Nintendo Downloads - August 2013

It's possible for Wii U's VC to be better than Wii's and still be bad. Ideally, the service should feel like it's got a varied and full lineup. Instead it often seems like it's playing catch-up.

Mileena isn't alone in complaining, either; there was a popular Miiverse post asking Nintendo not to do the trickle method right from when Miiverse started. If you look at the Vegas Stakes community you'd also see a ton of complaints. Japanese VC communities also tend to have a lot of "why don't we have this?" posts from foreigners.

From a brief check on Wikipedia, it seems that there are nearly two thousand releases between NES, SNES, and N64. I'm sure that's enough of a library between just those consoles to release at least one solid game a week for at least three years. It would involve dealing with third parties, sure - but if Nintendo wants their shop to be successful, isn't that on them to do?

On that note, is there any evidence yet that the Wii U VC will feature as many systems as Wii VC did? Before the system launched, I had foolishly hoped that I could play The Last Blade on the Gamepad after buying it for Wii. There's no Neo Geo games at all yet. Even if we can't get the GameCube or the Dreamcast, surely we can get newer Neo Geo titles. Surely VC Arcade can come back and introduce Capcom Play System titles. Right?
 
Guys are Monkey Bomb and Ketzal Corridors any good? They seem interesting.

Does Nano Assault requiere the circle pad pro or is it decent while not using it?

Edit: Also Mario vs Donkey Kong Minis on the Move, is it good? Does it have a lot of content? I'm hungry of puzzle games but after Pushmo I don't want to purchase Crashmo so soon

Ketzal's Corridors and Minis on the Move are okay, but for non-Crashmo puzzle games I'd recommend Art of Balance Touch and Witch's Cat. DSiware also has tons of great puzzle games to check out. I'm currently addicted to Art Style: Zengage. Snapdots, Mighty Flip Champs, and the Rabi Laby games are superb, as well.
 
On that note, is there any evidence yet that the Wii U VC will feature as many systems as Wii VC did? Before the system launched, I had foolishly hoped that I could play The Last Blade on the Gamepad after buying it for Wii. There's no Neo Geo games at all yet. Even if we can't get the GameCube or the Dreamcast, surely we can get newer Neo Geo titles. Surely VC Arcade can come back and introduce Capcom Play System titles. Right?

Only N64 and GBA (!) games have been announced to be coming to Wii U VC so far.
 
Your comparison is nonsense. Launch aligned, what is this? You put 10 months against 4 months. How does that make any sense?

Launch aligned makes sense because most of us are speaking as near-launch Wii U owners and our criticism of the VC is a proxy for our feelings on the Wii U library as a whole. If you don't agree with that or aren't a near-launch Wii U owner, that's cool of course, but that's the basis on which many people are speaking.

Obviously any criticism of the VC is going to be moot 5 years later. I think the Wii VC was relatively poorly managed, but obviously by the end it amounted to a pretty good service. But mostly when someone says the Wii U VC sucks, they mean it sucks right now.

And it may be the case that on a per-week basis it's releasing a comparable number of titles than the Wii VC, but most of us were much more satisfied with the Wii VC just after launch than we are with the Wii U VC just after launch. In quality, in quantity, in the variety of platforms supported. I know I was a Nintendo kid growing up, so playing Gunstar Heroes on the Genesis VC was an amazing experience. And

I've bought all the 30 cent titles and upgraded a fair few, and Earthbound is a huge get and no one would downplay that. But also I don't think the offering is great right now. I don't like the drip-feed method. I don't like that Wii VC titles aren't available on Wii U. It's just a bummer.

So my stance is:
- Nintendo should have ran the VC from day one of the console and the fact that they launched late suggests that they still don't have stuff under control
- Nintendo should abandon the drip feed method
- If they don't abandon the drip feed method, they should focus on non-garbage. Define non-garbage as you will.
- They should push for many titles per week.
- New titles are great, upgrade titles are great, it's all great!
- They should launch new platforms as rapidly as possible
- Where the fuck is Actraiser?

