About $1299 for the GSYNC model from Acer I think.
TFTCentral got their review unit:
![]()
GIVE IT TO ME.
The big shiny Acer (or worse, "Predator") logo branding looks crap on the otherwise neat-looking display. Interestingly it looks like Acer's box designer agrees with me and photoshopped it out. Could this mean they are maybe redesigning the logo for the actual display and making it more subdued or something? I'd love them to leave it out entirely, but that's probably way too subtle to hope from a Taiwanese electronics company. Maybe a small lit logo that can be turned off in settings and is practically invisible when disabled?TFTCentral got their review unit:
How hard would it be for Sony to add native 21:9 support?
Really don't care if it's 75hz or 100hz. Keeping my rog swift for fps intensive games like csgo and a 34 21:9 for all other games
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...1083446&is=REG
BH has the LG Ultrawide 34Uc97 curved in stock
Just ordered one, going to sell my LG34U95. IMO its was a near perfect monitor less the curve(and of course Gsync+120hz). Will post impressions once in arrives next week![]()
I see you've met the joy of wanting to use tech that isn't well known yet, even here on Gaf.
No its more that what I want could be available right now but it isnt (LG have the screen I want, but they use Freesync but didnt do a Gsync version) and it seems more than anything they are going to jump past the 1080p ultrawide gsync and go straight to 1440p ultrawide gsync which is twice the cost....I see you've met the joy of wanting to use tech that isn't well known yet, even here on Gaf.
Has a 21:9 + 1440p + IPS + gsync monitor been announced yet?
Is it still unclear if it's 75 or 100Hz?Yes, however its not released yet.
The Acer X34.
Is it still unclear if it's 75 or 100Hz?
Yes, however its not released yet.
The Acer X34.
EDIT:
I also forgot about the Asus ROG PG34Q.
Both likely to be only 75hz. Damn, we're so damn close. I mean, a VA panel would be preferable, but I'd settle for near-perfection. Come onnn.
TFTCentral got their review unit:
![]()
GIVE IT TO ME.
I think I would take 29" 1080p with 120-144Hz over 34" 1440p with 60-75Hz.
Is there a reason for lacking high refresh rates in 1440p monitors with Gsync? Not enough bandwidth?
Yeah me too. I don't care about the priceThat's what I think.
I want 34" 1080p 100+Hz with Gsync or Freesync and a VA or IPS panel.
No, Displayport 1.2 is enough for the 2560x1440@144Hz displays that are already available, and the bandwidth is enough for 3440x1440@100Hz.I think I would take 29" 1080p with 120-144Hz over 34" 1440p with 60-75Hz.
Is there a reason for lacking high refresh rates in 1440p monitors with Gsync? Not enough bandwidth?
Where did you sell it?
Does anyone here have a 75 Hz freesync monitor?
Yes, however its not released yet.
The Acer X34.
EDIT:
I also forgot about the Asus ROG PG34Q.
has it been confirmed that the Acer X34 has a HDMI in on the g-sync version? Tempted by the LG 34U95 which is quite affordable at the moment (relatively speaking) and I need at least two inputs. I'm not sure I could justify a 50% premium for Gsync but it would be tempting.
It has 1 HDMI port.
But GSync only works through the Display Port I believe.
Well, I've had a 21:9 monitor for about two weeks now, and I'm loving it. I've been surprised at how many games natively support 2560x1080. There are the weird ones where they forget to scale the HUD, or the hilarity of Max Payne 3 cutscenes, but overall I'm well chuffed.
I'm never going back, I know that much. Some of the vistas in Tomb Raider and Shadow of Mordor have dropped my jaw, and racing games are something else. All hail wiiiiiidescreen.
Well, I've had a 21:9 monitor for about two weeks now, and I'm loving it. I've been surprised at how many games natively support 2560x1080. There are the weird ones where they forget to scale the HUD, or the hilarity of Max Payne 3 cutscenes, but overall I'm well chuffed.
I'm never going back, I know that much. Some of the vistas in Tomb Raider and Shadow of Mordor have dropped my jaw, and racing games are something else. All hail wiiiiiidescreen.
I went with a 29". The resolution and PPI at that size look absolutely fine to me. If money hadn't been an issue, I almost certainly would've gone for a 34" 3440x1440 though.what size did you go for? Although lots of people say 27" 1080p is too low res, I like the size. For a 21:9 keeping the same size would probably be a 34"? Not sure whether to look at 2560x1080 or 3440x1440
I went with a 29". The resolution and PPI at that size look absolutely fine to me. If money hadn't been an issue, I almost certainly would've gone for a 34" 3440x1440 though.
It was weird going from a 42" 16:9 display to a 29" 21:9. At first it was like I'd lost three quarters of my display. The monitor was about as wide as the TV was tall, and I thought it would be like playing games through a letterbox. Yet since buying the monitor, the TV has been permanently relegated to displaying Youtube vids for my daughter when she's in my office. I just can't get enough of that super wide stuff.
I been using the LG Ultrawide 25" for a few months now and I love it.
![]()
Is that this one? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...5212&cm_re=LG_25UM56-P-_-24-025-212-_-Product
I can't find any kind of reviews on it, and for $175 it seems like a great monitor.
the one i got was this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824005724 which im guessing mine is an older model to that one? not sure.
I see. Well they seem similar enough and you also seem to like yours quite a lot, so for that price I might just go for it! You think 25" for an ultrawide at that resolution is a pretty good choice?
29" 1080p? which one did you go for?