krypt0nian
Banned
Varian said:To be specific, touchdown Augustus and I are calling it out for "bad art".
So you want to start/continue a bad art thread? Please do.
Varian said:To be specific, touchdown Augustus and I are calling it out for "bad art".
DCharlie said:... the fuck you say? *polishes shotgun*
I just wanted to use the phrase "Touchdown Augustus"krypt0nian said:So you want to start/continue a bad art thread? Please do.
Varian said:I just wanted to use the phrase "Touchdown Augustus"![]()
Any game where you can make a potion out of Patrick Stewart is no dud!krypt0nian said:Well then gratz! :lol
FallenOne666 said:
Speevy said:Yeah, I plan to sell merchants the belongings of their slain family members.
Andy787 said:
morbidaza said:I think the better question is how many games released at launch that are pretty good then will still be considered pretty good in 2 years. I'm guessing it'll be far less.
Lyte Edge said:Get Fantavision out of that list. It was an awesome game.
I think GUN even though it's not making use of the Xbox 360's graphics capabilities still looks like it could be a really fun game, more so than a lot of the other Xbox 360 games which people think look good. I don't like the fact that people say GUN is going to be a dud just because they don't like the graphics. Same with THAW, I don't like the graphics or even the series at all, but the game has already been reviewed for other systems and gotten decent reviews. THAW has an 87% rating right now according to Gamerankings. If that really was the worst game at launch, that would be an amazing launch.Servizio said:Am I the only one who thinks Gun looks like fun for a current gen title?
Maybe I'm just overly fond of the Max Payne/Punisher gameplay.
Speevy said:Oblivion (like Morrowind) will likely be the longest, most content-rich RPG released next generation.
As long as Bethesda keeps the framerate up and the bugs down, this is the 360 game to own.
Let's get ruthless with this lineup:
Current-gen console Port:
Need for Speed Most Wanted (Electronic Arts / EA Canada)
Peter Jackson's King Kong (Ubisoft / Ubisoft Montreal)
Gun / THAW2
PC Port:
Call of Duty 2 (Activision/Infinity Ward)
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (2K Games / Bethesda Softworks)
Looks inferior to FEAR:
Condemned: Criminal Origins (Sega / Monolith)
Not a significant enough advance over last gen's game:
Dead or Alive 4 (Tecmo / Team Ninja)
Project Gotham Racing 3 (Microsoft Game Studios /Bizarre Creations)
RARE LOL:
Kameo: Elements of Power (Microsoft Game Studios / Rare Ltd.)
Perfect Dark Zero (Microsoft Game Studios / Rare Ltd.)
Half-featured sports games:
Madden NFL 06 (Electronic Arts / EA Tiburon)
NBA 2K6 (2K Sports / Visual Concepts)
NBA Live 06 (Electronic Arts / EA Canada)
Now, this is playing devil's advocate, but you can see that they all have their pitfalls.
Xbox Live Arcade?VNZ said:I wouldn't mind something along the lines of Fantavision to spice up this line-up. There's nothing there to diversify from the "100% testosterone" / "Xdude Xtreme" theme, which I was under the impression Microsoft intended to do.
Speevy said:You wouldn't even believe how many pre-launch TeamXboxers were putting Shrek, Bruce Lee, Kabuki Warriors, Nightcaster, and Azurik on their must-own lists.
krypt0nian said:OK everyone gay for Blue Stinger...pretend I said "PenPen Tricelon"
The best part of Blue Stinger was the highly homoerotic bath scene.
Now stop defending sub-par titles and get on with the thread. I'm glad I didn't put That's So Raven now. :lol
Ghost said:Kameo is xtreme now?
borghe said:I can't see how you guys are saying the X360 launch looks like the best ever when there isn't one OMFGWTFBBQ!!?!? game among the bunch. No Halo. No SSX. No Mario 64. No Wipeout Pure. No Soul Calibur. While there might not be a true dud in there (depending on your definition of dud), there certainly aren't really and truly great games (from the looks of it).
I would rate higher a launch with 2-3 AAAAA titles and 10 shit ones than 9 average titles and 3 below average ones.
"Buy an XBox360! Our titles are alright!"
Speevy said:Uh.... No.
PGR3 = AAA
Kameo = AAA
Oblivion = AAA
Just to name a few.
And all of those games >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any SSX title.
ehh. from what I've seen, and sentiment from others, those are not games that will blow people away. And SSX (the original) I guess I should qualify hasn't held up well, but when it was released in 2000 the scope and graphics of it were pretty near unparalleled. When you saw SSX, there was NO question it was a next-gen game.Speevy said:Uh.... No.
PGR3 = AAA
Kameo = AAA
Oblivion = AAA
Just to name a few.
And all of those games >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any SSX title.
exactly. I am not ripping on X360 at all or even its lineup in general. but to call it the best launch ever, or even suggest that there is a single system seller in the group is reaching a bit. I guess I commend MS for not letting there be a single absolute shit title in the launch, but when you have a $400 system and games $50-60 a pop, I guess that commendation just isn't enough this time. They need the system seller IMHO more than any other system in gaming history (maybe except for the $250 PSP handheld, which at least had Ridge Racers, Wipeout Pure, and Lumines)Unison said:I don't think any of these games qualify as a Soul Calibur, or a Mario 64 though...
AAA doesn't just mean "the best game available on a system".
Halo 3 would be AAA.
borghe said:I can't see how you guys are saying the X360 launch looks like the best ever when there isn't one OMFGWTFBBQ!!?!? game among the bunch. No Halo. No SSX. No Mario 64. No Wipeout Pure. No Soul Calibur. While there might not be a true dud in there (depending on your definition of dud), there certainly aren't really and truly great games (from the looks of it).
I would rate higher a launch with 2-3 AAAAA titles and 10 shit ones than 9 average titles and 3 below average ones.
"Buy an XBox360! Our titles are alright!"
wazoo said:SSX, Wipeout Pure and Soul Calibur were not present at the launch of the console.
I bought Soul Calibur (and NFL2K, Blue Stinger, Sonic Adventure, Ready 2 Rumble, and VF3TB) at launch with my DC, SSX (and TTT) at launch with my PS2, and passed on Wipeout Pure in the store for MGA (uggh) and Lumines. So history disagrees with you unless you are talking about JPN launches, which would be a silly comparison being we are talking about the US X360 launch.wazoo said:SSX, Wipeout Pure and Soul Calibur were not present at the launch of the console.
I don't think any of these games qualify as a Soul Calibur, or a Mario 64 though...
AAA doesn't just mean "the best game available on a system".
Halo 3 would be AAA.
ehh. from what I've seen, and sentiment from others, those are not games that will blow people away. And SSX (the original) I guess I should qualify hasn't held up well, but when it was released in 2000 the scope and graphics of it were pretty near unparalleled. When you saw SSX, there was NO question it was a next-gen game.
X360 launch seemingly doesn't have anything like that. Good games but none most people will be sitting in front of thinking "This can only be done by a next-gen machine."
Unison said:Soul Calibur was available at US launch. When people talk about DC's great launch lineup, they're referring to the US launch.
I'm pretty sure SSX was in the same boat.
ehh... it wasn't really delayed by a year as much as it was released WAY early in JPN. When you only launch with three titles and don't get more than 2-3 titles over the next 2-3 months, you may have launched early.wazoo said:Delay the Xbox360 one year and you'll get an amazing never seen before launch.
I get your point, but I do not agree.