On that note, is there any evidence yet that the Wii U VC will feature as many systems as Wii VC did? Before the system launched, I had foolishly hoped that I could play The Last Blade on the Gamepad after buying it for Wii. There's no Neo Geo games at all yet. Even if we can't get the GameCube or the Dreamcast, surely we can get newer Neo Geo titles. Surely VC Arcade can come back and introduce Capcom Play System titles. Right?

Well Hudson doesn't exist anymore, so I suspect the TG-16 stuff ain't gonna happen. Sega is not the company it was in 2006 so I'm not sure Sega stuff will happen. We could at least get N64 though :p
 
Find me a better service for buying and playing retro console games.

The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)

But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.
 
I will say I wish Sony had better QA with their PS1 releases. A few releases still have well documented, game breaking bugs. I do wish I could buy once and play on anything. Hell, I'd pay a higher entry fee if that were the case.
 
Not sure I follow on the Sega/Hudson thing. Not sure how Sega's change in direction affects VC, nor why Nintendo couldn't try to go through Konami instead of Hudson.

I think the reason people dislike the "drip feed" method is that it isn't being handled properly.

Find me a better service for buying and playing retro console games.

Would you prefer if I were to say that all the services are bad? I'm not saying that I don't like to play games on VC or that I'm going to boycott it for some silly reason. I'm saying that there are significant flaws in it as it exists now.

Just like with retail releases, VC would be best if it kept up a constant rate of interesting software. That would maintain people's interest in the service. Furthermore, if the service doesn't offer anything new, it can't expect to attract people. Off-TV play and customizable controls are great, but I think new VC games (e.g. EarthBound) are a bigger deal.

Where the fuck is Actraiser?

Where the fuck is Illusion of Gaia?
Where the fuck is Brain Lord?
Where the fuck is E.V.O?
 
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)

But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.

I'm in no way at all defending Nintendo's constant bullshit with the VC, but the amount of time it took EU to get the Spyro games is nothing short of criminal. And there was that time they put Crash 2 up, took it down due to an error, and put it back up two years later. And for a long time, half the PS1 Classics catalogue on the EU PSN were Disney Interactive titles. So yeah, much better way they do cross-console with their content, but don't act like their ass is sparkly clean.
 
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)

But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.

You come off as very jaded for someone called Mileena.
 
What would be nice is if NCL allowed Wii Mode games to have "hotlinks" (?) on the Wii U menu -- allowing them to be clicked and started directly in Wii Mode, with Wii Mode exiting tied to jumping back to the Wii U menu.

I should be -possible-, I would think... folks said some of the Wii service disks had "autostart" programming...


You come off as very jaded for someone called Mileena.
incredible
I'm wondering if someone missed the pun...
 
What would be nice is if NCL allowed Wii Mode games to have "hotlinks" (?) on the Wii U menu -- allowing them to be clicked and started directly in Wii Mode, with Wii Mode exiting tied to jumping back to the Wii U menu.

I should be -possible-, I would think... folks said some of the Wii service disks had "autostart" programming...

Is that one extra click so much work, though? Sure they could do that probably but even if I sat there with all the power in the 'verse and say "why bother? you save one click."
 
Is that one extra click so much work, though? Sure they could do that probably but even if I sat there with all the power in the 'verse and say "why bother? you save one click."
To be honest, yes.

The WiiU eShop should be treated like the 3DS eShop as well. I would have played more than ten minutes of La Mulana if it worked like this.
 
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)

But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.

Can we keep this stuff out of here?
 
To be honest, yes.

The WiiU eShop should be treated like the 3DS eShop as well. I would have played more than ten minutes of La Mulana if it worked like this.

Just to make it clear, not saying that wouldn't be cool.

