Microsoft: "It’s up to us to prove that [Xbox One is] worth $100 more [than PS4]"

That and the X1 is a consumer electronics device. Not a games console. It just happens that it plays games. It's basically allowing for media consumption through apps on the TV. Pretty much makes your TV a multimedia computer and your paying a premium for that experience. The PS4 isn't marketed as a do everything device but a games console hence why it appeals to us at GAF more. Though it's not hard to see exactly were Microsoft is going with this.

The multimedia device side appeals to basically nobody. While this generation of consoles have sold 80 - 100M units each, the $99 and below media devices like Roku and AppleTV have less than 10M sold under their belts. No way anyone is going to pay 5x to 10x that for a gimmicky media player.
 
I disagree, they actually did fight tooth and nail. Kaz Hirai made his famous "the gap is widening" claim way back in 2002, and he was right, yet Microsoft kept pushing hard, with Live, with innovative new services like XBLA, with plentiful first party games, and just as many third party deals.

A couple of years later they did drop the console, but the reasons for that are well publicized - they were bleeding money, because of unfavorable deals with Intel and Nvidia they stood no chance of ever breaking even, they had a lot to gain by launching first, and they simply couldn't afford to launch after Sony again (if you can recall, PS3 was initially supposed to launch in spring 2006, Sony announced it at E3 2005). The two situations simply do not compare.

I understand their reason for jumping into the next gen with the 360. But I don't understand the simultaneous need to stick a thumb in the eye of everyone who bought the first Xbox by completely dropping all support for it right away.

Yeah maybe.. better with Kinect

I lol'd.

The multimedia device side appeals to basically nobody. While this generation of consoles have sold 80 - 100M units each, the $99 and below media devices like Roku and AppleTV have less than 10M sold under their belts. No way anyone is going to pay 5x to 10x that for a gimmicky media player.

Hmmm...never thought of it that way. Good point.
 
I'm not going to say Kinect is a waste of time. I had a lot of fun with Dance Central for instance. The voice and face stuff sounds neat. It's just I don't think they've shown its worth that extra money yet. I don't even think they have a Kinect game coming out for launch. The Tv stuff is worthless to me since I don't watch it live and I don't buy consoles just off of launch games.

I guess I'm just saying that Microsoft is going to have to work really hard to justify that price difference. I have a cousin who wants a next gen console for christmas and his mother is eyeing that extra $100 she could keep.
 
The multimedia device side appeals to basically nobody. While this generation of consoles have sold 80 - 100M units each, the $99 and below media devices like Roku and AppleTV have less than 10M sold under their belts. No way anyone is going to pay 5x to 10x that for a gimmicky media player.

Nobody on the GAF forums at least.
 
I'm seriously dumbfounded at any argument that brings the shrinking number of people who are watching tv into their argument, as if the number of people watching tv doesn't still significantly dwarf combined gamers on any platform, pc, smartphone and tablets included.

The multimedia device side appeals to basically nobody. While this generation of consoles have sold 80 - 100M units each, the $99 and below media devices like Roku and AppleTV have less than 10M sold under their belts. No way anyone is going to pay 5x to 10x that for a gimmicky media player.

Does Roku and AppleTV have the kind of games lineup that the Xbox One does and will have going into the future? Does it pack the graphics performance to even deliver the kinds of game experiences that the Xbox One can? Weak argument. The Xbox One isn't just some gimmicky media player, and that's a very silly and purposely ignorant way to look at it.
 
I'm seriously dumbfounded at any argument that brings the shrinking number of people who are watching tv into their argument, as if the number of people watching tv doesn't still significantly dwarf combined gamers on any platform, pc, smartphone and tablets included.

Make a Venn diagram. Make one huge circle represent TV watchers. Make one tiny circle represent gamers. The minuscule area where they overlap is the audience for a games console that controls their TV. And only a small fraction of that minuscule slice would be willing to pay $500 for that privilege.

