The majority of goals against Henrik of late are weird deflections or bounces or breakaways.
That was like the Bruins goals against Price. A lot of deflections.
The majority of goals against Henrik of late are weird deflections or bounces or breakaways.
@Met
You have tickets for the rest of the playoffs?
That was like the Bruins goals against Price. A lot of deflections.
Well, the team has a few days to figure some shit out. Tokarski was fine we just need to figure out how to beat Hank.
At least we prevented rat face and the neanderthal from sniffing the cup. Minor victories.
That's two stinkers in a row. It's like the Habs are just emotionally and physically done. How many times did a player pass instead of shoot?
Gotta say, aside from 1 weak goal, Tokarski played a great game (especially considering his last played game was 1 month ago!).
With a baseball bat?
The Rangers essentially have home ice advantage now
Take out Prust and Bork. Put in Bournival and White.
The Rangers essentially have home ice advantage now
They had home ice advantage after Saturday.The Rangers essentially have home ice advantage now
Take out Prust and Bork. Put in Bournival and White.
This is the Rangers' first 5-game winning streak in the playoffs since...1994.
We've also now matched our best postseason finish since winning in '94 (10 playoff wins in 2012).
bru-tal
Rags gonna sweep
I don't think you understand salty post, just go look at your last 15 posts for some great examples.
:lol :lolReally sherlock?
When they played their best in game 1 and 2 the Rangers scored twice and quickly. They can't win it, period, even when they are doing good it doesn't work.
This is the Rangers' first 5-game winning streak in the playoffs since...1994.
We've also now matched our best postseason finish since winning in '94 (10 playoff wins in 2012).
Well let's be quite honest, they had moments where they played well, but they haven't even pieced together ONE good period. Hell, they had quite a few defensive lapses in the first period that ended up costing them (which was their best tonight).
Comebacks are definitely possible, but Lord Henrik flatout steals games he is that good.
I don't think White should be in our lineup ever. Given Rangers speed, White would be humiliated I think.
they finally won while leading in a series!
Resorting to name calling (a team you aren't even playing) after a loss is pretty salty.I don't think you understand salty post, just go look at your last 15 posts for some great examples.
:lol :lol
Does anyone know the results of rangers vs la and rangers vs Chicago this season?
Really sherlock?
:lol
I almost posted exactly that.
I don't think you understand salty post, just go look at your last 15 posts for some great examples.
:lol :lol
They had home ice advantage after winning game 1.
They had home ice advantage after Saturday.
Friedman going in on Stock.
Friedman going in on Stock.
2nd period in game 1 and 1st period in this game were great, except in both cases they end up being scored two quick goals. It would have been a different story without Lundqvist, it would be at least 1-1. But when you try everything right and it doesn't produce, what can you do but start playing worst?
Does anyone know the results of rangers vs la and rangers vs Chicago this season?
See my argument was that as much good play as they had in those periods, they made TERRIBLE defensive lapses that cost them. So they haven't done everything right. In fact, they have yet to play an error-free period, which is unlike the series against the Bruins where they had so many error-free periods. The Rangers just look hungrier.
Damn, you guys are brutal =\
I'm missing it, what happened? Love when PJ gets embarrassed.
What happened?