The Frankman
Banned
Nuggets should trade Carmelo to Detroit or Charlotte for lulz. Detroit/Larry brown reunification!
The Frankman said:How is that team better? First guy off the bench is Roger Mason Jr? Sure they're better if you play the starters 45 min a night.
reilo said:ESPN :lol
1. Kevin Garnett
2. Dwight Howard
3. Chris Paul
T-4. LEBRON JAMES AND DWYANE WADE
5. Glen Davis
:lol :lol :lol :lol
http://espn.go.com/nba/notebook/_/page/Awards-101214/nba-awards-watch
The problem I have with the "Carmelo to NY" trade talks is that the Knicks are unwilling to provide the best package for him. All of the other offers that the Nuggets have received thus far are more appealing, imo.captmcblack said:Yes, the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th.
Yes, the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
Yes, this is a game of chicken.
Yes, I believe the Nuggets will blink first because the Knicks - just like this past FA period - have nothing to lose. Either they get Carmelo Anthony - via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period, or straight cash in the FA period - or they have their currently decent team as it's constructed right now and at least a max contract's worth of cash to improve it via trades and free agency.
Because Melo seems to be trying to control negotiations to go to NY. Why should the Knicks offer a higher package if they think they can sign him outright anyway?reilo said:The problem I have with the "Carmelo to NY" trade talks is that the Knicks are unwilling to provide the best package for him. All of the other offers that the Nuggets have received thus far are more appealing, imo.
and injured again before january. he's injured that same ankle 4 times since preseason.thekad said:DY_nasty MD on the case :lol He'll be back before next week.
captmcblack said:Yes, the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th.
Yes, the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
Yes, this is a game of chicken.
Yes, I believe the Nuggets will blink first because the Knicks - just like this past FA period - have nothing to lose. Either they get Carmelo Anthony - via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period, or straight cash in the FA period - or they have their currently decent team as it's constructed right now and at least a max contract's worth of cash to improve it via trades and free agency.
The Frankman said:Because Melo seems to be trying to control negotiations to go to NY. Why should the Knicks offer a higher package if they think they can sign him outright anyway?
Exactly.Blackace said:It is Melo who might blink first...with the lockout coming.
DY_nasty said:and injured again before january. he's injured that same ankle 4 times since preseason.
thegeniuskad - listen to this guy.
reilo said:The problem I have with the "Carmelo to NY" trade talks is that the Knicks are unwilling to provide the best package for him. All of the other offers that the Nuggets have received thus far are more appealing, imo.
captmcblack said:But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.
A lot of that is predicated on the assumption that Carmelo is ready to take a monumental pay cut.captmcblack said:But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.
Again, the options are as follows:
- the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th and he goes wherever (probably the Knicks) in free agency; the Knicks get themselves under the cap to acquire him.
- the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
- another team is happy to give up better players/picks than the Knicks offer knowing full well that the Anthony acquisition is only a rental
- the Knicks get Carmelo Anthony, via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period
- the Knicks don't get Carmelo, and are left with a good team and a lot of money
That's all there is.
Golden States 2011 second-round pick
captmcblack said:But it doesn't matter who else provided better offers, because Carmelo will not sign an extension with them - therefore, those trades will not happen because those better offers are contingent on Carmelo extending his contract.
Again, the options are as follows:
- the Nuggets can hold onto Carmelo indefinitely/until June 30th and he goes wherever (probably the Knicks) in free agency; the Knicks get themselves under the cap to acquire him.
- the Nuggets could move Carmelo against his will to any other team they want just to spite the Knicks, and leave the Knicks to hope that he still really wants to sign with them.
- another team is happy to give up better players/picks than the Knicks offer knowing full well that the Anthony acquisition is only a rental
- the Knicks get Carmelo Anthony, via trade from the Nuggets, sign-and-trade in the FA period
- the Knicks don't get Carmelo, and are left with a good team and a lot of money
That's all there is.
tyguy20204 said:Bogut is a game-time decision with one his migraines. That stinks.
Spurs might get let off easy.
giri said:Except, melo has never said those words. Only "an inside source is rumoured to have heard". The sameones that had LBJ to NY as a lock. Thats a big flaw in your stance on this.
The first rounder to NJ is for the 2012 draft. 2011 is going to be a weak draft class so it's not like it helps them.pilonv1 said:So if the Warriors finished 13th or something they'd have no draft picks this year. Cohan's legacy lives on.
captmcblack said:See: "this is a game of chicken"
I am well aware this isn't a lock.
I am also confident that Carmelo to NY is much more likely than the 2 years of collusion that resulted in LBJ's South Beach sojourn.
Carmelo is standing defiantly in the face of potentially getting less money as a function of a new CBA. We will see what happens. No player under contract could themselves say anything about not playing for the team they're contracted for, so I'm not going to wait for him to make any personal "ultimatums" because he literally cannot do so. That said, whatever things we do know or have evidence of - as much as we reasonably can have without being agents/FO people in the league/players in the league/Anthony himself - seems to lean more towards Carmelo ending up here.
