guy before he sees my gun and shoots me. I'm not really sure how I feel about normal citizens being able to carry a gun out freely like they are in the wild west. Sorry these are just thoughts going through my head right now.
 
Is George Zimmerman a murderer? I don't know. I'm not sure what happened that night. But I do know that there wasn't enough evidence to determine that George Zimmerman did not act in self-defense, and therefore the jury reached the correct verdict. Before you lock a man up, you have to be able to clearly demonstrate that he committed a crime, and the prosecution had a weak case.

If Zimmerman did murder Trayvon Martin, that is now between him and God. The court got it right.

in other words, it's over, nothing more to see here?
 
Because TM wouldn't have attacked an actual police officer? I can buy that,

I feel like your blaming trayvon for fighting a strange man who was stalking him at night..
A cop would have a uniform or a badge or a marked car....or clearly identified themselves..I don't know...things that would have hopefully avoided this whole situation
 
I wonder if Zimmerman would have been brave enough to confront TM without a gun strapped to his hip. I also wonder if when TM was on top of him beating the living daylights out of him, he thought to himself, hmm I better shoot this guy before he sees my gun and shoots me. I'm not really sure how I feel about normal citizens being able to carry a gun out freely like they are in the wild west. Sorry these are just thoughts going through my head right now.

Most likely not...And if he did approach Martin, I bet his language towards him would have been a lot less confrontational.
 
in other words, it's over, nothing more to see here?

Pretty sure that's what he said to the cops

You know, right after they never got around to properly questioning him or ID'ing the dead kid in the lawn - or finding out who the dead kid's parents were.
 
Fashion is a very individualistic field, he'd be perfect in the Men's Fashion thread.
pRpKkva.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom