2010/11 NBA Dec |OT| of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7lMXXaUaIo PEACE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Adam Blade said:
Anyone want a slightly used Chris Kaman? 11/7 on decent
36%
FG, only injured half a season each year, and with only 2 years left on his contract.
Ooh! Me!
 
giri said:
Did all those guys play a full season together, ever? Those suns teams were ravaged with injuries. I think probably the only season they had together was probably amare`s rookie season?

Can you really say that was an act of fate though? The team ran an 8 man rotation all season at an insane pace, running those guys up & down for 40 minutes night after night. Injuries would seem to be a natural outcome.
 
Adam Blade said:
Anyone want a slightly used Chris Kaman? 11/7 on decent
36%
FG, only injured half a season each year, and with only 2 years left on his contract.

Is the Clippers in the development league yet? I think the Lakers could borrow a backup center for a month or two.
 
Seeing that old Suns lineup...damn, really wish we'd chosen T-Mac for JoJo and Marion + 7th pick instead of the two lovers Franchise and Mobley.

Dwight
Marion
Hill
Johnson
Nelson
Deng or Iggy of the bench.

Nasty.
 
Oh, and games played in 2004-2005:

Amare: 80
Marion: 81
Johnson: 82
Richardson: 79
Nash: 75
 
reilo said:
Re-read my comment. It was specific to having number of players with All-NBA credentials in their prime playing together at the same time. I didn't say the Lakers nor Celtics were stacked. I said they didn't have four All-NBA players in their prime playing together. Which is true. Especially about the Celtics due to where their best players are in their career. I'm not saying they weren't stacked nor talented, just that their best players on their team weren't all put together during each and every one of their primes. That's the difference.

Besides, Lakers, Celtics and Spurs have experienced their fair share of injuries, too.

That first year the C's were together, they were (or should have been) every single one of them, either all nba, or all defensive, if not on both. Ron artest still plays D at an all defensive level, and gasol/kobe should/could quite easily make all nba. And bynum isn't untalented, he just doesn't give a fuck. And odom is extremely talented and could quite easily win 6th man of the year any of their Chip years.

But you're right, they are completely and utterly devoid of talent compared to those suns teams. Undoubtedly. None of these laker/celts/spurs teams are lacking any talent compared to those suns teams. None of htem are exactly dynasties though either.

And yes, all those teams had injuries, and in those injured years did they win it all? err, no.

03-04 marbury,
04-05 Joe gets injured in the play offs, this is the best year they had, and best shot. But LB was also injured in those play offs. Still they should have won it then and failed.
05-06 Amare's knees blow up. Bell/Diaw era begins
06-07 Spurs cheap shot gets amare/diaw suspended
07-08 The Shaquile O'Neal experience.
08-09 Mike D' gone, The terry porter experience.
09-10 WCF, where amare played like a giant skirt.

Besides, that suns teams biggest problem wasn't scoring depth, and everyone knows it.
 
LiveFromKyoto said:
Can you really say that was an act of fate though? The team ran an 8 man rotation all season at an insane pace, running those guys up & down for 40 minutes night after night. Injuries would seem to be a natural outcome.

Can't say you're wrong. But some of thats on the owner. They never kept draft picks so never had new blood to bring into a rotation. The picks they sold were used on decent talent too. Rudy, rondo, sergio too i think? such wastes.

reilo said:
Oh, and games played in 2004-2005:

Amare: 80
Marion: 81
Johnson: 82
Richardson: 79
Nash: 75

Regular season, yes.
 
06-07 Spurs cheap shot gets amare/diaw suspended

kegaqs.jpg
 
giri said:
Can't say you're wrong. But some of thats on the owner. They never kept draft picks so never had new blood to bring into a rotation. The picks they sold were used on decent talent too. Rudy, rondo, sergio too i think? such wastes.



Regular season, yes.
Don't forget Gortat. Would have been the perfect center next to Amar'''e.
 
ryutaro's mama said:

I detest Horry, and hope he dies in anyone of Branduils fantasy scenarios. I seriously wouldn't care if the guy tripped and broke his kneck.