I hope their integration of their handheld and console divisions bears its fruits in the Fall FW update. 3DS does some things Wii U still doesn't do, for example. And those are things that are clearly not impossible. Ah well, but that doesn't really have anything to do with downloads :)
 
The way Sony does it is much better. Buy game once, use on PS3/PSV/PSP without paying again, do not dripfeed games again when new system comes out (Vita got like 100+ titles on day one of the PS1 classics update, as opposed to the 8 Wii U VC titles available on day one)

But I'm sure someone will still argue Nintendo's way of handling classics is better, there always is.
I think the counter argument to this is "well it doesn't have Mario." But if you take the content itself aside and look at the system itself, yeah Sony shits on everyone else. Not just for the reasons you listed, but because their pipeline for 3rd party developers is much more efficient and you can push through something if you want, without fear of Nintendo's scheduling, etc.

In general, when it comes to digital, Sony has decided to flood the market and let consumers decide what rises to the top, and that's part of the reason why Microsoft's rigid policies have crumbled these past few years and Nintendo's spotlighting approach has left everyone frustrated.
 
Launch aligned makes sense because most of us are speaking as near-launch Wii U owners and our criticism of the VC is a proxy for our feelings on the Wii U library as a whole. If you don't agree with that or aren't a near-launch Wii U owner, that's cool of course, but that's the basis on which many people are speaking.

Obviously any criticism of the VC is going to be moot 5 years later. I think the Wii VC was relatively poorly managed, but obviously by the end it amounted to a pretty good service. But mostly when someone says the Wii U VC sucks, they mean it sucks right now.

And it may be the case that on a per-week basis it's releasing a comparable number of titles than the Wii VC, but most of us were much more satisfied with the Wii VC just after launch than we are with the Wii U VC just after launch. In quality, in quantity, in the variety of platforms supported. I know I was a Nintendo kid growing up, so playing Gunstar Heroes on the Genesis VC was an amazing experience. And

I've bought all the 30 cent titles and upgraded a fair few, and Earthbound is a huge get and no one would downplay that. But also I don't think the offering is great right now. I don't like the drip-feed method. I don't like that Wii VC titles aren't available on Wii U. It's just a bummer.

So my stance is:
- Nintendo should have ran the VC from day one of the console and the fact that they launched late suggests that they still don't have stuff under control
- Nintendo should abandon the drip feed method
- If they don't abandon the drip feed method, they should focus on non-garbage. Define non-garbage as you will.
- They should push for many titles per week.
- New titles are great, upgrade titles are great, it's all great!
- They should launch new platforms as rapidly as possible
- Where the fuck is Actraiser?

I've always blamed that motley crew of old gits, with their medievil "We must reinvent the wheel ways", that Iwata has surrounded himself with, i.e the current board. They need a central "focal" point for all their hardware to connect to instead of launching their services every time the release new hardware.
It's this "starting at square one" bollocks each time that's screwing all this up. NCL should be moving onto N64/Gamecube titles or even Wii remakes now. Instead, I'm still waiting for Terranigma and Secret of Evermore. :-/

Well Hudson doesn't exist anymore, so I suspect the TG-16 stuff ain't gonna happen. Sega is not the company it was in 2006 so I'm not sure Sega stuff will happen. We could at least get N64 though :p
Fuck you, Konami!
LLShC.gif
 
I want to see more titles on WiiU VC that never made its way originally to the West to finally make their debuts this time around. Miiverse would respond well to that I think.
 
I think the counter argument to this is "well it doesn't have Mario." But if you take the content itself aside and look at the system itself, yeah Sony shits on everyone else. Not just for the reasons you listed, but because their pipeline for 3rd party developers is much more efficient and you can push through something if you want, without fear of Nintendo's scheduling, etc.

In general, when it comes to digital, Sony has decided to flood the market and let consumers decide what rises to the top, and that's part of the reason why Microsoft's rigid policies have crumbled these past few years and Nintendo's spotlighting approach has left everyone frustrated.

Sony has the service down to a pat, Nintendo has the back catalog to make it something truly special. That Sony/Nintendo console would be so good man.
 
Instead, I'm still waiting for Terranigma and Secret of Evermore. :-/

Square Enix is waiting for your emails then.

Btw, I'm eagerly waiting for those exact same games.

Sony has the service down to a pat, Nintendo has the back catalog to make it something truly special. That Sony/Nintendo console would be so good man.

It would be a massacre. Not in the way that it would tear up sales charts but in that two completely different company philosophies would be tearing each other to shreds.
 