Does Roku and AppleTV have the kind of games lineup that the Xbox One does and will have going into the future? Does it pack the graphics performance to even deliver the kinds of game experiences that the Xbox One can? Weak argument. The Xbox One isn't just some gimmicky media player, and that's a very silly and purposely ignorant way to look at it.

It's like you didn't even read the very first part of his very first sentence, where he specifically referred to the multimedia device side of the Xbone.

Just amazing.
 
DVR control consists of the same exact controls they had to build into the OS for DVD/Blu-ray control.

I'm not sure what you're talking about "marketing." The Kinect has an IR blaster built into it so it can control every cable box or DVR in existence. All they have to program is the IR codes for: menu, up/down/left/right and select. Now your game controller or Xbox remote controls the DVR.


And just a reminder DVR watching makes up a very small percentage of how people actually watch TV:



Nielsen Study Shows Vast Majority of TV Viewing is Still Done Live

My marketing comment was a joke to point out the absurdity of trying to promote the XB1's capability to simply exchange one remote for another. So in stead of using my DVR remote, I would instead us an XB1 remote to send the signal to the console that would in turn use an IR blaster to send the signal to the DVR. Why would anybody do that?

And while it is true that few people use a DVR, that is not true for the multimedia enthusiast who would plop down $500 in order to control their TV by voice commands. I was also responding to someone in this thread that was trying to make the case that the Kinect would be a good replacement for the harmony remote, another enthusiast device. The point is that the price of the device is too high for these features to be bought by the masses. Only the enthusiast are in the potential market at the XB1's current cost. That enthusiast market has a different profile than the mass market. That is why the added features of the Kinect are not working to justify the XB1 being $100 more.
 
No it doesn't at all. I don't give a shit how much the PS4 is. My point is that the XONE is not expensive. The PS3 launched 7 years ago and was more expensive than XONE. If people can't afford one then there's no need to slate it. Just deal with it and move on with your life.
What in blue blazes are you talking about?
 
Make a Venn diagram. Make one huge circle represent TV watchers. Make one tiny circle represent gamers. The minuscule area where they overlap is the audience for a games console that controls their TV. And only a small fraction of that minuscule slice would be willing to pay $500 for that privilege.

The Xbox One is, based on the games lineup, a hardcore gaming platform first that happens to do a number of other things, too. No matter how much people try to box the Xbox One into this gimmick media player, or purely control your tv with your hands or voice box, it completely falls flat on its face when you factor in the kinds of gaming that will be possible on the Xbox One, and all the big releases and big game exclusives that will be coming to the system.

Anyway I'm done now, because I'm not going to keep having these silly arguments with anybody that insists on portraying the Xbox One as something other than a hardcore gaming device simply because it offers other things, too. It's not worth the time. :)
 
Yup the onus is certainly on you MS to prove your $100 premium is justifiable, just like it was on you to show that your magnanimous policy of hindering stuff like basic browser, Netflix and YouTube behind your paywall shows that XBL is better value proposition than PS+. Go fuck yourself MS. You can spin, moneyhat and 180 all you want. There’s nothing you can do that will sucker me back, short of getting rid of XBL paywall with a guarantee that you would not revert to your DRM plans in the future. No thanks, I’ve had enough of your antics.
 
That'd be amazing.

Reggie (disheveled, five days of beard growth, stinks to high heaven): Welcome to E3. I wanna kick things off by talking about the kill streak I had last night in Calluhdoody. My Xbox Live friends are so jelly.

Random Member of the Press in the Audience: Uh...Reggie? Shouldn't you be talking about the new Mario game or someth--

Reggie: Man, fuck Mario. Fucking red jumpsuit wearing bitch. Saving princesses all the damn time. He's a plumber, for fuck's sake! He should be working on pipes! (knocks back a slug of whiskey from a bottle he pulls from inside his stained suit jacket) I got a pipe you can work on, you kart-crashing fuck. (collapses in a heap)

944T61Q.jpg
 
Neilsen also finds that fewer people are actually watching TV, so it's a shrinking market (http://variety.com/2011/tv/news/nielsen-sees-shrinking-tv-universe-1118042915/).

