2014 NHL Playoffs |OT2| 'Yoff Harder

Pierre's report from the bench sounds a LOT like what was happening with the Penguins attitude-wise in the last three games of that series.
 
Rangers were undefeated against the Blackhawks this season, 2-0.

Both the Hawks and Kings were teams from the West that we actually played well against.

Small sample size, though, and the regular season doesn't count for much now.

Also, we still have a lot of hockey to play with Montreal.
 
Koharskis wide body and penchant for donuts (think scoreboard) might be an improvement in between the pipes!
71104170CP027_Carolina_Hurr.jpg
 
lol, sure it doesn't. Don't throw out "dismantle" and ignore the fact the Blackhawks didn't win either game against the team you are saying they would dismantle.
2 games in the regular season doesn't mean jack shit in the finals, against one of the most experienced and best teams in the league. Hawks are better in every way except goal, and Crawford has been fantastic this post season.
 
Well Montreal will get a good chance at the start of the period,score early on that PP remaining and it could give them the momentum for a win... :P
 
1 team coming out of the west, 1 team coming out of the east. If rangers win, then they have a 50/50 shot at being right to engrave the cup right now.

Two possible outcomes does not necessarily mean each has an equal probability ;)

also, there are more than two possible outcomes, lol
 
How does math work again I don't remember

Normally if you go one-on-one with another team you have a fifty-fifty chance of winning. But Rick Nash is a genetic freak, and not normal. You've got a 25%, at best, of beating the Rangers. And then you add in St. Louis to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See, in the Conference Finals, you have a 25% chance of winning the Cup, but the Rangers have a 50% chance of winning, cause those Canadiens know they can't beat them, and they're not even gonna try. So Chicago and LA, you take your 25% chance, minus The Rangers' 50% chance, and you've got an -25% chance of winning the Cup. But then you take the Rangers 75% chance of winning, if they were to go one-on-one, and then add 50 percent, New York has 125 percent chance of winning the Cup. You see, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you.
 
I did not know Price was out for the series. Remember posting that if you wanted to take out mtl, you had to run Price.

Still, series ain't over yet.
 
That's cause they don't ram the net skate first at 35 mph.
I had no idea Kreider was an olympic speed skater.

Normally if you go one-on-one with another team you have a fifty-fifty chance of winning. But Rick Nash is a genetic freak, and not normal. You've got a 25%, at best, of beating the Rangers. And then you add in St. Louis to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See, in the Conference Finals, you have a 25% chance of winning the Cup, but the Rangers have a 50% chance of winning, cause those Canadiens know they can't beat them, and they're not even gonna try. So Chicago and LA, you take your 25% chance, minus The Rangers' 50% chance, and you've got an -25% chance of winning the Cup. But then you take the Rangers 75% chance of winning, if they were to go one-on-one, and then add 50 percent, New York has 125 percent chance of winning the Cup. You see, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you.
Your math checks out.

See you guys in the off season thread!
 
Top Bottom