They should dump large swathes of games at a time and put up sales and promotions to help give titles the spotlight. Some games could be drip fed though, use other games as incentives for bigger releases.

We shouldn't have just got Galaga last week. They should have made it SHMUP week or something. Like, buy Recca and get Galaga, Xevious or Twinbee free or something. Not only would it spotlight an anticipated game, but it would have drummed up some interest in those other games as well.
 
They should dump large swathes of games at a time and put up sales and promotions to help give titles the spotlight. Some games could be drip fed though, use other games as incentives for bigger releases.

We shouldn't have just got Galaga last week. They should have made it SHMUP week or something. Like, buy Recca and get Galaga, Xevious or Twinbee free or something. Not only would it spotlight an anticipated game, but it would have drummed up some interest in those other games as well.

Well, next week is Street Fighter II week.
 
I have to give Nintendo the nod over Sony for digital releases, simply because they've finally started releasing proper 60hz versions of their games here in Europe. Sony still stubbornly cling to their crap, 50hz versions.

100% agree that the Wii U's Virtual Console so far has been awful though.
 
Wii U VC was looking decent for a while, especially when they were doing all those deals. It's really petered out since though. Since the 30c thing is done, hopefully they will come up with some new thing to inject some life into VC. Like... Oh I dunno... SMRPG
 
Sony has the service down to a pat, Nintendo has the back catalog to make it something truly special. That Sony/Nintendo console would be so good man.

The Crash Bandicoot and Spyro PS1 games can't be played on a NA Vita (unless you use an EU account).

That would be like, Mario games not being playable or something while everything else was.
 
Wii U VC was looking decent for a while, especially when they were doing all those deals. It's really petered out since though. Since the 30c thing is done, hopefully they will come up with some new thing to inject some life into VC. Like... Oh I dunno... SMRPG

I'm pretty sure Nintendo celebrates its 125th anniversary next year. How about a £1.25, 12.5% off, £12.50 off, £12.50 for games promotions...
 
Are there any of the old KOEI games on the 3DS?

Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Nobunaga's Ambition. Genghis Khan. Aerobiz.

I need something like these -- even if it's not by KOEI. Especially Aerobiz (Supersonic would be a ++). Where are the strategy games at?
 
Are there any of the old KOEI games on the 3DS?

Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Nobunaga's Ambition. Genghis Khan. Aerobiz.

I need something like these -- even if it's not by KOEI. Especially Aerobiz (Supersonic would be a ++). Where are the strategy games at?

If any of those are SNES games, no.

ROTK4 is on Wii U though.
 
So if they're releasing all those SF2s next week do you think they'd do all 3 for 10 bucks or something? Boggles my mind that they'd release vanilla and super at the same time at the same price.
 
Wario Land 3 8/29 according to eShop ticket in NA. Though to be fair I didn't look at the page prior to this one so not sure if it was posted already. If it was, my bad.
 
Finally got around to spending my coins on Mario Golf. Love it.

Hoping for Mario Tennis GBC on the eShop soon. That game was in my GBC constantly when I was younger.
 
Sega is not the company it was in 2006 so I'm not sure Sega stuff will happen.

Sega supported the Wii VC heavier than any other publisher, including Nintendo, and all of their more ambitious releases--the English version of Monster World 4, the online-enabled versions of Puyo and Street Fighter, etc--came out within the last year or two of the Wii VC's lifespan, long after pretty much everyone else had abandoned it. I have absolutely no doubt that they're gonna hit the Wii U VC hard, just as soon as Nintendo gives 'em the green light.
 
Sega supported the Wii VC heavier than any other publisher, including Nintendo, and all of their more ambitious releases--the English version of Monster World 4, the online-enabled versions of Puyo and Street Fighter, etc--came out within the last year or two of the Wii VC's lifespan, long after pretty much everyone else had abandoned it. I have absolutely no doubt that they're gonna hit the Wii U VC hard, just as soon as Nintendo gives 'em the green light.

Even if they do, it'll only be in Japan. :(
 
Top Bottom