So far it's been a very small decline overall, but Twitter may actually be starting to reverse the trend by making live TV watching more social. Twitter is increasing ratings for shows. I'm sure Microsoft is aware of this phenomenon.

In any case TV-viewing is a million times more used than either video games or Blu-ray, so shrinking or not it is still a feature of huge importance to a lot of potential customers.
 
The Xbox One is, based on the games lineup, a hardcore gaming platform first that happens to do a number of other things, too. No matter how much people try to box the Xbox One into this gimmick media player, or purely control your tv with your hands or voice box, it completely falls flat on its face when you factor in the kinds of gaming that will be possible on the Xbox One, and all the big releases and big game exclusives that will be coming to the system.

Anyway I'm done now, because I'm not going to keep having these silly arguments with anybody that insists on portraying the Xbox One as something other than a hardcore gaming device simply because it offers other things, too. It's not worth the time. :)

Show me where I said it wasn't a gaming device.

You made the argument that it was silly to bring TV viewship into the equation (which I actually agree with). You punctuated your argument by saying there are more people watching TV than gaming, which was apropos of nothing, since nobody would argue that.

My point was simply to point out that TV viewship does nothing to help Xbone, since the number of people interested in those multimedia functions are few and far between when measured against total TV viewers.

It's all a moot point since this whole TV thing is a stupid angle from which to tackle the debate.
 
I understand their reason for jumping into the next gen with the 360. But I don't understand the simultaneous need to stick a thumb in the eye of everyone who bought the first Xbox by completely dropping all support for it right away.

I see we're not talking about my initial claim anymore, but having just read The Xbox 360 Uncloaked a month or so ago, my memory is refreshed so I'll try to explain.

Although Microsoft is a company with huge cash reserves, the Xbox unit has limited budget. As I said, they were losing huge amounts of money with no hope of ever breaking even, so they couldn't just blindly spend and hope for the best. Ed Fries, who was the head of their first party studios at the time, made a huge gamble spending an extraordinary sum of money on acquiring Rare. That gamble wasn't really paying off. Then Halo 2 had to be delayed which caused a huge financial hit, and their fiscal year predictions ended up in the trash bin. Finally, Ed Fries resigned and Shane Kim took over in a very bad moment. Some hard decisions had to be made, studios had to be closed, and the resources rerouted to Xbox 360 which was launching relatively soon with practically no first party games in development. Dropping support for the original Xbox was an unfortunate necessity, but the time has shown it was the right decision.
 
So far it's been a very small decline overall, but Twitter may actually be starting to reverse the trend by making live TV watching more social. Twitter is increasing ratings for shows. I'm sure Microsoft is aware of this phenomenon.

In any case TV-viewing is a million times more used than either video games or Blu-ray, so shrinking or not it is still a feature of huge importance to a lot of potential customers.

But this has almost nothing to do with Xbone. As I said to (insert name here because my memory is shit), if you made a Venn diagram where you had one huge circle for TV viewers and one comparatively small circle for gamers, the tiny area of overlap is the number of people who would care about the TV stuff on Xbone. And only a tiny fraction of those would be willing to spend $500 for those functions.
 
I see we're not talking about my initial claim anymore, but having just read The Xbox 360 Uncloaked a month or so ago, my memory is refreshed so I'll try to explain.

Although Microsoft is a company with huge cash reserves, the Xbox unit has limited budget. As I said, they were losing huge amounts of money with no hope of ever breaking even, so they couldn't just blindly spend and hope for the best. Ed Fries, who was the head of their first party studios at the time, made a huge gamble spending an extraordinary sum of money on acquiring Rare. That gamble wasn't really paying off. Then Halo 2 had to be delayed which caused a huge financial hit, and their fiscal year predictions ended up in the trash bin. Finally, Ed Fries resigned and Shane Kim took over in a very bad moment. Some hard decisions had to be made, studios had to be closed, and the resources rerouted to Xbox 360 which was launching relatively soon with practically no first party games in development. Dropping support for the original Xbox was an unfortunate necessity, but the time has shown it was the right decision.

