I bought a 14 inch Sony Trinitron last year and I love it. I've tried CRT shaders on OLED tv's but nothing comes close to the look.
I really wish someone started making CRT tvs again. I'm sure technology would allow them to be a bit smaller.
Yes. I remember years ago people were leaving them out of the street for the bin men to take them away. Up until 5 years ago you could still pick one up at the charity shops but they stopped doing them. It's only private sellers now and the prices have one through the roof.They are extremely rare in Australia compared to the USA everything was binned.
The last crt tv I ever owned was this:
Set me back a few grand with the VCR
I read somewhere here that a company was working on making them only a few inches thick. Thicker than a modern panel but much smaller and thus lighter. In the good timeline this would be what we got, instead we've dealt with crappy LCD screens since then(yes LED TVs use LCD screens) which still offer poor motion.It's the hazardous waste at recycling them, shipping size, shipping weight, who's going to buy them?
Just be glad you have one and anytime a real nice one comes up upgrade. Took me years find my perfect made in Japan Sony CRT still using to this day.
They are extremely rare in Australia compared to the USA everything was binned.
You might be thinking if SED and FED which are both similar. It's basically a bunch of very tiny CRTs in a panel that gave the benefits of CRTs in a more LCD form factor. SED was if I remember correctly basically a CRT per pixel.I read somewhere here that a company was working on making them only a few inches thick. Thicker than a modern panel but much smaller and thus lighter. In the good timeline this would be what we got, instead we've dealt with crappy LCD screens since then(yes LED TVs use LCD screens) which still offer poor motion.
When you say you've tried shaders, what do you mean? It could be anywhere from very basic and light implementations to the top end.I bought a 14 inch Sony Trinitron last year and I love it. I've tried CRT shaders on OLED tv's but nothing comes close to the look.
I really wish someone started making CRT tvs again. I'm sure technology would allow them to be a bit smaller.
The one that looks interesting to me would be laser phosphor displays.(Since you wouldn't need to do a vacuum for one but it draws the same way as a CRT.) Too bad it looks like one company has the patents on that tech and they haven't gone too far with it.You might be thinking if SED and FED which are both similar. It's basically a bunch of very tiny CRTs in a panel that gave the benefits of CRTs in a more LCD form factor. SED was if I remember correctly basically a CRT per pixel.
Unfortunately these died around like 2009/2010 I believe when Sony and Canon gave up.
You should check them both out as they are really interesting.
Maybe one day we can switch to a world line where all of these exist.The one that looks interesting to me would be laser phosphor displays.(Since you wouldn't need to do a vacuum for one but it draws the same way as a CRT.) Too bad it looks like one company has the patents on that tech and they haven't gone too far with it.
Yes have tried the 4K HDR ones on my OLED tv. They do look good but still don't emulate the geometry distortion of a CRT depending what's happening on the screen.When you say you've tried shaders, what do you mean? It could be anywhere from very basic and light implementations to the top end.
There's a load of very good RetroArch shaders on the LibRetro boards, including ones that utilise 4K HDR to mimic CRT in a way not possible before.
You might be pleasantly surprised. People use their original TVs as references to make the good shaders.
Yeah uselessWidescreen, yikes
That's surprising, that's usually such a common feature of the filters. If you wanted you could look into stacking the distortion over that shaderYes have tried the 4K HDR ones on my OLED tv. They do look good but still don't emulate the geometry distortion of a CRT depending what's happening on the screen.
WTF?Thx sharinglove crts so much. Have 19 standing around all connected for retro gaming
![]()
Better to have then being in needWTF?
![]()
Why do you need that many?
The Crt was all gas lighting.
I read somewhere here that a company was working on making them only a few inches thick. Thicker than a modern panel but much smaller and thus lighter. In the good timeline this would be what we got, instead we've dealt with crappy LCD screens since then(yes LED TVs use LCD screens) which still offer poor motion.
They have no interest in making consumer-level devices. They prefer to sell to businesses for large installations.The one that looks interesting to me would be laser phosphor displays.(Since you wouldn't need to do a vacuum for one but it draws the same way as a CRT.) Too bad it looks like one company has the patents on that tech and they haven't gone too far with it.
Others mentioned SED already, but there is another.I read somewhere here that a company was working on making them only a few inches thick. Thicker than a modern panel but much smaller and thus lighter. In the good timeline this would be what we got, instead we've dealt with crappy LCD screens since then(yes LED TVs use LCD screens) which still offer poor motion.
HDR CRT shaders are amazing. If someone told me I was looking at a real CRT, I'd believe them.When you say you've tried shaders, what do you mean? It could be anywhere from very basic and light implementations to the top end.
There's a load of very good RetroArch shaders on the LibRetro boards, including ones that utilise 4K HDR to mimic CRT in a way not possible before.
You might be pleasantly surprised. People use their original TVs as references to make the good shaders.
I have one of these. I think i bought it from Kmart. I have a few RCA and Phillips sets as well.![]()
Going hd was the right decision but crtvs were great.
Better to have then being in need
Older Video with only 18![]()
It kind of isDamn, son. That looks like a museum exhibit!
I have one of these, $99 special for college in 2002. It actually has a really good picture, problem is composite only and (mine at least) has pretty aggressive over scan. Not an unusable level, but high.![]()
Going hd was the right decision but crtvs were great.
I've tried them all before as well but it's not the same. There is something missing from the experience that you can't replicate.That's surprising, that's usually such a common feature of the filters. If you wanted you could look into stacking the distortion over that shader
RIP. My condolences friend.My last CRT:
![]()
This is the Greatest Television Ever Made.
The 40" Sony Trinitron Wega XBR-700
305 lbs... More than enough to kill anything it falls on.
The last I saw of mine, it was being struggle-carried away by the two WWE-looking, lifting-belt-wearing mofos I hired to get dispose of it when I was moving overseas.
![]()
I'm talking about the whole image will bend and warp depending what's being shown on the screen. It's artefact of the technology. I do agree that they've got the general look of the crt. I'll have another look and see how it compares to my tv.That's surprising, that's usually such a common feature of the filters. If you wanted you could look into stacking the distortion over that shader
I can only assume you're talking about the curvature, because if you aren't I'm stumped.I'm talking about the whole image will bend and warp depending what's being shown on the screen. It's artefact of the technology. I do agree that they've got the general look of the crt. I'll have another look and see how it compares to my tv.
Thanks. I will look into it but to be honest I've realised that I can tolerate minor input lag and it doesn't bother me.I can only assume you're talking about the curvature, because if you aren't I'm stumped.
By the way, have you tried runahead in RA? helps keep input lag incredibly low.