dam dawgMVP Rankings
LMA
KD
CP3
If Bron wins it again with more help in the garbage East, it'll be robbery
Replay shows he did...oh Violet Palmer... not sure they were tryign to foul.
MVP Rankings
LMA
KD
CP3
If Bron wins it again with more help in the garbage East, it'll be robbery
Because back-to-backs don't ever happen?That is fucked up making the Clippers play back to back road games, including Christmas day, and the next.
WatThat is fucked up making the Clippers play back to back road games, including Christmas day, and the next.
MVP Rankings
LMA
KD
CP3
If Bron wins it again with more help in the garbage East, it'll be robbery
Doc's definitely chewing out Palmer saying they weren't. Barnes probably got too aggressive though.Replay shows he did...
Aldridge is still a pretty inefficient scorer. I couldn't in good conscience support him in the MVP race over offensive savants like Durant.
lol. ; )oh Violet Palmer... not sure they were trying to foul.
Because back-to-backs don't ever happen?
They do and they are fucking retarded for the team on the road. They should get rid of that all together. Complete unfair advantage. Trailblazers coming off rest and at home. Is it surprising how much more energy they had?
Aldridge is still a pretty inefficient scorer. I couldn't in good conscience support him in the MVP race over offensive savants like Durant.
What?
He has a sub 52% ts% and 1.14 points per shot.What?
Doesn't get to the line as much as he ought to and predicates his game almost entirely on the mid-range. His shooting percentage is not where it needs to be as a big man, and his points per possession numbers are pretty low.What?
That is fucked up making the Clippers play back to back road games, including Christmas day, and the next.
FG% snob
Portland has played 7 sets of back-to-backs this season and are 12-2 in them. It's part of the game. Portland also travels the most of any team in the league by the widest margin because their closest opponent is 800 miles away. Not sure what you propose they do, unless you a) extend the season or b) shorten the number of games played.
He has a sub 52% ts% and 1.14 points per shot.
I like him but he's not very efficient.
Bingo. This would make a much more entertaining and pleasurable NBA.
And are those Portland back to back games on the road? If so I am sure that is unusual, I mean Portland is also one of the better teams in the league. I am sure majority of the clubs suffer from these situations.
This season notwithstanding, Kobe has never had a season below 52.7% TS%. 55.5% for his career. As a shooting guard and not as a franchise big man, mind you.I wonder if you ever made these arguments against Kobe.
This season notwithstanding, Kobe has never had a season below 52.7% TS%. 55.5% for his career. As a shooting guard and not as a franchise big man, mind you.
Lebron scores more that LMA and shoots a full 10 percentage points above him at the 3-4. LMA's numbers aren't special at all, his whole MVP case is his team's record and they're only 1-2 games above the rest of the league. Hardly a front runner
I wonder if you ever made these arguments against Kobe.
Name the other 2 HOF players on Portland that command doubles at times in a "pick your poison" scenario like what happens in Miami.
LeBron is LeBron but you could throw doubles and triples at him in Cleveland without the fear of a Wade/Bosh lighting you up on the pass off.
I wonder if you ever made these arguments against Kobe.
made these arguments against Kobe.
arguments against Kobe.
Kobe.
Then we're in agreement. My original point about Aldridge being a pretty inefficient offensive player still stands. I don't think he should be taken very seriously in MVP discussions, even though I agree with IWMTB about his fairly important role in spacing the floor for the Blazers.But he never argued for Lebron using those metrics when the debate was between them, either.
Mind you, I'm not saying LMA should be in the MVP discussion, but the guy gets his points the way he gets them.
Garnett 2004 TS%: 54.7%To iterate, not making the case for LaMarcus as MVP, but the precedent is there:
Garnett in '04: 49.9FG%, 79FT% on 5.7FTA (KG was arguably the best big man defender at the time)
Nowitzki in '06: 48FG%, 90FT% on 7.4FTA, 41.6 3PT% on 2.2 3PTA
There's a case for his numbers being better in cleveland, whats your point?
To iterate, not making the case for LaMarcus as MVP, but the precedent is there:
Garnett in '04: 49.9FG%, 79FT% on 5.7FTA (KG was arguably the best big man defender at the time)
Nowitzki in '06: 48FG%, 90FT% on 7.4FTA, 41.6 3PT% on 2.2 3PTA
charles barkley is so fucking dumb, I can't even wrap my head around it
To iterate, not making the case for LaMarcus as MVP, but the precedent is there:
Garnett in '04: 49.9FG%, 79FT% on 5.7FTA (KG was arguably the best big man defender at the time)
Nowitzki in '06: 48FG%, 90FT% on 7.4FTA, 41.6 3PT% on 2.2 3PTA
LaMarcus also tends to pick his FG% up as the season goes along. January/December/February are his strongest months, career wise.
He was more of an MVP in Cleveland than in Miami. Did more with less.
Rose's TS% during his MVP year was nearly 4 percentage points higher than LaMarcus's right now. .208 win shares per 48 compared to LaMarcus's .168 this year. In almost every discernible offensive metric, Rose had a far more efficient year than LaMarcus is having now.I don't want to hear about efficiency in a league where Rose won MVP shooting 44%. LMA is the best player on the best team in the better confeference. If Blazer get the #1 seed, why shouldn't he win? Nash won 2 and he's never averaged 20ppg
Then we're in agreement. My original point about Aldridge being a pretty inefficient offensive player still stands. I don't think he should be taken very seriously in MVP discussions, even though I agree with IWMTB about his fairly important role in spacing the floor for the Blazers.
Garnett 2004 TS%: 54.7%
Nowitzki 2006 TS%: 58.9%
LMA TS%: 51.5%
This is also minimizing Garnett's role in running both the offense and defense for that Timberwolves team. Aldridge is a pretty mediocre defender and a much worse playmaker than Garnett was in his prime.
This is also minimizing Garnett's role in running both the offense and defense for that Timberwolves team. Aldridge is a pretty mediocre defender and a much worse playmaker than Garnett was in his prime.