UnObtainium17
Member
Lol YNB Even the fans behind tge bench are ltao
31-7 FT advantage
Steven Adams has attempted as many himself as the Spurs have
Not watching the game but how the fuck is this possible with an even foul count
It's not when this team is apparently self-entitled to these shitty calls.
I thought I could respect the Thunder, but like with 2012, this is the same stupid bullshit.
I'm just looking forward to how Thunders fans justify this crap.
No biggie, pops ain't losing this series
Why is it the Thunder fans' responsibility to justify anything? And why, if the NBA is rigged as many of you seem to believe, do you watch and support it? Sounds pretty foolish.
Why is it the Thunder fans' responsibility to justify anything? And why, if the NBA is rigged as many of you seem to believe, do you watch and support it? Sounds pretty foolish.
It's the playoffs. Nothing wrong with taking whoever the Spurs' equivalent of Brian Scalabrine is and having him give Ibaka a couple of good, hard, clean playoff fouls to his lower body.
That's targeting players trying to cause them injuries. Either way, Serge is a very eclectic player and I like to see the good players participate in the games.
if spurs dont make it,i will be rooting for miami.
My argument is based on what should be obvious. The Spurs don't look as impressive as they did last year, and therefore it's easy to say they were better last year. Plain and simple. Last year they didn't get pushed to 7 games in the first round.
lmao at Pop
Pop his hilarious.
His interview in between quarters with DA was funny too.
You're underrating the Mavs let's be real.
Because we foolishly believe the next game will be different or that maybe a team will overcome the fix.
Or you don't honestly believe it's fixed and you enjoy watching it and you use "It's rigged" as a means of coping with outcomes you dislike.
No biggie, pops ain't losing this series
Nah. Outside of homecooking, that's tinfoil hat stuff. And homecooking evens out. There's no favoritism for OKC or anyone. It's always the losing team that blames the refs. It's a copout. PEACE.I know what I believe. There are games where the refs just suck but then there's systematic favoritism that is supported by the numbers.
I agree. Foul calls on the Thunder: 24 - foul calls on the Spurs: 20I know what I believe. There are games where the refs just suck but then there's systematic favoritism that is supported by the numbers.
Nah. Outside of homecooking, that's tinfoil hat stuff. And homecooking evens out. There's no favoritism for OKC or anyone. It's always the losing team that blames the refs. It's a copout. PEACE.
I agree. Foul calls on the Thunder: 24 - foul calls on the Spurs: 20
Numbers don't lie.
Oh come on. No favoritism for anyone? Lebron getting calls anytime anyone breathes on him isn't favoritism? Or Kobe? Or Jordan? And the same goes for the opposite, when they somehow get away with blatant fouls that anyone else would be called on every time. Lebron was straight up grabbing jerseys Saturday night. Dude charges frequently. Stars have always gotten preferential treatment. Always and forever. No one can deny that.
Lebron was called for charging on Sat night.
Of course they get calls in their favor but Pacers get plenty of calls to go their way too.
22 FT's to 0 in one quarter. The numbers don't lie. They could make me a ref right now and I would know how to influence the game with all the right calls. It's not exactly incredibly nuanced to call shooting fouls consistently one way and call common fouls on another side.
Let's not forget that when you call fouls is important as well. Time and time again I see calls go heavily for a team in the first quarter only to get very little calls when it matters in the 4th.
Isolation basketball vs ball movement.
Only slasher SAS have is Tony. Versus Reggie KD and Russ.
FT difference is style of play not in competence.
SAS also had 4 shots blocked in the 3rd. Just wasn't meant to be.
OKC won the FT line in Game one 23-17. Then lost 10-23, in a game they lost by 40. Game three 31-16.
Really has nothing to do with the refs and everything to do with the players on the court.
That doesn't explain what they get away with it on defense.
This FT narrative is absurd. OKC got virtually no calls in Games 1 and 2. Westbrook was fouled on literally every drive in Game 2 and didn't go to the free throw line once.
SAS wasn't aggressive going to the paint last night. Period. You're not entitled to calls in the NBA, you have to seek out the contact and make them happen.
What I'm saying is that the Spurs very much benefited from calls going in their favor in the first two games in equal or greater degree than the Thunder did in Game 3.So what you're saying is that Thunder can't win without the Refs calling everything in their favor?
So what you're saying is that Thunder can't win without the Refs calling everything in their favor?
OKC got slapped the first two games. They are not getting away with much.
OKC at full strength is better than SAS. Last night was only the beginning of what's to come.
OKC got slapped the first two games. They are not getting away with much.
OKC at full strength is better than SAS. Last night was only the beginning of what's to come.
What I'm saying is that the Spurs very much benefited from calls going in their favor in the first two games in equal or greater degree than the Thunder did in Game 3.
okc is an inferior team that needs the refs for wins.
OKC got slapped the first two games. They are not getting away with much.
OKC at full strength is better than SAS. Last night was only the beginning of what's to come.
Including the 4 straight wins OKC snapped off in the WC Finals, OKC has won 11 out of the last 15 games vs. Spurs. 2 of the 4 wins the Spurs have gotten have been without Ibaka.
Seriously, where do some of you come up with this shit? Do you just spout off random opinions hoping eventually you'll get one right? OKC matches up well with the Spurs, Miami matches up well with both of them, but much better with OKC, etc.
Refs also helped them in 2012 WCF. Also you only want okc to win since heat will destroy them.
Consistently inconsistent (and giving the benefit of the whistle to the home team).We're talking about star players. You said star players attack the basket, I said that doesn't explain what they (star players) get away with on defense.
So where's the consistency then?