Some of that is directed at stern though, the single most ridiculous suspension ever handed down in one of the most absurd decisions ever made in professional sport in the history of the world.
 
giri said:
That first year the C's were together, they were (or should have been) every single one of them, either all nba, or all defensive, if not on both.
Nope. Allen hasn't been All-NBA since 2005. Rondo has never made an All-NBA team.
Ron artest still plays D at an all defensive level, and gasol/kobe should/could quite easily make all nba. And bynum isn't untalented, he just doesn't give a fuck. And odom is extremely talented and could quite easily win 6th man of the year any of their Chip years.

But you're right, they are completely and utterly devoid of talent compared to those suns teams. Undoubtedly. None of these laker/celts/spurs teams are lacking any talent compared to those suns teams. None of htem are exactly dynasties though either.
Artest was picked up way past his prime. Kobe was in a steady decline when Artest came into town and completely banged up. Bynum is always injured come playoff time. Odom chooses when or not to give a fuck, but he's extremely talented. I didn't say those teams weren't talented, I said that they weren't put together in all of their primes. Pau Gasol and Kobe are arguably the only two players on the Lakers team between 08-10 that were in their prime. I'll argue that due to his injuries last year, despite the ring, Kobe was on a downward swing.

And yes, all those teams had injuries, and in those injured years did they win it all? err, no.
Lakers did in 09 and 10. To say that Kobe was healthy for more than a five game stretch any time last year is silly. Celtics were banged up badly in 2009 and had some injury troubles last year and came really close to winning it in the finals. Fact is, they at least got there despite the adversity.

03-04 marbury,
04-05 Joe gets injured in the play offs, this is the best year they had, and best shot. But LB was also injured in those play offs. Still they should have won it then and failed.
05-06 Amare's knees blow up. Bell/Diaw era begins
06-07 Spurs cheap shot gets amare/diaw suspended
07-08 The Shaquile O'Neal experience.
08-09 Mike D' gone, The terry porter experience.
09-10 WCF, where amare played like a giant skirt.

Besides, that suns teams biggest problem wasn't scoring depth, and everyone knows it.
Two things killed those Suns teams:

1) Shit defense (you can thank D'Antoni for that)
2) A little bit lack of luck

But my opinion still stands: Those Suns teams were stacked at the exact right moment and should have at least gotten to the finals.
 
giri said:
I detest Horry, and hope he dies in anyone of Branduils fantasy scenarios. I seriously wouldn't care if the guy tripped and broke his kneck.

I love the guy, even though he ended his career as a 5pur.

Met him a couple times at E3.

Even took a picture with him.
 
reilo said:
Nope. Allen hasn't been All-NBA since 2005. Rondo has never made an All-NBA team.

Artest was picked up way past his prime. Kobe was in a steady decline when Artest came into town and completely banged up. Bynum is always injured come playoff time. Odom chooses when or not to give a fuck, but he's extremely talented. I didn't say those teams weren't talented, I said that they weren't put together in all of their primes. Pau Gasol and Kobe are arguably the only two players on the Lakers team between 08-10 that were in their prime. I'll argue that due to his injuries last year, despite the ring, Kobe was on a downward swing.


Lakers did in 09 and 10. To say that Kobe was healthy for more than a five game stretch any time last year is silly. Celtics were banged up badly in 2009 and had some injury troubles last year and came really close to winning it in the finals. Fact is, they at least got there despite the adversity.


Two things killed those Suns teams:

1) Shit defense (you can thank D'Antoni for that)
2) A little bit lack of luck

But my opinion still stands: Those Suns teams were stacked at the exact right moment and should have at least gotten to the finals.

Artest is still probably the best wing defender in the league. He's not the Offensive guy he used to be, but the lakers aren't exactly even trying. He's still got it though, every now and then you see him post guys up and he's still got moves. He just plays his role.

09-10 lakers were the only banged up year genuinely. Every team gets banged up a little, the suns team had key players sit out for entire games and stretches of them.

There's no mistaking the suns team has had talent, but as much, and as complimentary as any of those others? And here's a key point for the plays offs, some of those teams they lost too had head coaches that out played our coach, dramatically so.
 
Rodeo Clown said:
No, that came from Boston in the Ray Allen trade. Ibaka was originally a Suns pick, though.
And all that so sarver could save $1m in salary (for the record, the suns have regularly had one of the best attendances in the NBA for the last 7 or so years (as they should), and with regular play off games, i can't see how they wouldn't be making money).
 
ryutaro's mama said:
I love the guy, even though he ended his career as a 5pur.

