How come the NBN isn't included in either table?
Because it starts at 2017 by which point the NBN will be completely off budget for both sides.
Edit: Actually it's already off budget I think. They're selling bonds to fund it.
How come the NBN isn't included in either table?
It's always funny to read clever international people looking at our economy, then at our politics, and back at our economy, and saying what the fuck. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-crisis-down-under
If by funny you mean depressing, I agree.
If by funny you mean depressing, I agree.
It's a shame that there is a cynicism towards experts that is almost intrinsic in Aust society and it gets in the way of decent conversation all too often.
It's always funny to read clever international people looking at our economy, then at our politics, and back at our economy, and saying what the fuck. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-crisis-down-under
Yeah, I love that added perspective that economists world-over provide whenever they comment on us. It's a shame that there is a cynicism towards experts that is almost intrinsic in Aust society and it gets in the way of decent conversation all too often.
It's all too easy to be a big fish in our little pond, it would seem.
Mark Latham made some very interesting points on this in an article about climate change denial: http://www.afr.com/p/lifestyle/review/climate_change_denial_not_just_for_sFAw16a7QU34KIj2tmN4eJ
Basically our egalitarianism has made us wary of "experts" to the point that we often think we know better.
Why Australia Hates Thinkers said:In contrast to France, where philosophers often grace the covers of Le Monde, and England where Slavoj Zizek writes regular columns in The Guardian Weekly. In Australia, we have Peter Hartcher on anti-Gillard autopilot and the bile-flecked bleating of shock-jocks like Alan Jones.
Each week I watch Q&A praying for an expert, begging for someone who knows what they're talking about. And each week I get Joe Hildebrand accompanied by a flurry of tweets by the emotionally unstable. In fact Nick Osbaldiston and Jean-Paul Gagnon recently found in their research on Q&A that only 5 per cent of panellists since 2008 had a research background. Even in an entire show devoted to education issues, Professor Gonski sat in the shadows while Pyne and Garrett proffered glib inanities and vapid insults. No one learned anything.
My problem is not that our public sphere harbours ill-educated members (like the imbecilic Andrew Bolt who never made it past first-year uni). I think we need commentators from all walks of life. The problem is that as a country we are hostile to those who are well-educated. We prefer home-spun wisdom to years of research. Our language is peppered with vitriol reserved for those who think for a living: "chattering classes", "latte-sipping libertarians", "intellectual elites" and now Nick Cater's most unlovely term "bunyip elite". If we want to emphasise the importance of something we say that the issue "is not just academic". Any idea that takes longer than a nano-second to understand is howled down. Or perhaps, more precisely, any idea that threatens conservative orthodoxy is consigned to the divine irrelevancy of the academy. I've never heard Tony Abbott be told that his Rhodes scholarship and privileged tertiary education meant he was out of touch with the common man. Calling someone an "intellectual elite" is simply a way of ridiculing those who think for a living about how the world can be a fairer place.
...
Perhaps there's a link between the myth of Australian egalitarianism and anti-intellectualism. Australian history is popularly told as a story of democracy, equality and classlessness that broke from England's stuffy, poncy, aristocratic elitism. We're a place where hard yakka, not birth, will earn you success and by hard yakka we don't mean intellectual labour. Although, of course, equality is a great goal, we've interpreted it to mean cultural conformity rather than a redistribution of wealth and power. The lowest common denominator exerts a tyrannical sway and tall poppies are lopped with blood-soaked scythes. Children learn from an early age that being clever is a source of shame. Ignorance is cool.
There's also no room for cleverness in our models of masculinity or femininity. For women, intelligence equates with a dangerous independence that doesn't sit well with your role as a docile adoring fan to the boys at the pub. It's equated with sexual unattractiveness. And for men, carrying a book and using words longer than one syllable is a form of gender treason. It's as good as wearing bumless chaps to a suburban barbecue. Real blokes have practical wisdom expressed through grunts and murmurs. Real Aussie chicks just giggle.
Interesting words from Latham, thanks. As a country, we really dodged a bullet with him.
Related is this pretty great article from Alecia Simmonds earlier this year:
In contrast to France, where philosophers often grace the covers of Le Monde, and England where Slavoj Zizek writes regular columns in The Guardian Weekly. In Australia, we have Peter Hartcher on anti-Gillard autopilot and the bile-flecked bleating of shock-jocks like Alan Jones.
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
It's always funny to read clever international people looking at our economy, then at our politics, and back at our economy, and saying what the fuck. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-crisis-down-under
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
Hiring a performance speedboat and hitting a lake somewhere.So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
I think it's a bit disingenuous (to put it mildly) to suggest that the English media is some bastion of intellectual debate, they have just as much vile shit as us, it's just slightly offset by their two decent newspapers and a better funded public broadcaster. Our barren media environment is a product of being a small market and negligent regulation rather than some innate anti-intellectualism.
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
It is a bit disingenuous, but the point is that they at least have good journalism and a good public broadcaster that is well funded to offset all the shite, we don't.
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
So how do we all plan to spend celebrating the first day of Tony Abbott as our new Prime Minister?
SkyNews is often the mouthpiece of the conservative side of politics so it really isn't surprising.Why the fuck is David Spears arguing with Kevin Rudd more than Tony Abbott is?
Is this a debate or a two on one?
Is this debate going to be archived somewhere or was it exclusive to sky?
You can rewatch it on ABCs youtube.
It's on all the channels (7Two, ABC etc), so it's bound to be archived by atleast one of them. I'd check ABC 24 on iView tomorrow.
Won the toss and will bat, yahoo.
Much better than the first 'debate', Rudd handled himself very well and imo was a clear winner. In contrast Tony came across as erratic and frustrated, especially highlighted by the point when he butted in with "Does this bloke ever shutup". For a supposed Rhodes scholar he doesn't come across as very intelligent.
He clearly didn't have the answer and was after some get out.Much better than the first 'debate', Rudd handled himself very well and imo was a clear winner. In contrast Tony came across as erratic and frustrated, especially highlighted by the point when he butted in with "Does this bloke ever shutup". For a supposed Rhodes scholar he doesn't come across as very intelligent.
I noticed that the first few front rows were made entirely of seniors and the younger people were seated at the back so Abbott got a louder applause every time."Does this bloke ever shutup".
The NO Spin Zone @Meanz71
Fr gods sake how did a leftie journo frm #insiders get on @SkyNewsAust to comment on the #pplsforum ??? Go back to leftie world with Cassidy
He isnt smart. Academics dont prove shit. Plenty of 'smart' morons and plenty of 'dumb' smart people.
He clearly didn't have the answer and was after some get out.
I noticed that the first few front rows were made entirely of seniors and the younger people were seated at the back so Abbott got a louder applause every time.
Just saying, there was a very specific seating arrangement.
That was great, I love the 'it's a country of Jesus' comment and then how offended she looked when he suggested that Jesus is a prophet of Islam.![]()