2010/11 NBA Dec |OT| of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7lMXXaUaIo PEACE

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Frankman said:
How is that team better? First guy off the bench is Roger Mason Jr? Sure they're better if you play the starters 45 min a night.

Because he's only playing 10mins a night. At most. And even with the melo trade THIS year, you're not winning it all, just pushing as far as you can, to build the team chemistry. This off season, you get to build your bench and move guys around. Most chip winning teams, aren't 10 deep like the suns last year. They're maybe 7 deep, like the lakers/celtics that won the last 3 chips.

I think a deep bench is useful, if you have it. And it will certainly at times win you games you wouldn't other wise, and more so in the regular season. But as long as you can get a top 4 seed, you'll live.

That is, as long as your starters at all spots are decent enough to start in the first place. Miami hurts because their backup C is also trash, and so is their backup PG.
 
captmcblack said:
Yes, the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th.
Yes, the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
Yes, this is a game of chicken.

Yes, I believe the Nuggets will blink first because the Knicks - just like this past FA period - have nothing to lose. Either they get Carmelo Anthony - via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period, or straight cash in the FA period - or they have their currently decent team as it's constructed right now and at least a max contract's worth of cash to improve it via trades and free agency.
The problem I have with the "Carmelo to NY" trade talks is that the Knicks are unwilling to provide the best package for him. All of the other offers that the Nuggets have received thus far are more appealing, imo.
 
I get what you're saying, but the whole bench is trash + Turiaf is a starter in name only. In reality he's the Knicks defensive energy guy, he can't last playing 30 minutes every night. One onw of the reasons the Knicks are so effective is that Amar'e is surrounded by shooters/slashers at all times. Chandler/Douglas off the bench + Williams/Walker can play spot minutes.

How much flow would an eventual Moz/Amar'e/Williams/Mason/Rautins (:lol :lol :lol :lol ) lineup have? I'm not saying don't trade for Melo, just not trade 6 guys for him.
reilo said:
The problem I have with the "Carmelo to NY" trade talks is that the Knicks are unwilling to provide the best package for him. All of the other offers that the Nuggets have received thus far are more appealing, imo.
Because Melo seems to be trying to control negotiations to go to NY. Why should the Knicks offer a higher package if they think they can sign him outright anyway?
 
thekad said:
DY_nasty MD on the case :lol He'll be back before next week.
and injured again before january. he's injured that same ankle 4 times since preseason.

thegeniuskad - listen to this guy.
 
captmcblack said:
Yes, the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th.
Yes, the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
Yes, this is a game of chicken.

Yes, I believe the Nuggets will blink first because the Knicks - just like this past FA period - have nothing to lose. Either they get Carmelo Anthony - via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period, or straight cash in the FA period - or they have their currently decent team as it's constructed right now and at least a max contract's worth of cash to improve it via trades and free agency.

It is Melo who might blink first...with the lockout coming.
 
I'd love for Melo to stay with the Nuggs until the trade deadline. They'll probably scrape to the 8th seed, leading to one of the easiest 1st round matchups of the decade.
 
The Frankman said:
Because Melo seems to be trying to control negotiations to go to NY. Why should the Knicks offer a higher package if they think they can sign him outright anyway?

Not as much as media outlets say. The same ones that had LBJ to NY as a lock. Melo's only confirmed statement is that he wants out of Denver, and that he isn't opossed to NY.

If the knicks don't trade for him, your chances of retaining him decrease, a lot. If the nets trade for him (and they're putting together a mighty nice package 3 or 4 first round picks in the one draft? and in that, melo gets no choice), and then go on a tear, with prokorhov as the owner providing big sources of cash meaning they'll re-sign talent and not be adverse to spending, Lopez there, Humphries finally playing decently, Harris not being completely horrible, he may just decide that he'll sign the extension there for 86M or what ever it is, and not have the worry of the newCBA.
 
Blackace said:
It is Melo who might blink first...with the lockout coming.
Exactly.

I don't know too many guys who are willing to risk a min of 40 million on job location alone. In a game of chicken, always bet on the FO - players hardly ever win.
 
DY_nasty said:
and injured again before january. he's injured that same ankle 4 times since preseason.

thegeniuskad - listen to this guy.

Yeah, the big thing with rolled ankles like that, is that every time you do it, you're much more likely to do it again, as you keep re-tearing the same tendons/muscles. And sooner or later it leads to big amounts of time off. It takes something like 3 - 6 months off, for it to FULLY heal. Curry really could miss serious time this year if he keeps doing that every 5 games.
 
reilo said:
The problem I have with the "Carmelo to NY" trade talks is that the Knicks are unwilling to provide the best package for him. All of the other offers that the Nuggets have received thus far are more appealing, imo.


But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.

Again, the options are as follows:

- the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th and he goes wherever (probably the Knicks) in free agency; the Knicks get themselves under the cap to acquire him.
- the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
- another team is happy to give up better players/picks than the Knicks offer knowing full well that the Anthony acquisition is only a rental
- the Knicks get Carmelo Anthony, via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period
- the Knicks don't get Carmelo, and are left with a good team and a lot of money

That's all there is.
 
captmcblack said:
But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.

Except, melo has never said those words. Only "an inside source is rumoured to have heard". The sameones that had LBJ to NY as a lock. Thats a big flaw in your stance on this.
 
captmcblack said:
But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.

Again, the options are as follows:

- the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th and he goes wherever (probably the Knicks) in free agency; the Knicks get themselves under the cap to acquire him.
- the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
- another team is happy to give up better players/picks than the Knicks offer knowing full well that the Anthony acquisition is only a rental
- the Knicks get Carmelo Anthony, via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period
- the Knicks don't get Carmelo, and are left with a good team and a lot of money

That's all there is.
A lot of that is predicated on the assumption that Carmelo is ready to take a monumental pay cut.
 
captmcblack said:
But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.

Again, the options are as follows:

- the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th and he goes wherever (probably the Knicks) in free agency; the Knicks get themselves under the cap to acquire him.
- the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
- another team is happy to give up better players/picks than the Knicks offer knowing full well that the Anthony acquisition is only a rental
- the Knicks get Carmelo Anthony, via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period
- the Knicks don't get Carmelo, and are left with a good team and a lot of money

That's all there is.

Actually Melo has NOT said he will ONLY sign with NY

Also Melo wants to be paid, which means he needs to be signed before the season is over soooooo yeah
 
giri said:
Except, melo has never said those words. Only "an inside source is rumoured to have heard". The sameones that had LBJ to NY as a lock. Thats a big flaw in your stance on this.

See: "this is a game of chicken"
I am well aware this isn't a lock.
I am also confident that Carmelo to NY is much more likely than the 2 years of collusion that resulted in LBJ's South Beach sojourn.

Carmelo is standing defiantly in the face of potentially getting less money as a function of a new CBA. We will see what happens. No player under contract could themselves say anything about not playing for the team they're contracted for, so I'm not going to wait for him to make any personal "ultimatums" because he literally cannot do so. That said, whatever things we do know or have evidence of - as much as we reasonably can have without being agents/FO people in the league/players in the league/Anthony himself - seems to lean more towards Carmelo ending up here.

It's a risk. The Knicks are taking it. Hopefully, Anthony will too.
 
pilonv1 said:
So if the Warriors finished 13th or something they'd have no draft picks this year. Cohan's legacy lives on.
The first rounder to NJ is for the 2012 draft. 2011 is going to be a weak draft class so it's not like it helps them.
 
captmcblack said:
See: "this is a game of chicken"
I am well aware this isn't a lock.
I am also confident that Carmelo to NY is much more likely than the 2 years of collusion that resulted in LBJ's South Beach sojourn.

Carmelo is standing defiantly in the face of potentially getting less money as a function of a new CBA. We will see what happens. No player under contract could themselves say anything about not playing for the team they're contracted for, so I'm not going to wait for him to make any personal "ultimatums" because he literally cannot do so. That said, whatever things we do know or have evidence of - as much as we reasonably can have without being agents/FO people in the league/players in the league/Anthony himself - seems to lean more towards Carmelo ending up here.

