2010/11 NBA Dec |OT| of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7lMXXaUaIo PEACE

Status
Not open for further replies.
i fucking knew the spurs were going to lose as soon that jack ass on FSN was talking about this game being a gimmie for the spurs.
 
5kn1uh.jpg
 
They should just dump Davis, Bledsoe is so much better for their team.

Clippers owe the Warriors part of that win too.
 
Ninja Scooter said:
is the Clips roster really that far behind the Thunder? Especially if Bledsoe keeps developing.
Click to expand...


Two thunder players neither of them named Kevin Durant went for over 35
tonight.
 
Darkman M said:
Two thunder players neither of them named Kevin Durant went for over 35
tonight.
Click to expand...
Convenient of you to neglect to mention that they went over 35 in triple overtime.
 
Darkman M said:
Two thunder players neither of them named Kevin Durant went for over 35
tonight.
Click to expand...
It only took how many overtimes? Against the Nets?

But Bledsoe is already a smarter player than Wall by a mile. I didn't think he'd be so game ready at this point though.

Edit: beaten silly
 
Sharp said:
Convenient of you to neglect to mention that they went over 35 in triple overtime.
Click to expand...


Westbrook has been making 30 look pretty easy as of late, the only surprise was jeff green stepping up.
 
Darkman M said:
Doesn't really matter who they played, the spurs lost to the clips tonight...
Click to expand...
It definitely matters who you play.

Just look at Miami...

They blew out the Pistons tonight. Time for a thread title change?
 
It only matters in a playoff series, plenty of good teams are gonna get knocked off by scrubs on any given night. As far as individual numbers go 35 points is 35 points in the NBA period, this isn't college football or some shit.
 
Darkman M said:
It only matters in a playoff series, plenty of good teams are gonna get knocked off by scrubs on any given night. As far as individual numbers go 35 points is 35 points in the NBA period, this isn't college football or some shit.
Click to expand...
You know good and well that dropping 35 on the Wizards isn't the same as 35 on the Celtics...
 
DY_nasty said:
It only took how many overtimes? Against the Nets?

But Bledsoe is already a smarter player than Wall by a mile. I didn't think he'd be so game ready at this point though.

Edit: beaten silly
Click to expand...
I like how you can't resist trolling 19/8 even in the most innocuous of posts.
 
DY_nasty said:
You know good and well that dropping 35 on the Wizards isn't the same as 35 on the Celtics...
Click to expand...


That's true, but it's crazy to knock someones performance because of who they are playing in Professional sports, where every man is paid out the ass to perform.
 
Darkman M said:
That's true, but it's crazy to knock someones performance because of who they are playing in Professional sports, where every man is paid out the ass to perform.
Click to expand...
Only nobody is knocking them for their performance or saying that their 35 points don't "count." What we're knocking is your direct comparison between them and the Clippers considering that tonight they had fifteen more minutes to accumulate $tats.
 
Sharp said:
I like how you can't resist trolling 19/8 even in the most innocuous of posts.
Click to expand...
It was inadvertent this time, I swear. But Wall was getting clowned by Jose and Bayless. Fortunately for Wall, Raps play no transition D worth mentioning and he was allowed to score in the 2nd half - long after his team was out of the game. GJ Wall. Way to make Bayless feel wanted again.
Darkman M said:
That's true, but it's crazy to knock someones performance because of who they are playing in Professional sports, where every man is paid out the ass to perform.
Click to expand...
Not knocking him. This is the 5th time he's dropped 30 this season and he's definitely picked up KD's slack so far, but he had 15 extra minutes to boost his $tats - in a game that his team should've taken care of in regulation.
 
Sharp said:
Only nobody is knocking them for their performance or saying that their 35 points don't "count." What we're knocking is your direct comparison between them and the Clippers considering that tonight they had fifteen more minutes to accumulate $tats.
Click to expand...

I wasn't making a direct comparison to the clippers, my point was the Thunder can play without their best player and still win games. The clippers without Griffin are winless so theres really no comparison there. Are we gonna shit on Griffins big numbers because most of them end in losses?
 
Darkman M said:
I wasn't making a direct comparison to the clippers, my point was the Thunder can play without their best player and still win games. The clippers without Griffin are winless so theres really no comparison there. Are we gonna shit on Griffins big numbers because most of them end in losses?
Click to expand...
The fact that Griffin's talent can shine through the Clipper taint is an achievement in itself. I'm sure many of us thought he'd be dead by now.

btw, Durant's been off all year long. Its nice to see Westbrook stepping up in his absence though.
 
Darkman M said:
I wasn't making a direct comparison to the clippers, my point was the Thunder can play without their best player and still win games. The clippers without Griffin are winless so theres really no comparison there. Are we gonna shit on Griffins big numbers because most of them end in losses?
Click to expand...

The Kevin Durant-led Sonics finished 20-62 in his rookie year. The point of the comparison is that the Clippers seem to have a really great, young nucleus that could potentially rivals the Thunders in a few years.
 
Darkman M said:
I wasn't making a direct comparison to the clippers, my point was the Thunder can play without their best player and still win games. The clippers without Griffin are winless so theres really no comparison there. Are we gonna shit on Griffins big numbers because most of them end in losses?
Click to expand...


my remark was more about how surprising it is that the Clips are as bad as they are. They have a quality young roster that IMO isn't THAT far off from the Thunder, yet OKC will probably win 50+ games while the CLips will win 20. Is Del Negro that bad? Is it just the Clipper stink?
 
DY_nasty said:
The fact that Griffin's talent can shine through the Clipper taint is an achievement in itself. I'm sure many of us thought he'd be dead by now.

btw, Durant's been off all year long. Its nice to see Westbrook stepping up in his absence though.
Click to expand...

Westbrook has been their best player this year, Durant still relies on jumpers to much whereas if Lebron is off he can bulldose to the whole for and 1's all night.


Ninja Scooter said:
my remark was more about how surprising it is that the Clips are as bad as they are. They have a quality young roster that IMO isn't THAT far off from the Thunder, yet OKC will probably win 50+ games while the CLips will win 20. Is Del Negro that bad? Is it just the Clipper stink?
Click to expand...


I know exactly what you where saying, i think others may have took it literally.:lol
 
Gigglepoo said:
The Kevin Durant-led Sonics finished 20-62 in his rookie year. The point of the comparison is that the Clippers seem to have a really great, young nucleus that could potentially rivals the Thunders in a few years.
Click to expand...

They have Blake Griffin who is a monster, i don't think the rest of the roster compare though. Thunder have two top five players in their position, then Ibaka who has alot of potential.
 
Ninja Scooter said:
my remark was more about how surprising it is that the Clips are as bad as they are. They have a quality young roster that IMO isn't THAT far off from the Thunder, yet OKC will probably win 50+ games while the CLips will win 20. Is Del Negro that bad? Is it just the Clipper stink?
Click to expand...
Clippers usual stink.

Plus their schedule so far has been kinda rough too, especially for such a young team. Vinny isn't all that bad really.... Injuries and Baron hurt though.
 
Damn it must be frustrating being a Clippers fan. All of a sudden you beat a good team out of nowhere, gets the hopes up, then bam, lose against whatever teams again. That said, they do have B dot Griffin so it ain't all bad!
 
Ninja Scooter said:
is the Clips roster really that far behind the Thunder? Especially if Bledsoe keeps developing.
Click to expand...

Yes and no.

Do the clips have young players that could develop into something very special around Griffin, yes. They need help though, and plenty of it. Good coaching,some decent leadership in the locker room, and lots of good decisions by their GM and support from the owner at contract time.

The biggest difference between the clubs isn't the young core, but the front office.

Ninja Scooter said:
my remark was more about how surprising it is that the Clips are as bad as they are. They have a quality young roster that IMO isn't THAT far off from the Thunder, yet OKC will probably win 50+ games while the CLips will win 20. Is Del Negro that bad? Is it just the Clipper stink?
Click to expand...

Time playing together and everyone accepting their role.

Darkman M said:
They have Blake Griffin who is a monster, i don't think the rest of the roster compare though. Thunder have two top five players in their position, then Ibaka who has alot of potential.
Click to expand...

Durant and.... who is the other top 5?

If the clips draft well this year and get someone who can genuinely shoot really well and help create on th wing (presuming aminu doesn't turn into this player) or get a centre that can be a real defensive force but spread the floor for griffin. They'll be a long way there.
 
giri said:
Yes and no.

Do the clips have young players that could develop into something very special around Griffin, yes. They need help though, and plenty of it. Good coaching,some decent leadership in the locker room, and lots of good decisions by their GM and support from the owner at contract time.

The biggest difference between the clubs isn't the young core, but the front office.



Time playing together and everyone accepting their role.



Durant and.... who is the other top 5?

If the clips draft well this year and get someone who can genuinely shoot really well and help create on th wing (presuming aminu doesn't turn into this player) or get a centre that can be a real defensive force but spread the floor for griffin. They'll be a long way there.
Click to expand...


Westbrook is a top 5 point guard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Maria Corina Machado won Nobel Peace Prize
27
318
Little Mac replied
9/11
26
723
DaciaJC replied
NBA finals
2 3 4
183
5K
HeisenbergFX4 replied
Canelo vs Crawford VR watch party. Who is down to watch?
4
344
ReasonBeing replied
Starship Flight 11 launch within the hour
39
414
ReBurn replied
Top Bottom