If we aren't talking about the same thing, then I guess we have nothing else to discuss.

But we'll always have the memories ;)

Edit: Sorry for the double post.


Fucking perfect.

UB1eV%25255B1%25255D.gif
 
Sony has proven this generation that they just won't throw the towel despite backlash. They effectively created a superior service (that will get even better with ps4) than XBLG for a lesser MSRP price. They also turned the tides around in terms of exclusives. And they are still producing games for PS3.

Why should I choose anything but sony, based on their comeback this gen?
 
Does Roku and AppleTV have the kind of games lineup that the Xbox One does and will have going into the future? Does it pack the graphics performance to even deliver the kinds of game experiences that the Xbox One can? Weak argument. The Xbox One isn't just some gimmicky media player, and that's a very silly and purposely ignorant way to look at it.

Yeah but you're paying (a lot) extra for the media functionality. The problem with the Xbox One is that it tries to appeal to the intersection of gaming + media on a ven diagram. Gaming performance has been watered down to support media functionality (Kinect included) and media costs more than it should because it's grafted to an expense gaming console and online paywall.

I get that the entire purpose of "One" is to be that one device, but I think it's a flawed approach. Why buy an expensive master of none when you can get better single-purpose devices for much less?

That aside, Xbox One's advantages over the PS4 are unproven, gaming aside. They all do basically the same media stuff like Netflix and Hulu. What on the Xbox justifies a $100 premium over the PS4? Voice commands and HDMI passthrough? That's a hard sell.
 
i pay more than a benj for brunch with clients

you dont have to "prove" shit, just make sure titanfall works and ill buy 2

Ballin! PSTriple yo!

3snjkb.jpg


$500 is a lot of money for something you can't expense. Apple gets away with it because they have amazing marketing skills and diehard loyal fans.

But this has almost nothing to do with Xbone. As I said to (insert name here because my memory is shit), if you made a Venn diagram where you had one huge circle for TV viewers and one comparatively small circle for gamers, the tiny area of overlap is the number of people who would care about the TV stuff on Xbone. And only a tiny fraction of those would be willing to spend $500 for those functions.

They don't want to lose that core gamer circle, but they want to expand their circle. Maybe the primary console buyer does not care about Xbox TV, but their wife, sister, father, brother, mother, roommate might care.

The Xbox One is, based on the games lineup, a hardcore gaming platform first that happens to do a number of other things, too. No matter how much people try to box the Xbox One into this gimmick media player, or purely control your tv with your hands or voice box, it completely falls flat on its face when you factor in the kinds of gaming that will be possible on the Xbox One, and all the big releases and big game exclusives that will be coming to the system.

Anyway I'm done now, because I'm not going to keep having these silly arguments with anybody that insists on portraying the Xbox One as something other than a hardcore gaming device simply because it offers other things, too. It's not worth the time. :)

Very well said. Would be nice to move past this crap. I think at E3 and Gamescom Microsoft proved that they're making a game console primarily for core gamers. The fact that they want to also put in features to appeal to a broader audience doesn't make it less of a core games console anymore than Sony using PS2 to sell DVD movies or PS3 for Blu-ray movies.
 
Pretty sure all of this is gonna be irrelevant later on in the console cycle... none of this sound any different from the heat sony faced when the PS3 was being launched. Anyways, i dont mind paying the $100 extra for it. Its more my speed.
 
Most people with cable, if they haven't cut the cord already, are sick of monthly charges, why would they want to add 5 more bucks to their monthly bill where it doesn't get them any extra channels and their remote works just fine?
 
Very well said. Would be nice to move past this crap. I think at E3 and Gamescom Microsoft proved that they're making a game console primarily for core gamers. The fact that they want to also put in features to appeal to a broader audience doesn't make it less of a core games console.

Yes but you're paying more their wishes to reach a broader audience. Ironically an audience they will never reach at the price they are asking. As a gamer how do you feel knowing that die space was sacrificed for inclusion of media co-processors that could have went towards a better GPU for gaming?
 
