mckmas8808 said:You hate too much. Did you see the team Magic, Jordan, and Bird have?
They didn't jump ship to another stars team though, that's the difference, though unlike most of non heat gaf i don't really have a beef with Lebron.
mckmas8808 said:You hate too much. Did you see the team Magic, Jordan, and Bird have?
Sharp said:I don't think the championships Bird won are a terribly enormous part of his legacy either, but the mere fact that he did not abandon his team to acquire them means they're worth something.
Sharp said::lol Come on son, are you really comparing a constructed team with three top 20 players in the game with Jordan, an underdeveloped version of Pippen, and Paxson?
giga said:Bird? He wont even reach Pippen.
Darkman M said:They didn't jump ship to another stars team though, that's the difference, though unlike most of non heat gaf i don't really have a beef with Lebron.
Darkman M said:They didn't jump ship to another stars team though, that's the difference, though unlike most of non heat gaf i don't really have a beef with Lebron.
You don't even try anymore.thekad said:Lebron, Wade, and Bosh bring the pain again and destroy another playoff contending team on their own court. NBAGAF, of course, has to try to make excuses. 7 games and counting.
u mad?
mckmas8808 said:It's too hard to really compare Lebron to either Pippen or Bird imo. He's just so different. Pippen had better defense than Lebron, but he could never score like Bron Bron.
Blackace said:FA wasn't the same back in the day tho... I don't defend LBJ for leaving but teams weren't cashing out like they are now
Barkley is underrated as hell because of the era he played in. Either way, if Bird hadn't won those rings, who would you rate higher than him at SF? Havlicek?Blackace said:Really? If Bird had no rings he would be a Barkley level HoFer
Always brought later in the conversation about greats..
Its hard to steam roll your way into the FT line.mckmas8808 said:It's too hard to really compare Lebron to either Pippen or Bird imo. He's just so different. Pippen had better defense than Lebron, but he could never score like Bron Bron.
DY_nasty said:You don't even try anymore.
You're like the Chris Mihm of NBA-age now.
Sharp said:Barkley is underrated as hell because of the era he played in. Either way, if Bird hadn't won those rings, who would you rate higher than him at PF? Havlicek?
Darkman M said:I have no problem with what Lebron did, he was a FA and wanted to play with his friend wade and have a better shot at a ring, my point is legacy wise people will always use that against him no matter what he does from here out.
giga said:Its hard to steam roll your way into the FT line.
mckmas8808 said:Well if he wins a title or more I think people will look past the whole he played with Wade stuff. At the end of the day every champion played with another All-Star. Lebron wouldn't be any different and the history shows that.
I hope guys like you realize that he does more than just steam roll to the paint and score. But of course I wouldn't expect everybody to realize that.
Says the guy who thinks that Mike Brown's firing was a bad idea...mckmas8808 said:I hope guys like you realize that he does more than just steam roll to the paint and score. But of course I wouldn't expect everybody to realize that.
Garnett.Sharp said:Since people like to bring up the '08 Celtics here, I have a question for y'all. Which of them gets the majority of the credit for their rings: Allen, Garnett, or Pierce? The ring still matters but its effect is severely diluted. Same will be true of Heat rings.
His entire game? No? Its a significant aspect of it though. Any team whos faced him in the 4th can tell you that.mckmas8808 said:I hope guys like you realize that he does more than just steam roll to the paint and score. But of course I wouldn't expect everybody to realize that.
Sharp said:Since people like to bring up the '08 Celtics here, I have a question for y'all. Which of them gets the majority of the credit for their rings: Allen, Garnett, or Pierce? The ring still matters but its effect is severely diluted. Same will be true of Heat rings.
Sharp said:Since people like to bring up the '08 Celtics here, I have a question for y'all. Which of them gets the majority of the credit for their rings: Allen, Garnett, or Pierce? The ring still matters but its effect is severely diluted. Same will be true of Heat rings.
DY_nasty said:Who the fuck is Dominic McGuire and why is he getting so many shots?
Says the guy who thinks that Mike Brown's firing was a bad idea...
Sharp said:Since people like to bring up the '08 Celtics here, I have a question for y'all. Which of them gets the majority of the credit for their rings: Allen, Garnett, or Pierce? The ring still matters but its effect is severely diluted. Same will be true of Heat rings.
