Zen_Arcade
Banned
Oh, the ironing is delicious.sweet, can't wait for more videos from "youtube personalities" and hear what they've got on their mind
Oh, the ironing is delicious.sweet, can't wait for more videos from "youtube personalities" and hear what they've got on their mind
Exactly. For those who don't know, these people are referred in the industry as "whales": http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkai...y-male-spend-big-on-all-types-of-video-games/IThese business models are based around milking the few who are willing to pay tons rather than expecting every person to spend $5.
They get made the same way every single other title gets made. Only difference is when they started to work on said project is case by case depending on studio / publisher getting green lit for the project and when the dev kits arrive etc.
There isnt something magical or special that goes into a first party launch title making them different from the rest when it comes to the backend work.
Its not wanting to eat costs, but more wanting to eat more money seeing recent trends with social gaming pay schemes.
Maybe he can tell his buddy Major Nelson to fix it. Oh that's right, he's just some guy with a dumb character.
Yup.I think this action gives a more loud and clear message although it depends on the kind of microtransactions that are in the game and how they affect the game's design.
Maybe he can tell his buddy Major Nelson to fix it. Oh that's right, he's just some guy with a dumb character.
I'm amused by the fact that Boogie cited Blizzard expansions as the predecessors to DLC when in fact the very first game expansion disks were, oddly enough, extra cars for a driving game.
Back in 1989.
A driving game that is near and dear to my heart.
Test Drive II: The Duel.
Which, I owned for the Commodore 64 and then subsequently repurchased for the Amiga.
I still remember purchasing the Supercars and Muscle Cars floppy disks from my local computer shop (which was called Neutron Computers).
![]()
How many cars did you get on this disk? 5
You got a Lambourghini Countach, a Corvette ZR1, a Porsche 911 RUF, a Lotus Turbo Esprit... and, my favorite, a Ferrari Testarossa.
And it retailed for about $25 or thereabouts.
![]()
The fun twist is this.
Test Drive II: The Duel was developed by Distinctive Software and published by Accolade.
This studio was purchased a couple years later in 1991 by Electronic Arts and remolded into EA Canada.
And who conceived the first ever expansion disk for a driving game back in 1989? Distinctive Software's co-founder... who happens to be this guy...
![]()
I'm amused by the fact that Boogie cited Blizzard expansions as the predecessors to DLC when in fact the very first game expansion disks were, oddly enough, extra cars for a driving game.
Back in 1989.
A driving game that is near and dear to my heart.
Test Drive II: The Duel.
Which, I owned for the Commodore 64 and then subsequently repurchased for the Amiga.
I still remember purchasing the Supercars and Muscle Cars floppy disks from my local computer shop (which was called Neutron Computers).
![]()
How many cars did you get on this disk? 5
You got a Lambourghini Countach, a Corvette ZR1, a Porsche 911 RUF, a Lotus Turbo Esprit... and, my favorite, a Ferrari Testarossa.
And it retailed for about $25 or thereabouts.
![]()
The fun twist is this.
Test Drive II: The Duel was developed by Distinctive Software and published by Accolade.
This studio was purchased a couple years later in 1991 by Electronic Arts and remolded into EA Canada.
And who conceived the first ever expansion disk for a driving game back in 1989? Distinctive Software's co-founder... who happens to be this guy...
![]()
Didn't MS just recover from a whole PR shitstorm about DRM?
Also, Sony's going to do it too.Microsoft just hasn't told their microtransaction story very well. It's a messaging problem.
What we can see NOW is that a lot of Xbox One not free-to-play have aggressive microtransactions in them, while PS4 ones, at the least those available right now, have none. We'll eventually judge GT6 when it'll come out.I still hold the value that anyone blaming MS solely is an idiot, sorry but that is the way I see it because the facts clearly and definitively show that it is everyone playing a part and that cannot be disputed by rational people once the facts are looked at. Sony is just as guilty as MS, and third parties even more so, specifically EA and Capcom. And even in this Francis uses zero logos, he rages on about Forza 5 but here is the similar rage for Sony and GT6 which is just as bad? I mean if your going to point fingers, you point them at all culprits, other wise you simply lack demonstrable ethos and your argument lacks substance.
And that is what kills me about this whole microtransaction, even when people try to state otherwise and that they are neutral, you still see the bias and fanboyism shining clearly through. Where is the rage against Capcom for just about hiding every game they now produce behind a curtain of Microtransactions? Where is the rage at Bioware for doing it with ME3, and its nickel and dime dance it did to consumers with costumes and weapons? Where is the rage against Sony for the microtransaction debacle that is Playstation Allstars in what is probably the worse offender when it comes to 1st party games?
When it comes to this debate, and I am starting to lose a lot of respect for people and their credibility is taking huge nosedives, simply because they cannot maintain real dialogue when it comes to this issue and instead try to do the "only one party is at blame" nonsense and totally over looking everyone else that is doing the same. Its shameful, and as long as only MS is incorrectly blamed, it is an issue that will only grow.
Also, Sony's going to do it too.
No, you don't. This is exactly what you don't do. You single out the main offender, again and again. If the message gets too broad, it gets fuzzy and the discourse bottoms out. I find it hard to believe you were particularly interested in these issues when Microsoft wasn't at the forefront, which they currently are. People took the mentioned companies apart for their doings, and if GT6 is just as bad, they won't pull their punches either. I'm sorry, but it seems to me you're trying to muddle things up, distributing blame till it loses clarity and effectiveness.I still hold the value that anyone blaming MS solely is an idiot, sorry but that is the way I see it because the facts clearly and definitively show that it is everyone playing a part and that cannot be disputed by rational people once the facts are looked at. Sony is just as guilty as MS, and third parties even more so, specifically EA and Capcom. And even in this Francis uses zero logos, he rages on about Forza 5 but here is the similar rage for Sony and GT6 which is just as bad? I mean if your going to point fingers, you point them at all culprits, other wise you simply lack demonstrable ethos and your argument lacks substance.