Ballin! PSTriple yo!

3snjkb.jpg


$500 is a lot of money for something you can't expense. Apple gets away with it because they have amazing marketing skills and diehard loyal fans.

lol alot of money. yeah it was, back in high school. i pay more than that in taxes every week

heres my todays blackcard lunch bill -

sK5kRFe.png



different audiences. if the xbone didnt have titanfall, i wouldnt let that door stop 100 foot near my house even if it was a 200$. since it has titanfall i can pay up to a grand for it. same with how i paid more than 500$ for a ps3 because i wanted to play uncharted. didnt bother before that.

time is the priority at this stage of my life, not value. and i dont have time to play killer instict, 20 FPS deadrising, knack and whatever the fuck console manufacturers are lining up for their trashy launch, nor do i have time to be a loyal supporter of some brand (other than apple, because apple has class, unlike ms and sony). give them software, and people will buy

plus theres the iphone 5S next month
 
"$100, when you’re talking $400 vs. $500 [shrugs shoulders]. I don’t believe it’s going to be the deal-killer," he said.
If he really thinks that, then why isn't it $400? I mean, it's just $100 and you know when you're dropping 4-5 of those, no big deal.
 
But this has almost nothing to do with Xbone. As I said to (insert name here because my memory is shit), if you made a Venn diagram where you had one huge circle for TV viewers and one comparatively small circle for gamers, the tiny area of overlap is the number of people who would care about the TV stuff on Xbone. And only a tiny fraction of those would be willing to spend $500 for those functions.

Xbox very well create more interest in gaming from non gamers simply wanting a better multimedia experience.

Taking the poster's blurb about twitter boosting tv watching, now imagine snapping twitter to the side of the latest Walking Dead episode... That could very well appeal to some people. Not me, but someone.

Like I said before, Xbox may start off slow upon release, but once the features are in peoples hands, it may just explode into popularity.

There is no way to predict such things.
 
And that's one of the reasons I can't wait to get my hands on an Xbox One - I know they'll be fighting tooth and nail to regain that mind share, just like Sony did last gen. Good times ahead for owners of both platforms.

That is what I'm hoping. I feel like MS getting knocked down a notch to put them in a comeback position is going to be better than if they just coasted on 360 success into this gen with no critical feedback. Of course I hope Sony continues to bring it.

I have hope that mandatory Kinect is going to lead to devs actually using it, and some really cool features. I hope they do not put out a kinect-less version at this point. $100 is not that big of deal for a one-time console purchase.
 
lol alot of money. yeah it was, back in high school. i pay more than that in taxes every week

heres my todays blackcard lunch bill -

sK5kRFe.png



different audiences. if the xbone didnt have titanfall, i wouldnt let that door stop 100 foot near my house even if it was a 200$. since it has titanfall i can pay up to a grand for it. same with how i paid more than 500$ for a ps3 because i wanted to play uncharted. didnt bother before that.

time is the priority in this stage of my life, not value. and i dont have time to play killer instict, 20 FPS deadrising, knack and whatever the fuck console manufacturers are lining up for their trashy launch, nor do i have time to be a loyal supporter of some brand (other than apple, because apple has class, unlike ms and sony). give them software, and people will buy

plus theres the iphone 5S next month

Open drink, fuck I wanna hang out with you :D Give me all that Tequila
 
Has this thread really turned into how much someone is willing to blow on lunch?

Give the shit a rest. Microsoft fucked up their messaging, leave it at that.
 
Do you honestly see lots of non-gamers buying a $500 gaming console so they can wave their arms to open menus?

I dunno. And neither do you. That's my point. Years ago, did I think something called Facebook would dethrone MySpace? Not really, but here we are.

Also, you are describing it in the most simple downplaying way possible.

Would I pay $500 for a games console/media box that aggregates my movies(bluray and ultraviolet) music, tv and games, all controllable with my voice and all on the same input? Sounds good to me.
 