Bird>>>Barry>>>>>>>>>>>>>LeBroad.MiamiWesker said:I know that my opinion on lebron now means nothing just cause I am a heat fan. Still how is the notion that Lebron might be better than Bird at some point a crazy idea. Yes Bird is one of the greatest of all time, top 10 for sure. You guys think Lebron won't end up as one of the top 10 greatest players of all time? Statistically his numbers will be insane if he plays a full career. And yes he has to win rings, lots of them and I think he will get them.
Right now of course it's insulting to Bird to say Lebron is better, that isn't what they are saying. I really don't see it as crazy that Lebron ends up one of the very all time greats. But what do I know I am a Heat fan.
Blackace said:Really? Diluted? Three aging players brought together by legit trades? It was PP's team.. And everyone played their role.. With KG it wouldn't have been possible but PP was the Alpha of that team that year
Ninja Scooter said:Garnett was probably the MVP of that team so I'd give it to him, but you are right they are much closer to the Pistons title winners than the "one/two man shows" of most other champs.
To find a comparison to the Heat should they win a title, look no further than last year's Yankees. A-Rod finally got his ring, but does the media really treat him any different? Does he get worshipped as an all time great because of his incredible stats and numbers? No. All that changed is people don't throw the "no ring!" thing in his face anymore but the title doesn't seem to mean as much because he won it on someone else's team (Jeter/Wade).
We have people in this thread who think it was really KG's ring and people who think it was really PP's (and a lot more considering that he got the Finals MVP). Ultimately, they won a ring, but it was a lot more important for the Celtics as a franchise than for any of them individually. That is my point.Blackace said:Really? Diluted? Three aging players brought together by legit trades? It was PP's team.. And everyone played their role.. With KG it wouldn't have been possible but PP was the Alpha of that team that year
mckmas8808 said:Why do people even care if players are brought together by a GM or if they do it themselves? Seems so stupid to me to even care. Is this the slave mentality that Jason Whitlock was talking about?
A-Rod isn't getting that love because he did steroids. Had he not juiced he would be getting all the love.
I'd bet you would be singing a different tune if he went to the Knicks.charsace said:Bird>>>Barry>>>>>>>>>>>>>LeBroad.
mckmas8808 said:A-Rod isn't getting that love because he did steroids. Had he not juiced he would be getting all the love.
Sharp said:We have people in this thread who think it was really KG's ring and people who think it was really PP's (and a lot more considering that he got the Finals MVP). Ultimately, they won a ring, but it was a lot more important for the Celtics as a franchise than for any of them individually. That is my point.
I was just happy to see ARod finally submit to his superior(Jeter). Nomar washed out of the league so he wasn't an issue.Ninja Scooter said:lol like he was beloved before the steroids? He was already being hated on for being an egomaniac who had to jump to someone else's team to try and win a title because he couldn't do it alone. Sound familiar? Even Yankee fans didn't like him.
Sharp said:We have people in this thread who think it was really KG's ring and people who think it was really PP's (and a lot more considering that he got the Finals MVP). Ultimately, they won a ring, but it was a lot more important for the Celtics as a franchise than for any of them individually. That is my point.
Darkman M said:Pretty sure Arod was getting hate in NY before the steroid thing.
charsace said:I was just happy to see ARod finally submit to his superior(Jeter). Nomar washed out of the league so he wasn't an issue.
Sharp said:People who didn't win rings like Barkley, Ewing, Malone, etc. are generally underated, sure, but had they won even one ring they would instantly have been in the discussion with the greats. I don't think that will be the case with LeBron, and to be honest I'm not sure it's happened for Garnett either (though I could be going against the zeitgeist on that one).
Ewing gets shafted because his team played better without him.Blackace said:Please when you tam about great centers of the 90s Ewing gets shafted why is that?
For a player like KG getting the chip was the thing that made him one of the greatest PF to play.. Now he will be remember with Magic and Bird not Barkley and Ewing,.
Branduil said:Ewing gets shafted because his team played better without him.
Blackace said:Really? Diluted? Three aging players brought together by legit trades? It was PP's team.. And everyone played their role.. With KG it wouldn't have been possible but PP was the Alpha of that team that year
Blackace said:If KG retires this year, which he might, his numbers would look very Barkley like.. So.. Yeah..
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lolpeterb0y said:its not unreasonable though
Branduil said:Ewing gets shafted because his team played better without him.
The Crimson Blur said:I get what you are saying, but it doesn't help your argument that KG is a better player than Barkley ever was with or without the rings.
Nonsense.The Crimson Blur said:I get what you are saying, but it doesn't help your argument that KG is a better player than Barkley ever was with or without the rings.
Blackace said:76ers Barkely was a better player than KG...sorry