Met him a couple times at E3.

Even took a picture with him.

Oh he hit big shots, and helped the lakers/spurs out tons.

I'm not sure he's allowed back into Arizona yet though.
 
giri said:
Artest is still probably the best wing defender in the league.
I don't think he's the best at guarding faster players. Both him and Marion are among the best at guarding small forwards, though.
 
giri said:
There's no mistaking the suns team has had talent, but as much, and as complimentary as any of those others?
Yeah, I think so. That team was built to compliment their two key figures in Nash and Amare. The pieces fit together damn well. You don't win 60+ games by accident.

The advantage that Nash brought to the Suns over someone like Fisher or a very green (no pun intended) young point-guard in Rondo has to be evident, right? Can we also honestly say that Shawn Marion in his prime wasn't as good if not better than Lamar Odom in his prime? And of course there's the age-old debate of a prime Amare versus prime Gasol, but I won't get into that.

In the end, the wild-card would come in what Kobe brings versus his counter-part (Johnson or Bell) and what Nash brings versus his counter-part (Fisher or Rondo). I think the biggest thing that did those Suns in was their defense and lack of giving a shit on one end of the floor. They all had the athletes and talent to be a really amazing defensive (I'm not saying individual defensive, but overall defensive) team.

Which brings us to...
And here's a key point for the plays offs, some of those teams they lost too had head coaches that out played our coach, dramatically so.
And there is the big difference. That system D'Antoni employed was all about getting up the floor and to the basket as quickly as possible. Which means if one or two of your players are leaking out and getting ready to make the fastbreak layup, it means that they are not staying in front of their man or boxing them out when the shot goes up. It's a risk versus reward system, and when the other team can get back on defense enough times as you quickly get up to set up your offense, you will be exposed. Which is what happened.

A different coach that had a more balanced approach to the game would have done wonders for that Suns team. They might not have won 60+ games, but if they had won 57/58/59 and went on to the finals? That's already a much better accomplishment than what D'Antoni would have ever possibly brought.
 
Andre Miller got suspended? Boo NBA boo! Cook got 2 games? Uhm, that's not fair.
 
dIEHARD said:
So someone owes one John Hollinger an apology i see.
He said that Matthews, Craig Smith, Rudy and Camby would/should get suspended. I didn't say he'd be wrong, I just said his article was written badly.
 
reilo said:
He said that Matthews, Craig Smith, Rudy and Camby would/should get suspended. I didn't say he'd be wrong, I just said his article was written badly.
Wesley Matthews is a saint and should never be suspended, for any reason.

DY_nasty said:
JAX for Raja Bell
I would do this. Who wouldn't be entertained with Sloan and Jackson on the same team?
 
Branduil said:
I don't think he's the best at guarding faster players. Both him and Marion are among the best at guarding small forwards, though.

Artest is the only guy in NBA you could ask to guard the 1-5 for long periods and not be abused..

the faster PGs and taller skilled centers would of course give him problems but on the whole he can guard every position..
 
dIEHARD said:
I would do this. Who wouldn't be entertained with Sloan and Jackson on the same team?
JAX and Larry Brown is just too much team killing cancer for one young franchise to handle.

Wallace can go fuck himself too. Anyone want Wallace?
 
dIEHARD said:
I would do this. Who wouldn't be entertained with Sloan and Jackson on the same team?

This would be hot.. Seeing the name Sloan and Jackson made me think a Dream team coached by Jackson with Sloan would be even hotter
 
Sharp said:
I don't think anyone would hate on the Knicks if their fans weren't the lite version of Lakers fans, only with zero credibility.
Are you on drugs?

Come read the NBA thread back in 2007
Now read the 2008 version
Now read last years...

Now come back here and post that again.
 
Blackace said:
This would be hot.. Seeing the name Sloan and Jackson made me think a Dream team coached by Jackson with Sloan would be even hotter
Dream scenario for the "Overpaid With A Shitty Attitude" team coached by the following...

Sloan as headcoach
McMillan and Skiles as assistants

Line-up...

