Yeah, completely agreed. Like I wrote on the first page:
@EatChildren
Would it be fair to call this the PS4's Perfect Dark Zero?
Killzone name was always lukewarm but damn was thinking this would be the game to do it. Maybe the online makes up for it hopefully because GG seriously should step it up.
Idk bout Sony cutting them but they will probably be pit on the back burner this gen
And yet Killzone Mercenary, which was super well received by GAF, has a user score of 9.1 on Metacritic....has an average Metacritic score of 78. That should tell you everything you need to know about reviews, in context more so with the Killzone franchise.
I suggest people that just play these games for the single player is much higher, especially considering the average age of gamers goes up each year. I no longer play online as my reflexes now suck and 13 year old's easily kick my ass, so I look for a decent campaign as most, if not all my time will be spent on single player.It doesn't matter what COD or battlefield 4 because almost 100% of people buy those games for thier multiplayer (which lets face it, you can't trust a reviewer to review)
You guys gotta realize your the less than 1% that buys FPS games for the campaign. And I really don't understand why?
I love today lmao.OH SHIT!!!
![]()
![]()
Gemüsepizza;89666273 said:Ridiculous. Killzone = 5, but CoD:Ghosts = 7 (only on Xbox One of course)? Yeah right.
The whole staff has to favor anything Microsoft shits out because they paid for that bad documentary? That's a pretty black and white way of looking at the world.750,000 reasons in the form of US Dollars from Microsoft's pockets?
Gemüsepizza;89665513 said:Haha wtf?!
All the people expecting Killzone to be a good game and not just a fantastic graphical showcase was in denial.
Bought a ps3 in preparation of owing a ps4 and the Killzone games are all average.
Soo... you're saying that I cant wear Killzone avatar and be reasonable?
Dont play dumb. Polygon was ever like that. Almost any PS exclusive is by them undescored (The Last of Us is another GREAT example, but it have many more... almost all of them).
Im not complaining about no other reviews here. But polygon is pure joke!
I understand that the Killzone brand is tainted by the awful outings on PS3 but I am really not surprised by average scores for Shadow Fall, it just ups the ante on graphics but sticks to the same "tight corridor" structure as previous entries and it probably carries the horrible gunplay forwards as well since that is a consequence of how their engine is built (which prioritises pretty over gameplay).
That Gies scored it down because he died a lot is bullshit though, no need to score a game down because he is crap at gaming. That he gave Dead Space 3 a 9.5 is quite telling in that sense, he is definitely one of those "this game is great because it makes me feel awesome at gaming" (and vice versa) reviewers. Which Polygon should clamp down on. If the game is too hard then he needs to set the difficulty to easy or normal, not rag on it because he died a lot.
Can we please please please ban Polygon?
Also I don't get the logic of "it's all the same stuff we've seen before" but rating COD higher, isn't that the same stuff as well? At least KZ brings next gen into the mix.
This has been proven false. It's been repeatedly stated that almost half of the COD buyers never even touch the multiplayer.
Can we please please please ban Polygon?
Can we please please please ban Polygon?
Also I don't get the logic of "it's all the same stuff we've seen before" but rating COD higher, isn't that the same stuff as well? At least KZ brings next gen into the mix.
That's good news, because I liked the syndicate shooter too.
can we please ban Polygon from review threads? its ridiculous how sony games repeatedly are getting low scores from arthur gies.
5/10 wow.
Beginning to regret already buying this.
I'm not disagreeing with the overall premise of that quote - but Crysis 1 remains an excellent AND gorgeous game.
They underscored the games that matter.Yet on the same day Resogun gets 8.5 and the day before Ratchet and Clank scores 8.5 too, both PS exclusives and both scored higher than the Metacritic average for those two games.
What are the obvious reasons?
@EatChildren
Would it be fair to call this the PS4's Perfect Dark Zero?
I kind of liked 3 so well see how it goesif you dismiss polygon and kotaku (which is like tossing infowars and the onion from world news feeds) I thought the reviews were good? no?
...i think the reviewers were all a little pissy about the review event in general...hell even knack ranges from garbage to pretty good...its all a crap shoot with these reviews, like movie reviews..if you like it you like it, not every game or movie hits the same buttons for people.
keep an eye on gaf for feedback, and if you like a genre, play it.
Again, Polygon gave Forza Horizon a whopping 6/10 which goes against this "Xbox bias" that everyone keeps throwing around.
Perhaps they just use the 0-10 scale properly. Although that still doesn't sit well with me considering both FH and LToU were exemplary games. Still, opinions (and hits).
They are funded in part by MS.
Look at the review scores of Sony exclusives versus MS exclusives.
You will see a trend.
i thought this would be the crysis 1 of the killzonw series with all the talk about the more open levels and the owl gadget, but if it actually goes back to a more corridore design i might actually have to agree with arthur gies's looks like the future but is stuck in the past
Awful outings on the PS3? Have you even played a Killzone game? Killzone 2 is sitting at a 91 and Killzone 3 at a 84-85 I think? Uhm yea. Not even close to "awful".
The whole staff has to favor anything Microsoft shits out because they paid for that bad documentary? That's a pretty black and white way of looking at the world.