Good job turning a thread about female genital mutilation into a thread about men.
It's a discussion, it's how they work, you can talk about two similar things and carry it on.
Good job turning a thread about female genital mutilation into a thread about men.
And 100 million men in America have
Good job turning a thread about female genital mutilation into a thread about men.
FGM threads on an explicitly english-speaking, implicitly U.S./U.K./AUS-Centric forum are either going to be de-facto circumcision threads or de-facto immigration threads, as western folk have no reason to hear about or care about FGM except through the lens of circumcision and middle-eastern/african immigration.
So let's shut up about Circumcision for a moment.
1) Is it the West's obligation to enforce it's virtues on foreign soil? Has spreading freedom and democracy in the middle-east ever been a manifest good?
2) Assuming you are anti-war and anti-imperialism, you obviously don't want to enforce western values in the middle-east. In that case, these discussions must revolve around FGM occurring in the west. As this thread clearly is.
3) With that being the case, the questions to ask are A) Why are there people committing FGM in my backyard? and B) What can be done to change this? and failing that, C) how can we keep this situation from getting any worse?
Personally, I think the solution is to offer some kind of educational seminar for immigrants. FGM101: Introduction to Not Mutilating Your Kids
There are.
Im not sure how many of these were performed in Germany, though. The article mentions that the number of women who it has been performed on has increased, but not necessarily that every new case occurred in germany between the last check.
So for example some refugees or immigrants may already have had the operation before entering Germany, while according to the article some have been taken back to countries where it is legal to have it performed.
Messed up stuff.
And then discover that these fuckers just travel back to their countries of origins to have some old hag cut off the outer labias with a rusty knife, glass shard or filed finger nail.
These girls need to be rescued. Their families are a real danger to their well being, and need custody needs to be taken away from these monsters.
It is a pre-Islamic tradition, but that doesn't mean there isn't an Islamic influence to this tradition. Otherwise why the fuck would they do it in Indonesia of all places?
It is pre-Islamic, but the fact it is considered 'noble' in the hadith has made the tradition way more wide-spread.
And 100 million men in America have
In your hypothetical scenario:
1, immigrants return to their home country
2. immigrants perform surgery under the same conditions they would have in your country
3. immigrants return to your country after having mutilated their child
At what point in this scenario did they become a problem for your legal system and community?
I suppose that's a valid argument. Still wondering about the prevalence outside of the local Muslim communities though.
Good job turning a thread about female genital mutilation into a thread about men.
The moment these fuckers applied for citizenship or refugee status.
Attempts to prevent families to torture and mutilate their kids in Germany have been met with a tendency to just smuggle the girls out of the country and then once mutilated, return them to Germany.
Education only goes that far when these monsters are hell bent on mutilating their kids, because they went through it as well. At this point the safety of these girls needs to take absolute priority. It's not good enough to do something after the fact.
How is this even up for discussion. These people are cutting up their girls. Cultural tolerance doesn't extend to mutilation.
That's going to be hard because the Horn of Africa, the same region where the practice was always a thing, is now mostly islamic. You may find Christians in those areas not practicing FGM, because:
1. Foreign Christians would tell them not to. Christianity has a hierarchy, so they would probably accept it. Islam has no hierarchy, anyone can say 'this is my culture' and that's the end of it. Islam unlike Christianity also can't really be upgraded, so because it took a neutral stance, it is never going to be able to reverse this.
2. They have learned to avoid engaging in the practice because that way marriage between the two different religions will be avoided. They are also a minority, so they will likely want to differ from the majority in their religious practices anyway.
WTF? Men one is harmless and in hot areas of the world done for hygiene reasons - the only reason it's done for women is to make sure they can't receive pleasure during sex.
As far as I know female genital mutilation takes several different forms. The more horrible ones can involve complete removal of the clitoris whereas the less severe involves "trimming" the labia. Male circumcision is at least equivalent to the latter.WTF? Men one is harmless and in hot areas of the world done for hygiene reasons - the only reason it's done for women is to make sure they can't receive pleasure during sex.
Islam doesn't have an international hierarchy? Source on that? Mindblowing if true.
The only reason the mens one is done is to stop boys from masturbating.WTF? Men one is harmless and in hot areas of the world done for hygiene reasons - the only reason it's done for women is to make sure they can't receive pleasure during sex.
WTF? Men one is harmless and in hot areas of the world done for hygiene reasons - the only reason it's done for women is to make sure they can't receive pleasure during sex.
Do the US have something comparible as the hadith in Islam? And if so is racism considered noble in that? If so you could debate that it is indeed comparable.
Like said before. It is pre-Islamic, but Islam has had an influence on it. Otherwise I have no clue as why FGM is practized in Indonesia.
To everyone outside Europe: this is is the stuff us Europeans are worried about when we talk about Islamic immigrants having incompatible cultures. I have no issue with Islam itself, but related customs like these have no place in western society.