Yes but you're paying more their wishes to reach a broader audience. Ironically an audience they will never reach at the price they are asking. As a gamer how do you feel knowing that die space was sacrificed for inclusion of media co-processors that could have went towards a better GPU for gaming?

A PS2 cost more than a Dreamcast. A PS3 cost more than a 360. If they hadn't used DVD or Blu-ray they probably could have cut the cost of the device or put in slightly better GPU hardware. This is nothing new. Every consumer electronics device that Apple puts out could cut out features and put in a better GPU. Microsoft went all out on GPU for the original Xbox and they got their butts kicked by PS2. Microsoft went all out on GPU again for the 360 and they got their butts kicked by the Wii.

Honestly I find the whole GPU power thing stupid and I try to avoid spec wars. I look at the games and judge the console by what it's games are like. Most of the time the game console with the best graphics isn't even the most successful, because the system with best graphics doesn't necessarily have the best games. Why am I going to demand they put in a better GPU when I don't have a technical background and there is no proof that having the best GPU means having the best games of a generation?

If you don't think the games on Xbox One are appealing then don't buy it. If you think the games look good then buy it. Buying any electronics solely on the basis of specs is not smart.

Xbox very well create more interest in gaming from non gamers simply wanting a better multimedia experience.

Taking the poster's blurb about twitter boosting tv watching, now imagine snapping twitter to the side of the latest Walking Dead episode... That could very well appeal to some people. Not me, but someone.

Like I said before, Xbox may start off slow upon release, but once the features are in peoples hands, it may just explode into popularity.

There is no way to predict such things.

They don't even have to snap Twitter to the side of the screen. They can just have SmartGlass on your phone/tablet keep the Twitter conversation in sync with whatever you are watching on TV.

Put on CNN and SmartGlass syncs Twitter comments about what's on CNN, flip to AMC and SmartGlass syncs Twitter comments to what's on AMC... It can even filter the Twitter comments by the people you follow on XBL. Want to talk about something they said on Twitter you can Skype them during the commercial break and watch the program together.
 
If parents with disposable income are the ones buying it for their house multimedia features and/or gimmicks may make a difference.

True. But that number may not be as large as MS hopes.

I dunno. And neither do you. That's my point. Years ago, did I think something called Facebook would dethrone MySpace? Not really, but here we are.

Also, you are describing it in the most simple downplaying way possible.

Would I pay $500 for a games console/media box that aggregates my movies(bluray and ultraviolet) music, tv and games, all controllable with my voice and all on the same input? Sounds good to me.

But you're a gamer. We were talking non-gamers. I don't see many of them taking that dive. This isn't a Wii situation where it's only a couple hundred bones.

If I'm being totally honest with myself, I see the Xbone dominating the US just like the 360. But I think it'll have far more to do with dudebros wanting to play Madden and Calluhdoody with their fellow dudebros and since they've always used Xbox for that, they'll continue to.

But who knows? Only Jesus and his father, Santa Claus.
 
The Xbox One is, based on the games lineup, a hardcore gaming platform first that happens to do a number of other things, too. No matter how much people try to box the Xbox One into this gimmick media player, or purely control your tv with your hands or voice box, it completely falls flat on its face when you factor in the kinds of gaming that will be possible on the Xbox One, and all the big releases and big game exclusives that will be coming to the system.

You are right that the XB1 is a good gaming console. Which is probably why you get so frustrated trying to defend it. The part you are not getting is that while the XB1 is a good gaming platform, the PS4 is a better one. All the other stuff is just extra fluff on top of the gaming capabilities. Sure they are nice to have but they aren't what people are using to decide which console to buy. The fact that MS is trying to justify a $100 more expensive gaming console on the back of non gaming features shows how out of touch they are.
 
lol alot of money. yeah it was, back in high school. i pay more than that in taxes every week

heres my todays blackcard lunch bill -

sK5kRFe.png



different audiences. if the xbone didnt have titanfall, i wouldnt let that door stop 100 foot near my house even if it was a 200$. since it has titanfall i can pay up to a grand for it. same with how i paid more than 500$ for a ps3 because i wanted to play uncharted. didnt bother before that.

time is the priority at this stage of my life, not value. and i dont have time to play killer instict, 20 FPS deadrising, knack and whatever the fuck console manufacturers are lining up for their trashy launch, nor do i have time to be a loyal supporter of some brand (other than apple, because apple has class, unlike ms and sony). give them software, and people will buy

plus theres the iphone 5S next month

So you took your friends out to eat and they made you foot the bill. How sweet
 
How come lunchbox doesn't get a tag for that?
There are people who show off their nice cars in the automotive thread and there are some real nice expensive cars there, but none of those guys come off as douches.
 
Outside of a gaming console, XB1 doesn't replace anything. It's just passing input from other devices through itself to your TV. Unlike a stereo receiver that does the same thing with audio but actually does something to the signals, the XB1 just makes it look like Windows 8. It's essentially voice commands and a Windows 8 skin for your DVR. And it plays games.
 
lol alot of money. yeah it was, back in high school. i pay more than that in taxes every week

heres my todays blackcard lunch bill -

sK5kRFe.png



different audiences. if the xbone didnt have titanfall, i wouldnt let that door stop 100 foot near my house even if it was a 200$. since it has titanfall i can pay up to a grand for it. same with how i paid more than 500$ for a ps3 because i wanted to play uncharted. didnt bother before that.

time is the priority at this stage of my life, not value. and i dont have time to play killer instict, 20 FPS deadrising, knack and whatever the fuck console manufacturers are lining up for their trashy launch, nor do i have time to be a loyal supporter of some brand (other than apple, because apple has class, unlike ms and sony). give them software, and people will buy

plus theres the iphone 5S next month

so it was a corporate lunch? dont you just expense that anyway?
 
Outside of a gaming console, XB1 doesn't replace anything. It's just passing input from other devices through itself to your TV. Unlike a stereo receiver that does the same thing with audio but actually does something to the signals, the XB1 just makes it look like Windows 8. It's essentially voice commands and a Windows 8 skin for your DVR. And it plays games.

Or, it pulls in your tv content with all the media apps(Netflix, vudu, slacker, etc, etc) so its all a voice command away. And plays games.

I understand that you don't see the upside to that, and that's fine. But people seem to refuse to see that there will be folks that DO see value there.

I don't have to jack with the built in TV apps, or roku, or a separate bluray player or cable box. Its all together now.
 
lol alot of money. yeah it was, back in high school. i pay more than that in taxes every week

heres my todays blackcard lunch bill -

sK5kRFe.png



different audiences. if the xbone didnt have titanfall, i wouldnt let that door stop 100 foot near my house even if it was a 200$. since it has titanfall i can pay up to a grand for it. same with how i paid more than 500$ for a ps3 because i wanted to play uncharted. didnt bother before that.

time is the priority at this stage of my life, not value. and i dont have time to play killer instict, 20 FPS deadrising, knack and whatever the fuck console manufacturers are lining up for their trashy launch, nor do i have time to be a loyal supporter of some brand (other than apple, because apple has class, unlike ms and sony). give them software, and people will buy

plus theres the iphone 5S next month
Wow, you're not called Lunchbox for nothing.
 
lol alot of money. yeah it was, back in high school. i pay more than that in taxes every week

heres my todays blackcard lunch bill -

sK5kRFe.png



different audiences. if the xbone didnt have titanfall, i wouldnt let that door stop 100 foot near my house even if it was a 200$. since it has titanfall i can pay up to a grand for it. same with how i paid more than 500$ for a ps3 because i wanted to play uncharted. didnt bother before that.

time is the priority at this stage of my life, not value. and i dont have time to play killer instict, 20 FPS deadrising, knack and whatever the fuck console manufacturers are lining up for their trashy launch, nor do i have time to be a loyal supporter of some brand (other than apple, because apple has class, unlike ms and sony). give them software, and people will buy

plus theres the iphone 5S next month

Are you a wizard?
 
Top Bottom