And that is what kills me about this whole microtransaction, even when people try to state otherwise and that they are neutral, you still see the bias and fanboyism shining clearly through. Where is the rage against Capcom for just about hiding every game they now produce behind a curtain of Microtransactions? Where is the rage at Bioware for doing it with ME3, and its nickel and dime dance it did to consumers with costumes and weapons? Where is the rage against Sony for the microtransaction debacle that is Playstation Allstars in what is probably the worse offender when it comes to 1st party games?
When it comes to this debate, and I am starting to lose a lot of respect for people and their credibility is taking huge nosedives, simply because they cannot maintain real dialogue when it comes to this issue and instead try to do the "only one party is at blame" nonsense and totally over looking everyone else that is doing the same. Its shameful, and as long as only MS is incorrectly blamed, it is an issue that will only grow.
This. Dune's "Sony too" defense is premature. Should GT6 ship with less cars and tracks than 5, along with reduced race rewards and constant badgering of the player to buy credits with real money combined with much longer grind times than previous iterations of the series... then THAT is comparable.What we can see NOW is that a lot of Xbox One not free-to-play have aggressive microtransactions in them, while PS4 ones, at the least those available right now, have none. We'll eventually judge GT6 when it'll come out.
Considering what we know now, there's no reason to not point the fingers to Microsoft for its decisions about the first Xbox One exclusives, and if we wanted to play the boycott game we shouldn't buy these exclusives at all, pulling down the value of an Xbox One purchase at the moment.
Rent it at a RedBox or through GameFly. That way the greedy pricks see none of your money.Ugh I seriously wanted to get Forza 5 today. :/ Goddamnit Microsoft.
He was being sarcastic and referencing the Xbox-fanboy-patented "Sony too" rhetoric.What do you mean? Why do you say that exactly?
For the moment, Sony is showing reverse thinking... All Killzone future DLC will be Free. They have Free-To-Play games on PS4. Only 3rd party games (ie: 2k14) have micro-transactions of this nature on PS4.
A heavily hyped title, (console) exclusive to the XB1, and with MS and EA involved, it would be a miracle (or a career-ending oversight) if Titanfall escaped DLC/microtransaction hell.
What we can see NOW is that a lot of Xbox One not free-to-play have aggressive microtransactions in them, while PS4 ones, at the least those available right now, have none. We'll eventually judge GT6 when it'll come out.
Considering what we know now, there's no reason to not point the fingers to Microsoft for its decisions about the first Xbox One exclusives, and if we wanted to play the boycott game we shouldn't buy these exclusives at all, pulling down the value of an Xbox One purchase at the moment.
Microtransactions should not be in full priced games.
Simple as that.
I've only watched this one video, but I don't think I "get" Francis as a character. If you just took a transcript of what he's saying, it sounds like a reasonable statement against a shitty practice. Having it delivered by a histrionic, speech-impedemented, internet rage nerd character only serves to decrease the credibility of an otherwise sound message.
When you create a contemptible character, whatever they say is tainted by association. Characters like this usually deliver satirical twists on common nerdrage complaints to cast dumb opinions in an obviously negative light.
So what is he making fun of, really? The acts of yelling and lisping?
He's making a excellent point. I hate this nickel and dime shit that MS are going down. Just horrible.
Also, Sony's going to do it too.
The best one yet. Great rant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGGfwPIykAo
"Maybe by the end of the generation I can spend another 60$ to not even install the game to beat it"
Delete if old.
Boogies serious video on the topic: http://youtube.com/watch?v=O-ILszuIEIM
And if you still don't know him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ1cUup0ATg
The reason why he rages http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=721448
Also, Sony's going to do it too.
In short he made the character to irritate the standard denizens of the internet. Which it seems to do a good job of.
If you dont like his francis stuff, just watch his boogie stuff which he seems to be putting up a lot more these days.
At least he does both, where as other youtube celebs just have a single act they stick to all the time.
Is it really an act of cleverness to create something irritating that succeeds in irritating people? What's the message or the point of view being conveyed? The denizens of the internet aren't foolish for finding the character irritating, so what's the joke? I'm not trying to argue he shouldn't do it at all, but I'm trying to understand what the point is and why people like it. Is it merely "he pisses off people who aren't in on the joke, but I am in on the joke so that makes me feel good and slightly superior"?
I haven't seen any boogie stuff either, until just this moment, and he seems smart, articulate, and has a pleasant voice to boot. I have no issue with his real persona.
Older joke pic, but still pretty accurate I think on the whole DLC situation that we face these days.
Need to update that brah:
![]()
Is it really an act of cleverness to create something irritating that succeeds in irritating people? What's the message or the point of view being conveyed? The denizens of the internet aren't foolish for finding the character irritating, so what's the joke? I'm not trying to argue he shouldn't do it at all, but I'm trying to understand what the point is and why people like it. Is it merely "he pisses off people who aren't in on the joke, but I am in on the joke so that makes me feel good and slightly superior"?
I haven't seen any boogie stuff either, until just this moment, and he seems smart, articulate, and has a pleasant voice to boot. I have no issue with his real persona.