The only reason the mens one is done is to stop boys from masturbating.
Excision has shit to do with Islam and has more to do with tribal/regions traditions. Heck, it's also done in some african christian communities.
Because of sexual control over women. FGM's purpose isn't hygienic, it's to destroy even the possibility of female promiscuity; the clitoris is removed to prevent pleasure from sex, the labia are sewn to ensure that she can only urinate and never even think about masturbating, etc. Also it makes it "easy" to make sure that they stay virgins until marriage.
That, btw, is why it's so insanely stupid to compare this with male circumcision.
But yes, circumcision is not about controlling men.
If the concern people actually have is the victims of FGM, then surely they agree that it is easier to fix that when the victims and perpetrators are in a Western country?
People using it as a way to demonise immigrants and stop them coming just goes to show that they're concern clearly is not with the victims.
Like said before. It is pre-USA, but USA has had an influence on it. Otherwise I have no clue as why racism is practized in USA.
I do find it funny that you try to distance yourself from it tho.
There is no male equivalent. Are you suggesting that circimcision is as bad as female genital mutilation?
Except it totally isn't about hygiene. The entire point is to remove female sexual agency so men can be confident that they get their "pure" girls to marry.Ask someone who supports FGM if it's about controlling women. Ask them if FGM is hygienic. Nobody on planet earth is a nazi darth vader cartoon character you manichean.
I think this kinda thing go part and parcel with sexuality supression. Hopefully it'll just change in time. Religious leaders need to tell people to stop doing it.
No, not as bad.
But probably as bad as some lighter forms of female genital mutilation.
Is there really much of a difference of lightly trimming the labia vs circumcision?
It's all fucked up shit that needs to stop. I just find it super strange to defend one while attacking the other, when the whole thing is bad.
Except it totally isn't about hygiene. The entire point is to remove female sexual agency so men can be confident that they get their "pure" girls to marry.
There is no acceptable explanation for FGM and I care little for people who say "but think about what the other side might think".
Anyone who even utters the word "hygiene" in defence of FGM is lying to themselves and others. That won't fly.
fixed it for ya
circumcising a baby or child who cannot consent is obviously bad. not sure it compares to GETTING YOUR FUCKING CLITORIS CHOPPED OFF oh god just the thought of that has be squeezing my legs together in sympathy pain
Good job turning a thread about anything not related to men into a thread about men.
The only reason the mens one is done is to stop boys from masturbating.
The number of women from these countries living in Germany increased by 40 percent between 2014 and the middle of 2016.
In his 1891 work History of Circumcision, physician Peter Charles Remondino suggested that it began as a less severe form of emasculating a captured enemy: penectomy or castration would likely have been fatal, while some form of circumcision would permanently mark the defeated yet leave him alive to serve as a slave.[23][81]
Circumcision did not become a common medical procedure in the Anglophone world until the late 19th century.[88] At that time, British and American doctors began recommending it primarily as a deterrent to masturbation.[88][89] Prior to the 20th century, masturbation was believed to be the cause of a wide range of physical and mental illnesses including epilepsy, paralysis, impotence, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, feeblemindedness, and insanity.[90][91] In 1855, motivated in part by an interest in promoting circumcision to reduce masturbation, English physician Jonathan Hutchinson published his findings that Jews had a lower prevalence of certain venereal diseases.
I'd like you to practice making an actual point.Care to speculate on the motivation behind the double-standard?
Try to practice some level of self-awareness.
USE LATERAL THINKING
I'd like you to practice making an actual point.
...and? doesn't matter if it's a 'religious thing', a 'cultural thing', a 'regional thing' or whatever hand-waving term you wanna use. call it out for what it is: fucked.
It's more of a regional thing than a religious thing.
You seem as barbaric and intolerable to me as those people practicing FGM seem to you. All of your arguments and apologetics fall apart just as quickly as theirs. You have a case of extreme cognitive dissonance.
how do you legislate against fucked
Only in that it protects the glans from damage.
Wait, what? I thought Germany was supposed to be one of the most progressive countries in the world. Guess even Germany's a shithole.
Do you think people magically give up cultural practices when they enter Germany?
Integrating people and preventing things like this is Germany's responsibility.
Integrating people and preventing things like this is Germany's responsibility.
Or, you know, the responsibility of the people doing these terrible things? And every fucker that participates in it should be thrown in jail or kicked out of the country.Integrating people and preventing things like this is Germany's responsibility.
What I'd want is for the governments there to call this barbaric practice out and condemn it every chance they get. This is not about "western values" unless "non-western values" (whatever that is) means being OK with abuse and torture.2) Assuming you are anti-war and anti-imperialism, you obviously don't want to enforce western values in the middle-east. In that case, these discussions must revolve around FGM occurring in the west. As this thread clearly is.
Integrating people and preventing things like this is Germany's responsibility.