PG: Baron Davis
SG: Jackson
SF: Odom
PF: Blatche or Cousins
C: Haywood

Who kills who first?

Gold, Jerry! Gold!
 
reilo said:
Dream scenario for the "Overpaid With A Shitty Attitude" team coached by the following...

Sloan as headcoach
McMillan and Skiles as assistants

Line-up...

PG: Baron Davis
SG: Jackson
SF: Odom
PF: Blatche or Cousins
C: Haywood

Who kills who first?

Gold, Jerry! Gold!

you forgot PJ as an assistant and JR Smith at SG and Jackson at SF
 
reilo said:
Yeah, I think so. That team was built to compliment their two key figures in Nash and Amare. The pieces fit together damn well. You don't win 60+ games by accident.

The advantage that Nash brought to the Suns over someone like Fisher or a very green (no pun intended) young point-guard in Rondo has to be evident, right? Can we also honestly say that Shawn Marion in his prime wasn't as good if not better than Lamar Odom in his prime? And of course there's the age-old debate of a prime Amare versus prime Gasol, but I won't get into that.

In the end, the wild-card would come in what Kobe brings versus his counter-part (Johnson or Bell) and what Nash brings versus his counter-part (Fisher or Rondo). I think the biggest thing that did those Suns in was their defense and lack of giving a shit on one end of the floor. They all had the athletes and talent to be a really amazing defensive (I'm not saying individual defensive, but overall defensive) team.

Which brings us to...

And there is the big difference. That system D'Antoni employed was all about getting up the floor and to the basket as quickly as possible. Which means if one or two of your players are leaking out and getting ready to make the fastbreak layup, it means that they are not staying in front of their man or boxing them out when the shot goes up. It's a risk versus reward system, and when the other team can get back on defense enough times as you quickly get up to set up your offense, you will be exposed. Which is what happened.

A different coach that had a more balanced approach to the game would have done wonders for that Suns team. They might not have won 60+ games, but if they had won 57/58/59 and went on to the finals? That's already a much better accomplishment than what D'Antoni would have ever possibly brought.

I'd put odom over marion, considering marions propensity to hide in big moments. And he's even more of a hormonal nut job than Ron. Have you read SSOL ? it doens't paint a nice picture of Marion, having the be babied all the time.

Kobe v Nash is an interesting debate, but i think just about everyone takes Kobe, including me.

It's the coaching that killed us. Its why Gentry was a better fit, he held people accountable on both ends. Mike only on one end. Using a very similar (80% or so were mike d' sets) though not as fast paced, and a little more deliberate (i.e.e a better 1/2 court) offense, but a much better D, the suns of last year would have out played any of those previous years teams. Even though they got no further.

The sad part is, i now wonder what would have happened if Gentry was head coach, but Mike D the O Coach.

For the record, luck does play a big part in getting to a chip. Or if you want to debate that, a lack of luck can certainly kill your chances of winning one. And the suns for 3 or 4 years got a bit unlucky, some of it due to their own fault, others not so much.
 
Blackace said:
Artest is the only guy in NBA you could ask to guard the 1-5 for long periods and not be abused..

the faster PGs and taller skilled centers would of course give him problems but on the whole he can guard every position..
Depends on what you mean by abused... no way could Artest guard Rose or Dwight. Heck he couldn't even guard Kobe his last year in Houston.
 
Branduil said:
Depends on what you mean by abused... no way could Artest guard Rose or Dwight. Heck he couldn't even guard Kobe his last year in Houston.
Is there anyone in the league that can currently guard rose?
 
The Frankman said:
Odom doesn't fit with that group, he's too soft. No thug in him also unless he gets a scar and grows a beard.
He'd drive coaches crazy with his lazy attitude and disappearing acts though.
 
Branduil said:
Depends on what you mean by abused... no way could Artest guard Rose or Dwight. Heck he couldn't even guard Kobe his last year in Houston.

I think my post pretty much covered that..
 
I have a story to tell (in picture form!)

t6G7W.jpg

bgJzo.jpg

f9SDF.jpg

yWu3w.jpg

CGjvg.jpg

BrXsB.jpg


Well deserved hit, well deserved suspension. Apparently Miller didn't like some shoves Blake gave him to his back a possession prior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom