Alligatorjandro
Banned
If I cosplay as Merry Poppins with lipstick and fake breasts, am I being offensive?
I must know GAF!
Do you also paint your skin white?
If I cosplay as Merry Poppins with lipstick and fake breasts, am I being offensive?
I must know GAF!
It's to lampoon the racial stereotypes that are classically associated with the character he represented.
He could have easily been a walking trope without the makeup.
Which is really the point, isn't it? There is more to blackface than just putting on makeup.
Then why dress up as anyone ever? I mean it's all should be offensive not just thing associated with black characters. There cloths aren't a defining characteristic, neither is the hair, nor how they look.
There is nothing in what she did that says the she think that being black was the defining human characteristic. She changed her style and her clothes along with darkening her skin. She is trying to look physically more like the character. It is a physical characteristic.
Do you also paint your skin white?
The stereotypes weren't the target for his character. They were an added element to the degree of his ignorance.
Do you also paint your skin white?
I'm gonna call BS here. We all know if she'd dressed up as that character without using makeup there would be people out there accusing her of trying to "whitewash" the character in effect.
Insisting that her costume was racist because she dressed up as black character is just as ignorant as you're accusing me of being. It's ignorant of her intent and it's ignorant of context.
Crap, gotta go as something else now.
I already had a matching umbrella and everything.
I'm unfortunately white, otherwise I probably would have.
Im gonna call BS on this, no onr would claim she trying to whitewash a character espically at a Halloween event. She could have pulled off the character with out painting her skin. Like I said just plain ignorance.
Not racist but shows a lack of sensitivity and piss poor judgement.
But it is part of their physical appearance whether you like it or not and the whole purpose of dressing up is to look as closely as possible to the person you are trying to imitate how they look.The stereotypes weren't the target for his character. They were an added element to the degree of his ignorance.
There's a reason why plain costumes like.. let's say dressing up as Bill Gates.. don't tend to get noticed unless the person wearing the costume naturally looks like the character or person they're portraying. If you absolutely need to paint your skin black to portray someone, it's a bad idea for a costume. Wade as JT was an AWFUL idea and similarly if a white person were to dress up as JT, it would still be a bad idea unless they already resembled him. Why? Because he's nondescript.
Clothing, hairstyles, accessories, and mannerisms are defining characteristics. These are all things that a person or character has active control over. Skin color isn't.
Blog of (mostly) good execution of costumes that didn't need painted skin to be recognizable.
Of course they were. Whether or not he was acutely aware that he was basically a walking stereotype, he still was. I honestly don't understand the point.
But it is part of their physical appearance whether you like it or not and the whole purpose of dressing up is to look as closely as possible to the person you are trying to imitate.
To be fair, Obama being black is a huge characteristic to who he is because he is the first black president. Clinton wasn't the first white anything. Well, maybe the first white guy to get caught getting a bj in his office.
Also, I can't speak for anyone else, but if I had to describe Clinton physically to someone who had no idea who he was or the history of race of the elected Presidents of America I would probably still mention him being white as a key characteristic of his appearance.
Then why dress up as anyone ever? I mean it's all should be offensive not just thing associated with black characters. There cloths aren't a defining characteristic, neither is the hair, nor how they look.
There is nothing in what she did that says the she think that being black was the defining human characteristic. She changed her style and her clothes along with darkening her skin. She is trying to look physically more like the character. It is a physical characteristic.
People in most cases aren't the costumes they wear either. Klansman are definitely racist. They wouldn't wear the uniform of a Klansman if they weren't.
If I went as Fat Albert (And I could pull it off, trust me... I have the girth) and used make up to make my skin tone match Fat Albert's I'd be doing it purely for that purpose. I wouldn't be driven by racism in that effort, I'd be driven by trying to look like the character I was trying to dress up as for Halloween.
Does that make me racist? Does that make the act racist? Hell no.
Read what I was responding to genius.A better example would be someone appropriately using the word "niggardly" in a sentence. There's nothing inherently racist about that compared to any other word, offense would come from reminding people of racist usage by how it sounds rather than its actual meaning.
So if you're white and you want to go dressed as Abraham Lincoln but Lincoln is a few shades lighter than you would you lighten you skin to match? After all, him being white is one of his most defining characteristics is it not?
So if you're white and you want to go dressed as Abraham Lincoln but Lincoln is a few shades lighter than you would you lighten you skin to match? After all, him being white is one of his most defining characteristics is it not?
Read what I was responding to genius.
So you ignored and completely missed the point of my post... where did I say anything about racism?
Yeah, because being the first black person to be President of a country born out of slavery is an amazing feat that could drastically change the country forever. When you're the first to do something that's usually what they lead your resume with.And it's still his most defining characteristic to a lot of people. Doesn't matter what he has done in office or who he is as a person he is black first.
You're saying that her using make-up to appear more like they character she's dressing up as is boiling the character down to JUST being black. Which is kinda what racism is, making assumptions about someone just based off of their race.
You may not have stated it explicitly, but that's subtext I got from it. Skin color means nothing. Anyone, of any race, can be a dickbag or a good person. It's up to them.
Focusing so much attention on her choice to use makeup in her costume is doing exactly what her costume is being accused of doing. Kinda funny how that works, eh?
You're saying that her using make-up to appear more like they character she's dressing up as is boiling the character down to JUST being black. Which is kinda what racism is, making assumptions about someone just based off of their race.
Mother of god. The "you're racist for accusing me of racism" argument. A clear sign of a purely semantic argument.
I think that you're racist, because you're accusing enzom21 of being racist, for accusing Julianne Hough of being racist!
And I'm racist for thinking that you're racist for accusing enzom21 of being racist for accusing Julianne Hough of being racist!
The cycle will NEVER end!
Kinda funny how that works, eh?
Cause the character is noted for having weird hair by Japanese standards and was picked on for it. Part of his black story.
I don't personally get why so many white people feel the need to paint their skin to "look like" someone who is chocolate.
I have dressed up as Mario and Eminem ... never felt the need to paint my skin cause there's more elements to a person/ character then what color they are.
If you mean ignorant of the fact that there are armies of over-sensitive people who'd chose to take issue with a harmless Halloween costume, sure.
Haha...Coming To America.This one is great.
![]()
Harmless? Wow just wow, I have grandparents who grew up in the era of blackface that would take offense to this. Dont just brush this off cause YOU dont take offense to it my main issue with this isnt because i think she is a racist (i dont think she is) but the fact that everyone thinks you need to paint your skin black to dress as black charcters
This one is great.
![]()
Being black for white people means they only assume the superficial appearance of being black for a temporary time in order to play a role or pretend to be someone who is black, for fun. While actual black people live every day black, cannot pretend not to be black, or shed themselves of society's hurtful stereotypes of black people, like the white people in black paint are able to do. The white people who paint their skin black are insensitive to black people for the reason that black people are marginalized for the way they look - the color of their skin - to the point it defines many blacks' life experiences. So when a white person casually assumes that visual, apparently unaware of the privilege them being white grants them, it makes some people uncomfortable.
The power dynamic of our society isn't conducive to treating everyone in a vacuum. That context that whites maintain cultural dominance and exert oppressive forces on minorities is still there, and to pretend (in all the ways it can be manifested in every day life) it isn't is ignorant and insensitive. Intent does not absolve anyone of not knowing that what they do is potentially offensive to people.
This one is great.
![]()
Wow look at that he dressed as a black charcter without the need for painting his skin, interesting
Harmless? Wow just wow, I have grandparents who grew up in the era of blackface that would take offense to this. Dont just brush this off cause YOU dont take offense to it my main issue with this isnt because i think she is a racist (i dont think she is) but the fact that everyone thinks you need to paint your skin black to dress as black charcters
Wow look at that he dressed as a black charcter without the need for painting his skin, interesting
Her costume was not blackface. When dressing in costume people typically try to look like the creature, person, or thing they're attempting to dress ass. If she was going as Wolverine and glued on some sideburns should then people with sideburns take offense? If she was going as a turtle, and used green makeup, should we rally and take her down for offending turtles? No, that'd be silly.
This whole thing is silly in the same way. Her costume in no way is blackface.
Am I of the opinion that actual blackface is bad? Hell fucking yes I am. But am I gonna sit here and say that Julianne's costume constitutes blackface, no way.
White privilege: casually practicing overt racism without intentionally meaning to.
My whole beef with this thing is darkening your skin to play black characters.
Because there is no need to paint her skin blackAnd my whole issue is why take such offense at it when it's done innocently?
Though, and this may just be me, if I hadn't looked above your post and read "Coming to America," I would have thought he was a Korean dictator. Oh, well.
And my whole issue is why take such offense at it when it's done innocently?
I understand why the costume is offensive to some, but what makes it racist?
Edit: Assuming you are talking about Hough's costume. If not I apologize for the misunderstanding.
Idiotic questions require stupid answers as well - we feel as offended as much as you think she's real. But please, continue with the idiotic questions - seems like a given with the posters in this thread.How does the anti-paint team feel about this?
A stupid answer without starting with an idiotic question - an improvement if I ever see one.But it isn't blackface.
Not so much the costume, more of the blackface. While she herself might not be a racist, it was quite a overt racist action considering that she's American (doesn't help she's white as well).