It's a risk. The Knicks are taking it. Hopefully, Anthony will too.

Except in a game of chicken, if the nets trade for him, i really don't see the knicks winning.

It's not game over for you guys, you get rid of currys expiring, and free up some cash to sign some people. But to really compete for a chip, you need melo (or a talent on his level).
 
giri said:
Yeah, the big thing with rolled ankles like that, is that every time you do it, you're much more likely to do it again, as you keep re-tearing the same tendons/muscles. And sooner or later it leads to big amounts of time off. It takes something like 3 - 6 months off, for it to FULLY heal. Curry really could miss serious time this year if he keeps doing that every 5 games.
He should've sat out for a month after he rolled it the first time. Props to the guy for trying to play through it, but this is exactly how guys end up screwed.
captmcblack said:
See: "this is a game of chicken"
I am well aware this isn't a lock.
I am also confident that Carmelo to NY is much more likely than the 2 years of collusion that resulted in LBJ's South Beach sojourn.

Carmelo is standing defiantly in the face of potentially getting less money as a function of a new CBA. We will see what happens. Whatever we know - as much as we reasonably can know without being agents/FO people in the league/players in the league/Anthony himself - seems to lean more towards Carmelo ending up here.

It's a risk. The Knicks are taking it. Hopefully, Anthony will too.
History tells us that 9 times out of 10 guys are going to take the money. Melo is playing a great game, but with the CBA change coming up... I don't see him just throwing money away like that.
 
giri said:
Except in a game of chicken, if the nets trade for him, i really don't see the knicks winning.

It's not game over for you guys, you get rid of currys expiring, and free up some cash to sign some people. But to really compete for a chip, you need melo (or a talent on his level).

Is this because you believe Carmelo's want of money > Carmelo's want of winning?

He isn't going to win more by joining a Nets team in Newark that needs to trade draft picks and 1/2 of Harris/Favors/Lopez to land him. He will secure his financial future, though...assuming that the CBA is definitely totally deleterious to max contracts and max players.

[EDIT: as for "taking the money", I just saw someone bypass that in MLB *yesterday* to go where they wanted to go. In addition, I saw people lessen their money to facilitate the new Big 3 in Miami just this FA period. It's not impossible!]
 
giri said:
Except in a game of chicken, if the nets trade for him, i really don't see the knicks winning.
This the same Nets who had a better FO offseason than the Knicks and have a much better record/are closer to competing for the playoffs? Knicks are fucked...
 
captmcblack said:
Is this because you believe Carmelo's want of money > Carmelo's want of winning?

He isn't going to win more by joining a Nets team in Newark that needs to trade draft picks and 1/2 of Harris/Favors/Lopez to land him. He will secure his financial future, though...assuming that the CBA is definitely totally deleterious to max contracts and max players.

[EDIT: as for "taking the money", I just saw someone bypass that in MLB *yesterday* to go where they wanted to go. In addition, I saw people lessen their money to facilitate the new Big 3 in Miami just this FA period. It's not impossible!]
Dropping a few million and an extra year is one thing.

The new CBA that Stern and the owners want is trying to drop player salaries by nearly half.

You think Lee is going to take that same deal if its only 50 million and 3 years with a team option for the 4th?
 
DY_nasty said:
Jax-11.jpg

JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAX
 
captmcblack said:
Is this because you believe Carmelo's want of money > Carmelo's want of winning?

He isn't going to win more by joining a Nets team in Newark that needs to trade draft picks and 1/2 of Harris/Favors/Lopez to land him. He will secure his financial future, though...assuming that the CBA is definitely totally deleterious to max contracts and max players.

[EDIT: as for "taking the money", I just saw someone bypass that in MLB *yesterday* to go where they wanted to go. In addition, I saw people lessen their money to facilitate the new Big 3 in Miami just this FA period. It's not impossible!]

The nets aren't that far off winning. And all of the trades/signings they made last year weren't block busters, but they were for the most part, good value. So they didn't win, but they didn't lose either. If harris could stay healthy, they'd probably have another 4 wins.

The knicks, before they can totally trash people, need to come through this tough stretch, above .500 before they can say that they can allure FA's by being a "winning team". The nets have a SOS of .514 (11th toughest) the knicks have one of .413 (2nd easiest). So it's not as easy as comparing records just yet.

My reason for saying that melo, if traded to NJ is more likely to stay there, is because it offers him as many positives as the knicks do, plus they'd be able to offer him the full extension. Not the new CBA rates, what ever they might be.
 
ryutaro's mama said:
Damn.

Local radio here in LA says that Sasha and Farmar hated each other when they played together on the Lakers--now they are reunited.

I smell sitcom!

So they hated each other for 5 minutes, 82 times a year? thats less than 10hours of hate a year!
 
Robin Lopez evidently back for the Suns tonight.

But that doesn't matter because Rambis will find some way to turn the tide in this one. Will Wes barely play again? Will Jonny get benched so Ridnour can continue to play like trash? Find out soon!
 
Rodeo Clown said:
Robin Lopez evidently back for the Suns tonight.

But that doesn't matter because Rambis will find some way to turn the tide in this one. Will Wes barely play again? Will Jonny get benched so Ridnour can continue to play like trash? Find out soon!
WWKRD?
 
Games of the night:

Tier 1 (must watch):

Celtics @ Knicks -- Watch to see both the Knicks' and STAT's streak snapped amidst millions of sweet, sweet New York tears.

Tier 2 (should be good):

Lakers @ Pacers -- The Lakers began their road trip with two victories against subpar teams. Bynum looked rusty in his return, and the Pacers are actually good, so this should be a competitive matchup.

Clippers @ Sixers -- The two most underrated teams in the league.

Rockets @ Thunder -- I think this will be a pretty competitive matchup, even though the Rox almost lost to Sacramento the other day.

Blazers @ Mavericks -- Brandon Roy may be dead and Branduil may be dying, but that doesn't mean this won't be a good game.

Tier 3 (tune in if it's close):

Bucks @ Spurs -- The Bucks already dealt with the Mavs, can they pull off the upset again? (A: On a back-to-back? Hell no).

Bobcats @ Grizzlies - The Grizzlies are in that lower tier of okay teams that can be frustrated by Bobcats shameball.

Timberwolves @ Suns -- Both play at an extremely fast pace so the game should at least be entertaining even if it's a blowout.

Tier 4 (for fans of the teams only):

Bulls @ Raptors -- The Bulls are good and the Raptors are bad.

Cavaliers @ Heat -- Now that the initial allure of this matchup has worn off there is no reason to watch this except for GIF purposes.

Kings @ Hornets -- Try as I might to hype up the Pooh Jeter vs. CP3 matchup, I just can't.
 
Rodeo Clown said:
Robin Lopez evidently back for the Suns tonight.

But that doesn't matter because Rambis will find some way to turn the tide in this one. Will Wes barely play again? Will Jonny get benched so Ridnour can continue to play like trash? Find out soon!

Yeah, i'm amped for robins return. a C who boxes out, bodies up, and plays on the inside! Fuck Yeah! Mediocrity here we come!
 
Rodeo Clown said:
Keep Martell on the bench even though he's our best option at 2. Need that depth.
I wouldn't be offended by that, if all those minutes were going to Wes instead. But they aren't.

Also, brewers terrible.
 
Sharp said:
Rockets @ Thunder -- I think this will be a pretty competitive matchup, even though the Rox almost lost to Sacramento the other day.

The Rockets almost lost to Sacramento yesterday? They blew them out in the third quarter :lol It wasn't close since the second quarter :lol :lol

And today's game will not be competitive. We're going to get run off the court.
 
giri said:
I wouldn't be offended by that, if all those minutes were going to Wes instead. But they aren't.

Also, brewers terrible.
Exactly. Brewer is trash and shouldn't be in the rotation with Webster back.

I'd run a short rotation. Flynn/Webster/Beasley/Love/Darko with Wes as 6th man and the only guy that gets meaningful minutes of the bench. I'd also give Tolliver and Pekovic some run and demote Ridnour to ballboy, but that's it. Those other guys don't need to play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom