Big Baybee
Member
I don't think so at all. Monty put in work in the western conference with Anthony Davis and a bunch of bench players/trash. Davis will get his help in a couple of seasons.It would be a huge upgrade.
I don't think so at all. Monty put in work in the western conference with Anthony Davis and a bunch of bench players/trash. Davis will get his help in a couple of seasons.It would be a huge upgrade.
I think Bulls will beat Cavs in a series.
I don't think so at all. Monty put in work in the western conference with Anthony Davis and a bunch of bench players/trash. Davis will get his help in a couple of seasons.
Celtics in 7.
The baby faced assassin leaving the scene of the crime..
It's certainly possible but I don't think its very probable. Not yet anyway.
Cavs in 5. Six at the very most.
Didn't Steph have a four point play at the end of regulation? I've seen the replay half a dozen times now and it looks like he gets hammered.
5 games? :lol There is no way the Cavs are going to cruise through the Bulls. The Cavs aren't a very good defensive team and they aren't as experienced as the Bulls. How are they going to stop Rose and Butler? I would be scared of Rose, he looks like he is on a mission this year.
What the hell lmao. He's like a QB staying in the pocket when he's about to get crushed. Dat concentration.Refs didn't give a fuck:
![]()
What the hell lmao. He's like a QB staying in the pocket when he's about to get crushed. Dat concentration.
He shot it with his eyes closed too..
Hmm. I would argue this Bulls team with everybody healthy is the best they've been in a bit. Rose, Butler, Noah, Gasol, Gibson, Brooks, Mirotic. Pretty deep.I don't see the Cavs cruising, but I'll give them the edge over the Bulls in the 2nd round. The Bulls are more experienced as a team, but this team is not as good as the Bulls of previous years too.
Put James on Rose. He did it before, and he can do it again.
Steph Curry did go 10-29, so he had a bad shooting night. Hit a big shot though, so props.
Hmm. I would argue this Bulls team with everybody healthy is the best they've been in a bit. Rose, Butler, Noah, Gasol, Gibson, Brooks, Mirotic. Pretty deep.
Ok looks like it but i want a different angle. My goodnessHe shot it with his eyes closed too..
I don't think Lebron has it in him to guard D-Rose full time anymore. He's older and has gotten worse on D.
D-Rose may be frail, but when he's healthy he's still quick as hell. Or at least it seems like he is watching these last few Bulls game.
Hmm. I would argue this Bulls team with everybody healthy is the best they've been in a bit. Rose, Butler, Noah, Gasol, Gibson, Brooks, Mirotic. Pretty deep.
He can't guard D-Rose from the start.
They put him on him at the end of the game.
No way LeBron can stay in front of a fresh Derrick Rose.
They are pretty deep right now, no doubt about it. But the team when Rose was MVP and the team a year after were much better and was also deep. Rose, Deng, Noah, Asik, Gibson, Korver, Boozer and some pretty decent veterans. And Mirotic right now is still injured so that's a decent loss to their depth right now if he's not yet ready to play.
Put James on Rose. He did it before, and he can do it again.
I don't see the Cavs cruising, but I'll give them the edge over the Bulls in the 2nd round. The Bulls are more experienced as a team, but this team is not as good as the Bulls of previous years too.
Butler > Deng(and Luol was my favorite player on those teams probably)
Any offense > Asik(and I wanted the Bulls to keep that one dimensional wall but NOT at the expense of Taj)
Korver=Dunleavy(Korver is having the better year but they both are very good threepoint shooters and Dunleavy is better on D and more versatile)
Gasol >>>>>> Boozer(I liked Boozer but Gasol is way better on defense and better on offense)
The Bulls may have had the better records back then but this Bulls team is easily more potent than those.
By the way, I don't see LeBron guarding Rose the majority of the game, just on and off.
I think the Bulls could beat the Cavs and they matchup pretty well. The problem is they have stretches were they look like they never played basketball even though there is lots of talent on the court and those stretches can be the difference in a series. If Evan Turnover can get shots off on Kyrie and JR I'm sure Rose and Butler can. I'm interested to see if Gasoft can do work in the paint. The X factor will certainly be if Butler gets the quick whistle on Lebron. They cannot win if he doesn't play near 40 minutes a game.
Having not watched the Bulls this season outside of when they played my crappy heat team, how are they defensively? Thibs's previous Bulls teams were pretty strong on the defensive end and I'd like to see what the Cavs are like against a team playing playoff defense
![]()
The faces on the fans...
Exactly. The variety of ways he can get his shot off puts him ahead of most. He's also on pace to break all the career records for 3's and already has the two best single seasons for 3's made in NBA history.Reggie was great but he depended a lot on getting the ball coming off screens. Curry does not much to get his shot off and he can handle the ball with the best of them. Scary player :O
Didn't Steph have a four point play at the end of regulation? I've seen the replay half a dozen times now and it looks like he gets hammered.
Rightfully so? But...it was a foul. Only if he missed it?The refs, rightfully so, would never call that on the final play of the game on a made shot, especially since he got the shot off clean. They MIGHT have called it if he missed it.
![]()
We could be watching the GOAT as far as 3 point shooting goes.
I understand that it's hard to call fouls on a game tying shot or winner but that's as blatant of a foul as it gets.
So if someone like football tackled another player, as long as the ball goes in it shouldn't be a foul. That's what's ridiculous about shit like this.
Chil' please. It's playoff crunch time basketball. Refs didn't call that and-one just like they didn't call Speights for walking right before he passed the ball to Curry. Refs let them play and it was the right choice.
Is it a foul or not?
not sure if I'm down with the idea of selective foul calls. Especially when they're so clear.![]()
Sure, but when they're that clear and that important I feel like that's extra incentive to call it.You implicitly have to be down with selective foul calls if you want an NBA game to not last four hours and have the starters on the bench fouled out.
The refs, rightfully so, would never call that on the final play of the game on a made shot, especially since he got the shot off clean. They MIGHT have called it if he missed it.
Sure, but when they're that clear and that important I feel like that's extra incentive to call it.