Guys are Monkey Bomb and Ketzal Corridors any good? They seem interesting.
Does Nano Assault requiere the circle pad pro or is it decent while not using it?
Edit: Also Mario vs Donkey Kong Minis on the Move, is it good? Does it have a lot of content? I'm hungry of puzzle games but after Pushmo I don't want to purchase Crashmo so soon
On that note, is there any evidence yet that the Wii U VC will feature as many systems as Wii VC did? Before the system launched, I had foolishly hoped that I could play The Last Blade on the Gamepad after buying it for Wii. There's no Neo Geo games at all yet. Even if we can't get the GameCube or the Dreamcast, surely we can get newer Neo Geo titles. Surely VC Arcade can come back and introduce Capcom Play System titles. Right?
Your comparison is nonsense. Launch aligned, what is this? You put 10 months against 4 months. How does that make any sense?
On that note, is there any evidence yet that the Wii U VC will feature as many systems as Wii VC did? Before the system launched, I had foolishly hoped that I could play The Last Blade on the Gamepad after buying it for Wii. There's no Neo Geo games at all yet. Even if we can't get the GameCube or the Dreamcast, surely we can get newer Neo Geo titles. Surely VC Arcade can come back and introduce Capcom Play System titles. Right?
It's possible for Wii U's VC to be better than Wii's and still be bad.
- Where the fuck is Actraiser?
Find me a better service for buying and playing retro console games.
Find me a better service for buying and playing retro console games.
Where the fuck is Actraiser?
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)
But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)
But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.
You come off as very jaded for someone called Mileena.
You come off as very jaded for someone called Mileena.
I'm wondering if someone missed the pun...incredible
What would be nice is if NCL allowed Wii Mode games to have "hotlinks" (?) on the Wii U menu -- allowing them to be clicked and started directly in Wii Mode, with Wii Mode exiting tied to jumping back to the Wii U menu.
I should be -possible-, I would think... folks said some of the Wii service disks had "autostart" programming...
To be honest, yes.Is that one extra click so much work, though? Sure they could do that probably but even if I sat there with all the power in the 'verse and say "why bother? you save one click."
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)
But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.
To be honest, yes.
The WiiU eShop should be treated like the 3DS eShop as well. I would have played more than ten minutes of La Mulana if it worked like this.
I think the counter argument to this is "well it doesn't have Mario." But if you take the content itself aside and look at the system itself, yeah Sony shits on everyone else. Not just for the reasons you listed, but because their pipeline for 3rd party developers is much more efficient and you can push through something if you want, without fear of Nintendo's scheduling, etc.The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)
But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.
Launch aligned makes sense because most of us are speaking as near-launch Wii U owners and our criticism of the VC is a proxy for our feelings on the Wii U library as a whole. If you don't agree with that or aren't a near-launch Wii U owner, that's cool of course, but that's the basis on which many people are speaking.
Obviously any criticism of the VC is going to be moot 5 years later. I think the Wii VC was relatively poorly managed, but obviously by the end it amounted to a pretty good service. But mostly when someone says the Wii U VC sucks, they mean it sucks right now.
And it may be the case that on a per-week basis it's releasing a comparable number of titles than the Wii VC, but most of us were much more satisfied with the Wii VC just after launch than we are with the Wii U VC just after launch. In quality, in quantity, in the variety of platforms supported. I know I was a Nintendo kid growing up, so playing Gunstar Heroes on the Genesis VC was an amazing experience. And
I've bought all the 30 cent titles and upgraded a fair few, and Earthbound is a huge get and no one would downplay that. But also I don't think the offering is great right now. I don't like the drip-feed method. I don't like that Wii VC titles aren't available on Wii U. It's just a bummer.
So my stance is:
- Nintendo should have ran the VC from day one of the console and the fact that they launched late suggests that they still don't have stuff under control
- Nintendo should abandon the drip feed method
- If they don't abandon the drip feed method, they should focus on non-garbage. Define non-garbage as you will.
- They should push for many titles per week.
- New titles are great, upgrade titles are great, it's all great!
- They should launch new platforms as rapidly as possible
- Where the fuck is Actraiser?
Fuck you, Konami!Well Hudson doesn't exist anymore, so I suspect the TG-16 stuff ain't gonna happen. Sega is not the company it was in 2006 so I'm not sure Sega stuff will happen. We could at least get N64 though![]()
I think the counter argument to this is "well it doesn't have Mario." But if you take the content itself aside and look at the system itself, yeah Sony shits on everyone else. Not just for the reasons you listed, but because their pipeline for 3rd party developers is much more efficient and you can push through something if you want, without fear of Nintendo's scheduling, etc.
In general, when it comes to digital, Sony has decided to flood the market and let consumers decide what rises to the top, and that's part of the reason why Microsoft's rigid policies have crumbled these past few years and Nintendo's spotlighting approach has left everyone frustrated.
Instead, I'm still waiting for Terranigma and Secret of Evermore. :-/
Sony has the service down to a pat, Nintendo has the back catalog to make it something truly special. That Sony/Nintendo console would be so good man.
I just want to play Super Mario Bros. 3 on the gamepad, is that too much to ask.
I just want to play Super Mario Bros. 3 on the gamepad, is that too much to ask.
Square Enix is waiting for your emails then.
Btw, I'm eagerly waiting for those exact same games.
They'll release it on 3DS a month earlier and hope that you'll be weak enough and double dip in the end.I already know I will
That was announced to be coming soon in last week's ND.
They should dump large swathes of games at a time and put up sales and promotions to help give titles the spotlight. Some games could be drip fed though, use other games as incentives for bigger releases.
We shouldn't have just got Galaga last week. They should have made it SHMUP week or something. Like, buy Recca and get Galaga, Xevious or Twinbee free or something. Not only would it spotlight an anticipated game, but it would have drummed up some interest in those other games as well.
Sony has the service down to a pat, Nintendo has the back catalog to make it something truly special. That Sony/Nintendo console would be so good man.
Mario Golf GBC is absolutely the best downloadable game for 3DS that isn't Zelda.
Wii U VC was looking decent for a while, especially when they were doing all those deals. It's really petered out since though. Since the 30c thing is done, hopefully they will come up with some new thing to inject some life into VC. Like... Oh I dunno... SMRPG
Are there any of the old KOEI games on the 3DS?
Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Nobunaga's Ambition. Genghis Khan. Aerobiz.
I need something like these -- even if it's not by KOEI. Especially Aerobiz (Supersonic would be a ++). Where are the strategy games at?
If any of those are SNES games, no.
ROTK4 is on Wii U though.
You come off as very jaded for someone called Mileena.
The 3DS can't emulate SNES games?
Sega is not the company it was in 2006 so I'm not sure Sega stuff will happen.
I just want to play Super Mario Bros. 3 on the gamepad, is that too much to ask.
Sega supported the Wii VC heavier than any other publisher, including Nintendo, and all of their more ambitious releases--the English version of Monster World 4, the online-enabled versions of Puyo and Street Fighter, etc--came out within the last year or two of the Wii VC's lifespan, long after pretty much everyone else had abandoned it. I have absolutely no doubt that they're gonna hit the Wii U VC hard, just as soon as Nintendo gives 'em the green light.