Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
I guess this is the tradeoff for the more stable framerate. That art design tho.![]()
Yes I did attack it
![]()
![]()
I guess this is the tradeoff for the more stable framerate. That art design tho.![]()
Yes I did attack it
![]()
![]()
If it was 60 fps I think it would be easier to understand. I'm interested in seeing comparisons between Bloodborne and Dark Souls 2 PS4 in a couple weeks.I guess this is the tradeoff for the more stable framerate. That art design tho.
If it was 60 fps I think it would be easier to understand. I'm interested in seeing comparisons between Bloodborne and Dark Souls 2 PS4 in a couple weeks.
Yeah I wish for that to end, we're now in a time where it shouldn't happen as consoles get stronger and games looking better to the point where they shouldn't make it look beyond what the game would look like in the final build.What sucks is that they show great looking graphics early on and then do this. It sucks being lied to that way. It sucks that most of the industry does this.
So Bloodborne is a bit unimpressive so far... The early stuff looked so great. Do we have another Dark Souls II situation on our hands? I haven't been following it closely enough to tell.
Didn't they change some stuff around besides making it 1080p 60fps? I thought they changed the lighting for the new versions.I don't see why you have to wait a couple weeks when you could just look at the PC version to compare as it's pretty much going to look like that. Dark Souls 2 is a pretty ugly game a lot of the times though, even in comparison to Dark 1. The improvements DS2 actually makes don't make up for the things it did worse visually imo.
Didn't they change some stuff around besides making it 1080p 60fps? I thought they changed the lighting for the new versions.
Didn't they change some stuff around besides making it 1080p 60fps? I thought they changed the lighting for the new versions.
They look washed out thanks to the PS4 share compression.
We've all said it a million times but Sony are hurting themselves by not allowing png exporting. It would take them 2 seconds to patch in.
Possibly, considering that the first set of footage looked like this.So Bloodborne is a bit unimpressive so far... The early stuff looked so great. Do we have another Dark Souls II situation on our hands? I haven't been following it closely enough to tell.
Bloodborne E3 pics
Possibly, considering that the first set of footage looked like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx8KTIeSnzs
But as you can see the framerate was god awful. Like terribad. So it's possible that they toned it down a bit to get a much better performance, apparently there are no areas so far with the framerate of "blight town." Which validates the purchase for me personally. Cloth physics still look fantastic though.
Ehh, you're probably right. Fixed.I don't think this is the right place to do this, it would probably derail the thread to argue whether bloodborne has had a downgrade or not. Maybe wait until release or for someone to make a thread about E3-final comparison.
did we ever get official word on what resolution the game runs at. Game has this weird blurry look to it.
Every PS4 screen here looks like crap to me because of the god damn awful compression level that the console uses. Except for Infamous and Skylanders tho. Those 2 look as clean as they do on my console.Bloodborne pics are out!! Judging from some of the pics here, it looks great overall but I think that has a lot to do with the art style. It is a bit behind technically and that CA is hurting the IQ. I'm willing to bet that those screens here don't do the game justice and there are other better looking scenes in the game.
Not really..... I think Type-0 HD just renders in this way, even shows in the screens and during streaming as well.You have some overscan on your TV or something? That black space in those Type-0 shots appear if you have your display area settings set a certain way
Agreed. Sony needs to fix this issue soon. I haven't seen many PS4 games in person but you can definitely tell that the compression is making most screens here look bad.Every PS4 screen here looks like crap to me because of the god damn awful compression level that the console uses. Except for Infamous and Skylanders tho. Those 2 look as clean as they do on my console.
That's good news.This game looks a lot better when it's night. I played the alpha. There was no downgrade, there was a lighting change in the first area. Aliasing is still there, but a lot better than in the IGN footage we've seen in february and it's solid 30fps.
So Bloodborne is a bit unimpressive so far... The early stuff looked so great. Do we have another Dark Souls II situation on our hands? I haven't been following it closely enough to tell.
did we ever get official word on what resolution the game runs at. Game has this weird blurry look to it.
You have some overscan on your TV or something? That black space in those Type-0 shots appear if you have your display area settings set a certain way
Working just fine.Halo 4 - XB1 (let me know if you're able to view those since they're from Onedrive)
Possibly, considering that the first set of footage looked like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx8KTIeSnzs
But as you can see the framerate was god awful. Like terribad. So it's possible that they toned it down a bit to get a much better performance, apparently there are no areas so far with the framerate of "blight town." Which validates the purchase for me personally. Cloth physics still look fantastic though.
Halo 4 - XB1 (let me know if you're able to view those since they're from Onedrive)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
edit: removed bloodborne e3 shots to prevent potential controversy
So Bloodborne is a bit unimpressive so far... The early stuff looked so great. Do we have another Dark Souls II situation on our hands? I haven't been following it closely enough to tell.
Halo 4 - XB1 (let me know if you're able to view those since they're from Onedrive)
![]()
![]()
![]()