It's a risk. The Knicks are taking it. Hopefully, Anthony will too.
He should've sat out for a month after he rolled it the first time. Props to the guy for trying to play through it, but this is exactly how guys end up screwed.giri said:Yeah, the big thing with rolled ankles like that, is that every time you do it, you're much more likely to do it again, as you keep re-tearing the same tendons/muscles. And sooner or later it leads to big amounts of time off. It takes something like 3 - 6 months off, for it to FULLY heal. Curry really could miss serious time this year if he keeps doing that every 5 games.
History tells us that 9 times out of 10 guys are going to take the money. Melo is playing a great game, but with the CBA change coming up... I don't see him just throwing money away like that.captmcblack said:See: "this is a game of chicken"
I am well aware this isn't a lock.
I am also confident that Carmelo to NY is much more likely than the 2 years of collusion that resulted in LBJ's South Beach sojourn.
Carmelo is standing defiantly in the face of potentially getting less money as a function of a new CBA. We will see what happens. Whatever we know - as much as we reasonably can know without being agents/FO people in the league/players in the league/Anthony himself - seems to lean more towards Carmelo ending up here.
It's a risk. The Knicks are taking it. Hopefully, Anthony will too.
giri said:Except in a game of chicken, if the nets trade for him, i really don't see the knicks winning.
It's not game over for you guys, you get rid of currys expiring, and free up some cash to sign some people. But to really compete for a chip, you need melo (or a talent on his level).
This the same Nets who had a better FO offseason than the Knicks and have a much better record/are closer to competing for the playoffs? Knicks are fucked...giri said:Except in a game of chicken, if the nets trade for him, i really don't see the knicks winning.
Dropping a few million and an extra year is one thing.captmcblack said:Is this because you believe Carmelo's want of money > Carmelo's want of winning?
He isn't going to win more by joining a Nets team in Newark that needs to trade draft picks and 1/2 of Harris/Favors/Lopez to land him. He will secure his financial future, though...assuming that the CBA is definitely totally deleterious to max contracts and max players.
[EDIT: as for "taking the money", I just saw someone bypass that in MLB *yesterday* to go where they wanted to go. In addition, I saw people lessen their money to facilitate the new Big 3 in Miami just this FA period. It's not impossible!]
Is it terrible that I knew who every starter was in that lineup :lol?DY_nasty said:
captmcblack said:Is this because you believe Carmelo's want of money > Carmelo's want of winning?
He isn't going to win more by joining a Nets team in Newark that needs to trade draft picks and 1/2 of Harris/Favors/Lopez to land him. He will secure his financial future, though...assuming that the CBA is definitely totally deleterious to max contracts and max players.
[EDIT: as for "taking the money", I just saw someone bypass that in MLB *yesterday* to go where they wanted to go. In addition, I saw people lessen their money to facilitate the new Big 3 in Miami just this FA period. It's not impossible!]
ryutaro's mama said:Damn.
Local radio here in LA says that Sasha and Farmar hated each other when they played together on the Lakers--now they are reunited.
I smell sitcom!
I bet you Sasha was scared Farmar would sex up his girlfriend.giri said:So they hated each other for 5 minutes, 82 times a year? thats less than 10hours of hate a year!
WWKRD?Rodeo Clown said:Robin Lopez evidently back for the Suns tonight.
But that doesn't matter because Rambis will find some way to turn the tide in this one. Will Wes barely play again? Will Jonny get benched so Ridnour can continue to play like trash? Find out soon!
:lolThe Frankman said:I like the LOLcats sig:
![]()
Rodeo Clown said:Robin Lopez evidently back for the Suns tonight.
But that doesn't matter because Rambis will find some way to turn the tide in this one. Will Wes barely play again? Will Jonny get benched so Ridnour can continue to play like trash? Find out soon!
Keep Martell on the bench even though he's our best option at 2. Need that depth.reilo said:WWKRD?
I'm starting to wonder if there's anyone in the NBA who actually likes sasha.The Frankman said:I bet you Sasha was scared Farmar would sex up his girlfriend.
I wouldn't be offended by that, if all those minutes were going to Wes instead. But they aren't.Rodeo Clown said:Keep Martell on the bench even though he's our best option at 2. Need that depth.
:lolSharp said:Blazers @ Mavericks -- Brandon Roy may be dead and Branduil may be dying, but that doesn't mean this won't be a good game.
Sharp said:Rockets @ Thunder -- I think this will be a pretty competitive matchup, even though the Rox almost lost to Sacramento the other day.
Exactly. Brewer is trash and shouldn't be in the rotation with Webster back.giri said:I wouldn't be offended by that, if all those minutes were going to Wes instead. But they aren't.
Also, brewers terrible.